Slaidburn Brennands Endowed Primary School Review 2026: Village Primary, Strong Early Years, Forest School Thread

This is a state school with no tuition fees. Costs are more likely to come from the practicalities of school life, such as uniform, trips, and optional clubs.

Published key stage 2 outcomes need careful reading because cohorts are tiny. The school’s own performance page states that the 2024 results were based on three children, meaning each pupil represents 33%. In 2024, 66% met the expected standard in reading, writing, and mathematics combined, compared with an England average of 62%. At subject level for 2024, reading shows 100% at the expected standard, while writing and maths show 66% at expected standard, again with the same small-cohort caveat.

For families comparing schools, the main implication is volatility. In a cohort of three, one child having a difficult test week changes the headline. What matters more is whether the school can explain its curriculum and identify gaps early, especially in reading and mathematics, and whether pupils transition to secondary school confident and secure.

The 2022 inspection evidence adds useful context. It describes reading as central to the curriculum, with a recently introduced phonics programme and staff training to ensure consistent delivery, including in early years. It also notes that pupils who struggle to read get targeted help to keep up.

The most persuasive picture here is the combination of a structured approach to core learning and an outward-looking enrichment style that makes small-school learning feel bigger than the building.

Start with reading, because the external evidence does. The inspection report highlights the consistency of phonics teaching after the introduction of a new programme, plus careful matching of home books to the sounds pupils have learned. That is the kind of practical implementation detail that usually correlates with children becoming fluent readers, rather than just enjoying story time.

Curriculum thinking is not uniformly strong across every subject, and that nuance matters. The same report points to a small number of subjects where leaders had not sequenced knowledge as carefully as they should, limiting how well pupils build learning term by term and year by year. For parents, the implication is not a crisis, it is a useful question to ask on a visit: which foundation subjects have been reworked since 2022, and how does the school now map knowledge across mixed-age classes?

Early years provision is unusually integrated. Pre-school children learn alongside Reception, and the pre-school page describes a balance between hands-on, practical learning and more formal table time. It also describes a bright classroom and significant access to outdoor areas. The canopy room opened on 15 November 2013 and is described as primarily for foundation stage children while also being used by the wider school, a sensible arrangement in a small primary where specialist spaces need to earn their keep.

Outdoor learning is not an add-on. The Forest School page documents year-round activity, including den building and practical tasks such as making damper bread, and frames sessions as child-led as well as skill-based. In a rural setting, a well-run Forest School programme can be more than muddy fun. It tends to build teamwork, language, planning, and risk awareness, and it can particularly suit children who find desk-based learning demanding in the early years.

As a primary school (ages 3 to 11), the main transition point is into Year 7. The school’s published inclusion information notes that it has close links with its principal feeder secondary school and that Year 6 pupils visit their forthcoming secondary school for taster sessions, with secondary teachers also visiting to ease transition. It also describes tailored transition programmes where needed.

What is not publicly set out is a named list of the most common receiving secondary schools, which is understandable in a village community where destinations can vary year by year based on family choice, catchment, and transport. For families, the best practical step is to ask directly which secondaries have been most common over the last two to three years and what transport patterns look like for each option.

Admissions for Reception are coordinated through Lancashire, with a school-specific Church of England admissions policy and a parish boundary emphasis. The determined admission arrangements for September 2026 set a clear application window: applications should be made between 1 September 2025 and 15 January 2026 using the home local authority common application form.

Because this is a church school, there is an extra step for families who want to be considered under faith criteria. The admissions document says that parents must complete a supplementary information form and return it to the school by 15 January 2026 if they want to be assessed against faith criteria, otherwise the application is considered under lower priority criteria. Offers for on-time applicants are issued by the local authority on 16 April 2026.

For 2026 intake planning, the published admission number for Reception is a maximum of 10 places. In a school of this size, that figure matters. It influences not just the probability of entry but also the shape of the peer group, the mixed-age class balance, and how quickly cohorts can grow.

Demand data indicates pressure even at low absolute numbers. Recent admissions data shows 10 applications for 7 offers, meaning the school is oversubscribed, with around 1.43 applications per place. This is not the kind of scale where you see hundreds of applications, but it still means entry is not guaranteed, especially for families outside the higher priority criteria.

Open days are handled in an unusually accessible way. The school states that every day is an open day, welcoming families from 9.15am to 3.00pm, and it highlights specific weekly activities such as Forest School sessions and stay-and-play opportunities. The sensible approach is to treat this as a pattern rather than a calendar deadline, and still book ahead so you see the school in full flow rather than on a quiet day.

The pastoral proposition is largely a function of scale and clarity. The inspection report describes pupils feeling safe and welcome, positive relationships with teachers, calm behaviour, and low levels of disruption. It also notes that pupils do not worry about bullying and feel staff would deal with issues quickly.

Safeguarding messaging is explicit. The school identifies Sarah White as the designated safeguarding lead and prevent duty lead, and notes regular training and clear routes for pupils to seek help. The same inspection report confirms safeguarding arrangements as effective and describes staff knowing pupils and families well, plus appropriate links with external agencies when support is needed.

SEND identification is highlighted as early and effective, beginning in early years, with staff described as skilled at providing the support needed for pupils to access the curriculum. For a small primary, this matters because capacity can be tight, and early identification reduces the risk that needs are missed until Key Stage 2.

Clubs in small primaries can easily become generic, dependent on whichever staff member has time that term. Here, the school publishes a named club list that signals real variety across age groups and interests.

The School Clubs page lists activities such as Gymnastics Club (Years 1 to 3, after school), Calligraphy Club (Years 2 to 3, after school), Gardening Club (lunchtime), Cross Country Club (Key Stage 2, lunchtime), Craft Club (Years 3 to 4, lunchtime), Cookery Club (Years 1 to 2, after school), Art Club (Years 5 to 6, lunchtime), Science Club (Key Stage 2, after school), and Rounders Club (Key Stage 2, lunchtime).

The implication is breadth without overloading pupils. Lunchtime clubs suit families who cannot manage late pickups, while after-school clubs provide a deeper block of time for activities like cookery or science. For pupils, the value is not just skills, it is identity. In a small peer group, finding your thing matters, and clubs provide a structured route to that.

Forest School also sits in this section because it shapes the whole experience. The Forest School documentation and updates describe practical projects such as den building, rope play, and making food outdoors, and show the programme running through winter as well as the sunnier seasons. Children who thrive with movement, tools, and hands-on projects often do well in schools where outdoor learning is normal rather than occasional.

Community life rounds out extracurricular culture. Friends of Slaidburn School (FOSS) is a formal part of the site navigation, and inspection evidence links pupil participation to village events, which in practice often means fundraising, performances, and collaborative projects beyond the classroom.

The school day runs 8.45am to 3.30pm, with doors closing at 9.00am. For wraparound care, breakfast club provision is clearly described as running 7.45am to 9.00am, with booking required. After-school club is referenced (including as part of Bears Club), but the published information available in the sources accessed does not set out regular finishing times, so families should check the current schedule directly with the school office.

Lunches are cooked on site, with the school noting meals prepared in the school kitchen by the cook, Mrs Maggie Taylor. That can be a practical plus for families who value predictable meals and fewer packed lunches.

Transport is inherently rural here. The school describes pupils coming from nearby villages such as Newton and Tosside, and from Clitheroe, described as around a 15-minute drive away. Parking for pickup and drop off is referenced in the school’s published inclusion information.

• Tiny cohorts mean volatile data. The school’s published 2024 key stage 2 results are based on three pupils, so percentages swing dramatically year to year. Use results as a conversation starter about teaching and support, not as a definitive judgement.

• Faith criteria add complexity. Families seeking priority under Church of England faith criteria need to complete and return the supplementary form by 15 January 2026 for September 2026 entry. Missing that step can reduce priority in oversubscription.

• Mixed-age classes suit many, not all. Some pupils thrive with older role models and a family-like dynamic, others prefer large single-year cohorts and more segmented teaching. This is a key fit question.

• Breadth is strong, but curriculum sequencing is a live issue. The 2022 inspection raised a point about knowledge sequencing in a small number of subjects. Ask what has changed since then and how subjects are mapped across mixed-age teaching.

This is a small, faith-shaped village primary where early years integration and outdoor learning appear to be central rather than peripheral. The strongest fit is for families who want a close-knit setting, are comfortable with Church of England ethos in daily life, and see value in mixed-age learning and Forest School as part of the weekly routine. Entry can be competitive for a school of this size, so the practical work is understanding the admissions criteria, especially parish and faith elements, well before deadlines.