The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Safety first, commitment to learning, and aspirations that stay visible, these themes run through Mapledene’s public-facing messaging and show up in the way the school describes its day-to-day priorities. The age range is 3 to 11 and the structure is 1.5-form entry, with year groups capped at 45 children, so it sits in a sweet spot: large enough for breadth of friendship groups and staffing, small enough to feel knowable for most families.
On the external accountability side, the latest Ofsted inspection (15 and 16 November 2022) confirmed the school continues to be Good, with safeguarding judged effective.
Academically, the most recent published Key Stage 2 (KS2) indicators are encouraging: 74% met the expected standard in reading, writing and maths, compared with an England average of 62%, and 20.67% achieved the higher standard compared with 8% across England.
Mapledene’s stated ethos is compact and memorable: Belong, Believe, Be You: ACHIEVE!, supported by an emphasis on safety, commitment and aspirations. That framing matters because it tends to shape what children hear repeatedly, and what staff refer back to when behaviour, attendance, and effort need tightening.
The school also signals an explicit commitment to inclusion and communication, particularly in the early years. On its EYFS pages, it highlights a “book inspired” and “oracy rich” approach, with play positioned as central rather than incidental. It also describes open-plan Reception classrooms with a dedicated outdoor learning area, which usually suits children who learn best through a mix of structured tasks and purposeful exploration.
Day-to-day routines are clearly defined. The published opening hours distinguish Reception from Years 1 to 6, and the school frames the start of the day as more than just a queue at the gate, with a Breakfast Bistro and supervised playground time from 8:30am. For many families, that structure reduces the friction of mornings, especially when siblings are in different year groups.
Leadership is presented transparently on the school website. The current headteacher is Mr Jonathan Hyde, and the senior team list also names safeguarding leadership roles, which is useful for parents who want to understand who holds responsibility for key areas.
For a state primary, the most parent-relevant headline is how many pupils reach the expected standard at the end of Year 6, and how many exceed it.
74% of pupils reached it in the latest data compared with the England average of 62%. The implication is straightforward: a typical child at Mapledene is more likely than the average child in England to finish primary with secure basics across the core.
20.67% achieved the higher standard, compared with an England average of 8%. That gap suggests there is also meaningful stretch for higher-attaining pupils, not just a focus on getting everyone over a minimum threshold.
Scaled scores add texture: reading 104, maths 102, and grammar, punctuation and spelling 104. These are above the usual England reference point of 100 for scaled scores, and they align with the stronger-than-average combined outcomes.
FindMySchool’s proprietary ranking (based on official data) places the school at 10,494th in England, and 201st in Birmingham for primary outcomes. In plain English, that sits within the lower-performing band nationally (below England average overall, within the lower 40% of schools in England), even though the specific KS2 attainment indicators read as above England average. For parents, the practical takeaway is to hold two ideas together: the core outcome measures look solid, and the school is operating in a context where many schools also perform strongly, so relative ranking can look less flattering than the raw attainment picture.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
74%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
Mapledene describes its curriculum as carefully sequenced, shaped by four “curriculum drivers”: Global Contribution, Creativity, Relationship Building, and Critical Thinking. The wording is not window dressing if it is used to design topics and revisit knowledge over time. The school explicitly describes a spiral approach, where learning is revisited to support long-term memory, and it positions reading as a central life-chances lever, starting with spoken language and moving into systematic teaching of reading.
The most recent Ofsted report card gives a useful, concrete sense of how teaching is intended to work in practice. It highlights clear organisation of knowledge in most subjects, teaching that deliberately returns to prior learning in maths, and an approach to early reading where books are matched to the sounds children are learning, with additional support designed to help pupils catch up quickly. That combination typically correlates with fewer children quietly falling behind in the early years, particularly those who need tight phonics routines and rapid intervention.
The same report also points to improvement priorities that parents should pay attention to, because they affect daily experience. It notes that in a small number of subjects, the detailed knowledge pupils should learn is not consistently identified, and teachers can sometimes lean towards memorable activities rather than emphasising learning. It also flags handwriting, specifically pencil grip and fluent formation, as an area where inconsistency can allow errors to embed. The implication is not that standards are poor, but that some parts of the wider curriculum may feel less coherent than the strongest subjects, and children who need very explicit modelling for handwriting might benefit from extra reinforcement at home.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As a Birmingham primary, progression at Year 6 typically means families apply through the city’s coordinated secondary admissions process, choosing a mix of local comprehensive schools, faith schools, and in some cases selective routes where relevant. Mapledene does not publish a destination list or named feeder pattern on its website, so it is best to treat secondary transition as family-specific and driven by the preferences you submit, rather than automatic progression to a single linked school.
What Mapledene does make clear is its emphasis on readiness for the next phase through character, responsibility, and wider experiences. The Ofsted report references pupils taking on roles such as librarians and reading to younger pupils, and it notes clubs and performances that help children build confidence and a sense of contribution. For many children, those habits translate well into Year 7 expectations around independence, organisation, and speaking up appropriately.
Reception entry is handled through Birmingham City Council’s coordinated process. For September 2026 entry, the school states that children born between 1 September 2021 and 31 August 2022 are eligible to start Reception in September 2026.
For Birmingham’s primary application cycle for September 2026, the published timeline is: applications opened 1 October 2025, the statutory closing date was 15 January 2026, and National Offer Day is 16 April 2026. Those dates matter because late applications can materially reduce the chance of an offer at first preference schools.
Demand indicators suggest the school is oversubscribed on the primary entry route, with 108 applications for 44 offers, and 2.45 applications per place applications per place. The first-preference ratio is shown as 1.0 which usually indicates that first preferences are broadly aligned with offers, but the headline point is still competitiveness. In practice, this means families should be realistic about how distance and oversubscription criteria can bite in an urban authority, and should use tools like FindMySchool’s Map Search to understand how their exact home-to-gate distance compares with typical cut-offs where these are published.
In-year admissions are handled directly by the school rather than the council. The school states it will require proof of identity and proof of address as part of the process, and it links to Birmingham’s in-year guidance for forms and advice.
100%
1st preference success rate
43 of 43 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
44
Offers
44
Applications
108
Safeguarding is the non-negotiable baseline, and in the latest Ofsted report the safeguarding arrangements are judged effective. Staff training, clear processes for recording concerns, and working with families and external agencies are all described as part of how the school manages risk and supports pupils who need additional help.
Beyond safeguarding, the report describes a calm behavioural picture: pupils behave well, rules are understood, and bullying is dealt with effectively. It also references pupils learning about equality and diversity and visiting different places of worship, which supports a wider personal development agenda in a mixed, non-faith school.
For pupils with SEND, the inspection report points to effective identification, well-trained staff, and progress against specific targets. The implication for parents is that support is designed to be part of mainstream classroom life rather than something bolted on, though as always, the fit for a particular child will depend on the specificity of needs and the consistency of implementation over time.
Mapledene positions learning as bigger than lessons, and even though its clubs page mostly signposts rather than listing a term-by-term programme in text, the Ofsted report gives concrete examples: dance, drumming, choir, and opportunities to perform in the local community. Those named activities matter because they point to participation rather than simply offering clubs on paper.
Pupil leadership and contribution also show up as a strand of wider life. The inspection report references roles like librarians and reading to younger pupils, plus Reception responsibilities such as milk and fruit monitors. In well-run primaries, these micro-responsibilities can do real work: they normalise routines, make children feel trusted, and often improve transitions between activities.
There is also an implicit emphasis on voice and participation. The website navigation highlights School Council as part of the pupil area, and the British Values page frames democracy and pupil voice as active rather than theoretical. For families who value children being able to articulate opinions respectfully and listen to others, that is a positive signal, provided the practice matches the statement.
Reception runs 9:00am to 3:20pm; Years 1 to 6 run 9:00am to 3:30pm.
The school publishes a Breakfast Bistro model from 8:30am. Reception children enter via Reception doors from 8:30am for breakfast; Years 1 to 6 access the playground from 8:30am, with supervision and guidance into the dining hall for breakfast.
The website clearly describes breakfast provision and supervised early access from 8:30am, but it does not publish, in the accessible pages reviewed here, a clearly costed after-school wraparound timetable (for example, a fixed after-school club end time). Families who need dependable after-school coverage should ask the office what is currently offered, including days, end times, and booking arrangements.
The school is in Sheldon, Yardley (B26). The website does not publish dedicated parking or public transport guidance, so it is worth asking during a visit how drop-off and pick-up are managed, and whether there are any preferred walking routes, gate routines, or restrictions that affect daily logistics.
Ofsted improvement points are practical, not cosmetic. The latest report highlights curriculum precision in a small number of subjects and handwriting consistency as areas to improve. If your child is sensitive to inconsistently structured subjects, ask what has changed since November 2022, and how handwriting is taught and corrected in early years and Key Stage 1.
Competition for places. The figures show an oversubscribed picture on primary entry, with 108 applications for 44 offers. If you are targeting Reception entry, it is wise to have a realistic Plan B and to submit on time through Birmingham’s coordinated process.
Early years matters here. With nursery provision and two Reception classes described on the website, the early foundations are clearly a focus. That can be a real strength, but it also means parents may be expected to engage with routines around oracy, reading practice, and communication, especially if children need extra help.
After-school logistics need confirming. Breakfast arrangements and the school day timings are published; after-school wraparound details are not clearly set out in the pages reviewed, so working families should verify what is available now, not what may have been available in a previous year.
Mapledene Primary School offers a structured, values-led experience with strong KS2 outcomes in the core measures and a confirmed Good judgement at its most recent Ofsted inspection. The early years provision reads as thoughtfully set up, with play, language, and reading treated as foundational rather than optional.
Who it suits: families who want clear routines, a strong emphasis on reading and early communication, and a school that combines academic fundamentals with practical opportunities like choir, dance and drumming. The key decision points are admissions competitiveness and making sure wraparound arrangements match your working week.
The latest Ofsted inspection (15 and 16 November 2022) confirmed Mapledene Primary School continues to be Good, and safeguarding arrangements were judged effective. KS2 outcomes are also above England averages in the combined expected standard and the higher standard measures.
For Reception entry, Birmingham City Council coordinates admissions, and allocation depends on the authority’s published oversubscription criteria and how places are allocated across applicants. The school does not publish a fixed catchment boundary on its website, so families should check Birmingham’s admissions guidance and consider visiting to understand local patterns.
Applications are made through Birmingham City Council. For September 2026 entry, the published application window opened on 1 October 2025 and the closing date was 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026.
The school publishes a Breakfast Bistro arrangement from 8:30am and a 9:00am start for all year groups, with different access routines for Reception and Years 1 to 6. After-school wraparound details are not clearly published in the pages reviewed, so it is sensible to confirm current provision directly with the school.
Provided, 74% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined, compared with an England average of 62%. At the higher standard, 20.67% achieved greater depth compared with an England average of 8%.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.