The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Immanuel Christian School is a very small independent day school for pupils aged 4 to 16, running from Reception through to GCSEs, with a published capacity of 60. It is set in Rodford Tabernacle near the village of Westerleigh in South Gloucestershire, and presents itself as a family focused school where Christian belief is central to daily life and the curriculum.
Size shapes almost everything here. With small teaching groups and a single community spanning primary and secondary ages, the experience can feel close knit and consistent, particularly for families seeking continuity from early years to GCSE.
The headline external picture is mixed in a way parents should understand clearly. A January 2023 ISI educational quality inspection judged pupils’ academic and other achievements as good and pupils’ personal development as good, and confirmed the Independent School Standards were met at that point. However, a later ISI material change inspection dated 15 December 2025, linked to an application to expand capacity and add an additional site, concluded the school was not likely to meet the relevant Standards if that material change were implemented, and listed safeguarding related weaknesses that required action.
The school’s identity is explicit and consistent. Admissions materials set the expectation that parents and guardians accept the school’s Christian ethos and teaching, and the inspection documentation records aims centred on a biblical understanding of the world and a strong focus on conduct and character.
On the practical side, leadership and governance are unusually intertwined for a school of this size. The chair of governors is named as Mr Jonathan Gulliford, and the headteacher is Mrs Joanna Gulliford. This can bring clarity and speed in decision making, which some families value, but it also makes robust checks and balances especially important, a theme that appears in later inspection findings.
Pupil experience is likely to be shaped by mixed age groupings and small cohorts. The admissions policy commits to small teaching groups and notes that class structures may flex depending on pupil numbers. For the right child, that can mean more individual attention and fewer social pressures that come with large year groups. For others, particularly those who crave a wide peer group or large scale activities, it can feel limiting.
There is limited published performance data available for this school, and it is not currently ranked in the FindMySchool metrics shown. That means families should treat headline comparisons with other schools cautiously and focus on what can be evidenced: curriculum intent, teaching quality, pupil progress in class, and suitability for the individual child.
The school does enter pupils for GCSEs, but the January 2023 inspection explicitly notes that the small numbers involved prevent wider reporting and analysis of results in the way parents might expect from larger secondaries. In practice, for a school of this size, the best academic due diligence is often qualitative: ask to see curriculum plans, samples of work across year groups, and how the school stretches higher attainers while supporting gaps.
Where external evaluation does help is in the quality judgements from the 2023 educational quality inspection. It reports strong attitudes to learning and generally good progress, while also noting that senior pupils did not always receive sufficient challenge to take initiative, and recommended more consistent use of performance data and greater stretch in senior school. That combination, positive culture with a clear recommendation about challenge, gives parents a useful line of enquiry when speaking to the school about current practice.
The curriculum is supported by a small staff team that covers both primary and secondary phases. The staff list includes subject specific roles in English, mathematics, science, art and textiles, physics, computing, and languages. In small schools, breadth depends heavily on staff capacity, so it is sensible to ask how GCSE option blocks are constructed and how the school manages specialist teaching when staffing changes.
A recurring strength in the school’s public facing work is the way it shares examples of classroom projects and outcomes. The school site highlights practical and creative work, including ICT web design activity, art and watercolour projects, and music composition tied to animation projects. These kinds of artefacts matter, especially where exam data is thin, because they show what pupils actually produce and the standard expected.
From the inspection evidence, the quality of pupils’ attitudes and willingness to work collaboratively comes through clearly, with examples of peer assessment and respectful discussion. For parents, the key question is whether this culture is paired with enough intellectual stretch in Years 9 to 11, particularly for pupils aiming for selective sixth forms or demanding post 16 routes.
The school runs through to Year 11, with pupils taking GCSEs before moving on. There is no sixth form provision in the information provided, so progression planning is about external destinations at 16.
Admissions are direct to the school. The admissions policy states that pupils are admitted from Reception to Year 11 and that there is no entrance examination. The same document sets clear conditions: families must accept and respect the Christian ethos and teaching, and for entrants outside Reception there is a one term trial period.
For Reception entry, the policy sets a specific timing rule. Parents are asked to submit the completed application form by 31 August in the year before the child is due to start, with places confirmed as soon after that as possible and no later than 31 October. For September 2026 Reception entry, that implies an application deadline of 31 August 2025 and confirmation by 31 October 2025, unless the school has since updated this policy.
For Year 7 and other year groups, the policy advises applying as far in advance as possible, with availability depending on cohort size. The policy also contains a specific restriction affecting some families: it states that, unless exceptional circumstances apply, the school will not admit pupils from a home schooled setting after they have reached the age of 10.
A practical note for parents: where small schools operate at or near capacity, availability can change quickly. If Immanuel is a serious option, it is wise to engage early and ask about current year group numbers rather than assuming places exist.
Small schools often have an advantage in knowing pupils well and responding quickly, but this only works if safeguarding systems are rigorous and independent enough for the setting. The most important recent external evidence here is the December 2025 material change inspection. It describes prompt responses to concerns and thorough safeguarding training, but it also identifies structural and policy weaknesses, including insufficient independence in handling allegations concerning the proprietor or their family, an out of date safeguarding policy, and ineffective oversight of filtering and monitoring.
Parents should treat that as a serious conversation starter. A sensible approach is to ask what has changed since December 2025, how governance has been strengthened, and how the school now ensures that safeguarding decision making has the necessary independence and external escalation routes.
On additional needs, the inspection documentation records that the school identifies pupils with special educational needs and disabilities, and the staff list includes a named SENCO. The admissions policy is also direct that the school will assess needs and may decline admission or identify additional costs where it cannot meet a child’s needs.
For a small school, the extracurricular programme is unusually well evidenced through specific examples, rather than generic claims. The school publishes regular snapshots of clubs and enrichment, including Craft Club projects such as string art, and an after school den building club that takes pupils to local woods on Mondays to build dens in teams.
Trips and events are also concretely described. The site references GCSE History work connected to a visit to the American War Museum, GCSE Geography connected to a Wessex Water trip, and STEM linked activity such as a Renishaw 3D printing visit. These are useful indicators of how the curriculum is brought to life, and they help parents judge whether enrichment is regular, purposeful, and matched to age.
The school also shares creative outputs, including pupil music composition for animation projects, and art work in watercolours and textiles. For pupils who learn best by making and doing, those kinds of projects can be motivating, particularly in small cohorts where participation is not limited to a select group.
Fees for 2025 to 2026 are published by key stage. Reception, Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 are £4,545.00 per year; Key Stage 3 is £5,050.00 per year; Key Stage 4 is £5,555.00 per year. The school states that fees are payable termly in advance, or by twelve monthly instalments if agreed in advance.
Sibling discounts are clearly set out: a 10% discount for a second child, and 20% for each subsequent child.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per year
Term dates are published online for both 2025 to 2026 and 2026 to 2027. The school’s website also maintains an events calendar and homework calendar, which suggests a preference for structured routines and clear communication with families.
For travel, the location is described in inspection documentation as near the village of Westerleigh, on a main road into Yate, which may suit families commuting from nearby areas in South Gloucestershire and north Bristol.
Safeguarding governance and oversight. The December 2025 material change inspection identifies safeguarding related weaknesses, including policy currency and independence in handling certain allegations. Parents should ask what has changed since then and what independent oversight now exists.
Very small cohort size. With a published capacity of 60, peer groups will be small, and subject breadth at GCSE may depend on staffing and timetable constraints.
Home education transition limits. The admissions policy states the school will generally not admit pupils from a home schooled setting after age 10, which will matter for some families considering a later entry point.
Faith alignment is not optional. The school expects parents to accept and respect its Christian ethos and teaching, so families wanting a broadly Christian environment may feel well served, while others may find it a poor fit.
Immanuel Christian School will appeal most to families who actively want a small, all through independent school with a clearly stated Christian worldview and close continuity from Reception to GCSE. The scale can be a genuine advantage for pupils who benefit from calm routines, familiar adults, and a tight community.
Who it suits: families aligned with the school’s ethos who prioritise small class sizes and a consistent environment over large cohort breadth. The key diligence step is to understand how the school has responded to the safeguarding and governance issues raised in December 2025, and to confirm that current practice is both compliant and resilient.
It has strengths evidenced in external review, particularly from the January 2023 educational quality inspection which judged pupils’ academic achievements as good and personal development as good, and confirmed Standards were met at that time. A later inspection in December 2025 raised important safeguarding related weaknesses in the context of a proposed expansion, so parents should explore what has changed since then and how safeguarding is now overseen.
For 2025 to 2026, published annual fees are £4,545.00 for Reception to Key Stage 2, £5,050.00 for Key Stage 3, and £5,555.00 for Key Stage 4. Fees are payable termly in advance or by monthly instalments if agreed. Sibling discounts of 10% for a second child and 20% for subsequent children are published.
The published admissions policy asks Reception applicants to submit the application by 31 August in the year before the child is due to start, and states places will be confirmed no later than 31 October. For September 2026 entry, that implies submitting by 31 August 2025 with confirmation by 31 October 2025, unless the school has updated its policy since.
No entrance examination is required according to the admissions policy. Admission includes an interview with the headteacher, and for many applicants a half day visit is usually required.
Examples published by the school include Craft Club projects, an after school den building club, trips linked to GCSE subjects, and STEM related visits such as a Renishaw 3D printing activity. Creative projects in music and art are also regularly shared.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
