The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Engineering on a primary timetable is still unusual; here it is deliberately normal. From Year 3 onwards, the curriculum explicitly includes Engineering alongside the core academic subjects, with projects ranging from structural challenges to robotics and aeronautical themes.
This is a co-educational independent day prep for pupils aged 4 to 13, founded in 1884, with a long Cambridge connection and a Christian ethos that is described as welcoming to families of all faiths and beliefs.
Leadership is stable and visible; the head is Dr Crispin Hyde-Dunn.
For parents, the essential headline is that the school positions itself as a specialist-prepared generalist: strong foundations in literacy and numeracy, specialist teaching as pupils move up the school, and a very structured runway into senior school entrance and scholarships. On outcomes, the school publishes detailed destination information for Year 8 leavers, including numbers to individual senior schools and scholarship counts, which is unusually useful for a prep.
A school can say it is ambitious; it is more persuasive when the routines and structures match. Here, the organisational spine is clear: pupils are placed under a Tutor (or class teacher in the younger years) who remains the first point of contact, and tutor time is built into the day. That matters for a busy prep where children are taught by an increasing number of subject specialists as they move through the years.
Pastoral identity is also shaped by the house system. Pupils join one of four houses (Bentley, Chaucer, Latham, Newton) in Year 3 and keep that affiliation through to Year 8, with inter-house competition used as a steady, positive driver. House events are not presented as occasional add-ons; they are a recurring part of school culture, including a house singing competition and end-of-term showcases.
Ethos is framed through a Christian foundation and a strong emphasis on kindness and community language. The latest inspection materials also describe a consistent set of learning habits and a “best selves” expectation that is designed to be everyday, not performative. The same documents are explicit that the school welcomes families across faiths and beliefs, which is an important reassurance for a school described as Protestant in its designation.
The atmosphere is likely to suit children who enjoy variety and “structured busyness”. The published enrichment model is a good indicator: rather than relying only on weekly clubs, the school uses off-timetable academic extension and enrichment blocks across Years 3 to 8, with themed days and visits that change year by year. For some children, that feels energising; for others, it can feel like a lot of moving parts. The best fit is usually a pupil who likes clear routines but also likes to be stretched into new contexts, such as museum-based curriculum days and residential trips.
The published results for this profile does not provide exam metrics.
The most practical “results lens” for a prep is preparedness for senior school entry. On that measure, the school provides unusually granular destination reporting. It states that, over the last five years, an average of 92% of pupils secured places at their first choice senior schools, with an average of 30 scholarships annually. It also reports that in 2025, 91% moved to their first choice school and 33 scholarships were awarded.
Those claims become more meaningful when paired with the published destination table for 2024/2025 Year 8 leavers. It shows, for example, 30 pupils to The Leys (with a split across day and boarding) and 10 to The Perse Upper, alongside moves to a wide set of regional and national senior schools. For parents, the implication is simple: the school is not only “placing” children, it is placing them into different types of senior setting, Cambridge day schools, strong boarding options, and specialist scholarship routes, which suggests a well-developed understanding of different pathways.
When comparing local options, FindMySchool’s Local Hub pages and Comparison Tool can still be useful, not for direct exam-line comparison, but for understanding how different feeder preps and local state options approach admissions, travel, and later transition.
The strongest single differentiator is curriculum intent made concrete: Engineering is not just a club; it is a timetabled subject with a published project sequence by year group. The projects described are deliberately varied, from early workshop skills and structural challenges (such as pyramid-strength construction tasks) through to gears, kites, rockets, and solar charging builds as pupils get older. The obvious educational payoff is that children meet applied problem-solving early, and that can lift confidence for pupils whose strengths are practical, visual-spatial, or iterative rather than purely essay-based.
Beyond Engineering, the school’s own curriculum documents show a wide subject mix with specialist teaching increasing as pupils move up the school. In Years 3 and 4, the taught subject set includes English, mathematics, science, humanities, Spanish, computing, engineering, arts, drama, music, personal development education, and sport. From Year 5, the school adds Classics and begins grouping by ability; it also moves further into subject-specialist teaching. Parents should read that as an explicit academic pivot point: if your child benefits from structured setting and higher pace in the later prep years, this model can work well; if they flourish in mixed-ability classrooms longer, the transition deserves thought.
The timetable snapshots reinforce that Engineering is positioned as a core component rather than enrichment. In the published sample timetable, a Year 3 day includes an Engineering lesson early in the morning, and the end of lessons is shown at 15:40 for the older year groups. That matters because it indicates priority, not just availability.
Finally, external evaluation aligns with this picture: teaching is described as well planned with effective use of resources, and teachers are described as enthusiastic and knowledgeable, with strong questioning and adaptation. Parents should treat this as supportive context rather than a marketing badge; the more important implication is that the school’s “specialist but broad” claim is backed by a coherent academic model.
For a prep, this is the section that often decides fit, because it reveals the school’s true end point. The school’s published destination reporting is unusually specific. It states that many pupils move to Cambridge senior schools, with almost half transferring to The Leys, and a high percentage moving to The Perse Upper and St Mary’s. That “almost half” is then illustrated with the destination table, which lists 30 pupils to The Leys for 2024/2025 Year 8 leavers.
The same destination reporting is helpful for families considering boarding or a wider geographic net. The school lists a range of senior destinations outside Cambridge, including Uppingham, Oakham, Oundle, Haileybury, Stowe, King’s Ely, Framlingham, Felsted, Culford, Eton and Harrow. It also shows smaller numbers to several of those schools in the leavers table. The implication is that the school is set up to support both the “stay local in Cambridge” route and the “move out to boarding or day elsewhere” route, rather than being narrowly optimised for one pipeline.
Scholarships are treated as a formal process rather than a casual aspiration. The school describes a Year 7 recommendation model where departments endorse scholarship candidates, and it explicitly flags that the process is rigorous and should not be undertaken lightly. For families, that is a useful cultural signal: scholarship entry is presented as earned and carefully curated, which usually supports credibility with senior schools.
Entry points are clearly defined: the school describes main entry at Reception, Year 3 and Year 4, and Year 7. For Year 3 and above, the admissions pages describe an entry assessment that generally takes place in January of the year the child would join, covering core curriculum areas. After assessment, the school states it will contact families regarding the outcome within two weeks.
For Year 7 specifically, the school requests a recent school report and permission to contact the current school for a reference, which signals that admissions is not purely test-score driven. The implicit message is that they are looking for a match between the pupil’s profile and what the school can support, which is what you want from any prep, especially one that advertises tailored learning.
Open events appear to follow a predictable rhythm. The school states it holds two open mornings each year, one in April for younger entry and one in October for older entry, and it publishes a specific date for the next Pre Prep open morning on Saturday 25 April 2026. For families building a timeline, that is helpful because it suggests the structure repeats annually.
A final admissions nuance is financial assistance. Bursaries are described as discretionary and means tested, with awards reviewed annually and not normally awarded to the youngest section. The school also publishes a bursary closing date for September 2026 entry, which has already passed as of February 2026. If bursary support is a key factor, families should treat deadlines as immovable and plan earlier than they might for fee-paying-only applications.
If you are moving into the area, FindMySchool’s Saved Schools feature can help keep track of multiple entry points and differing assessment months across competing options.
The pastoral structure looks intentional. Every child is placed under a Tutor or class teacher who is responsible for overall welfare, with daily registration contact built into the routine. The school links pastoral work to personal development sessions delivered through tutor structures, which often makes a difference in prep schools where children are moving between specialists and locations in the day.
The latest inspection commentary also reinforces a focus on wellbeing and safeguarding systems, including training, reporting routes, and prompt action when concerns arise. The practical implication is that parents should expect clear processes and record-keeping, particularly in a school that sends a high proportion of pupils into competitive senior school environments where continuity of support matters.
For older pupils, the “Year 7 and 8” framing is distinctive: the school explicitly argues that staying in a prep environment through those years can support resilience and confidence at a time when puberty and wider pressures often intensify. That will appeal to families who want children to become leaders at the top of a smaller school before moving to a larger senior setting. It may be less compelling for families whose child is eager for earlier exposure to the scale, subject breadth, and social range of a large senior school.
The co-curricular story is strongest when it is specific, and the school provides enough specifics to judge it properly.
First, there is a structured enrichment model. Years 3 to 8 participate in Academic Extension Days and an Enrichment Week, with up to eight off-timetable days per year. The “typical” examples range from Egyptian Day tied to a visit to the Fitzwilliam Museum galleries, to a computing history visit, to sports psychology and first aid, debating and public speaking, and outdoor mapping skills. The implication is breadth through experiences, not just breadth through club menus.
Second, after-school activity is presented as high volume and varied, and the school names clubs that give a sense of character. Examples include Quiz Club, Chess, Science Challenge, and Codebreakers, plus a gardening club and podcast-making for pupils who prefer quieter or more creative projects. It also references “Green Goblins” as a small-capacity option that is invitation-based, which hints at targeted pathways for pupils who show particular aptitude or commitment.
Third, the house system provides co-curricular leadership opportunities that are not dependent on being the strongest athlete or the loudest performer. House competitions, captains, and end-of-term showcases give different pupils permission to step forward.
Finally, Engineering deserves a second mention here because it functions like a co-curricular bridge inside the timetable. The published project sequence includes practical builds and iterative design challenges, which tends to suit pupils who learn through testing and refining rather than getting it right first time.
For 2025-26, the published day fees (including VAT) are:
Pre Prep: £6,632 per term, £19,896 per year
Years 3 and 4: £8,143 per term, £24,429 per year
Years 5 to 8: £8,354 per term, £25,062 per year
The school also publishes one-off charges: a £120 registration fee, and a £500 deposit payable on accepting a place, with £300 credited against the first term invoice and the remainder held and credited at the end of the child’s time at the school (subject to the school’s stated conditions).
Bursaries are described as discretionary and means tested, reviewed annually, and intended to support families who will benefit from and contribute to school life; the school also notes bursaries are not normally awarded to Pre Prep pupils. Scholarship pathways are positioned around senior school entry, with the school describing academic, STEM-related, arts, music, sport, and all-round scholarship routes and an internal recommendation process.
The school publishes preschool fee information for 2025-26, but early years pricing is best checked directly on the school’s official pages, and eligible families should also consider government-funded early years entitlements.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per term
Published timings show a clear finish time split: older pupils’ lessons end at 15:40, while Pre Prep late stay begins after a 15:20 end-of-day point for the younger years. Breakfast is offered in the morning between 07:45 and 08:15. Late stay runs to 17:45, and for Years 3 to 8 the after-school supervision includes time for homework followed by a snack. Holiday provision is described for younger pupils through the Little Wyverns holiday club during Easter and summer holidays.
On transport, the school describes a travel plan focused on sustainable travel and runs a home-to-school transport service with routes from Royston and Saffron Walden, alongside wider Cambridge collaboration and digital tracking via its transport partner’s app from September 2025. For rail users, one of the school’s open morning pages states it is about a mile from Cambridge city centre and the railway station, with regular buses along Trumpington Road and on-site parking.
Data-light if you want exam charts. Families who prefer to shortlist using standardised national exam metrics will find less comparable published data at prep level; the most meaningful published outcomes here are senior school destinations and scholarship numbers.
A busy, varied week can be a lot. The enrichment model includes multiple off-timetable days each year and frequent theme-based activities; this suits adaptable pupils, but children who prefer a narrower routine may find the pace tiring.
Behaviour monitoring is an explicit improvement focus. The most recent inspection recommends strengthening how behaviour data is used to spot patterns across groups, which is worth asking about if your child is sensitive to peer dynamics.
Bursary timelines matter. The published bursary closing date for September 2026 entry has already passed, so families depending on fee assistance should plan earlier for future entry cycles.
This is a prep for families who want academic stretch without narrowing a child too early, and who like the idea of applied learning, especially Engineering, as a core part of the week. Senior school transition is treated as a structured process, backed by unusually transparent destination and scholarship reporting.
It best suits pupils who enjoy variety, respond well to specialist teaching as they get older, and are likely to benefit from staying in a smaller setting through Years 7 and 8 before stepping up to senior school at 13. The main challenge is that the school runs a clearly defined admissions process with assessment timings and, for bursary candidates, firm deadlines.
For a prep, the most useful indicators are curriculum quality, external evaluation, and senior school destinations. The latest Independent Schools Inspectorate inspection confirms that the required Standards, including safeguarding, are met, and the school publishes detailed Year 8 destination outcomes including scholarship counts.
Fees vary by year group. For 2025-26, published annual fees (including VAT) range from £19,896 in Pre Prep to £25,062 for Years 5 to 8. There is also a registration fee and an acceptance deposit, and the school describes means-tested bursary support in limited cases.
The school publishes a destinations table for Year 8 leavers, including numbers to individual senior schools. Recent destinations include Cambridge options such as The Leys and The Perse Upper, alongside a range of boarding and day schools further afield.
The school describes an entry assessment process that usually takes place in January of the year of entry, with the assessment covering core curriculum areas. The Year 7 process also asks for a recent school report and permission to request a reference from the current school.
Yes. The school states it runs two open mornings each year, typically an April event for younger entry and an October event for older entry. A specific date is published for the next Pre Prep open morning on 25 April 2026.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.