The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Anstey Junior School serves pupils from Year 3 to Year 6 in Alton, with junior transfer into Year 3 as the main entry point. The school’s culture is deliberately framed around belonging, learning, resilience and well-being, with behaviour described as calm and purposeful and pupils reporting that bullying is rare and dealt with quickly.
Academically, the most recent published Key Stage 2 picture is steady rather than headline-grabbing. In 2024, 66% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined, compared with an England average of 62%. Reading is a relative strength, with an average scaled score of 105 and 70% at the expected standard, while maths is closer to the England midpoint, with an average scaled score of 102 and 58% reaching the expected standard.
Families often judge junior schools by two practical questions, how easy it is to join at Year 3, and what day-to-day support looks like for working parents. On the first, Hampshire County Council coordinates applications and sets the Year 3 published admission number at 64 for September 2026 entry. On the second, wraparound care is clearly laid out, with breakfast club from 7.45am and after-school provision until 5.45pm.
The defining feature here is that expectations are explicitly human as well as academic. In the most recent inspection narrative, pupils are described as proud of a respectful and kind culture, and staff are described as aiming high for every pupil’s next steps. That matters in a junior setting, because the Year 3 intake is a reset point. Children arrive from infant provision with different levels of independence, stamina for longer writing, and confidence speaking up in class. A school that is intentional about belonging tends to make that transition smoother.
The school is also quite candid, in a helpful way, about how it tries to reduce friction for families. For example, practical routines such as gate timings and a clear request not to drive into Eastbrooke Road at drop-off and pick-up are paired with a “park and stride” approach, encouraging families to use short-stay parking and walk the final stretch. The implication is a calmer start and finish to the day, less congestion, and fewer avoidable disputes about parking, which can shape the feel of a school more than most prospectuses admit.
Leadership stability is another part of the current picture. The headteacher is Mrs Emma Humphrey, and local reporting around her arrival frames this as a new headship from 2020 onwards, following the previous inspection cycle. If you are comparing junior schools, that timeline matters, because it aligns with how policies, curriculum sequencing, and staff training have likely evolved since 2019.
Finally, there is a sense of an established site with modernised classroom expectations. The school’s own history note says the building dates from 1957, and there is parallel emphasis on classrooms being well-resourced with devices and interactive boards. The useful parent takeaway is that this is not a “heritage campus” proposition; it is a practical junior school site, upgraded to support contemporary teaching and learning.
This is a junior school, so the results that matter most are Key Stage 2 outcomes. The most recent published data (2024) reads as follows:
Expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined: 66% (England average 62%)
Higher standard in reading, writing and maths combined: 21.67% (England average 8%)
Reading: average scaled score 105; 70% at expected standard; 27% at higher standard
Maths: average scaled score 102; 58% at expected standard; 13% at higher standard
Grammar, punctuation and spelling: average scaled score 103; 62% at expected standard; 23% at higher standard
Science expected standard: 72% (England average 82%)
The most parent-useful way to read this is “secure basics, with reading the clearer strength, and a meaningful proportion hitting greater depth across the combined measure”. The higher-standard combined figure is materially above the England comparator, which usually signals that the top end is being stretched effectively, even if the headline expected-standard figure sits only modestly above average.
Rankings place the school at 10,956th in England for primary outcomes (FindMySchool ranking, based on official data), and 8th locally within the listed local area of Alton. This corresponds to performance in the lower band nationally, meaning below the England average overall when viewed through that ranking lens. The key implication is that outcomes look more “mixed strength” than “consistently high” across all measures, so families should compare subject-level signals rather than relying on a single summary judgement.
A useful nuance from the most recent inspection narrative is that the school recognised a dip in maths national assessment performance and introduced changes to strengthen specific aspects of mathematical knowledge as pupils move through Key Stage 2. For parents, that is a good question to ask about on a tour: what exactly changed in maths teaching and practice, and how does it show up in homework, fluency practice, or lesson structure in Years 5 and 6?
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
66%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
Teaching and learning here reads as structured and diagnostic, with particular care around reading fluency and identifying gaps early.
Because this is a Year 3 to Year 6 school, the question is not “do they teach phonics”, it is “what happens if a child arrives in Year 3 still needing phonics consolidation”. The school’s curriculum information is unusually specific for a primary website: pupils who need continued phonics work continue through phases using Unlocking Letters and Sounds, and reading is checked through both a reading age test and a more diagnostic assessment, with additional support if pupils are not reading in line with chronological age. The implication is that the school expects a spread of starting points at transfer, and has an established mechanism to catch pupils who might otherwise quietly fall behind.
The curriculum is described as well organised, with knowledge identified precisely in most subjects, and with particular effectiveness in English and maths. That typically suggests clear sequencing, planned vocabulary, and shared approaches to modelling and practice. Where this becomes practical for parents is in how consistent the experience feels between classes. If your child is anxious about change, consistency matters. If your child is very curious, consistency still matters, but you also want teachers who can go beyond the plan without losing the thread.
There is one area to watch carefully: the inspection narrative flags that in a small number of subjects, the planned curriculum is not implemented as securely as in other areas, and staff training is being used to tighten this up. The parent implication is not “avoid”, it is “probe”. Ask which subjects are being strengthened, how leaders are checking impact, and whether pupils’ knowledge is building year on year as intended.
The inspection narrative is very clear that pupils with SEND are supported effectively, with barriers identified and addressed so that pupils can access the same opportunities as peers. For families with additional needs, the practical follow-up is to ask how this looks day to day, for example scaffolding in writing, pre-teaching vocabulary, adapted tasks in foundation subjects, and communication between class teachers and the SENDCO.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Outstanding
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As a junior school, the “destination” question is about transition to secondary at the end of Year 6. The school does not publish a single fixed list of feeder destinations on the pages reviewed, which is common for state schools because patterns vary year to year and depend heavily on address and admissions rules.
Practically, most pupils in this area move on to local secondary provision through Hampshire’s coordinated admissions process. For families planning ahead, the most important action is to map likely secondary options early, then work backwards: if a particular secondary school is a priority, confirm how the Year 6 address will be treated in that school’s admissions rules, and whether catchment or distance is the main driver.
If your child is aiming for a selective route, the junior years are also the period when tutoring culture can begin to appear informally among peer groups. This school does not present itself as an exam-prep environment; instead it signals broad development, enrichment and clubs alongside core learning. The implication is that any selective preparation is more likely to sit outside the school day rather than being embedded in the school’s identity.
For Anstey Junior School, the main admission round is entry to Year 3, with Hampshire County Council as the admission authority.
Published Admission Number: 64 for 2026 to 2027 entry.
Application deadline: midnight on 15 January 2026 for the main admission round.
Offer notifications: 16 April 2026.
If the school is oversubscribed, the admissions policy prioritises, in order, children with an Education, Health and Care Plan naming the school, looked-after and previously looked-after children, exceptional medical or social need (with independent professional evidence), children of staff in defined circumstances, children attending the linked infant school (Alton Infant School), then catchment and sibling criteria, and finally distance as the tie-break where needed.
The useful parent implication is that this is a fairly standard Hampshire junior-school model, but with two locally significant features: the explicit linked-infant criterion, and the importance of catchment alongside distance. If you are moving house or considering a future move, treat catchment mapping as essential homework rather than a nice-to-have.
A practical tip: FindMySchool’s Map Search is useful here because it helps families sanity-check straight-line distance assumptions against real gate-to-home distances, which is how many local authorities measure proximity when distance becomes the deciding factor.
The school’s pastoral story is closely tied to its values and routines. Pupils are described as happy in school, with strong behaviour and confidence that adults will help if something is wrong. That is important in Key Stage 2, where friendship issues become more complex and children become more aware of fairness, identity and social standing.
Two particular features stand out as practical pastoral design rather than generic messaging:
A lunchtime “Calm club” running daily from 12.25 to 12.55 in the Anstey room. The implication is a structured option for pupils who need a quieter space, a reset, or guided social time during the busiest part of the day.
Explicit wellbeing framing in activities and wraparound care. The after-school club describes a balance between physical activity and quieter “chill time”, with a steady routine and snack provision. This matters for working families, because a well-run after-school environment can be the difference between an exhausted evening and a manageable one.
If you are visiting, the key questions to ask are simple: how does the school spot children who are “just about coping” socially, and what low-key interventions are used before problems escalate? The Calm club suggests the school is thinking in that direction.
Anstey’s extracurricular offer is more specific than many comparable school websites, and that specificity is useful because it tells you what pupils can actually do, not just what the school aspires to.
The current teacher-led club list includes Origami club, Debate club, Mindfulness story writing club, Comic book club, Cross-Stitch club, Lego club, Film club, Drama club, Karaoke club, plus sports and dance options. The implication is breadth that is not just sport-and-performance; there are quieter, creative, and language-rich choices too, which suits pupils who are less drawn to competitive games.
The school advertises iRock as an in-school day opportunity, alongside external sports providers. Even without detailed instrumentation lists on the reviewed pages, the point is that there is a structured pathway for pupils who want contemporary band-based music, which can be more motivating for some children than traditional peripatetic lessons.
The Junior Duke Award is positioned as a whole-school opportunity by year group level, from Bronze in Year 3 through to Platinum in Year 6. The challenge menu includes practical life skills such as first aid, ICT, eco awareness, cookery, and puncture repair, with much of the work done with family support outside school. This is one of the more distinctive “wider curriculum” signals, because it encourages independence in tangible, household-relevant ways.
Overall, the extracurricular story here is less about prestige and more about participation. For many families, that is exactly what you want in Key Stage 2, a programme that helps children find an identity, practise teamwork, and build confidence before the social jump to secondary.
gates open at 8.35am; registration by 8.45am; the school day finishes at 3.25pm.
breakfast club runs from 7.45am; after-school club runs until 5.45pm. Charges are published as £5.00 per breakfast session and £11.00 per after-school session.
the school requests that families avoid driving into Eastbrooke Road for drop-off and pick-up and promotes a “park and stride” approach, using short-stay parking and walking in. In Alton, many families also use a mix of walking, cycling and local driving with the final approach on foot, which can reduce congestion and stress.
Performance is mixed across subjects. Reading looks stronger than maths in the most recent results set, and science expected standard is below the England average. Families with a child who finds maths hard should ask what the strengthened approach looks like in daily practice, and how quickly gaps are identified.
Curriculum consistency is still being tightened in some areas. The most recent inspection narrative indicates that in a small number of subjects, implementation is not as secure as in others, and staff training is being used to improve this. If your child thrives on clarity and routine, ask how leaders ensure a consistent experience across classes and subjects.
Year 3 entry is structured and deadline-driven. If you are aiming for September 2026 entry, the key date is the 15 January 2026 deadline, with offers released on 16 April 2026. Missing the main round can reduce choice, so organisation matters.
Drop-off logistics are actively managed. The “do not drive into Eastbrooke Road” message and park-and-stride approach are sensible, but they do require family buy-in. If you rely on car drop-off, you will want to understand how this works day to day.
Anstey Junior School presents as a grounded, values-led junior school with a calm behavioural culture, clear routines for the school day, and a genuinely varied menu of clubs that includes quieter creative options alongside sport. The academic picture is steady, with reading a clear strength and a meaningful proportion reaching higher standards, while maths and science results suggest room for further uplift.
Who it suits: families looking for a practical Year 3 to Year 6 setting with clear wraparound care, a broad enrichment offer, and a culture that prioritises respectful behaviour and confidence-building, rather than a narrowly academic identity. The key challenge for some families is less about the school itself and more about admissions timing and the realities of junior transfer in Hampshire, particularly if you are outside catchment or relying on distance.
The school has a Good Ofsted rating from its previous graded inspection cycle, and the March 2025 inspection found that the school had taken effective action to maintain standards. Results are steady, with 66% meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined in the latest published results, slightly above the England average of 62%.
Year 3 is the main entry point. Hampshire County Council coordinates the process, with the deadline for on-time applications for September 2026 entry set at midnight on 15 January 2026, and offers issued on 16 April 2026.
For the September 2026 intake into Year 3, the published admission number is 64.
Yes. Breakfast club runs from 7.45am and the after-school club runs until 5.45pm. The school publishes charges of £5.00 per breakfast session and £11.00 per after-school session.
The school lists a wide set of clubs including Debate club, Origami club, Mindfulness story writing club, Comic book club, Cross-Stitch club and Lego club, plus football, dance and drama. Pupils can also take part in Junior Duke, a structured life-skills award running from Year 3 to Year 6.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
