The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Outdoor learning is not a token extra here, it is a daily thread running through nursery, Reception and Key Stage 1. The federation’s two-site set-up gives families a sense of continuity from age 3 through to Year 6, with shared leadership and joined-up wraparound care. It is the kind of school that suits children who learn best through talk, play, movement and regular time outside, while still benefiting from a structured approach to early reading and maths.
Leadership is split across the federation: Yvonne Hammerton-Jackson is Executive Headteacher, and Claire McKimm is Head of School for the infant and nursery site.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (25 February 2025) graded all key judgements as Good, including early years provision. That is an important update for parents who remember the earlier era of overall grades, because inspections from September 2024 no longer give an overall effectiveness judgement for state-funded schools.
This is a school built for younger children and it leans into that phase properly. The campus and routines are shaped around what three to seven-year-olds need: predictable structures, consistent relationships, and lots of space to move. The school’s own value statement, “We work together to make Stoke Hill a great place to learn, work and play”, sets a collaborative tone that fits an infant setting well, because parents are expected to be partners rather than spectators.
The physical environment is a major part of the offer. The federation describes large plots with established outdoor teaching areas and woodland, plus vegetable patches, raised beds, fruit trees, wild areas and substantial green space. The buildings themselves date from the 1950s, with additions over time, and the nursery is described as purpose-built and opened in 2011. For families prioritising outside learning and nature-based routines, this sort of site matters, because it allows outdoor learning to happen without constant logistical friction.
Diversity is framed as a normal part of school life rather than a special project. The federation describes itself as serving families from many backgrounds and emphasises tolerance and community cohesion. In practice, that tends to show up in curriculum choices, library stock, assemblies, pastoral messaging, and the way the school talks about respect and fairness.
There is also a strong “pupil voice” culture for a primary federation. The School Council page gives unusually detailed examples of what children say they value and want to improve, including requests around outdoor learning, play equipment, and practical improvements. For parents, this is a useful signal: children are not just asked for opinions, there are systems for turning ideas into actions.
This is an infant and nursery school (ages 3 to 7), which means you should not expect the same public examination footprint as a junior or all-through primary. Many of the standard published end-of-Key Stage 2 measures are not the right lens here, because the school’s job is to secure strong foundations in early language, reading, writing, number and learning habits, then hand pupils on well prepared for Key Stage 2.
The evidence base that matters most is the curriculum and teaching story, and how well children are supported to catch up quickly if they need it. The latest inspection’s graded profile provides a recent external check on this, with Good judgements across all areas, including early years.
For parents comparing local options, the practical question is less “What were the end-of-primary results?” and more “How well does the school teach reading, language, and early maths, and how well are children supported if they are not ready yet?” The school’s own published approach to phonics, reading practice and home learning gives a clearer view of its priorities than generic headline data.
A useful additional clue comes from demand. For the main entry route, the school is oversubscribed in the most recent admissions, with 113 applications and 72 offers, which is about 1.57 applications per place. That points to a school that local families actively seek out, even in a city with multiple infant and primary options.
Parents using FindMySchool’s Local Hub pages can compare demand and local context across nearby schools side by side, which is often more decision-useful for infant entry than chasing a single headline metric.
Early reading is clearly treated as a core discipline rather than a warm extra. Home learning expectations describe a structured pathway: children begin with book bags and library books in nursery, then move into phonics-linked reading practice once blending is established. The school references Little Wandle phonics in this progression, which signals an approach based on systematic synthetic phonics with decodable books that match taught sounds.
The key advantage of this kind of model is consistency. When a child reads a book that aligns closely to the sounds they have already learned, parents get fewer “guess-the-word” habits at home and more genuine fluency building. It also allows teachers to spot quickly whether a pupil is struggling with decoding or with language comprehension, because the materials are controlled.
Maths is also framed as a daily habit. The school describes home learning support through Mathseeds, with a placement process and an expectation of steady progress through mapped lessons. In infant settings, that sort of approach is often helpful for children who need repetition, because it reduces anxiety around maths and makes practice feel routine.
Curriculum intent statements on the site also highlight a deliberate emphasis on vocabulary and language. The English curriculum overview describes learning building year on year and references vocabulary choices aimed at engaging curiosity and reflecting the diversity of the school. That kind of language matters in infant education because vocabulary is a multiplier: stronger language supports reading comprehension, writing quality, and confidence across the curriculum.
For most families, the key transition point is Year 2 to Year 3. The school sits within a federation with the junior school, and the admissions documentation explicitly links the two, including shared catchment arrangements. In practical terms, many families will plan for progression into the junior phase locally, although families should still read the junior school’s admissions criteria carefully for the relevant year, because feeder priorities can change.
The admissions policy for 2026 to 2027 identifies Stoke Hill Junior School as the linked setting for onward progression, and it also clarifies how priority works around catchment and siblings across the infant and junior schools. For parents, the implication is straightforward: the federation structure supports continuity, but the admissions route still needs attention, especially for families moving into the area.
For children, the educational implication is also important. A strong infant foundation in phonics, early writing, number fluency and learning routines tends to make the Key Stage 2 transition smoother, because pupils arrive ready to engage with longer texts, more independent writing, and the step-up in curriculum volume.
Main entry is Reception, with applications made through the local authority rather than directly to the school. The published admission number (PAN) for 2026 to 2027 is 90 places.
The 2026 to 2027 admissions policy is unusually clear about dates and process. For Devon-resident children, the normal round application window is 15 November 2025 to 15 January 2026, with offers on 16 April 2026. Late applications are accepted, but the policy explains that they may be considered after timely applications, which can reduce the chance of an offer if the year group is full.
Oversubscription criteria follow a familiar state-school hierarchy: looked after and previously looked after children first, then exceptional social or medical need (with evidence), then catchment and siblings (including links to the junior school), then other catchment children, then siblings outside catchment, then children of eligible staff, then other children.
Distance is used as the tie-breaker within a criterion, measured as straight-line distance, with an electronic randomiser used if distances are equal within a small margin.
Demand is meaningful here. In the most recent for the main entry route, the school is oversubscribed, with 113 applications for 72 offers. That level of pressure tends to make two things matter more than parents expect: getting the application submitted on time, and being realistic about how catchment, siblings, and distance play out year to year.
Parents considering the school should use FindMySchoolMap Search to check their home-to-school distance precisely. Even when a school is catchment-based, micro-geography often decides borderline cases.
Nursery has a different route. The admissions page states that nursery applications must be made directly to the school, and that a fresh application is required even if a child already attends nursery when applying for Reception. This is an important operational detail for working parents, because it is easy to assume nursery attendance automatically rolls into Reception. It does not.
The nursery timetable is set out clearly: morning sessions are 9.00am to 12.00pm, afternoons 12.00pm to 3.00pm, and full days 9.00am to 3.00pm. Families can use funded early years entitlement hours if eligible, and the school signposts 15 hours for all families and potential 30 hours eligibility.
100%
1st preference success rate
68 of 68 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
72
Offers
72
Applications
113
Pastoral practice for infants is often more about routines and emotional literacy than formal systems, and this school appears to treat wellbeing as a schoolwide priority rather than a reactive service. The mental health review document describes ongoing work with Zones of Regulation strategies, staff training, and pupil-facing toolkits in classrooms, plus spaces that support regulation when children need a moment away from the main classroom environment.
Family support is also described as part of the model. The mental health review references drop-in sessions with a Family Support Worker across the week, and targeted support such as bereavement support accessed by pupils. For parents, this is useful because infant-phase challenges are often family-phase challenges too: sleep, separation anxiety, language delay, behaviour at transitions, or a sudden change at home.
The practical safeguarding picture is also clear. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. For families, the main implication is confidence that basic systems are in place, while still leaving room to ask sensible questions during a visit about routines, supervision, and how concerns are handled day to day.
This is where Stoke Hill’s site and federation structure become a genuine advantage. Outdoor learning is repeatedly referenced across federation documents, and the physical resources described are unusually strong for an infant setting: woodland, wild areas, vegetable patches, raised beds, and fruit trees, all framed as learning resources rather than decoration. The implication is clear: children who learn through making, moving and exploring can thrive, and teachers have more scope to teach science, geography, art and personal development through real-world experiences.
Enrichment also extends beyond the infant site. The PE and Sport page includes examples of structured clubs and events across the federation, including an after-school dance club delivered by Premier Sports with performances at local venues, plus orienteering activity linked to a new course on the junior site. For younger children, the key point is not competition but access: experiences like dance performances and outdoor navigation build confidence, memory, listening skills and group discipline.
The School Council content also gives a helpful window into what children actually value. Pupils mention the library, PE equipment, outdoor learning, the top field, and specific playground resources. That kind of pupil feedback aligns well with an infant-phase school where play and movement are not optional extras, they are core tools for learning self-control and social skills.
Food and routines matter too. The school references universal infant free school meals (UIFSM) and the School Food Standards as part of its approach to nutrition across the day, including clubs. When infant schools do this well, it reduces lunchtime stress for picky eaters and supports consistent expectations around healthy snacks and hydration.
This is a state school with no tuition fees.
Wraparound care is a practical strength. The federation’s breakfast and after-school provision, Treetops, runs daily, with breakfast starting at 7.30am and running to 9.00am for infant children, and after-school provision from 3.10pm to 6.00pm. Breakfast is listed at £5 per morning and after-school at £10 per evening. The operational implication for working families is that the school day can be extended without relying on informal childcare, and children are escorted between sites by staff.
Nursery sessions run 9.00am to 3.00pm for a full day, and the nursery page notes that a school meal can be purchased for £2 if preferred, otherwise children bring a packed lunch. (This is a meal cost rather than a nursery fee, and it is not the kind of figure that normally changes family affordability decisions.)
Transport-wise, the school is in Exeter’s Stoke Hill area, so many families will walk or use local bus routes. For rail travel into the city, Exeter Central and Exeter St Davids are the main stations families tend to use, then connect onwards by foot, taxi or bus depending on the time of day.
No overall Ofsted grade in the latest report. The 25 February 2025 inspection predates the old single-word headline judgements for state schools, so you need to read the judgement profile rather than looking for “Outstanding” or “Good” overall.
Oversubscription is real. Recent application and offer figures indicate more demand than places for the main entry route. Families should apply on time and be realistic about the role of catchment, siblings and distance.
Nursery does not equal Reception. Nursery applications are direct to the school, but Reception entry requires a separate local-authority application.
Wraparound comes with set costs. Treetops is a useful service for many families, but it is a paid add-on, so it is worth budgeting early if you expect to use it most days.
Stoke Hill Infant and Nursery School suits families who want an early-years start that takes outdoor learning seriously, with clear systems for early reading and steady home learning habits. The federation model and wraparound care make it workable for many working households, and the published admissions information is unusually clear for a state setting. Best suited to children who will enjoy plenty of learning through talk, play and time outside, and families prepared to engage with a competitive Reception entry process.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (25 February 2025) graded all key judgements as Good, including early years provision. The school also publishes clear approaches to early reading, phonics and home learning, which are the foundations that matter most at ages 3 to 7.
Reception applications are made through the local authority, not directly to the school. For the 2026 to 2027 intake, the school’s admissions policy states the application window is 15 November 2025 to 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026.
No. The admissions information is explicit that children in nursery still need a separate Reception application through the local authority, and nursery applications are handled directly by the school. Treat nursery and Reception as two linked but separate processes.
Yes. The federation runs Treetops wraparound care. Breakfast starts at 7.30am and runs to 9.00am for infant children, and after-school runs from 3.10pm to 6.00pm. Charges are listed as £5 per breakfast session and £10 per after-school session.
Many families plan for progression into the linked junior phase locally, and the admissions policy explains the relationship between the infant and junior schools through shared catchment arrangements. Families should still read the junior school’s admissions policy for the relevant year, because criteria can change.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.