The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A small primary with a clear sense of belonging, Tutshill builds much of its identity around community, place, and a wider view of the world. That is not just branding. The most recent inspection describes a deliberate ritual where pupils place a pebble into a communal bowl when they join, then take one out when they leave, a simple practice that reinforces membership and continuity across year groups.
Leadership sits within the Forest Edge Federation, with Jennifer Lane named as headteacher in the latest inspection documentation. Federation governance documents also show her listed as Executive Headteacher from 01 September 2020, which helps anchor the tenure when parents are trying to understand how long current strategic direction has been in place.
As a Church of England school, the Christian vision is explicit, framed around Love One Another, Know Ourselves, Believe and Grow, and rooted in 1 John 4:7. Families looking for a faith informed ethos will see it clearly; families preferring a more secular framing should read the way values and worship are woven into routines.
Belonging is treated as something pupils practise, rather than something adults simply talk about. The pebble tradition is a good example because it is concrete and pupil facing, it gives children a shared language for joining, leaving, and being part of something bigger than one class. The same inspection also describes pupils as proud of their local area and “the wider world”, and links that directly to curriculum choices that start from where children live and then widen horizons.
Expectations appear to be calm and consistent. The inspection narrative points to clear routines and a focus on helping pupils “learn how to learn”, including coping with setbacks and building resilience. That matters in a small primary, where behaviour culture can swing quickly if expectations are vague. Here, the emphasis is on building habits and language that pupils can carry into later schooling.
The school’s faith character is not presented as a bolt on. The vision statement sits at the centre of the school’s self description, and the language of values is positioned as part of daily life, not just assemblies. For many families, that reads as coherent and reassuring. For others, it is simply a prompt to ask practical questions: how worship is organised, what religious education looks like, and how inclusive the community feels to families of different faiths or none.
This is a school where academic ambition is expressed through curriculum intent and consistency, rather than headline statistics. The latest inspection report describes a broad curriculum with clear progression in each subject, alongside deliberate opportunities for pupils to revisit and consolidate knowledge so it sticks over time. It also notes that pupils who fall behind are identified quickly and supported to catch up, an important marker for parents who want early gaps addressed rather than tolerated.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (14 to 15 May 2024) confirmed the school continues to be Good, and that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
One useful nuance for parents is that the inspection also flags a specific improvement priority: at times, teaching and learning systems are not monitored closely enough, and when that happens some pupils do not learn as well as they could. That is a common challenge in small schools where lots of responsibility sits with a tight team; it is also a very fixable issue when leaders build sharper routines for checking consistency across classes.
If you are comparing local schools, the FindMySchool Local Hub page can still be useful for side by side context, even when the differentiator is more about approach and culture than published numbers. The Comparison Tool is particularly handy once you have a shortlist and want to sanity check likely fit.
The curriculum theme of starting local and widening out shows up in both the inspection narrative and the way subject pages frame learning. History, for example, is described as building children’s entitlement to a broad and balanced curriculum while developing key concepts such as chronology, cause and consequence, and continuity and change. That kind of concept led framing usually signals that staff are aiming for more than topic coverage, it is about children learning how to think historically, not just what to remember.
Early years gets a specific nod. Reception is described as giving children a strong start, with learning framed as fun and interesting. The practical implication for parents is that the first year is likely to feel purposeful rather than purely pastoral, while still keeping play and curiosity central. Where this tends to work best is when there is a clear bridge between Reception routines and Key Stage 1 expectations, so children grow into formality rather than being jolted into it.
Reading is positioned as a cornerstone. Staff reading stories and non fiction with enthusiasm is highlighted as a driver of strong reading habits, and the report describes pupils talking with joy about books they like. That matters because reading culture in primary is often the hidden engine behind writing quality, vocabulary growth, and confidence across the wider curriculum.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As a primary for ages 4 to 11, most pupils move on to secondary schools through the usual local routes, with decisions shaped by where families live and their preferences. Given the school’s location close to Chepstow and the border context, some families will also be thinking about how eligibility works across local authority lines, especially if home addresses, transport, or family networks straddle areas.
Transition work is easiest for children when it is treated as a gradual process rather than a single event. The inspection emphasis on resilience and coping with setbacks suggests pupils are being equipped with language and habits that support adjustment, which is often as important as academic readiness at the point of moving into Year 7.
If you want to sharpen this part of your decision, ask the school which secondary destinations are most common in recent years, and how they support pupils who are anxious about the move. That conversation usually reveals a lot about pastoral practice and how well the school understands its community.
Reception admissions are coordinated through Gloucestershire County Council. For September 2026 entry, the school’s published admissions page sets out a clear timeline: applications run from 3 November 2025 to midnight on 15 January 2026, with allocation day on 16 April 2026. It also lists follow up milestones for accepting places and the waiting list process.
Demand data in the provided admissions results points to a competitive but not extreme picture. For the most recent cycle captured, there were 54 applications for 28 offers, with the school described as oversubscribed and an application to offer ratio of 1.93. The practical takeaway is that families should not assume a place will be available by default, particularly if you are moving into the area late or applying as a change of preference.
73.0%
1st preference success rate
27 of 37 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
28
Offers
28
Applications
54
Pastoral support is described in practical, operational terms rather than vague reassurance. The school outlines a combination of daily informal support in class, an emotion coaching approach, and classroom “Regulation Stations”, described as toolkits to help children manage big emotions and regulate themselves. That is the kind of low level universal provision that often prevents issues from escalating, especially for pupils who find transitions, friendships, or unstructured time difficult.
The “Trick Box” approach is used as a shared framework, with strategies grouped around calm, confidence, communication, and creativity. The key point for parents is consistency. When staff across year groups use the same language and routines, children internalise them and can apply them under stress. If your child struggles with emotional regulation, it is worth asking how pupils are identified for extra help, how progress is tracked, and how parents are included in the plan.
Safeguarding is treated as a baseline rather than a headline feature, but it matters that the latest inspection states the arrangements are effective.
Extracurricular life is used strategically rather than as a long list of options. The latest inspection highlights that activities and visits deepen educational experiences and support personal development, and it gives a specific example of teamwork being developed through bushcraft club, where pupils work together in a natural environment. That is a useful signal that clubs are not just childcare add ons, they are being chosen for the behaviours and social skills they develop.
The school’s published calendar provides a more granular view of what after school life can look like in practice. Examples include Book Explorers (Key Stage 1), Bushcraft (Key Stage 2), Hockey (Years 1 and 2), and a STEM Club (Key Stage 2). For parents, the implication is choice across sport, reading culture, and structured enrichment, with different offers by age rather than a one size fits all programme.
Other club information circulated to families indicates additional options such as cookery, board games, cricket, and art clubs at different points in the year. The value here is less about prestige and more about breadth, children can try something new without feeling it has to become a competitive pathway.
The school day is published as starting at 8.45am and ending at 3.15pm, with gates opening from 8.35am for morning arrival.
Wraparound care is available via on site breakfast and after school provision run independently in cooperation with the school. Published information for families indicates breakfast sessions run 7.45am to 8.45am and after school sessions run until 5.55pm on most weekdays, with session pricing set out per attendance.
For transport, the location suits families in Tutshill and the wider Chepstow border area who can manage a short drive, walk, or cycle. Drop off logistics are shaped by two gates and staggered arrival arrangements. If you are moving into the area, consider doing a timed run in the morning and mid afternoon to understand traffic pinch points.
Oversubscription risk. With 54 applications for 28 offers in the most recent admissions snapshot, demand can exceed places. Families should treat admission as a process to manage, not a certainty, and apply on time.
Monitoring consistency. The latest inspection identifies that teaching and learning systems are not always monitored closely enough, and when that happens some pupils do not learn as well as they could. Ask how leaders are tightening consistency across classes, especially around interventions and catch up.
Faith character. The Christian vision is central to how the school presents itself. Many families will welcome this; others should explore what collective worship and religious education look like day to day.
Wraparound is third party run. On site wraparound is a strength, but it is run independently, so policies and booking may feel slightly separate from the main school. That is normal, but worth understanding early if you will rely on it regularly.
Tutshill offers a grounded primary experience that puts community, place, and personal development at the centre, backed by a curriculum that is described as coherent and well sequenced. The atmosphere seems shaped by consistent expectations and practical wellbeing tools, with clubs used to build teamwork and confidence rather than simply fill time.
Who it suits: families who value a Church of England ethos, want a smaller setting with clear routines, and like the idea of enrichment that reinforces learning behaviours. The main challenge is admission when year group demand rises, so successful applicants tend to be those who plan early and follow the local authority timeline closely.
The school was confirmed as continuing to be Good at its most recent Ofsted inspection in May 2024, and safeguarding arrangements were judged effective. The report highlights clear expectations, a broad curriculum, and strong support for pupils to become confident learners who can handle setbacks.
Applications are coordinated through Gloucestershire County Council. The school publishes a timeline showing the application window from 3 November 2025 to 15 January 2026, with allocation day on 16 April 2026. Applying on time matters if the year group is oversubscribed.
Yes. Published information describes on site breakfast provision from 7.45am to 8.45am and after school provision running later into the afternoon, operated independently in cooperation with the school. Families who will use it regularly should confirm booking expectations and session structure early.
The school describes daily in class pastoral support, emotion coaching, and the use of “Regulation Stations” in each class. It also uses the Trick Box framework to help pupils build skills around calm, confidence, communication, and creativity.
The inspection highlights bushcraft as an example of teamwork building enrichment. The school calendar also lists clubs such as Book Explorers, hockey for younger year groups, and a STEM club for Key Stage 2, with activities changing across the year.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.