The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is a prep that leans into two priorities that do not always sit together, an unhurried childhood from age 2, and a highly organised preparation pathway to selective senior schools by the end of Year 8. Its setting near Danehill gives it the feel of a self-contained school community, with a nursery, pre-prep, prep and a small boarding provision for older pupils.
Leadership is stable and visible. Fergus Llewellyn is named as headmaster on both government and school documentation, and the school’s own history notes he is among a small number of heads in the post-war period.
The most recent Independent Schools Inspectorate inspection (October 2025) reports that the Standards are met across the assessed areas, including safeguarding.
The tone is deliberately family-facing. Internal documents describe a “traditional but forward-thinking” approach, rooted in Christian values and a strong emphasis on children feeling secure and known. The motto, Aim High, Be Kind, Dare to be Different, is used repeatedly across school materials, not as branding, but as a practical behavioural and pastoral reference point.
A notable feature is the school’s commitment to inclusion within a non-selective framework. The boarding handbook is explicit that “everyone is equal” in boarding life, and it sets expectations around tolerance, flexibility, and shared living that are age-appropriate for Year 7 and Year 8 pupils. This is helpful for families considering flexi-boarding as a gradual step towards senior school independence, rather than a full boarding commitment at 11 or 13.
Early years culture looks structured rather than informal. The nursery fee schedule describes a timetable that includes specialist sessions through the week (for example, swimming, music, and Forest School named as Woodpeckers Forest School), which signals a setting where “play-based” does not mean “hands-off”. The language is consistent with a routine-led nursery day that still gives children choice and agency.
. The more relevant question is how well pupils are prepared for entry to senior schools at 11-plus and 13-plus, and how consistently they secure scholarships and awards.
On that measure, the school publishes a clear track record. A school candidate information pack states that Year 8 leavers secured 26 scholarships in the referenced year, and that 46 leavers progressed to 17 different senior schools. A separate staff handbook summary also refers to over 125 scholarships to senior schools over a five-year period. These figures matter because they suggest breadth, pupils are not funnelled into one or two destination patterns, and success is spread across multiple routes.
The October 2025 inspection also supports the idea of a deliberate transition programme. It references specialist entrance examination guidance, study-skills sessions and interview practice for older pupils, and describes pupils as attentive learners who contribute thoughtfully in discussion.
Curriculum strength is framed around structure, subject expertise, and a willingness to add formal enrichment without turning the week into an endless carousel of activities. The October 2025 inspection highlights a well-structured curriculum and explicitly names the “kudos” programme in Years 7 and 8 as part of how the school builds skills and knowledge for the next stage. If your child responds well to clear routines and cumulative learning, that is a positive signal.
Facilities are unusually ambitious for a prep, and they appear designed to make specialist teaching realistic rather than occasional. The staff handbook lists a Science Centre with three laboratories plus a preparation room, alongside a design and technology studio, a full-size all-weather pitch, a nine-hole golf course, and Forest School provision. That combination tends to translate into more practical science, more making and building, and more outdoor learning that is planned rather than improvised.
Support for different learner profiles is described in detail in the SEND policy. The language is pragmatic, pupils with additional needs are welcome where they can access the curriculum with reasonable independence, and admission includes a taster day (or more than one) so the school can assess fit and resources before a place is confirmed. That approach is reassuring for families who want early clarity about what support will look like, rather than vague promises.
The school’s exit point is the end of Year 8, so the destinations conversation starts earlier than it would in many primaries. The practical implication is that families need to think about senior school strategy well before Year 6, particularly if they are aiming for scholarship pathways or selective entry at 13-plus.
Published school materials emphasise breadth of outcomes. The candidate information pack describes leavers moving on to a wide range of senior schools, with scholarships and awards forming a significant part of the story. The 2025 inspection adds detail on how preparation is handled, including entrance exam guidance and interview practice. Put together, the pattern looks like structured, coached progression rather than a “find your own way” approach.
For some families, this is exactly the value of a prep. For others, it introduces pressure earlier than they would like. The best fit tends to be families who want a broad base in the early years, but also want clear direction and support once senior school decisions become live.
Admissions are direct to the school, rather than local-authority coordinated. That matters for timing and for the feel of the process. Policies describe early assessment of fit, especially where additional needs are involved, using taster days as a core part of decision-making.
Because the school spans nursery through Year 8, there are multiple entry points. Nursery places are offered from age 2, and the nursery documentation describes both term-time and year-round patterns, which suits families who need childcare continuity rather than term-only coverage. For older entry points, school materials and inspection commentary indicate a transition focus in the last two years, including preparation for entrance exams and interviews.
Open events appear to run as an “Open Week” format, with the school advertising an Open Week from 9 to 13 March 2026. If you are aiming for a competitive entry point (for example, Year 4 bursary routes or later prep entry), treat open events as the start of the process rather than the point you make a final decision.
Parents shortlisting multiple prep options can use FindMySchool’s Saved Schools feature to keep notes on each entry point, then line up open events and taster days in one place.
Pastoral expectations are made explicit in both boarding and inspection materials. In boarding, the handbook focuses on community norms, sleep, respectful shared space, and clear boundaries around devices and privacy. One detail that will stand out to many parents is the statement that personal electronic devices are not permitted at school at any time, with additional restrictions around dormitory areas. That is a strong stance, and it will suit children who do best with clear limits and fewer digital distractions.
The 2025 inspection narrative places wellbeing alongside strategy and governance, describing systems intended to support pupils across school life. It also notes that leaders implement safeguarding measures effectively and that staff training is a strength, while highlighting a process improvement point about seeking local authority advice promptly when concerns may meet referral thresholds.
In day-to-day practical terms, health and safety provision includes a registered nurse on site during the main school day, and a wider first-aider structure that includes staff trained for early years, sport, and swimming. For active children and a school with significant sport and outdoor programming, that staffing model is relevant.
Co-curricular life is best understood here as “deep and practical” rather than “endless and superficial”. Inspection evidence and fee schedules both point to a programme with specific skill-building elements.
The 2025 inspection gives concrete examples: netball club focused on developing shooting and turning skills; art scholars using sewing machines safely; and a pre-prep drawing club that links creative design to literacy by asking pupils to add descriptive language to their work. Those examples signal a programme that is designed, supervised, and aligned to learning, not just entertainment.
For younger pupils, the fee schedule describes externally run after-school activities that can include ballet, modern dance, tennis, swimming, yoga, Spanish, drama, art, and robotics and coding, while older pupils can access staff-led enrichment blocks in the early evening. This is a good match for families who want variety without having to build an entire schedule of clubs outside school.
Music and performance routes appear well established. The 2022 inspection report references success in Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music exams and London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art examinations, and the fee schedule sets out an approach where specialist tuition is available as an extra. Even without quoting every detail, the broad message is clear, arts outcomes are treated as serious, assessed disciplines rather than occasional enrichment.
For 2025 to 2026, fees are published on a per-term basis and include lunch, break snacks, stationery, laundry, and personal accident insurance. Termly totals including VAT range from £3,106 (Reception after funding entitlement) to £9,428 (Years 5 to 8).
One-off costs published in the same schedule include a £240 registration fee and a £1,200 acceptance deposit.
On financial support, the school describes multiple routes: sibling discounts; music scholarship support (structured around instrument grades, with tuition support for up to two instruments under the conditions set out); hardship assistance; and The Cumnor Foundation, which is described as offering up to two fully-funded scholarships, means-tested annually, for children who could not otherwise access independent education.
Nursery fee details are published separately by the school; it is best to review the nursery schedule directly as patterns vary by session and by funded entitlement.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per term
Boarding is flexi rather than full, targeted at Year 7 and Year 8, and designed as an extension of the day school rather than a separate institution. That distinction matters. Children can access the social and independence benefits of boarding while keeping family routines intact during most of the week.
The 2025 inspection describes boarding as well managed, with a supportive culture and evening activities such as film nights and baking alongside supervised free time. The boarding handbook reinforces community expectations and practical routines, including sleep, tidiness, and respectful use of shared space.
For parents, the key question is not whether boarding exists, but why it exists. Here it looks like a transition tool, it helps pupils practise organisation, friendships, and independence before moving to senior schools where boarding or longer days may be the norm.
The school day is described as running from morning registration at 8:15am, with different finish times by age, and with structured attendance routines. For wraparound, the published fee schedule and staff handbook describe care extending from 7:00am to 7:00pm, plus holiday club options, which will appeal to families who need longer-day coverage without patching together multiple providers.
Transport specifics (such as dedicated bus routes or nearest rail links) are not consistently published in the documents available; most families should assume car travel and plan accordingly.
Parents comparing several schools can use FindMySchool’s Map Search to sanity-check daily travel time for morning drop-off and evening pick-up, especially if you are considering clubs, late supervision, or flexi-boarding patterns.
Senior school pressure starts earlier than in many primaries. With the main exit at the end of Year 8, families who want selective destinations will start planning before the end of primary age, and some children thrive on that clarity while others prefer a slower ramp-up.
Device boundaries are firm. Boarding documentation sets clear restrictions around personal electronic devices and privacy in boarding areas. That will suit many families; it may feel restrictive for others.
Safeguarding processes include a specific improvement point. Inspectors recommended strengthening the timeliness of seeking local authority advice when concerns might meet referral thresholds, even while reporting that safeguarding standards are met overall.
Costs extend beyond tuition. The fee schedule makes clear that “extras” can include trips, clubs, learning enhancement, and specialist tuition, so it is sensible to ask what a typical term looks like for your child’s likely pattern of activities.
This is a strong fit for families who want a genuinely broad prep experience, with specialist facilities, structured enrichment, and a clear runway to senior school destinations by Year 8. It particularly suits confident, active children who like practical learning, outdoor time, and well-defined routines.
The main decision is not whether the school offers enough, it does, but whether your child will enjoy the pace of senior-school preparation alongside an otherwise child-centred early years and prep experience. Families who want to shortlist seriously should attend an open event, ask how the “kudos” programme works in Years 7 and 8, and clarify what a typical term of extras looks like for your child.
The school’s most recent Independent Schools Inspectorate inspection in October 2025 reports that the Standards are met across the assessed areas, including safeguarding. It also describes high expectations in teaching, a well-structured curriculum, and strong preparation for senior school transition.
For 2025 to 2026, termly fees including VAT range from £3,106 (Reception after funding entitlement) to £9,428 (Years 5 to 8). Fees are published per term and include lunch and several compulsory items. Nursery fees are published separately by the school.
Yes, flexi-boarding is available for older pupils (Years 7 and 8), with an evening programme and structured routines designed to support independence and community life.
Admissions are direct to the school. Nursery operates from age 2, and school policies describe the use of taster sessions to support decision-making and ensure fit, especially where additional needs may require adjustments.
The school advertises an Open Week running from 9 to 13 March 2026. Families usually benefit most by visiting early, especially if considering entry beyond Nursery, because senior school planning tends to start earlier in a Year 8 leaver model.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.