For families in Harwich and Dovercourt who want a straightforward, community-facing secondary with clear routines and a strong emphasis on reading, this is a school with a defined direction. The school’s public-facing message centres on working, reading and learning together, and the most recent inspection evidence aligns with that focus, describing regular opportunities to read challenging texts across subjects and a culture where pupils talk confidently about books.
This is a state school with no tuition fees. The profile is comprehensive and mixed, with a sixth form that is relatively small in size, and presented as a place where students are supported onto courses that fit their next steps.
The latest Ofsted inspection, carried out in late September 2021, judged the school Good across all graded areas, including sixth form provision.
The clearest defining feature is the school’s reading agenda. This is not limited to English lessons. Reading is positioned as a whole-school habit, with opportunities for pupils to encounter demanding texts in different subjects and build vocabulary as they go. The practical implication for families is that literacy is treated as a shared responsibility across the curriculum, which can help pupils who need more language exposure to access knowledge in humanities and science subjects, not just improve reading in isolation.
A second strand is the emphasis on calm, consistent expectations. The inspection evidence describes pupils as happy, well looked after, and generally behaving well with respectful relationships. Bullying is described as infrequent and dealt with quickly when it occurs, which matters because it signals a culture where issues are addressed early rather than normalised.
Pastoral systems include a specific internal structure designed to stabilise behaviour and re-establish learning routines for pupils who need it. The Curriculum and Achievement Support Academy is described as helping pupils remain in school and reintegrate into lessons when ready. The implication is that the school is aiming to reduce escalation and exclusion by providing an in-school route back into learning, although families should still ask how thresholds work and what reintegration looks like day to day for different year groups.
Leadership stability is another relevant factor. The headteacher is Kate Finch, and the headship is noted as being in place since February 2018. That length of tenure typically supports coherent implementation of curriculum and behaviour routines, particularly where the school is balancing academic and vocational pathways and managing a wide attainment range.
The overall attainment picture, based on FindMySchool’s proprietary rankings derived from official outcomes data, places the school below England average for GCSE performance. Ranked 2965th in England and 1st in Harwich for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), the school sits below England average overall, within the bottom 40% of schools in England on this measure.
That broad positioning does not mean pupils cannot do well here. It does mean families should look closely at subject choices, support, and how progress is tracked, especially for pupils who need stronger scaffolding in literacy or mathematics.
At GCSE, the school’s Attainment 8 score is 39.3. Progress 8 is -0.67, which indicates that, on average, pupils’ outcomes are below expectations when compared with pupils nationally who had similar starting points. In practice, this kind of score often points to a need for tighter curriculum sequencing, more consistent teaching routines, and stronger intervention for pupils who fall behind.
The English Baccalaureate profile also suggests an area for development. The percentage achieving grades 5 or above in the EBacc is 10.7, and the average EBacc APS is 3.39. These figures imply that the EBacc pathway is not yet producing strong grade outcomes for many pupils, even if entry to language and humanities subjects is increasing.
For sixth form, the FindMySchool A-level ranking is similarly challenging in national context. Ranked 2562nd in England and 1st in Harwich for A-level outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), the school sits below England average overall for this measure, within the bottom 40% of schools in England.
The A-level grade profile is low, with 6.9% of entries at A* to B. By comparison, the England average for A* to B is 47.2%. The implication is that families considering post-16 study here should ask detailed questions about study culture, guided independent learning, subject availability, and the extent of targeted academic support, particularly for courses that traditionally require high volumes of practice and exam technique.
Parents comparing nearby options can use the FindMySchool Local Hub to view GCSE and A-level outcomes side by side, then narrow down which schools warrant a visit based on the pattern that best fits their child.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
A-Level A*-B
6.9%
% of students achieving grades A*-B
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
Curriculum intent is described as carefully planned, with an emphasis on building knowledge over time. Mathematics is explicitly referenced as an example of step-by-step sequencing that supports pupils in solving harder problems, which is a meaningful detail because it signals a shift away from superficial coverage and towards cumulative learning.
Subject expertise is described as solid. Teachers are presented as knowing their subjects well and using in-class checks to identify gaps, then providing practice to consolidate learning. The practical implication for pupils is that lessons are designed to identify misunderstandings early and revisit skills, rather than letting errors persist until mock exams.
Where the school is still developing is consistency across year groups and for specific learners. Curriculum planning for older pupils is described as sometimes less well sequenced than elsewhere, which can make it harder for pupils to retain key knowledge. For families, that translates into a sensible question at open events: how does the school ensure Key Stage 4 curriculum plans are as tightly structured as Key Stage 3, and how is staff training used to align practice across departments?
Support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities is described as generally effective, but uneven in some classrooms where appropriate adaptations are not consistently used. The implication is that some pupils may progress well with the right teacher and classroom routines, but could struggle if adjustments are not embedded. For parents of pupils with SEND, it is reasonable to ask how strategies are shared, how staff are trained, and how leaders check the quality of classroom implementation.
The sixth form is described as small, with students accessing courses suited to their needs and being supported in their next steps. That scale can suit students who prefer a more personalised environment and clearer adult oversight, although it can also limit subject breadth and the number of groups per subject. Families should ask what the typical class sizes are for key subjects, and whether teaching is shared with other schools for specific options.
For leavers in the 2023 to 2024 cohort, the destination picture is mixed and includes multiple routes. 15% progressed to university, 5% to apprenticeships, and 33% moved into employment. This spread suggests the school is serving a diverse range of ambitions and readiness levels. For some students, a direct route into employment can be a positive and planned outcome, particularly if supported by careers guidance and meaningful work experience.
Careers education is described as effective, with students receiving independent advice and learning about local options, including routes within the school itself. The practical implication is that the school aims to keep post-16 decisions grounded in realistic progression steps rather than prestige markers alone.
The dataset does not provide usable Oxbridge acceptance figures for the relevant period, and the school does not publish an Oxbridge pipeline in the available evidence reviewed here, so it is not positioned as a primary differentiator for this sixth form.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
Year 7 admissions are coordinated by Essex, not handled solely by the school. For September 2026 entry, Essex confirms that applications made after 31 October 2025 are treated as late. In practice, that means families who miss the deadline can still apply, but late preferences are considered after on-time applications, reducing the likelihood of securing a preferred school if it is full.
Offer notifications for secondary places in Essex are tied to national offer day timings. Essex indicates that emails for online applicants for secondary places are sent on 2 March 2026.
This review dataset does not include a verified last distance offered for Year 7 entry, so it is not appropriate to frame admissions around a catchment distance threshold. Families who are distance-sensitive can use FindMySchoolMap Search to check how far their home is from the school gates, then compare that with any published local authority allocation data once available for the relevant year.
For sixth form entry, the clearest expectation to set is that requirements and timelines are typically school-led and vary by course. With a small sixth form, it is worth asking how internal progression from Year 11 is handled, what entry grades are required for specific subjects, and how the school supports students who need to bridge gaps from GCSE to A-level study.
Applications
229
Total received
Places Offered
221
Subscription Rate
1.0x
Apps per place
Pastoral support is presented as a school strength. Pupils are described as feeling safe and well looked after, with staff addressing bullying promptly when it occurs.
Safeguarding is also addressed directly in the published evidence. Inspectors confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective, and described a strong safeguarding culture with appropriate staff training and clear reporting systems.
Personal, social and health education is referenced as a valued element for pupils, supporting decision-making, safety, and healthy relationships. In practical terms, families may find reassurance that wellbeing and protective education are part of taught provision rather than left to occasional assemblies.
Trips and visits are used as a deliberate tool to widen experience beyond the immediate local area. Examples referenced include a Year 7 London trip and a Year 10 visit to Auschwitz. These are high-impact experiences. The educational implication is twofold: pupils are exposed to cultural capital that supports curriculum learning, and they are expected to engage with complex history and ethical questions in a structured way.
Reading also shows up here as an enrichment pillar rather than simply an academic intervention. The “reading school” initiative is described as providing many opportunities to read challenging texts, which can be reinforced through book-focused activities and structured expectations across subjects. This is particularly relevant for families whose child is capable but reluctant to read independently, because the environment normalises reading as part of school identity rather than an optional hobby.
Behaviour support is part of enrichment in the broad sense, because it protects access to clubs, trips, and classroom learning. The Curriculum and Achievement Support Academy is described as helping pupils take responsibility for behaviour and reintegrate. When this is implemented well, it reduces the number of pupils who lose learning time through repeated removals, which is often one of the hidden drivers of weak results in mixed-intake schools.
The school also presents itself as part of a wider trust, which matters mainly for curriculum collaboration and staff development. The Ofsted evidence notes that some sixth form lessons are shared with other schools in the trust. The practical implication is that students may gain access to a broader set of post-16 options than the school could run alone, although families should check the logistics and whether travel between sites is required.
Published details about the exact start and finish times of the school day were not accessible in the available evidence reviewed here. Families should confirm the current timetable directly before relying on wraparound planning, especially if transport connections or childcare handovers are tight.
For rail travel, Dovercourt station is nearby, and Harwich International station can also be relevant depending on the direction of travel. Both are managed by Greater Anglia. For bus travel, local services include routes that stop on or near Hall Lane in Dovercourt, and families should check the current timetable for the specific service pattern that matches their commute.
GCSE progress measures. The Progress 8 score of -0.67 suggests that many pupils, on average, are not achieving as well as similar pupils nationally. Families may want to ask how the school identifies pupils who are falling behind, and what changes have been made since the most recent published outcomes.
A-level outcomes and sixth form scale. With a small sixth form and a low A-level grade profile students considering post-16 study here should explore subject-by-subject support, independent study expectations, and how teaching is staffed for smaller classes.
Curriculum consistency for older pupils. External evidence notes that curriculum sequencing for older pupils is not always as strong as elsewhere. For parents of pupils entering Key Stage 4, it is worth asking how departments structure revision, retrieval, and cumulative knowledge.
SEND adaptation consistency. Support for pupils with SEND is described as generally effective but not consistently implemented by all teachers. Families with an EHCP or a child who needs specific classroom adjustments should probe how strategies are shared and monitored.
This is a Good-rated comprehensive secondary with a distinctive reading-led identity and a clear intent to keep pupils safe, settled, and learning. It may suit families who value structure, literacy focus, and a school that openly supports varied post-16 and employment pathways, including apprenticeships and work. The main challenge is that, on the published outcomes picture, results and progress measures are not yet where many families would want them to be, so it is best approached by visiting, asking detailed questions about improvement work, and ensuring the support offer matches your child’s needs and learning profile.
The school was judged Good in its most recent Ofsted inspection in September 2021, including Good for sixth form provision. The report describes pupils as safe and well looked after, with calm behaviour and a strong reading focus across the curriculum.
Applications for Year 7 are coordinated by Essex. For September 2026 entry, applications submitted after 31 October 2025 are treated as late, which can reduce the chances of securing a preferred school if places are limited.
Essex indicates that emails for online applicants are sent on 2 March 2026. Families applying on time should expect to receive their offer on that date.
Reading is positioned as a whole-school priority, with pupils encountering challenging texts across subjects and building vocabulary through regular reading activity. For families with a child who needs more confidence with reading, this approach can support access to the wider curriculum as well as English.
Yes, the school has a sixth form, described as small and focused on supporting students onto courses that match their needs and next steps. It may suit students who prefer a more personalised post-16 setting, though families should ask about subject breadth and the level of academic support for demanding A-level courses.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.