All-through schools can sometimes feel like two institutions sharing one name. Here, the through-line is clearer: a structured approach to character education and enrichment sits alongside a broad curriculum from Reception to Year 11. This is a state-funded academy in Darlington, part of Woodard Academies Trust, with capacity for 882 pupils and 841 on roll at the time of the most recent published Ofsted documentation.
The school’s most recent inspection (25 November 2025, published 19 January 2026) reported safeguarding standards met and graded the school using Ofsted’s newer “report card” approach. Personal development and wellbeing was recorded at Strong standard, with achievement, attendance and behaviour, curriculum and teaching, early years, inclusion, and leadership and governance all recorded at Expected standard.
Data from primary outcomes shows a high proportion of pupils meeting expected standards by the end of Year 6, while GCSE measures sit closer to mid-pack nationally, with slightly below-average progress at secondary. The overall picture is of a school where the enrichment and pastoral architecture is a major differentiator, and where academic outcomes are good in parts, with clear headroom at GCSE.
A defining feature is the way personal development is organised rather than left to chance. The inspection record describes a planned programme that protects time in the school day for enrichment, with Activities lessons spanning sport, creative options, performance, volunteering and membership, plus explicit preparation for later pathways. The point for families is practical: enrichment is not simply “after-school if your child fancies it”, it is built into routine access. That tends to matter most for pupils who benefit from structure, and for families who want breadth without needing to self-organise every club and experience.
The all-through nature supports continuity. Staff share expertise across phases, and curriculum transition from primary to secondary is described as “seamless” in the inspection evidence, with subject knowledge and approaches aligned across age groups. For parents, that usually translates into fewer “resets” at Year 7, and a clearer sense of what skills look like at each stage, especially in reading and mathematics.
Community is also formalised through the house system. Pupils are organised into houses (Swale, Skerne, Kent and Tees), and the inspection record links this to cross-age leadership, pastoral identity, and a shared culture across the full age range. In practice, houses can be a stabiliser in an all-through setting, helping younger pupils feel known, while giving older pupils structured leadership roles.
Leadership stability is a further anchor. The principal is Kate Reid, and Ofsted’s 2018 report notes that a new principal was appointed in 2017, following the school’s transition into its then current model.
Because the school is all-through to Year 11, it is worth separating the primary story from the GCSE story.
Outcomes at the expected standard are strong. In 2024, 80.33% of pupils reached the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, compared with the England average of 62%. At the higher standard, 27.67% achieved the higher standard in reading, writing and mathematics, compared with the England average of 8%. In science, 79% reached the expected standard, against an England average of 82%.
On FindMySchool’s ranking (based on official data), the school is ranked 4,003rd in England and 7th in Darlington for primary outcomes. This reflects solid performance, in line with the middle 35% of schools in England (25th to 60th percentile), while still delivering high headline attainment at Year 6.
A useful way to interpret this combination is that attainment is strong, but rankings are influenced by the broader distribution of measures and year-to-year volatility across the system. For parents, the practical implication is that Year 6 outcomes look reassuring, but it is still sensible to ask how the school supports pupils who are disadvantaged or who need help sustaining momentum through Key Stage 3.
At GCSE level, the school’s Attainment 8 score is 42, and Progress 8 is -0.05. A Progress 8 score close to zero indicates outcomes broadly in line with pupils’ starting points, and -0.05 suggests slightly below average progress across the cohort. EBacc-related measures are modest, with 11.8% achieving grade 5 or above in EBacc subjects.
On FindMySchool’s ranking (based on official data), the school is ranked 2,559th in England and 5th in Darlington for GCSE outcomes, again placing it broadly in the middle band nationally (25th to 60th percentile). The inspection evidence also supports a “steady, with improvement needed in pockets” view at Key Stage 4, noting that outcomes are broadly in line with national averages for most subjects and groups, while identifying a small number of GCSE subjects and cohorts where pupils do not achieve as well as they could.
For families, this usually leads to two sensible questions during visits: where are the strongest departments, and what has been put in place for consistency in checking learning and adapting teaching during lessons, especially for disadvantaged pupils.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
Reading, Writing & Maths
80.33%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
The curriculum is described in Ofsted’s published evidence as broad and carefully sequenced from early years upward, with staff training focused on consistent expectations and the use of targeted questioning to build independent thinking. That matters in a mixed-ability state setting because the “how” of lessons often makes the difference between pupils keeping up confidently and pupils coasting until gaps become visible.
A second strength is the deliberate connection between phases. In an all-through model, it is easy for Year 7 to become a hard boundary. Here, the evidence points to subject knowledge sharing across primary and secondary, and specific support for secondary-age pupils who need extra development in reading and mathematics. The implication is that pupils who arrive at Year 7 with uneven foundations are less likely to be written off as “behind already”, and more likely to be picked up for planned, expert intervention.
Early years provision is characterised in the inspection record by well-understood routines, daily phonics, and an emphasis on communication and independence, including purposeful outdoor learning and structured activities that build social and language skills. For parents of Reception-age children, this is often the part that is hardest to assess quickly, so the presence of clear routines and systematic early reading is a meaningful positive indicator.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
Because the school runs to Year 11, families are mainly thinking about two “next steps”, transition into secondary within the same institution, and post-16 routes after GCSE.
The internal transition is a practical advantage. Pupils already know the routines, adults, and expectations, and the curriculum is designed to link across the phases. For many children, that continuity reduces the social disruption that can come with moving sites and friendship groups at 11.
That said, all-through schools still vary in how “seamless” the experience feels for children. A useful approach is to ask how the school maintains age-appropriate experiences for primary pupils while still preparing them for the independence expected in Key Stage 3.
The most recent inspection evidence states that pupils move on to academic and vocational courses after leaving, and frames this as evidence that pupils are equipped for the next stage. The school does not have a sixth form, so students will be applying to local sixth forms and colleges for Year 12 or equivalent pathways.
A practical tip for families is to ask how careers guidance is structured from Key Stage 3 onward, and how GCSE option choices are connected to later destinations. The published evidence indicates a comprehensive careers programme beginning in primary, with a demonstrable impact on later course choices.
This is a state-funded school, so admissions follow the coordinated local authority process and published admission numbers.
Reception is oversubscribed in the available demand data. The figures show 125 applications and 41 offers for the entry route measured, around 3.05 applications per offer, with the entry route recorded as oversubscribed. This is a useful indicator that early application matters and that families should read the oversubscription criteria carefully.
Darlington’s primary admissions guide for 2026 to 2027 states a closing date of 15 January 2026 for on-time applications. It also lists the school’s published admission number for Reception entry in 2026 as 45.
Year 7 is also oversubscribed in the available demand data, with 305 applications and 108 offers (around 2.82 applications per offer), again recorded as oversubscribed.
Darlington’s secondary admissions guide for 2026 to 2027 states the closing date for the secondary application form as 31 October 2025, and confirms 1 March as the national offer date. The coordinated admissions scheme documentation also outlines the wider timetable used for coordination across admission authorities.
For Year 7 entry, Darlington Borough Council publishes open event dates. For the September 2026 cohort, the council listed an open event on Tuesday 16 September 2025 at 5:30pm. If you are looking beyond that cycle, it is reasonable to treat September as the typical window for open evenings, and to confirm the current year’s event schedule directly.
Families comparing schools should also use the FindMySchool Map Search to understand how admissions criteria interact with where you live, particularly when oversubscription is common.
Applications
125
Total received
Places Offered
41
Subscription Rate
3.0x
Apps per place
Applications
305
Total received
Places Offered
108
Subscription Rate
2.8x
Apps per place
Pastoral care is a clear pillar. The inspection evidence points to calm routines, warm staff-pupil relationships, and consistent behaviour expectations across both lessons and social time. It also describes an on-site counsellor used as part of attendance support, and a culture where pupils feel safe and know who to approach for help.
Another distinctive feature is the school’s internal support architecture. The inspection record names in-house provisions including Portunus, Hercules, Ancora and Salus, described as offering short-term and long-term support for needs ranging from anxiety to literacy and numeracy, with an intention to reintegrate pupils into mainstream classrooms. For parents, named interventions like this are useful because they indicate the school has thought about tiered support, rather than relying only on external referrals.
There is also a strong emphasis on personal, social and health education, including a programme referred to as Nosce Te Ipsum (know thyself), designed to broaden cultural understanding and support mature reflection on beliefs, cultures, and wider events.
Enrichment is one of the school’s most clearly evidenced differentiators, and it appears to be designed as a whole-school entitlement rather than a menu for the already confident.
A core mechanism is the dedicated Activities lesson programme. The inspection evidence describes this as covering multiple strands, including performance, volunteering and membership, sports, creative options, and preparation for the world of work. The implication is breadth with scaffolding, which often helps pupils who might not self-select into clubs but thrive when new experiences are made routine.
There are also specific highlights. The school has been recognised for the quality of its tennis activities, and pupils’ work with local politicians has a clear focus on online safety. For many families, these are the kinds of experiences that make school life feel bigger than lessons, especially in Key Stage 3 when motivation and identity can shift quickly.
For older pupils, cadet force participation is singled out as something pupils particularly enjoy, and drama productions are presented as a source of excitement and involvement. For parents, the practical question is how participation is managed alongside homework and GCSE preparation, especially for pupils who do best with clear time boundaries.
The school is on Grange Road in Darlington, which tends to work well for families seeking a school that is accessible within the town rather than requiring a long rural commute. Transport patterns will vary by address, so it is sensible to test your likely route at realistic times of day.
As an all-through school, day structure and wraparound care arrangements can be important, particularly for younger pupils. Details such as start and finish times, breakfast provision, and after-school care are best confirmed directly with the school, as these operational details can change year to year.
GCSE progress is close to average, with pockets to strengthen. Progress 8 is -0.05, which indicates slightly below-average progress overall. Families should ask how consistency in checking learning is being strengthened across subjects, and how pupils who fall behind are identified early.
Oversubscription is a real constraint at both key entry points. The demand data shows oversubscription for Reception and Year 7 entry routes. Plan early, read the criteria carefully, and use realistic backup preferences.
The all-through model suits many, but not all. Continuity can be a major advantage, but some children benefit from a clearer “fresh start” at Year 7. It is worth considering whether your child thrives on familiarity or on new environments.
A structured enrichment model can feel busy. A strong personal development programme is a positive, but some pupils need downtime and may find a packed week tiring. Ask how the school balances enrichment expectations with workload and wellbeing.
This is a state-funded all-through academy where the personal development and enrichment architecture is a standout feature, supported by the most recent published inspection evidence and a structured programme embedded into the school day. Academic outcomes are strong at the end of primary, and more mixed at GCSE, with slightly below-average progress and clear improvement priorities in a small number of subjects.
Best suited to families who value a consistent, all-through journey, who want enrichment organised as part of the core week, and who are comfortable engaging early with a competitive admissions process.
The most recent published inspection (dated 25 November 2025 and published 19 January 2026) recorded safeguarding standards met, with personal development and wellbeing at Strong standard and other areas at Expected standard. Primary outcomes are strong, with 80.33% meeting the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined in 2024, compared with 62% across England.
Reception admissions are coordinated through Darlington’s primary admissions process. For September 2026 entry, the published deadline for on-time applications is 15 January 2026.
Darlington’s secondary admissions guide states the closing date for secondary applications for September 2026 entry is 31 October 2025. Offers are released on 1 March.
Yes, both Reception and Year 7 entry routes are recorded as oversubscribed in the demand data. For Reception, the figures show 125 applications and 41 offers; for Year 7, 305 applications and 108 offers.
The school’s Attainment 8 score is 42 and Progress 8 is -0.05, which indicates slightly below-average progress across the cohort. The school is ranked 2,559th in England and 5th in Darlington for GCSE outcomes in the FindMySchool ranking based on official data.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.