The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A school that builds confidence through structure can feel like a relief, especially for students who need clear expectations. The Blyth Academy leans into that idea with a culture of rewards and recognition, including a weekly PROUD celebration that makes progress visible and public. The most recent official inspection (an ungraded visit in April 2025) concluded that the academy had taken effective action to maintain standards, and it describes a calm, orderly environment where pupils focus in lessons and value positive relationships with staff.
Academically, outcomes sit broadly in line with the middle of schools in England, based on FindMySchool rankings for GCSE performance. The academy is ranked 2,236th in England and 2nd locally in Blyth for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking, based on official data). Progress 8 is slightly below average, which is important context for families weighing support and stretch across the full ability range.
This is a state school with no tuition fees. The practical challenge, as with many schools, is matching the academy’s routines and expectations to your child’s temperament, particularly around behaviour standards and consistent written accuracy across subjects, both flagged as areas to keep sharpening.
The prevailing theme from formal evidence is purposeful calm. Pupils are described as happy and proud of their school, with positive relationships between students and staff doing a lot of the heavy lifting day to day. The academy’s approach is not subtle, it uses recognition frequently and intentionally. Rewards are presented as motivating, building confidence and helping pupils hold a positive attitude to school.
The weekly PROUD celebration is a useful window into what the school is trying to be. It signals that effort and improvement are meant to be seen, not just recorded. In classrooms, the inspection describes pupils focusing during lessons, working hard, and demonstrating good manners. That kind of consistency matters for families who want predictability, especially at the transition into Year 7.
Leadership sits within a trust structure, and the academy is part of Northern Education Trust. In the April 2025 inspection report, the school is described as being led within that trust framework, with shared responsibility across trust leadership alongside school leaders. For parents, the implication is that systems, policies, and staff development are likely to reflect trust-wide expectations rather than being entirely bespoke to the academy.
The current named school leader on the academy’s website is the Acting Principal, Ms Jodie Urwin. The academy also lists key safeguarding staff, identifying Ms J Urwin as the Designated Safeguarding Lead.
This is a secondary academy for students aged 11–16, so the headline data point is GCSE performance and progress measures rather than sixth form outcomes. On FindMySchool’s GCSE outcomes ranking (based on official data), the academy is ranked 2,236th in England and 2nd in Blyth. This level of performance sits in line with the middle 35% of schools in England (25th to 60th percentile), which typically indicates steady outcomes rather than a sharply selective profile.
Looking at the core indicators, Attainment 8 is 41. Progress 8 is -0.18, which indicates students make slightly below average progress from their starting points across eight subjects. EBacc average point score is 3.78, and 21.2% of pupils achieved grade 5 or above in the EBacc measure reported here.
What should parents take from that mix? The academy is not positioned as a results outlier, either positively or negatively. The more meaningful question becomes how well it supports individual students to improve their trajectory. The April 2025 inspection describes leaders as relentless in their pursuit of pupils achieving their potential, particularly disadvantaged pupils, and it notes an effective focus on improving attendance. The implication is that the school’s improvement work is intended to show up first in consistency, routines, attendance, and learning behaviours, then in results over time.
If you are comparing schools locally, FindMySchool’s Local Hub and Comparison Tool can help you view these GCSE indicators side by side, including progress measures, not just attainment. That is often the fairest way to compare schools serving different cohorts.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The most helpful detail from the latest inspection is how learning is structured in day to day lessons. Teachers are described as having secure subject knowledge, explaining things clearly, and designing activities that help pupils learn securely. The report highlights routines such as “bell tasks” used to help pupils recall important knowledge. That small detail matters, because it suggests lessons begin with retrieval and re-activation, which tends to benefit students who need structure and frequent reinforcement.
A second strand is deliberate practice. Students are given regular opportunities to apply learning through “independent practice”. Again, this points to a model where teachers demonstrate and explain, then students practise, then teachers check and correct. For many learners, particularly those who can lose confidence quickly, this approach reduces ambiguity and makes success feel more attainable.
Two areas to watch are also clearly signposted. First, the school is still working to reduce variation in how well pupils are supported with written accuracy and precision, including spelling, grammar, and presentation. Second, the report indicates the academy should continue developing behaviour support strategies so that all pupils consistently meet its high expectations. Neither point suggests a chaotic school, the description is calm and orderly, but it does indicate that consistency across classrooms is a key improvement lever.
For Year 11, the academy explicitly flags GCSE enrichment in Maths and English as mandatory on Tuesdays and Thursdays, with additional enrichment sessions offered daily for students who are encouraged to attend. For families, this signals that the school is putting structured time behind examination readiness, not simply relying on homework and independent revision.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Requires Improvement
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
Because the academy finishes at 16, the main transition point is post 16 education and training. The most recent inspection describes high quality careers advice and guidance, including a range of employers visiting the school. That employer engagement matters for two groups in particular: students who are motivated by seeing real pathways into work, and students who are still deciding between sixth form, further education, and apprenticeships.
The academy also describes participation in wider personal development through the iAspire programme, which encourages pupils to develop wider skills through projects in the local community. This kind of structured enrichment can translate well into post 16 applications, because it provides tangible examples of teamwork, leadership, and contribution, rather than generic claims about being “well rounded”.
For students aiming for a strongly academic route after Year 11, the key question is subject readiness and exam confidence. The school’s emphasis on clear lesson structures, recall routines, and additional Year 11 enrichment suggests it is trying to reduce last minute panic by normalising practice and feedback. For students considering vocational routes, the combination of employer contact, careers guidance, and community-facing programmes offers a more applied picture of “next steps”, which can be more motivating than purely classroom based planning.
For September 2026 entry, secondary school applications in Northumberland follow the Local Authority coordinated process. The published timetable for the 2026 to 2027 admissions round indicates the application period opens on 12 September 2025, with the closing deadline at midnight on 31 October 2025. National Offer Day for those applications is listed as 16 April 2026.
That timeline is important even for families who are not new to the area, because late applications are treated differently and may not receive an offer on Offer Day. The coordinated scheme also sets out how late applications and exceptions are handled, which is worth reading carefully if you anticipate a move or family change in autumn 2025.
For in-year admissions, the academy directs families to contact the school for joining outside the normal intake.
Where admissions are distance-led or criteria-led, parents should use FindMySchool’s Map Search to check their home-to-school distance accurately and consistently. Even where distance is not the only criterion, it helps families make realistic shortlists and avoid last minute surprises.
Applications
212
Total received
Places Offered
151
Subscription Rate
1.4x
Apps per place
The pastoral picture described in the latest inspection is grounded in relationships and predictability. Pupils value their relationships with staff and feel supported to succeed and stay safe. The environment is described as calm and orderly, and pupils’ attitudes to school are positive, which typically correlates with effective supervision, clear routines, and consistent adult presence.
Safeguarding is described as effective in the latest report. This is a baseline expectation, but it is still meaningful for parents who want external confirmation that procedures and culture are operating as they should.
The “work to do” element sits in behaviour consistency. The inspection indicates the school should continue developing behaviour support strategies to ensure all pupils adhere to the academy’s high expectations. The practical implication is that families with children who struggle with impulse control or peer conflict should ask directly about behaviour supports, internal inclusion processes, and how the school keeps pupils learning without narrowing access to the full curriculum.
A school’s extracurricular offer is only meaningful when it is specific, and the most recent inspection provides several clear signposts. Clubs are explicitly referenced in performing arts, gaming, and sport. This mix suggests the academy is not treating enrichment as purely athletic or purely cultural, it is trying to cover different interests that appeal to different students.
Two named programmes stand out as particularly characteristic. First, iAspire is framed as a personal development programme that encourages pupils to build wider skills, including through local community projects. Example, pupils supporting projects locally. Evidence, increasing numbers are taking part, and it is presented as a structured programme rather than ad hoc volunteering. Implication, students can build credible experiences for post 16 applications and interviews, while learning practical responsibility.
Second, the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award has clear traction. The academy reported that 38 students completed their expedition across 29 and 30 June 2023, after working through volunteering, skills, and physical sections, with examples including work in the local community and involvement in school enrichment clubs. The implication is that students who want a sustained challenge with a recognised outcome have a viable route to do it here, supported by staff leadership of the programme.
For families, the key question is participation. Ask how students are encouraged into activities, whether there is targeted support for quieter students, and how the school balances enrichment with the demands of Year 10 and Year 11 exam preparation. The academy’s stated Year 11 enrichment pattern suggests it is aware that exam years require additional structure, not fewer opportunities.
This is a state school with no tuition fees. Families should still plan for the usual associated costs, such as uniform, trips, and optional activities.
The academy publishes the structure of the school day, including lesson and break times, and it also highlights that GCSE enrichment in Maths and English is mandatory for all Year 11 students on Tuesdays and Thursdays, with additional daily sessions available.
As an 11–16 academy serving Blyth and the surrounding area, most families will travel by local road and public transport options. The most reliable approach is to test the journey at peak times and confirm any bus routes that align with the start and finish of the day, as services and timetables can change.
Progress is slightly below average. A Progress 8 figure of -0.18 suggests students make a little less progress than expected from their starting points. Families should ask how the academy targets support for middle attainers and how it stretches higher attainers so that progress is consistent across the cohort.
Consistency in writing standards is still tightening. The latest inspection points to variation in how well pupils are supported with written accuracy and precision, including spelling, grammar, and presentation. If your child needs very explicit literacy routines in every subject, ask how the school is embedding those expectations across departments.
Behaviour expectations are high, and the support strategies matter. The school is described as calm and orderly, but it is also tasked with continuing to develop behaviour support strategies so that all pupils meet expectations. This is worth exploring in detail for children who have struggled with behaviour, attention, or peer dynamics previously.
The Blyth Academy comes across as a school that prioritises routine, recognition, and structured learning, with a calm atmosphere and students who feel supported by staff. The latest ungraded inspection confirms standards have been maintained and safeguarding is effective, which provides a solid baseline of reassurance.
Best suited to families who want a clearly organised 11–16 academy with explicit expectations, visible rewards for effort, and structured exam-year support, including mandatory Year 11 enrichment in Maths and English. The key due diligence is understanding how consistently academic progress is driven across subjects, and how behaviour supports operate for students who need more help meeting expectations.
The most recent inspection (April 2025, ungraded) concluded that the academy had taken effective action to maintain the standards identified at the previous inspection, and it describes pupils as happy and proud of the school, in a calm and orderly environment. The academy was previously judged Good at its graded inspection in July 2021.
Applications are made through Northumberland’s coordinated admissions process. The published timetable for 2026 entry indicates the portal opens on 12 September 2025 and the deadline is midnight on 31 October 2025. Offers are scheduled for 16 April 2026.
The current establishment details list the academy as serving ages 11 to 16, so post 16 study is typically pursued elsewhere after Year 11.
Ofsted’s latest published report relates to an ungraded inspection (8 and 9 April 2025) and states the academy has taken effective action to maintain standards. The previous graded inspection in July 2021 judged the school Good overall.
The latest inspection notes clubs including performing arts, gaming, and sport, and it also references the iAspire programme for personal development through wider skills and community projects. The academy has also reported participation in the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, including an expedition completed by a cohort of students in June 2023.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.