A secondary school can be academically ambitious without being selective; this one is a strong example. A distinctive feature is how tightly the day is organised, with explicit routines, learning habits, and a shared language around behaviour and effort. That structure is not a superficial branding exercise. It shows up in the way learning time is protected, how expectations are communicated, and how enrichment is built into the week.
An April 2024 Ofsted inspection confirmed the school continues to be Outstanding, alongside a picture of calm classrooms, high expectations, and very strong progress for pupils.
For families, the key trade-off is straightforward. Those who value clarity, consistent standards, and a longer school day will often see the approach as a benefit. Pupils who need a looser, more informal school culture may take longer to settle.
The academy’s public identity is built around three values, Integrity, Diligence and Civility, and these are defined in practical terms rather than left as slogans. Integrity is framed as doing the right thing; diligence as attention to detail and perseverance; civility as respect and professionalism.
Daily life is shaped by routines that remove negotiation from the basics. There is an explicit set of learning habits covering uniform, punctuality, equipment, homework, staying on-task, and not answering back. The purpose is to stop small issues from consuming attention that should be on learning. The “no bags” approach sits within this, with an expectation that pupils arrive with the right equipment but without time-wasting at the start and end of lessons.
A further cultural feature is “line up”, the daily start point that includes an inspirational talk linked to the school’s values, and often connected to a well-known figure from history. Weekly appreciations are also part of this, with recognition read out to the school and shared in a newsletter. For pupils, this can make expectations feel consistent across year groups, and it also creates a shared rhythm to the week.
Leadership clarity matters in schools that run on tight routines. The principal is Mr Richard Wilson, and trust documents record his appointment as principal from 01 April 2020.
The headline message from the published data is strong progress and solid attainment at GCSE. The academy’s Progress 8 score is 0.54, which indicates pupils make substantially above-average progress compared with pupils nationally who had similar starting points. (Progress 8 is centred on zero.) Its Attainment 8 score is 53.4. These figures suggest that results are not only about prior attainment; the school is adding significant academic value.
There is also evidence of strength in the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) measures. The average EBacc APS is 4.97, compared to an England average of 4.08. 39.1% of pupils achieved grades 5 or above across the EBacc.
Rankings give additional context. Ranked 794th in England and 3rd in Bradford for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), the academy sits above the England average overall and comfortably within the top 25% of secondary schools in England by this measure.
Parents comparing nearby options can use the FindMySchool Local Hub page to view GCSE outcomes side-by-side using the Comparison Tool, then cross-check against admissions rules to see what is realistically accessible.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The school’s own description of its teaching approach is built around maximising learning time and making assessment central to day-to-day classroom decisions. The stated expectation is that every lesson shows evidence of structured learning activities, effective formative assessment, and a clear sequence for developing knowledge and skills.
There is also a strong literacy thread. The academy describes three literacy strategies that cut across subjects: pupils keep a reading book with them, speak in full sentences without slang, and track the speaker when listening. Those routines aim to raise the baseline for communication, not only in English but across the curriculum.
Curriculum documentation points to carefully sequenced content. For example, mathematics is described in terms of building from Key Stage 2 foundations and returning to ideas across years to strengthen long-term understanding. English curriculum materials indicate planned cycles of reading and writing with specific anchor texts, reflecting a knowledge-rich approach rather than ad hoc topic selection.
Academic ambition is not limited to high attainers. The most recent inspection describes a curriculum intended to be ambitious for all pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and disabilities, with a high proportion following the EBacc pathway.
Quality of Education
N/A
Behaviour & Attitudes
N/A
Personal Development
N/A
Leadership & Management
Outstanding
As an 11 to 16 academy with no sixth form, the key transition is post-16. The most useful question for families is less “where do pupils go?” and more “how systematically does the school prepare them for the next step?”
The most recent inspection notes a broad careers programme and emphasises preparation for next steps in education, including engagement with technical education and apprenticeships information through the provider access requirements.
For many families, the practical implication is to start the conversation about post-16 early. A strong Progress 8 figure often correlates with pupils being academically ready for a wide range of sixth-form and college routes. Since the academy does not publish destination percentages in the data supplied here, families should focus on sixth-form entry requirements in Bradford and the surrounding area, and discuss subject plans from Year 9 onwards so that Key Stage 4 choices keep pathways open.
Admission is competitive. In the most recent admissions data available, there were 1,195 applications for 150 offers, and the academy is described as oversubscribed. That works out at roughly eight applications per place, which is high for a non-selective secondary and suggests strong demand.
The admissions process has distinctive elements. The academy uses a fair banding assessment for Year 7 entry, and it is explicit that this is not a pass or fail test. The purpose is to admit pupils across the attainment range, rather than only those with the highest scores, with places allocated by oversubscription criteria.
Catchment also matters. The published arrangements describe an inner catchment associated with postcode zone BD7, and an outer catchment associated with postcode zones BD1-6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18. Places are split between these two catchments, so families should read the oversubscription rules carefully and not assume that living “nearby” is enough without checking which zone applies.
For September 2026 entry, the key deadlines were clearly stated: the supplementary form deadline was 30 September 2025, the assessment date was 11 October 2025, and the local authority common application form deadline was 31 October 2025. Offers for Bradford secondary places are released on 02 March 2026, according to Bradford Council’s guidance. For later intakes, the pattern typically follows similar autumn deadlines, but families should always confirm the current year’s timetable on the official admissions pages.
Families can use the FindMySchool Map Search to check practical proximity and travel time, then combine that with the catchment-zone rules and the academy’s admissions criteria when judging realistic chances.
Applications
1,195
Total received
Places Offered
150
Subscription Rate
8.0x
Apps per place
A strict routines culture can either feel heavy or reassuring, depending on the child. Here, the intent is to create predictability and reduce ambiguity, so pupils know what will happen if expectations are met, and what will happen if they are not. The parent handbook frames consequences as automatic rather than negotiated, and positions this as part of building long-term habits around effort and organisation.
The most recent inspection describes pupils feeling safe, alongside an open safeguarding culture where pupils know the safeguarding staff. Safeguarding arrangements are described as effective.
For families, a sensible due diligence step is to ask how the academy supports pupils who struggle with anxiety, attention, or transitions, and what adjustments are made without diluting the consistency of routines. The school’s SEND information reporting indicates a focus on effective support and inclusion, but the detail that matters most is how that feels in day-to-day practice for an individual child.
Enrichment is treated as a core entitlement, not a peripheral add-on. Clubs run after school across multiple days each week, and the published list includes named activities such as Mathletics, robotics, chess, baking, drumming, needlework, science club, art club, gardening, and rowing using rowing machines. For pupils, this variety matters because it provides different routes to confidence, including practical skills and performance, not only academic clubs.
Two strands stand out because they have unusually specific detail.
First, the school garden is described as a deliberately developed learning and wellbeing space. It was funded through two grants, £27,500 from a National Nature Parks project and £10,000 from the Royal Horticultural Society, and it includes features such as a 50 m wheelchair-accessible path, a 150 m hedgerow described as a biodiversity corridor, a school orchard, a vegetable garden, and native perennial flower beds. The implication for pupils is that enrichment is not only clubs in classrooms; it also includes hands-on environmental learning with a tangible on-site asset.
Second, the Duke of Edinburgh programme is described with practical detail around expeditions. The academy reports three expeditions each year, typically involving around 40 to 50 students, with an expedition pattern including an 8 km walk and overnight camping with stoves and structured activities. For pupils, this builds independence and teamwork in a setting that is very different from the routines of the school day, which can be a valuable counterbalance.
There is also an academic enrichment strand called “Stretch for all”, based on themed projects completed at home and showcased each cycle, with themes including morality, culture, natural topics, and language. The practical point is that independent research and presentation are built into form time review, and success is publicly recognised through a cycle showcase.
This is a state school with no tuition fees. Families should still budget for the usual extras such as uniform, transport, school trips, and optional activities.
The academy day is longer than many local secondaries. The parent handbook states pupils must arrive by 7.55am to attend line up, with some pupils expected earlier for practice or mastery sessions. Finish times are 3.30pm on Monday to Wednesday, and 2.40pm on Thursday and Friday.
On travel and drop-off, the family handbook notes that parents are not allowed to bring cars into the academy grounds at the start or end of the school day, so families should plan for walking routes, nearby parking, or public transport options and allow extra time.
Competition for places. With 1,195 applications for 150 offers in the latest available data, admission is the obstacle for many families. This is not a school to assume you can access without engaging closely with the published criteria.
A highly structured culture. Learning habits, strict routines, and automatic consequences suit many pupils, particularly those who respond well to clarity and predictability. Children who struggle with rigidity may need thoughtful transition planning and explicit support.
Longer days and early starts. The 7.55am arrival expectation and the longer Monday to Wednesday finish can be a benefit for learning time and enrichment, but it also affects childcare, travel, and after-school commitments.
Dixons Kings Academy combines very strong outcomes with a culture that is unusually explicit about routines, behaviour, and the habits that support learning. The academic data points to high progress, and the wider offer includes specific enrichment that goes beyond generic clubs, including a well-resourced school garden and structured Duke of Edinburgh expeditions.
Best suited to families who want high expectations, a clear behaviour framework, and a school day designed to protect learning time, and who are comfortable with the formality that comes with that approach.
For many families, yes. The school continues to hold an Outstanding judgement following its April 2024 inspection, and the academic data shows very strong progress, including a Progress 8 score of 0.54. It is also highly popular locally, which is reflected in heavy oversubscription.
Typically, yes. The most recent admissions data available shows far more applications than offers, so it is best approached as a competitive option rather than a guaranteed place.
Year 7 entry includes a fair banding assessment, alongside an application through the local authority common application form. Fair banding is designed to admit pupils across a range of attainment rather than selecting only the top scorers. The detailed oversubscription criteria then determine offers.
The school’s published performance indicators suggest strong outcomes. Its Progress 8 score of 0.54 indicates pupils make substantially above-average progress from their starting points, and its EBacc measures are also strong, including an average EBacc APS of 4.97.
The parent handbook sets out an early arrival expectation, with pupils required to arrive by 7.55am for line up. Finish times are 3.30pm on Monday to Wednesday and 2.40pm on Thursday and Friday. Some pupils may be asked to arrive earlier for additional practice sessions.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.