The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A Victorian-era first school that still feels rooted in its community, but with a noticeably modern focus on curriculum clarity and early reading. The setting is compact, with five single-age classes and a pupil roll that sits at around 150, so children tend to be known quickly by staff.
Leadership has stabilised since September 2023 under Mr Christopher Burton, following a period of interim headship. The school’s offer leans into breadth for younger pupils, including Forest School within the grounds and a steady flow of leadership roles and activities that help pupils practise independence early, not just at the point of moving on.
The school’s identity is tied to its scale and its site. The oldest part of the building dates to Victorian times and the school opened in 1878, which gives it a sense of continuity that many newer primaries do not have. Over time it has expanded in a very practical way, with a hall and classroom extension added in the 1960s, plus a further two-classroom extension completed in 2009 for the youngest children, alongside ongoing modernisation of the older areas. For families, the implication is straightforward, this is not a single shiny new build, but it is a site that has been adapted repeatedly to suit early years and Key Stage 1 and 2 learning, including purpose-built early years classrooms and adjoining outdoor terraces designed to support free-flow indoor and outdoor routines.
The atmosphere described in official reporting is calm and purposeful, with pupils described as happy, regular attenders, and confident in relationships with staff. That description matters because at first-school age, a sense of safety and predictable routines are often what makes the difference between a child who simply “goes to school” and a child who settles, participates, and takes learning risks. The report also gives unusually concrete examples of how pupils are encouraged to take responsibility early, including volunteering as junior leaders, play leaders, librarians linked to an outdoor book hotel, and wellbeing ambassadors. These roles are small on paper, but in practice they can be powerful, they create structured opportunities for children to practise speaking up, supporting others, and being trusted with real jobs.
A second strand of the school’s character is its values language. Official reporting highlights resilience, teamwork, respect, and independence as values pupils actively embrace. The implication for parents is that behaviour expectations are not only rule-based, they are framed in language children can understand and repeat, which tends to be more effective at this age than purely sanctions-led systems. The same reporting also describes a vigilant safeguarding culture, with staff operating on the principle that small concerns are worth noticing early.
Finally, there is a clear “outdoors” thread running through how the school describes itself. It explicitly references Forest School provision within the grounds. That does not automatically mean every child is outside every week, but it signals a commitment to learning that is not only desk-based. For many children aged four to nine, that balance matters. It can support confidence, language development, and self-regulation, particularly for pupils who learn best through practical tasks.
As a first school, the age range ends at nine, so families should not expect the familiar Year 6 SATs narrative that dominates many primary school discussions. The more useful question here is whether children leave Year 4 reading confidently, writing with fluency, and with secure foundations in number and problem solving before moving into the middle school phase.
The latest inspection evidence points to a school that has tightened its curriculum thinking and expects pupils to achieve well, including pupils with special educational needs and disabilities. The curriculum is described as ambitious and logically sequenced, with careful attention to what pupils learn and when, including key vocabulary that links across subjects. This matters because curriculum coherence is one of the strongest predictors of consistent outcomes in primary settings, children remember more when knowledge is revisited deliberately rather than encountered as a series of disconnected topics.
Early reading is a specific strength to look at in any first school. In this case, official reporting describes a phonics approach where pupils, including those who find reading difficult or who have fallen behind, can sound out words using their phonics knowledge, with books matched to the sounds pupils know and need to practise. The implication is reassuring for parents of Reception and Year 1 pupils, the school is not relying on chance progress in reading, it is using a structured approach with consistent materials. If your child is already a confident reader, this type of structure typically frees teachers to stretch comprehension and vocabulary, rather than spending all their time repairing decoding gaps.
Mathematics is also described as logically structured from Reception through to Year 4, with attention to supporting pupils who struggle. For parents, the most useful follow-up is to ask how the school checks that gaps are spotted quickly and what “same day” or short-cycle intervention looks like in practice. The inspection evidence supports the view that the school’s curriculum improvement work has been effective since the previous inspection cycle, and that outcomes for pupils are now stronger as a result.
If you are comparing local schools, FindMySchool’s Local Hub pages and the Comparison Tool can still be useful, but here the best comparison points are often pastoral stability, curriculum clarity, and the likelihood of securing a place, rather than headline Year 6 test scores.
The school’s own curriculum statement stresses motivation, interest, and a broad, balanced offer that builds knowledge and skills from each child’s starting point. That can read like standard language, but the value is in the detail shown elsewhere.
One concrete example from inspection evidence is the way subject vocabulary is used in context, such as pupils learning the term camber when studying Roman roads, and the homefront when studying World War Two. This is a useful indicator of teaching quality because vocabulary is not being left to chance, it is being taught deliberately as part of the knowledge pupils are expected to retain. For children, the benefit is twofold, they gain language that supports reading comprehension, and they learn that “big words” are not just for older pupils.
Reception practice also comes through with a specific example of children learning about recent family history through photographs provided by parents. The implication is a curriculum that values home-school connection without making it performative. It is also a good sign for speech and language development in early years, because children tend to talk more fluently about familiar people and events.
A final teaching point worth noting is the role of subject leadership. Inspection evidence indicates that some subject leadership roles were still at an early stage of development at the time of the January 2024 inspection. In practice, that usually means the core direction is clear, but monitoring and refinement may still be bedding in. For parents, this is not automatically a red flag, it can be normal in small schools where staff carry multiple responsibilities. It does suggest a sensible question for open events, how does the school assure consistency across subjects when leaders are developing, and what training or external support helps them?
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
The key transition here is from Year 4 into the middle school system used in this part of Worcestershire. In the local pyramid information published by Worcestershire County Council, Lickey End First School is listed as a feeder link to Catshill Middle School. For many families, that clarity is helpful because it gives a default pathway to plan around, even if you later choose a different route.
What matters most in a Year 4 transition is readiness, not just academically, but socially. Pupils moving into a larger setting benefit from being able to organise belongings, follow multi-step instructions, manage friendships, and ask for help appropriately. The leadership roles described in official reporting, such as junior leaders, play leaders, and wellbeing ambassadors, can support that readiness because children get repeated practice in responsibility while still in a small-school environment.
If you are considering this school specifically as the start of a longer Bromsgrove pathway, it is worth mapping your shortlist early. FindMySchool’s Map Search can help families understand the practicalities of daily travel to likely middle school options, especially if working patterns make wraparound care essential.
Admissions are coordinated by Worcestershire County Council for first and primary schools in the area. For September 2026 entry, the published timeline shows applications opening on 01 September 2025, closing on 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026.
Demand for places looks high. For the latest year of data, there were 97 applications for 30 offers for the Reception entry route, with the school recorded as oversubscribed. That level of competition means families should treat admission as the main uncertainty, not the educational offer itself. It also means timing and accuracy matter, get the application in well before the deadline, ensure preferences are in the right order, and keep evidence ready if you are claiming a criterion that requires documentation.
The school also publishes admissions information and policy documents on its website, including an “available spaces” snapshot by class year group. That is useful for in-year applicants, but it should never replace the formal local authority admissions process for Reception entry.
80.0%
1st preference success rate
24 of 30 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
30
Offers
30
Applications
97
Pastoral quality in a first school often shows up in small, repeatable behaviours: consistent routines, adults who notice emotional shifts quickly, and a school culture where children are encouraged to speak up early. Official reporting describes trusting relationships between staff and pupils, plus a safeguarding culture framed around the idea that small concerns are taken seriously.
The school also provides published information for families about support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities, including how concerns are identified, how support is delivered, and how transitions are managed. For parents, the practical implication is that the school expects regular communication, and it frames support as a shared process between class teachers, the SENDCo, and families, rather than a separate system that only activates once difficulties become acute.
If your child is anxious, sensitive, or easily overwhelmed, the small-school structure can be a genuine advantage. With one class per year group and a staff team that knows children well, it is often easier to spot patterns early and adjust strategies. The best way to test fit is to look for evidence of predictable routines and calm transitions at drop-off, pick-up, and lunchtime, because those are the moments where children who struggle with regulation find school hardest.
In a school of this size, extracurriculars need to be purposeful. The most convincing programmes are those that complement the curriculum and give children repeated chances to build confidence, rather than one-off enrichment that looks good in a newsletter.
The school’s wider-life offer described in official reporting includes activities such as dancing and ballet, as well as creative work like designing mosaic patterns. These examples are useful because they suggest a programme that is not narrowly sport-only, even though the school also places clear emphasis on keeping children active.
School-led experiences also include community-facing events, such as a remembrance coffee morning involving the Royal British Legion, plus hands-on historical learning like building an Anderson shelter as part of a World War Two day. The implication for pupils is that “history” is not treated as a worksheet subject, it is connected to practical making and local memory, which tends to deepen engagement at primary age.
From the school’s own information about clubs, examples include Hummingbirds Choir, Football Club, Athletics, Gymnastics Club, American Sports Club, Origami Club, and Generation Pound. In a first school, this kind of mix matters because children develop interests quickly between Reception and Year 4. A varied menu helps quieter pupils find a niche, while giving energetic pupils structured outlets beyond the classroom.
The school also uses pupil responsibility roles as part of wider life, including librarians connected to an outdoor book hotel and wellbeing ambassadors. These roles are easy to underestimate, but they are often where confidence grows fastest, especially for pupils who are not drawn to competitive sport. Finally, the presence of Doug, the school dog, as part of reading routines is a distinctive detail that many children will remember long after they forget the name of a phonics scheme.
At first-school age, “STEM” is not about formal labs, it is about building habits: curiosity, careful language, and the ability to explain a process. The curriculum emphasis on precise vocabulary is a strong fit with that goal. If your child is already science-minded, the best question to ask is how the school stretches the most curious pupils in Year 3 and Year 4, for example through problem-solving projects, design tasks, or structured computing activities. Staff roles listed internally include computing responsibilities, which suggests the subject is owned by named adults rather than treated as an add-on.
The school day begins at 08:45, with gates opening for drop-off at 08:35, and the day ends at 15:15, with pick-up access from around 15:00. That timetable is workable for many families, but those needing childcare beyond these hours should plan early.
Wraparound care is referenced through the school’s clubs and extended-hours provision. However, the published before-and-after-school page does not provide enough operational detail to rely on for scheduling, so families should confirm hours, availability, and booking arrangements directly before assuming it solves the childcare puzzle.
For travel, the school describes itself as having a rural aspect while remaining extremely close to major routes such as the M42. That usually translates into relatively straightforward car access for families commuting in multiple directions, but also a need to think carefully about parking and safe walking routes if you live nearby.
Admission pressure. With 97 applications for 30 Reception offers in the latest admissions data, competition is the practical challenge. Families should build a realistic shortlist and keep alternative options strong.
Developing subject leadership. Some subject leadership roles were described as early-stage in the most recent inspection evidence. In a small school this can be normal, but parents who want maximum curriculum depth across every subject should ask how consistency is quality-assured.
Wraparound details need checking. Extended-hours and clubs are part of the offer, but the publicly available information does not provide enough detail to plan work schedules around without direct confirmation.
Transition planning matters. Moving on after Year 4 is a meaningful shift. The feeder link to Catshill Middle School helps, but families should still explore how the school supports readiness for a larger setting.
Lickey End First School suits families who want a small, community-rooted first school with improving academic foundations, particularly in reading, plus an ethos that values responsibility and active learning. The scale is a strength, especially for younger children who benefit from being known well and supported quickly. It will suit children who enjoy a mix of classroom structure and practical experiences, including outdoor learning and varied activities.
Who it suits most, families seeking a friendly first-school start in the Bromsgrove middle-school system, especially those who value a structured approach to phonics and a culture of pupil responsibility. The main hurdle is securing a place.
The school was graded Good at its latest inspection in January 2024, with strengths highlighted around curriculum improvement, early reading, and a culture where pupils feel safe and take on responsibility through roles such as play leaders and wellbeing ambassadors.
Applications are made through Worcestershire County Council. For September 2026 entry, applications opened on 01 September 2025 and closed on 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026.
No. This is a state school, so there are no tuition fees.
Local published feeder-link information lists Catshill Middle School as the feeder link from Lickey End First School.
Yes. Examples referenced in the school’s information include Hummingbirds Choir, gymnastics, athletics, football, origami, and other activity options, alongside pupil leadership roles that build confidence and responsibility.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.