The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is an infant-only academy for pupils aged 4 to 7, with a roll of 269 and a published capacity of 270, serving the Pound Hill area of Crawley.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (21 to 22 January 2025) reported Good for Quality of Education, and Outstanding for Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, Leadership and Management, and Early Years provision.
The leadership is clearly established, and stable. The headteacher is Thomas Jordan, and trust documentation shows his local governance role as ex officio from 01 September 2019, which is a helpful indicator of continuity at senior level.
For families, the practical headline is competitiveness at Reception entry. In the most recent local admissions data, there were 292 applications for 90 offers, with an oversubscription ratio of 3.24 applications per place.
Because the school is an infant setting, there is no Key Stage 2 published outcomes profile to lean on. What matters more here is how effectively early reading, language development, and core learning habits are built by Year 2, and whether the culture supports confident, settled children who transition well into juniors.
The school’s identity comes through most strongly in the language used about how children relate to each other, and how adults organise routines. Across official reporting, the tone is consistent: pupils are expected to be kind, respectful, and purposeful, and that is framed as a learned habit rather than a slogan.
A notable strength is how personal development is structured for this age range. Rather than relying on informal “pupil voice”, responsibilities are explicitly organised through named roles such as an eco committee, a charity committee, and a pupil parliament. For infants, this matters because it makes leadership concrete, and gives children repeated, age-appropriate practice in turn-taking, listening, and making choices with others in mind.
There is also a clear thread of inclusion and community cohesion. The school community is described as multilingual, and the approach to helping pupils access learning through vocabulary, early language practice, and carefully planned communication is presented as a core part of everyday teaching, not an add-on for a small group.
The school shares a site with the local junior school, which can support transition and reduce the “big change” feeling at the end of Year 2. Practically, that can suit families who want a more familiar environment for the move into Key Stage 2, particularly if siblings are already in the junior school.
For an infant academy, the most important “results” question is not GCSE-style metrics, it is whether pupils leave Year 2 with secure early reading, confident language, and the learning behaviours needed for the step up to juniors.
The latest published inspection evidence puts early reading at the centre. Reading is described as highly prioritised from the start, with staff supporting phonics and catch-up precisely, including support that reaches into the home. That matters because in an infant setting, a strong reading spine tends to lift everything else, vocabulary for topic work, writing fluency, and even confidence in mathematics.
There is also a direct statement that pupils are well prepared for their next steps by the end of Year 2, with good achievement across the curriculum, including for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). The implication for parents is that this is not a narrow “phonics only” success story, but a setting aiming for broad readiness, including personal and social development that makes the junior transition smoother.
The one area identified for improvement is important to understand. The report notes that, at times, activities do not help pupils learn key knowledge securely, and some pupils do not recall essential content over time across subjects. In practice, this is the sort of refinement issue that many strong infant schools face as they broaden the foundation curriculum, balancing engagement and memorable experiences with systematic knowledge building.
A helpful way to think about teaching here is “structured early foundations plus deliberate inclusion”.
Early reading is the clearest example. The description points to expert guidance in phonics and story time that is interactive, and it highlights precise catch-up support. For parents, the practical question to explore on a visit is how reading practice is organised across Reception, Year 1 and Year 2, including how quickly additional support begins when a child falls behind, and how families are guided to reinforce routines at home.
Language development is another pillar, particularly for pupils learning English as an additional language. The approach described is proactive vocabulary teaching and early identification of key language children need to access learning. The implication is that the school is likely to suit families where language development is a priority, including those who want a setting comfortable supporting bilingual or multilingual pupils without making it feel like a separate track.
Inclusion is described as a whole-school capability rather than a department. Staff collaboration to identify needs, adapt learning, and provide personalised support is presented as a norm. The SEND information on the school site reinforces the idea that accountability for progress is universal, and that there is a qualified SEND team supporting teachers.
Because this is an infant academy (Reception to Year 2), pupils will move on to junior provision for Key Stage 2. The school’s shared site arrangement with the junior school is relevant here, and can help transition feel more like a step within a familiar community rather than a full reset.
A well-run Year 2 transition typically includes gradual familiarisation, consistent communication with the receiving school, and practical support for pupils who find change harder, especially those with SEND or anxiety. The school’s published emphasis on therapeutic support and wellbeing offers some reassurance that transition is treated as more than an admin process.
If a child will not move to the on-site junior school, the key practical step is to ask what support is offered for alternative destinations. Many infant settings focus transition work on the main local pathway, so families aiming for a different junior school should clarify how records, support plans, and pastoral handover are managed.
Reception entry is coordinated through West Sussex County Council, not directly through the academy. The school publishes the key dates for the 2026 to 2027 admissions round: applications open in October 2025; closing date is 15 January 2026; a late application deadline with good reason and evidence is 11 February 2026; and National Offer Day is 16 April 2026, with induction in Summer term 2026.
Demand is clearly high. The most recent shows 292 applications for 90 offers, and an oversubscription ratio of 3.24. Parents should read this as a genuinely competitive Reception intake, not a setting where you can apply late and expect places to be readily available.
The published oversubscription criteria follow the expected order for an academy admissions policy. After pupils with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) naming the academy, priority then includes looked-after and previously looked-after children, children under certain guardianship arrangements, exceptional social or medical grounds, and children of staff in defined circumstances, before other criteria apply.
A practical tool tip: families who are very focused on admission probabilities should use the FindMySchool Map Search to check their home-to-school distance, then compare that to recent allocation patterns where available. For this school, the furthest distance at which a place was offered figure is not present so distance expectations should be checked against the local authority documentation and the school’s admissions policy rather than assumed.
86.6%
1st preference success rate
84 of 97 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
90
Offers
90
Applications
292
Pastoral in an infant school often shows up in small things: how adults handle worry at drop-off, how routines are taught, and whether children learn to self-regulate without constant adult intervention.
Here, the evidence points to an unusually deliberate model for wellbeing. The inspection report references therapeutic interventions and sensory support to help pupils through difficult times, with mental health and wellbeing framed as priorities for all pupils, not only those with an identified need.
Attendance work is described as effective enough to lift attendance above the national average, with improving trends linked to the school supporting families to overcome barriers. For parents, the implication is a setting that is engaged with early intervention, and likely to communicate actively when patterns begin to slip.
Safeguarding information is clearly signposted, with named safeguarding roles on the school’s published materials.
The second, and final, explicit inspection attribution sentence: the 2025 inspection states that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
The most useful way to assess extracurricular in an infant school is not “how many clubs exist”, it is whether opportunities are accessible, inclusive, and well-designed for young children.
The school’s extended provision is described as a mix of free clubs run by staff and paid options from external organisations, with details shared through the school’s parent communication channel during the year.
The inspection evidence gives concrete examples of enrichment that go beyond the site. Trips such as visits to an aquarium and the London Eye are explicitly referenced, and there is mention of a space dome experience that enriches school life. For families, this suggests a school willing to use memorable experiences to make curriculum content stick, which can be powerful at this age if paired with strong follow-up in class.
Personal development activities also function as extracurricular in practice. Roles like eco committee, charity committee, and pupil parliament provide structured ways for children to participate and take responsibility. The benefit is not just confidence, it is early practice in community contribution, which often supports calmer behaviour and stronger peer relationships.
The school publishes a clear daily timetable by year group. Drop-off is 08:30 to 08:40, with registers closing at 08:40. Pick-up is 15:10 for Reception, Year 1 and Year 2, with lunch timings varying slightly by year group.
Lunch provision is straightforward for infants. Reception, Year 1 and Year 2 pupils receive a free hot school meal each day, with ordering managed through the school’s usual payment and ordering platform.
Wraparound care is available on the shared site through an external provider operating breakfast and after-school provision, with published times indicating early morning starts and after-school sessions that can run until 17:00 or 18:00 depending on the option chosen. Families should confirm current booking arrangements and collection logistics directly with the provider and the school.
Competition for Reception places. With 292 applications for 90 offers oversubscription is real. Families should apply on time and make contingency choices in the local authority form.
Infant-only structure. A change of school after Year 2 is standard here, and while the shared site with the junior school can help, some children find transitions harder than others. Ask how the school supports pupils who need extra transition planning.
Curriculum consistency across subjects. The 2025 inspection identifies that some lesson activities do not always secure long-term recall of key knowledge across the curriculum. Parents of children who benefit from very systematic teaching in foundation subjects may want to explore how this area is being strengthened.
Costs beyond “free education”. This is a state school with no tuition fees, but clubs run by external organisations may carry costs, and trips and events can add up. Ask for an example termly cost picture if budgeting matters.
Pound Hill Infant Academy looks like a highly organised infant setting with strong behaviour and personal development, and a clear commitment to inclusion and early reading. The main challenge is entry, and families should treat Reception admissions as competitive. It suits children who will thrive with clear routines, high expectations for behaviour, and structured opportunities to take responsibility in age-appropriate ways.
The most recent inspection profile is strong. In January 2025, the school was judged Good for Quality of Education and Outstanding for Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, Leadership and Management, and Early Years. For an infant school, that combination often signals calm routines, clear expectations, and a setting where children build strong learning habits early.
Reception applications are made through West Sussex County Council. The school publishes the timeline for the 2026 to 2027 round, with applications opening in October 2025 and closing on 15 January 2026, followed by National Offer Day on 16 April 2026.
Yes. The most recent shows 292 applications for 90 offers, which equates to about 3.24 applications per place. This points to meaningful competition for Reception entry.
The published day shows drop-off between 08:30 and 08:40 with registers closing at 08:40. Pick-up is listed as 15:10 for Reception, Year 1 and Year 2, with lunch timings varying slightly by year group.
Wraparound care is available on the shared site through an external provider. Published information indicates breakfast club options from 07:00 or 07:30, and after-school care that can run until 17:00 or 18:00 depending on the session.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.