The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Maiden Beech Academy is a state primary in Crewkerne, Somerset, serving ages 4 to 11, with a published capacity of 420 and a much smaller current roll. In practice, that creates a particular mix: pupils get a close-knit, everyone-knows-everyone feel, while the curriculum is designed to be broad and structured, rather than narrowed early. External reporting highlights a well sequenced curriculum, strong subject knowledge among staff, and a music offer that goes beyond the usual primary “singing plus recorder” pattern.
The headline limitation for parents doing a data-led comparison is that this specific results does not include recent key stage 2 performance figures or FindMySchool rankings for the school, so the academic picture needs to be judged through curriculum quality, consistency, and the wider evidence base rather than league-position shorthand. Admissions for Reception are coordinated through Somerset, and the school is oversubscribed on the most recent admissions snapshot provided.
The school’s own language is clear and consistent: “curious, kind and confident” is presented as the organising trio for daily expectations. That matters because it is easy for values to become posters; here, the supporting detail suggests a deliberate attempt to connect values to concrete routines, relationships, and participation.
Formal reporting describes a welcoming culture and generally positive behaviour, with a specific note that low-level disruption can occur in some lessons and needs consistent handling. That is the kind of caveat parents should take seriously because it speaks to a very normal primary-school challenge: not extreme behaviour, but whether classroom routines feel calm and predictable day to day. If your child thrives on structure, it is worth asking how the school reinforces expectations consistently across classes.
A second distinctive feature of the atmosphere is how inclusion is described. Pupils with special educational needs and disabilities are portrayed as confident learners who access the same broad curriculum with additional support as needed. For families who have struggled with “bolt-on” support elsewhere, that emphasis on full curriculum access is a meaningful signal to explore further.
Leadership information is presented in two layers. The official government record lists Mrs Claire Luce as headteacher or principal. On the school website, Claire Luce is presented as Executive Headteacher and Rose Boyce as Head of School, alongside class teacher responsibilities. That structure often indicates a small setting within a trust where leadership capacity is shared across more than one school, and where day-to-day operational leadership sits with the Head of School. If you are visiting, it is sensible to ask who your main contact is for pastoral issues, SEND, and transition into Reception.
This review’s performance section is necessarily more qualitative than for many primaries because does not include key stage 2 outcomes, scaled scores, or FindMySchool rankings for this school. That means there are no ranking statements to make here, and no published percentages to compare against England averages within this specific input.
What can be said with confidence is that the school publicly directs families to the Department for Education performance tables for its most recent published outcomes. If results matter heavily in your shortlist, it is worth checking the latest DfE table alongside the school’s cohort size context, because small cohorts can make year-on-year outcomes look more volatile even when teaching quality is stable.
In the absence of comparable figures the most useful academic indicators come from the curriculum detail and the way learning is organised and reinforced, which are covered in the next section.
A practical tip for parents using FindMySchool tools: if you are comparing local primaries and want a clearer view of relative performance and context, use the Local Hub and Comparison Tool to line up schools consistently, then follow through to the official performance tables for the most recent published outcomes.
The clearest strength here is curriculum intent and sequencing. Reporting describes a well sequenced curriculum where pupils build new learning explicitly on prior knowledge, and staff use assessment to identify gaps and adjust provision, including adaptations to reading to meet individual needs. That is a strong marker for parents who want teaching to feel systematic rather than dependent on a single charismatic teacher.
Subject breadth is also visible in the school’s own curriculum map. The published “Whole School Curriculum” lists the full spread you would expect, including computing, design and technology, modern foreign languages, and personal, social, health and economic education, alongside reading and writing. For a smaller school, maintaining breadth can be a challenge; the fact it is positioned prominently suggests it is an intentional priority.
Music is the standout specialism in the external evidence. Pupils are described as learning musical notation, playing instruments such as guitar and keyboard, and composing their own music. In a primary context, that implies two things: first, specialist confidence among staff or structured external provision; second, the likelihood that music is treated as a taught subject with progression rather than occasional enrichment. For children who light up in music lessons, this can be the difference between “enjoys singing” and “develops transferable discipline through practice and performance”.
Reading is framed as both targeted and adaptive, especially for pupils who need additional support to become fluent readers. If you are choosing between schools, ask to see how early reading is taught, how phonics is organised, and how quickly children who fall behind are supported back into step. Those operational details usually tell you more than a general statement about “loving books”.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As a primary school, Maiden Beech’s key transition is into local secondary education. The school’s local authority is Somerset, and the school sits in Crewkerne, so most families will be considering a mix of nearby middle or secondary routes depending on local arrangements and the child’s age at transfer.
The most important practical point is that transition is rarely only about distance. It is also about continuity of support, friendships, and travel feasibility. For pupils with SEND, the quality of transition planning can be decisive, particularly if external agencies are involved. Because formal reporting emphasises effective support and full curriculum access for pupils with SEND, it is reasonable to ask how that support is documented and handed on during transition conversations.
If you are unsure which secondary options are realistic from your address, use FindMySchoolMap Search to sense-check travel distance and local patterns, then confirm the latest admissions criteria on the relevant local authority pages.
Admissions are coordinated by Somerset for Reception entry, and the school’s own admissions page directs families to the local authority route while also offering a bespoke tour and information on open events.
The supplied admissions snapshot indicates an oversubscribed picture for the relevant entry route, with 39 applications and 24 offers, which is about 1.63 applications per place on that cycle’s data. There is no furthest distance at which a place was offered figure provided in the input for this school, so this review does not include any distance-based statement.
For September 2026 entry, Somerset’s published primary admissions timetable includes an on-time closing date of 15 January 2026, with offers issued on 16 April 2026, and an appeal deadline of 18 May 2026 for those notified on 16 April. If you are applying late, Somerset also sets out separate processing dates, including outcomes sent on 5 June 2026 for applications received by 1 May 2026.
What this means in practice is simple: the administrative system has fixed dates, but school choice benefits from earlier engagement. If Maiden Beech is a serious contender, arrange a tour in the autumn term if you can, and do not rely on finding an open day at the last minute.
Applications
39
Total received
Places Offered
24
Subscription Rate
1.6x
Apps per place
The strongest safeguarding statement available is unambiguous: safeguarding arrangements are described as effective. Beyond that headline, the useful detail for parents is how safeguarding is framed as both physical and emotional safety, with staff training, clear referral routes, and pupils knowing there is a trusted adult to talk to.
Wellbeing also shows up in the way staff describe inclusion. Pupils with SEND are described as thriving with additional support where required, and being confident, successful learners. For families, the implication is that support is not purely remedial; it is intended to keep children participating fully and building independence.
If you are assessing fit, ask about the practicalities: how the school communicates day-to-day worries, how it handles friendship issues, and what the escalation route looks like if low-level disruption affects learning in a class. Those questions map directly onto the strengths and improvement points in the available evidence.
The extracurricular offer is unusually easy to evaluate because the school publishes a club overview with timings, year groups, and a half-term structure. Clubs are organised for sign-up early each half term and then typically run from Week 2. That gives a predictable rhythm for families managing pick-ups and routines.
Examples from the published club menu include Running Club, Book Club, Winter Crafts, Netball Club, Lego Club, Board Games, Clay Club, Tennis Club, Outdoor Club, and Rounders Club, offered across different year groups and terms. The value here is not the individual activity, it is the pattern: pupils can try different types of enrichment across the year, and families can plan ahead because sessions are scheduled and time-bounded.
Music also cuts across the “beyond the classroom” experience as well as the taught curriculum. With pupils learning instruments and composition as part of curriculum delivery, children with musical interest are likely to find an additional identity space that is not purely academic or sport-led.
The school publishes a clear day structure: the school day starts at 08:45 and ends at 15:15, totalling 32.5 hours per week. For working parents, wraparound care is available before and after school during term time, with sessions needing to be pre-booked in advance.
Uniform expectations are also published, with logoed items described as optional. That is helpful for budgeting and for families who prefer simplicity over strict branding.
A small roll within a larger capacity. Official sources show a large capacity but a much smaller current number on roll. This can be brilliant for individual attention, but it can also mean smaller friendship pools in some year groups. Ask how the school supports friendship-building and mixed-age interaction.
Behaviour consistency. The evidence points to a generally positive culture, with a specific improvement point around consistent handling of low-level disruption in some lessons. If your child is easily distracted, explore classroom routines and how behaviour expectations are reinforced day to day.
Oversubscription pressure. The most recent admissions snapshot provided indicates more applications than offers for the entry route. If you are moving house for the school, confirm the current admissions criteria and realistic chances with Somerset before committing.
Leadership structure. The school presents an Executive Headteacher and a Head of School model. That can work very well, but parents should be clear on who handles which issues and what continuity looks like when staff are off-site.
Maiden Beech Academy looks best suited to families who want a smaller, values-led primary with a deliberately broad curriculum and a music strand that is more ambitious than many local peers. The character feels inclusive and community-minded, and the practicalities, including wraparound care and club scheduling, are clearly set out. Entry remains the main constraint; for families who secure a place, the day-to-day experience is likely to feel personal, structured, and varied.
Maiden Beech Academy is rated Good in its most recent published Ofsted inspection, and the report describes a well sequenced curriculum, strong subject knowledge, and a particular strength in music. The school’s current age range is 4 to 11.
Reception admissions are coordinated through Somerset. For September 2026 entry, Somerset’s on-time closing date is 15 January 2026, with offers issued on 16 April 2026. The school also encourages families to arrange a tour and ask about open events.
The published school day runs from 08:45 to 15:15, totalling 32.5 hours per week. Wraparound care is available before and after school during term time, with sessions requiring advance booking.
The school publishes a rotating programme of clubs across the year. Examples include Running Club, Book Club, Lego Club, Board Games, Clay Club, Tennis Club, and Outdoor Club, with different year group eligibility by term.
The official government record lists Mrs Claire Luce as headteacher or principal. The school website also presents Claire Luce as Executive Headteacher and Rose Boyce as Head of School.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.