This is not a conventional secondary school. Aston University Engineering Academy is a University Technical College (UTC) for ages 13 to 19, set up to blend GCSEs and sixth form study with technical learning and employability training. The model suits students who want a clearer line of sight from Key Stage 4 into engineering, health, business, or related technical routes, and who are motivated by learning that connects to real projects and employer expectations.
Leadership has evolved recently within a new trust structure. Daniel Locke-Wheaton leads the Aston University STEM Education Academy Trust as CEO and Executive Principal, and the UTC’s day-to-day leadership is led by David Chapman as Head of UTC.
Parents should expect a longer school day than many local secondaries, which is part of the UTC offer and reflects the added technical and enrichment time.
AUEA is designed around purposeful routines and a professional tone, with students expected to take responsibility early. Personal development is treated as more than a “nice to have” and is tied to employability, leadership, and structured enrichment, including service-style programmes and supervised projects.
The school’s identity is closely connected to Aston University and a network of employers. That matters in practical ways, not just branding, because it supports careers education from the moment students join and allows curriculum experiences that look more like applied learning than purely classroom-based study.
AUEA also sits within a wider set of STEM institutions at Lister Street, including post-16 expansion and specialist provision across the trust. For families, the key implication is that the UTC model here is intended to scale, especially at sixth form level, rather than operate as a small niche project.
The headline here is mixed. At GCSE, the academy’s outcomes are below England average on several measures in the most recent dataset provided, and progress appears weaker than parents typically want to see. The Progress 8 score is -0.4, which indicates students, on average, made less progress than similar pupils nationally from their starting points.
Rankings reflect that same picture. Ranked 3,158th in England and 81st in Birmingham for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), AUEA sits below England average overall, placing it in the lower performance band nationally.
On key GCSE measures, Attainment 8 is 42.5 and EBacc average point score is 3.41.
Sixth form results are also in the lower national band in the supplied dataset. Ranked 2,291st in England and 47th in Birmingham for A-level outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), the academic profile is not currently a headline strength. A-level grades show 0% at A*, 9.64% at A, 16.75% at B, and 26.4% at A* to B, compared with an England average of 47.2% at A* to B.
What this means in practice is important. For students who thrive with applied learning and structured technical pathways, the value of the UTC can sit in the curriculum design, placements and destination routes, rather than pure headline grades. For students aiming for highly selective academic routes that depend on top A-level profiles, families should interrogate subject-by-subject outcomes carefully during open events and ask how teaching quality is improving where assessment and sequencing have been uneven.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
A-Level A*-B
26.4%
% of students achieving grades A*-B
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The curriculum is deliberately built around specialist subjects plus employability skills, with academic and vocational strands planned to fit together.
Engineering is the clearest example of the UTC promise. It is taught with practical and technical skills built in from the start of Year 9, so students can move through GCSE-level learning into sixth form engineering pathways with continuity. The Ofsted report gives a concrete example of this applied approach through a student project to build a working aeroplane in partnership with the Air League and the Royal Air Force. That kind of work is not universal in mainstream schools, and it signals the sort of student AUEA can suit best, one who enjoys making, testing, iterating, and presenting outcomes to adults outside school.
The teaching picture is more uneven outside the specialism. Science curriculum sequencing was identified as weaker than other subjects, and assessment practice was not consistently strong across classrooms. For families, the practical question is how leadership has responded since 2022, including curriculum redesign and teacher development, because consistency matters most for students who need predictable instruction to catch up or accelerate.
AUEA’s destination story is a core part of the UTC model. Careers education is embedded across year groups and is closely tied to employer input and next-step planning.
Using the most recent leaver destination dataset provided, 63% of the 2023/24 cohort progressed to university, 6% started apprenticeships, 12% entered employment, and 1% moved into further education. That blend is typical of a school designed to support both higher education and technical employment routes, including apprenticeships, rather than pushing every student down a single academic path.
Oxbridge is not a dominant pipeline here, but it exists. In the same measurement period, two students applied, one received an offer, and one ultimately took up a place, with Cambridge recorded as the destination. The implication is that the ceiling is not capped for very high attainers, but the dominant value proposition remains broad STEM and technical progression rather than elite university volume.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Outstanding
Leadership & Management
Good
AUEA admits into Year 9 and Year 12, reflecting its UTC structure and a deliberate choice to offer an alternative pathway part-way through secondary school. Ofsted notes that the admissions policy changed in September 2019, moving the pre-16 intake from Year 10 to Year 9.
Applications are made directly with the academy, rather than through a standard Year 7 local authority process, and the offer is designed to be accessible across a broad geographic area. Local authority guidance for UTC applications indicates that applications typically open in September with closing dates around late October, although individual providers can set later deadlines.
For sixth form entry, the school is explicit about September 2026 applications and publishes an initial closing date of 28 February 2026 for Year 12 entry.
Given the non-standard entry points, families should treat open events as a key part of decision-making and ask direct questions about the balance of GCSEs, technical qualifications, enrichment time, and expectations around attendance and professionalism.
The UTC model only works when behaviour is calm and routines support learning, because technical projects and employer-linked work quickly unravel in a disorganised culture. AUEA’s most recent inspection paints a school where disruption is rare, students feel safe, and expectations for conduct are clear.
Safeguarding is described as effective, with a strong culture of keeping students safe and systems that allow concerns to be raised and acted on quickly, including appropriate use of outside agencies.
For students with special educational needs and disabilities, the report indicates that needs are taken into account in planning, and that targeted support, including around reading, helps students catch up and succeed.
Enrichment is central here and is tied to employability and leadership. Students take part in structured programmes and projects, rather than a purely optional menu of clubs.
Two named elements stand out because they align closely with the UTC identity. First, the Combined Cadet Force is a significant option for many students, supporting leadership, teamwork and discipline. Second, the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award is part of the enrichment offer for all students, which can suit those who respond well to challenge outside a conventional classroom setting.
The broader extracurricular proposition is therefore less about casual lunchtime clubs and more about sustained commitments that build a CV as well as confidence. That is a strong fit for students who like structure and tangible outcomes, and a weaker fit for those who prefer a lighter after-school rhythm.
UTCs typically operate a longer day, and AUEA has historically described an extended school day running from 8.30am to 4.40pm, which gives additional time for technical learning, employer engagement and enrichment. Families should confirm the current timetable for the specific year group during admissions, as operational details can change.
Location is central Birmingham, close to Aston University and well-served by city transport links, which supports attendance from a wide geographic area. The practical implication is that travel time can be a real factor for younger Year 9 students, especially with a longer day.
Results profile. Current headline performance indicators sit below England average in the supplied dataset, and Progress 8 is negative. Families focused primarily on top academic outcomes should probe subject-by-subject results and teaching consistency carefully.
Long school day. The extended timetable can be a major advantage for technical learning and enrichment, but it is demanding. Students who struggle with stamina or travel long distances may find the rhythm challenging.
Non-standard entry points. Joining in Year 9 or Year 12 can be a fresh start, but it also involves changing peer groups mid-phase. Some students thrive on that reset; others prefer continuity.
Specialist emphasis. Engineering and applied learning are central. Students who want a traditional, purely academic secondary experience may find the balance here less aligned to their interests.
Aston University Engineering Academy is best understood as a pathway school. It aims to convert motivation into employability, apprenticeships, and higher education routes through a structured UTC model built around engineering and employer-facing work. The culture and enrichment programme can be a strong fit for students who like practical challenges and clear next steps.
Who it suits most is a student who wants an applied route from 13 or 16, is comfortable with a longer day, and will use employer projects, cadets, and structured enrichment to build confidence and direction. The key trade-off is that headline academic performance, as currently evidenced in the supplied dataset, does not yet match the strength of the technical narrative, so families should do their diligence on classroom consistency and subject outcomes before committing.
The most recent full inspection (January 2022) judged the academy Good overall, with Outstanding personal development. The school is strongest when students benefit from practical, technical learning and structured enrichment, including projects with employers and established leadership programmes.
AUEA admits into Year 9 and Year 12, and applications are made directly with the academy rather than through a standard Year 7 local authority process. UTC guidance indicates applications commonly open in September with autumn deadlines, though exact timings should be checked for the relevant year of entry.
For Year 12 entry in September 2026, AUEA’s published guidance references an initial closing date of 28 February 2026. Families should check for any later rounds or late applications if places remain, as UTC sixth forms sometimes hold rolling processes after initial review.
Students who like applied learning, teamwork, and structured expectations often do well. The UTC model places value on employability skills, employer-linked projects, and sustained enrichment, so students who respond to practical outcomes and professional routines can find it motivating.
UTCs commonly run longer days, and AUEA has historically described an extended day from 8.30am to 4.40pm. Families should confirm current timings for the relevant year group, especially if travel time is significant.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.