The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A small primary in Soudley with a genuine village-school character, Soudley School sits in the Forest of Dean and keeps things deliberately simple, a tight-knit cohort, mixed-age classes, and a strong emphasis on relationships. The school is oversubscribed at Reception entry, with 14 applications for 7 offers in the latest available data, so demand can outstrip the number of places even at this small scale.
The most recent full inspection found the school Requires Improvement, with leadership and management judged Good. Safeguarding was confirmed as effective.
Since September 2022 the school has been led through an executive model, shared with partner schools in the local federation, which has brought stability after a turbulent period and set a clear improvement agenda.
Soudley School’s identity is shaped by its size. With a published capacity of 77 and a roll that has varied in recent years, it operates more like a learning community than a production line. Small numbers mean adults know pupils and families well, and daily routines can be responsive, particularly when children need extra reassurance or a calm reset.
The school’s stated core value, “Respect for ourselves, each other and our environment”, is positioned as more than a slogan. It is tied to expectations about how pupils treat one another, how they talk about belonging, and how the school frames responsibility, including respect for the local environment that surrounds it.
There is also a clear rights-based strand running through the school’s personal development work. Soudley reports achieving the UNICEF Rights Respecting Schools Silver Award in December 2025, and describes weekly assemblies that link children’s rights to current affairs, supported by a child-friendly news resource used to discuss topical issues. That approach tends to suit families who want values taught explicitly, rather than assumed.
The latest inspection paints a mixed picture that is useful for parents trying to calibrate expectations. Pupils generally enjoy school, feel safe, and describe bullying as rare, with confidence that adults would deal with it quickly. At the same time, learning behaviours have not been consistently strong, with low-level disruption and weak presentation standards noted as issues that can get in the way of pupils taking pride in their work.
Because this is a primary school, the most relevant data point for most families is Key Stage 2 performance at the end of Year 6, especially the combined expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics.
In 2024, 64% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined. That is slightly above the England average of 62%. The higher standard measure is more striking, 16.67% achieved the higher standard in reading, writing and mathematics, compared with an England average of 8%. Scaled scores also sit on the positive side of England norms, with reading at 104 and mathematics at 102, plus grammar, punctuation and spelling at 105.
On FindMySchool’s primary outcomes ranking (based on official data), Soudley is ranked 10,111th in England and 15th in the Forest of Dean. This places performance below England average overall, in line with the lower band of schools nationally, and it underlines a key point for parents, outcomes are not consistently “high-performing” by national rank, but they include areas of genuine strength, particularly the higher standard figure, which is often harder to shift in small schools.
A practical implication of those numbers is that families should expect a school where attainment can look uneven from year to year. In a setting where one pupil can materially change percentages, results are best read as a direction of travel rather than a stable headline.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
64%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
The most recent inspection describes a curriculum that is improving and broad in intent, but uneven in implementation. Where subject knowledge is set out clearly and sequencing is strong, pupils retain more and can use prior learning confidently. Science and geography were highlighted as examples where the knowledge pupils need is identified clearly and taught in a logical order, which helps pupils remember and connect ideas.
Reading is clearly positioned as a priority. The school has invested in a library described as containing high-quality texts, and the inspection notes pupils’ enthusiasm for new and diverse books, alongside positive habits of listening to adults read aloud.
The sharper improvement point is phonics. The inspection found that the phonics programme was not being delivered effectively enough, with assessment checks that were not always accurate and some pupils not consistently matched to reading books aligned with the sounds they know. For parents of early readers, this matters because phonics consistency is one of the biggest levers in helping children become fluent readers early, which then frees cognitive capacity for comprehension and writing later.
Early years was also identified as an area needing improvement, including the match between activities and children’s needs, plus the learning environment and access to resources. Families considering Reception entry should take this seriously and, during a visit, ask specifically what has changed since the inspection, how staff are trained and coached in early reading, and what routines are in place to reduce disruption and improve pride in work.
Quality of Education
Requires Improvement
Behaviour & Attitudes
Requires Improvement
Personal Development
Requires Improvement
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
For a small Forest of Dean primary, the key question is usually not specialist pathways but practical transition, which secondary schools typically serve the area, and how confident Year 6 pupils feel moving into a much larger setting.
Gloucestershire’s place planning documents identify Dene Magna School and The Forest High School as the main secondary schools serving the Cinderford area. In practice, families at Soudley most often look at those routes, alongside any other Forest of Dean options that fit transport and catchment realities.
What matters most for transition is preparation and relationship-building. The most recent inspection notes that relationships between adults and pupils are strong and pastoral care is a clear strength. That tends to translate well into transition support, because children who feel known and secure are often better able to cope with new routines and higher independence demands in Year 7.
Soudley School is a state school with no tuition fees. Reception applications are coordinated by Gloucestershire County Council, rather than handled directly by the school.
Demand for Reception places can be higher than supply. The latest available admissions data shows 14 applications for 7 offers, which is consistent with an oversubscribed picture, even though the absolute numbers are small. In schools of this size, a handful of additional families can move the dial quickly, so it is worth treating “oversubscribed” as a real constraint rather than a statistical quirk.
For families applying for September 2026 entry, Gloucestershire’s admissions information indicates the online application window has closed and later submissions are treated as late applications.
For September 2027 entry, the national closing date of 15 January 2027 applies for primary applications.
The school also supports in-year admissions when families move into the area, subject to space. Soudley’s own admissions page encourages families to enquire about places and describes transition planning that includes liaison with parents and pre-school providers, plus settling-in sessions for new starters.
If you are trying to judge the realism of a place, FindMySchool’s Map Search is a sensible first step, even where last-offered distance is not published, because local demand can change sharply year to year in small rural schools.
100%
1st preference success rate
7 of 7 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
7
Offers
7
Applications
14
Pastoral care is one of the school’s clearer strengths in the published evidence. The most recent inspection describes relationships between adults and pupils as strong, with leaders ensuring a high standard of pastoral care that supports pupils’ social and emotional resilience. Pupils say they feel safe. Safeguarding arrangements were judged effective.
The school’s “Healthy Schools Plus” description adds some useful practical detail about daily routines, including access to water through the day, encouragement of fruit or a healthy snack at playtime, and a structured approach to physical activity. It also describes a buddy system for new Reception pupils, beginning at pre-school visits and continuing into the first years of school, which is a simple but often effective way to reduce anxiety for the youngest children.
On emotional regulation, the school publishes a mindfulness explainer that frames mindfulness as attention and awareness rather than enforced silence, and it suggests pupils have had opportunities to learn how the brain works and strategies for managing worry. That sort of language often resonates with families who want wellbeing treated as a teachable skill, not just a reactive intervention.
In small schools, enrichment often looks different. Rather than dozens of clubs running simultaneously, provision tends to be seasonal and staff-led, with a few high-participation options at a time.
Soudley’s published clubs information gives two concrete examples, a Cricket Club (a weekly after-school session in the summer term) and a bakery club in the second half of the summer term. Those are not generic “we offer clubs” claims, they are the sort of practical, hands-on activities that can suit children who learn best by doing and who enjoy relaxed, mixed-age social time after lessons.
Sport and outdoor learning appear to be anchored in the setting. The school describes extensive grounds used for outdoor sport and cross-country runs in the forest, plus use of the Village Hall and field for events such as sports day. Swimming is also described as a weekly opportunity at a local leisure centre at some point during the year.
There is also a community-facing strand in the most recent inspection evidence. Pupils were described as beginning to engage more with the local community and wider world, including older pupils leading an assembly to promote a local charity and organising fundraising. In a small rural school, these roles can be particularly meaningful because children are often more visible in the life of the village, and leadership opportunities can come earlier.
The published school day runs from 8:40am to 3:10pm. Families can arrive from 8:30am and wait on the playground, with staff collecting children from there.
Breakfast Club is offered daily from 8:00am, priced at £2.50 per session and including breakfast.
Details of after-school wraparound provision beyond clubs are not clearly published in the same place, so families who need childcare beyond 3:10pm should ask directly what is currently available, how often it runs, and whether it is consistent across the year.
For travel, this is a village school, so the practical question is usually not rail links but driving routes, walking safety, and drop-off logistics. It is worth asking how parking is managed at peak times and whether there are preferred approaches for families walking or arriving by car.
Requires Improvement judgement. The most recent full inspection (February to March 2023) rated the school Requires Improvement, with early years and phonics delivery identified as key areas to strengthen. Families should ask what has changed since that inspection, and what evidence the school can share about improved consistency.
Learning behaviours and presentation. Low-level disruption and weak pride in work were noted as barriers to learning. In a small school this can be very manageable if expectations are clear and consistently applied, but it is worth probing how behaviour expectations are taught, reinforced, and supported.
Small cohorts mean volatile data. The school itself flags that small numbers can make percentages hard to interpret. If you are comparing schools, focus on patterns across several years and what leaders are doing to improve day-to-day teaching, rather than treating one year’s percentage as definitive.
Wraparound needs. Breakfast Club is clear and priced, but families needing after-school childcare should confirm what is offered beyond clubs and whether it meets working patterns reliably.
Soudley School will suit families who value a small, relationship-led primary where children are known well and community ties are part of everyday school life. The setting and outdoor access are a real asset, and personal development work is unusually explicit for a school of this size, particularly through its rights-respecting approach.
The main question is improvement momentum. For parents comfortable with a school that is honest about what needs to get better, and who want to see clear leadership action on phonics, early years provision, learning behaviours and curriculum consistency, Soudley can be a sensible choice. Those seeking a consistently high-ranked academic profile, or who want the reassurance of a Good or Outstanding judgement, may prefer to keep alternatives in view while tracking progress.
Soudley School has strengths in pastoral care, pupil safety, and community ethos, with safeguarding judged effective at the latest inspection. However, the school was rated Requires Improvement at its most recent full inspection, and families should look closely at how phonics, early years provision, and learning behaviours have improved since then.
Reception places are allocated by Gloucestershire’s coordinated admissions process and oversubscription criteria. The school is small and demand can exceed places, so families should review the local authority criteria carefully and apply on time. If you are moving mid-year, in-year admissions depend on space.
Breakfast Club is available daily from 8:00am. After-school provision beyond clubs is not clearly published in the same place, so families who need care beyond the end of the school day should confirm current arrangements directly with the school.
In 2024, 64% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, slightly above the England average of 62%. The higher standard figure was 16.67%, which is above the England average of 8%. Results can vary in small cohorts, so it is worth looking at trends.
Families typically consider Forest of Dean secondary options that serve the Cinderford area, including Dene Magna School and The Forest High School. The best fit will depend on catchment rules, transport, and the child’s needs, so it is worth researching transition support early in Year 6.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.