Two-form entry, an ambitious curriculum, and an unusually broad enrichment offer shape daily life at The Dingle Primary School in Haslington, near Crewe. It serves pupils from Reception to Year 6 and is a community school with no tuition fees, so competition tends to come from local demand rather than selection.
The most recent inspection judged the school Outstanding overall, with Early years provision graded Good (inspection dates 27 to 28 September 2023, report published 10 November 2023).
Academically, the school’s latest Key Stage 2 outcomes sit well above England averages. The detailed picture suggests strength across reading, writing, maths, and wider tested subjects, rather than a single headline area. Admission is typically competitive for a school of this size, so families should treat application timings as seriously as they would for any sought-after local option.
The school’s own description is clear about the tone it aims to set, “learning, laughter and friendship” is presented as the guiding line, and the most convincing indicator is that the language matches the way the school explains day-to-day routines, expectations, and wider opportunities.
A practical, child-centred site design supports that message. The school describes a semi-open plan building with each class having access to practical areas for subjects such as art, design and technology, cookery, and science, alongside substantial use of technology to support learning. It is also explicit that the site is surrounded by playing fields, trees, and country views, which matters for primary-aged pupils because outdoor space is not an optional extra, it is a daily resource.
Leadership is stable. The current headteacher is Mr Ben Cox, and official inspection correspondence shows he was in post by March 2017, with the school continuing to list him as headteacher today.
What does this feel like for families? Expect a calm, structured school where routines are taken seriously, but where the “wider life” of primary school is treated as part of the core offer. Leadership roles for pupils are a visible feature of the culture, and the school signals that responsibility and contribution are part of how pupils grow in confidence across Key Stage 2.
The outcomes profile is strongest when read as a coherent package. At Key Stage 2, 87.3% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and maths combined. England’s comparator figure is 62%, so the gap is substantial. At the higher standard, 29.3% achieved the higher standard in reading, writing and maths, compared with an England average of 8%, which indicates that high attainers are also being stretched rather than simply secured at the pass threshold.
The scaled score indicators support the same conclusion. Reading averaged 108 and maths 107, with grammar, punctuation and spelling at 108. Each of these sits above typical England benchmarks, and they reinforce that attainment is strong across the core tested areas rather than driven by one subject alone.
Subject-level expected-standard rates are also high: reading 88%, maths 90%, grammar, punctuation and spelling 82%, and science 88%. If you want a quick sense of consistency, those numbers are close together, which usually suggests coherent teaching quality across year groups rather than isolated peaks.
For parents comparing local options, the FindMySchool ranking adds another lens. Ranked 2,353rd in England and 5th in Crewe for primary outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), performance sits above England average and comfortably within the top 25% of primary schools in England.
If you are shortlisting several local schools, the FindMySchool local hub comparison view is the quickest way to compare these indicators side-by-side without losing context.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
87.33%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
The most persuasive evidence of teaching quality is how the curriculum is described and how it is implemented from the earliest stage. Reading is clearly prioritised, starting with systematic phonics in Reception and continuing through Key Stage 1 to build fluency. The school also describes careful matching of reading books to pupils’ current phonics knowledge, a practical detail that often separates “phonics as a programme” from phonics as a daily habit that sticks.
Curriculum ambition shows up again in how subjects are planned and sequenced. The school describes a broad and balanced curriculum, taught discretely, with explicit intent around the knowledge pupils need to succeed and the order in which content is taught. This matters because sequencing is what helps pupils remember and use knowledge later, rather than repeatedly relearning the same surface facts each year.
The practical space described in the prospectus supports a hands-on approach. Access to practical areas for art, design and technology, cookery and science implies that teaching is not restricted to book-based outcomes, and it gives staff more options for purposeful explanation and application, especially for pupils who learn best through making and doing.
One area to read carefully is early years. The early years judgement is Good rather than Outstanding, and the report text indicates that some learning experiences could be developed further. For most families this will not be a red flag, but it is a cue to ask specific Reception questions during a visit: how continuous provision is planned, how early language development is assessed, and how quickly phonics routines settle for new starters.
Quality of Education
Outstanding
Behaviour & Attitudes
Outstanding
Personal Development
Outstanding
Leadership & Management
Outstanding
For a primary school, “destinations” is less about headline university pathways and more about continuity and transition. The school states that nearly all pupils move on to Sandbach School and Sandbach High School at the end of Year 6, which gives families a clear expected route if they want a mainstream local secondary progression.
A practical implication follows. If your child is likely to thrive in those secondaries, the primary-to-secondary pathway can feel straightforward. If you are considering a different secondary route, for example a faith option elsewhere or a school outside the usual pattern, you should think early about travel time, friendship groups, and how much continuity matters to your child.
Admissions are coordinated through the local authority for community schools, and the school states that it follows Cheshire East admission arrangements for community and voluntary controlled schools.
Demand data indicates that securing a place can be competitive. For the most recent available Reception-route admissions data there were 119 applications for 60 offers, which is about 2.0 applications per place. First preferences also exceeded offers (proportion of first-preference applications versus first-preference offers: 1.18), which supports the picture of a school many families actively choose rather than land in by default.
Because “how close is close enough” shifts year by year, families should treat distance as dynamic rather than fixed. Where distance is a deciding factor, use the FindMySchool Map Search tool to check your own measured distance against recent patterns before relying on a place.
For September 2026 entry, Cheshire East’s published timetable sets out the key dates: applications open 01 September 2025, the closing date is 15 January 2026, offers are made 16 April 2026, and families typically need to accept or refuse by 30 April 2026.
The school also describes its own approach to welcoming prospective families. It states that each year it holds an open evening in early October, led by the headteacher, aimed at parents with pre-school children. That is useful because it signals a predictable annual rhythm even when exact dates vary.
Applications
119
Total received
Places Offered
60
Subscription Rate
2.0x
Apps per place
A key strength is the emphasis on calm routines and a purposeful learning culture. Behaviour is described as excellent and the school places weight on pupils taking pride in their work and contributing responsibly, including through structured pupil roles and councils.
Support for pupils with additional needs is treated as an integral part of the offer rather than a bolt-on. The report describes early identification of needs and effective support so that pupils with SEND access the same curriculum as their peers.
The school also lists a named Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator as part of the senior and wider team structure, which is a practical point for parents who want clear routes for communication.
Safeguarding is a baseline question for any school choice. The most recent inspection states that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
The extracurricular programme is unusually specific for a primary school website, which suggests it is not an afterthought. The school lists a wide range of clubs and activities that run at different times of year, spanning both sport and creative or academic options.
For sport and physical confidence, the list includes athletics, cross country, cricket, hockey, netball, rounders, and tag rugby, plus cheerleading and skipping. For families, the implication is that pupils who are not naturally drawn to traditional team sports still have accessible entry points, and those who are sporty can build consistency across the year rather than relying on a single seasonal club.
Arts and performance are clearly prioritised. The school offers choir for both infant and junior pupils, drama, dance, ukuleles, and a school band. This breadth matters because it creates multiple “ways to belong” for pupils, which can be especially important for quieter children or those who find their confidence through performance rather than competition.
There is also a clear nod to wider skill development: computing and coding, construction club, board games, and a newspaper club that writes the school newspaper, The Dingle Times. That last detail is a useful signal of pupil voice and real audience, writing for publication generally encourages higher standards than writing purely for a teacher’s mark.
The published school day timings are detailed and vary slightly by phase. Morning registration is 8.50am, with the morning session running to 12.00 noon. Afternoon finish times run from 3.15pm in Reception to 3.30pm for Years 5 and 6. The school also states that children should arrive no earlier than 8.45am when doors open, which matters for working families who need clarity on supervision.
Wraparound care is clearly set out. Breakfast club runs from 7.45am and after-school club runs to 6.00pm, with published session prices and snacks included. Booking is handled through Arbor, which is useful for parents who prefer predictable, app-based booking rather than ad hoc paper forms.
Transport details are not laid out as a “how to get here” guide on the main pages reviewed, but the Haslington setting and the start-time guidance suggest the school expects a typical mix of walking and driving, with punctuality treated seriously. If you are planning a move, it is worth doing a practice run at drop-off time before committing.
Reception is Good, not Outstanding. Early years provision is judged one step below the overall grade. For many children this will still be an excellent start, but ask detailed Reception questions during a visit, especially around learning routines and how continuous provision supports early language and phonics.
Competition for places. Recent demand data indicates about 2.0 applications per place for Reception-route offers, so families should treat timing and paperwork as decisive rather than procedural.
Broad enrichment can add costs. The school is open that some clubs and activities may involve a charge to cover instruction or materials. That is often reasonable, but it is worth budgeting for the cumulative total across a year.
Secondary pathway is concentrated. The school states that nearly all pupils move on to Sandbach School and Sandbach High School. That can be reassuring, but families planning a different secondary route should think early about transition and transport.
The Dingle Primary School combines high expectations with a strong “whole-child” offer that is unusually tangible for a state primary: clear curriculum ambition, strong KS2 outcomes, and a club list that reads like a real programme rather than a marketing line. Admission is the main hurdle, so families should plan early and use distance tools sensibly when making decisions.
Who it suits: families seeking a calm, structured primary with strong academic outcomes and plenty of opportunities in sport, music, and creative life, particularly those who value a straightforward transition into the common local secondary pathway.
The most recent inspection judged the school Outstanding overall, and the latest Key Stage 2 outcomes show attainment well above England averages. The school also ranks 2,353rd in England and 5th in Crewe for primary outcomes in the FindMySchool ranking based on official data.
Admissions follow Cheshire East arrangements for community schools. Catchment and distance rules can change in impact year to year depending on applications, so families should check the current local authority criteria and measure their home-to-school distance carefully before relying on a place.
Reception applications are made through the local authority. Cheshire East’s timetable for September 2026 entry shows applications opening 01 September 2025 and closing 15 January 2026, with offers made 16 April 2026.
Yes. The school publishes a breakfast club from 7.45am and an after-school club running until 6.00pm, with sessions booked through Arbor and published prices for standard time bands.
The school states that nearly all pupils move on to Sandbach School and Sandbach High School at the end of Year 6. Families planning a different secondary route should think early about travel time and transition arrangements.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.