The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is a large, mixed secondary in Prescot that is trying to move from recovery to consistency. The story of the last few years is one of raised ambition, tighter routines, and a curriculum that has been reshaped so that pupils learn more securely than they did previously. The latest Ofsted inspection (08 May 2024) judged the school as Requires Improvement across all judgement areas, while also confirming that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
Leadership is in a new phase. Matthew Reynolds took up the Principal role in September 2024, and the senior team now describes a clear emphasis on consistent teaching, reading development, and pupil conduct.
For families, the key question is fit and trajectory. The school offers scale, breadth, and improving systems, but current GCSE outcomes sit below England averages, and the inspection record points to variability, especially around behaviour at social times and attendance. The most suitable families tend to be those looking for a mainstream local secondary with strengthening routines, who are also ready to work closely with the school on attendance, organisation, and revision habits where needed.
The school signals its tone early through its stated values, “Kindness, Integrity, Tenacity”, which are positioned as practical expectations rather than a slogan. In day to day terms, this shows up through a focus on routines, behaviour systems, and tracking, including the use of ClassCharts to log and follow up behaviour events. That kind of approach can work well for pupils who respond to clear lines, quick feedback, and predictable consequences.
There is also a visible effort to give pupils a voice and a stake in how the community runs. The student council is presented as a functioning route for feedback, and formal reports note examples of pupils seeing their ideas acted on in practical ways. This matters because it hints at an underlying shift from “done to” school improvement to “done with”, which can strengthen belonging for pupils who might otherwise disengage in a big setting.
At the same time, the atmosphere is not uniformly settled yet. Formal evidence points to a split experience: behaviour in lessons is usually calm enough for learning, but social times can feel less consistent, with a minority of pupils slow to respond to staff direction, particularly when boisterous. For some pupils, that unpredictability at break and lunch can affect confidence and comfort.
A final strand of identity is history. The school references a long local legacy, and its own communications have described the institution as being in the area since 1544. That heritage can be a source of pride, but the more practical implication for parents is simpler: this is a school with deep roots in Prescot’s community and a long tradition of educating local families.
The headline for outcomes is that GCSE performance currently sits in the lower end of schools in England, and parents should read this alongside the school’s improvement narrative.
Ranked 3,581st in England and 39th in Liverpool for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data), performance sits below England average overall.
The supporting metrics reinforce that picture:
Attainment 8: 32.7.
Progress 8: -1.08, indicating pupils make less progress than similar pupils nationally from their starting points.
EBacc average point score: 2.76 compared with an England benchmark of 4.08.
A useful way to interpret this is through “what needs to go right” rather than labels. Formal evaluation notes that curriculum changes have improved ambition and ordering in most subjects, and that teachers generally have strong subject knowledge and explain ideas clearly. If that classroom quality becomes consistently paired with effective checking for understanding, and if attendance improves so pupils are present for the learning they need, outcomes would be expected to strengthen over time. The tension is that those two conditions, consistent teaching routines and strong attendance, are exactly the areas that still show unevenness.
Parents comparing local options can use the FindMySchool Local Hub pages and the Comparison Tool to line up GCSE rankings and progress measures across nearby schools, then test that shortlist against practical factors like travel time and the child’s temperament.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The curriculum has been reshaped in recent years, with an emphasis on being broad and ambitious, including for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities. The important point for families is that the school is not presenting curriculum as a loose menu. In most subjects, learning is intended to build step by step, so prior knowledge is revisited and extended rather than skipped over.
One practical mechanism that supports this is the use of subject knowledge organisers, which the school describes as a way for students to carry key information for each subject and term. For pupils who need structure to revise, this kind of tool can reduce the “blank page” problem, it gives a defined set of concepts and vocabulary to revisit regularly. The implication is strongest for pupils in Years 10 and 11 who can turn knowledge organisers into small, frequent recall practice, rather than relying on last minute revision.
Reading is treated as a priority area. The school reports annual reading assessment using GL Assessment’s NGRT, with follow up testing to identify specific needs and target support. The point for parents is not the brand of test, but the workflow: assess, diagnose, intervene, then recheck. For students whose subject learning is being held back by reading fluency or comprehension, this approach can improve access across the curriculum, not only in English.
Where teaching still needs to tighten, formal evidence points to two related issues: some teachers do not give enough opportunities for pupils to apply learning in varied contexts, and in some areas misconceptions are not identified and addressed quickly enough, so pupils move on before they are secure. For families, the implication is that independent revision habits and good attendance matter more than they might at a school where classroom checking is consistently precise, because gaps can otherwise persist.
Quality of Education
Requires Improvement
Behaviour & Attitudes
Requires Improvement
Personal Development
Requires Improvement
Leadership & Management
Requires Improvement
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
This is an 11 to 16 school, so the main transition is after Year 11. The most helpful indicator from formal evidence is the emphasis placed on careers education and next steps guidance. Pupils are described as receiving substantial careers information, leaving them well informed about future routes.
In practical terms, most students in this context will move into one of three pathways: sixth form, further education college, or apprenticeships and training routes. The school’s role is to help students choose a realistic route and meet entry requirements, especially where attendance, punctuality, and revision discipline have previously been weak spots. Careers guidance is most effective when it starts early, so parents of Year 9 and Year 10 students should ask how option choices connect to post 16 plans, and what support exists for applications and interviews.
Admissions are coordinated through Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council, rather than direct application to the school for Year 7 places. The school is also described as oversubscribed in recent years in the local authority’s published materials, which is a useful signal that demand is steady.
For September 2026 entry into Year 7, the published local timeline is:
Closing date for applications: 31 October 2025 (this deadline has already passed).
National offer day: 02 March 2026.
Appeal deadline (as published by the school): 27 March 2026 at 4pm.
If you are reading this after the main deadline, the relevant route is typically in year admissions via the local authority, and families should focus on practical questions: how quickly a new student can be assessed for reading gaps, whether there is space in key option subjects, and what pastoral support is in place for transition.
A useful way to plan is to treat admissions as two tracks: the formal application process, and the readiness process. The first is paperwork and deadlines, the second is the child’s organisation, attendance habits, and attitude to routines. Even with a place secured, students who struggle with punctuality and consistency are less likely to benefit from the curriculum improvements described in formal evaluation.
99.1%
1st preference success rate
108 of 109 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
188
Offers
188
Applications
293
Wellbeing support is framed as a structured offer rather than an informal promise. The school lists a range of support strands including confidence building, health and fitness guidance, mediation and conflict resolution, emotional support and counselling, anti bullying and online safety information, plus a KS3 GRIT programme. For pupils who need help regulating friendships, anxiety, or motivation, this kind of menu makes it easier for families to ask for the right support early.
SEND information is presented through a local offer and an information report that describes the difference between SEND Support and Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs), and how needs are identified and met. A practical strength highlighted in formal evaluation is that staff are given relevant information about pupils’ needs, helping teachers adapt delivery so pupils with SEND generally learn well alongside peers.
Behaviour and attendance sit at the centre of pastoral reality. The school’s behaviour policy is linked to tracking and staff training, and the platform approach supports follow up and consistency when it is used well. The harder challenge is the one noted in formal evidence: attendance and punctuality are not yet where they need to be for a large proportion of pupils, and this limits how much progress students can make, even when teaching is improving.
The enrichment offer is more specific than many schools publish, which helps families picture what day to day opportunities look like.
The school’s own enrichment listings include a mix of sport, performance, and identity based groups, for example:
British Weightlifting, Boxing Club, and Morning Gym Club.
KS3 Dance Club and Cheerleading.
LGBTQ+ Club and Environment Club.
A structured Year 11 study support pattern in core subjects, which signals that revision is expected to be organised, not improvised.
The implication for families is twofold. First, pupils who engage with clubs tend to build friendships and a sense of belonging more quickly, which can reduce behaviour issues at unstructured times. Second, the school itself is aware that uptake is uneven. Formal evidence notes that participation in trips and extracurricular is lower for some pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND, which limits the benefit of the wider offer. Parents of pupils who might opt out should ask what the school is doing to increase access, and whether there are targeted invitations, transport support, or staff encouragement for specific groups.
The published school day structure shows a start around 8:25am, with lessons running through to around 3:05pm, and a total of 32.5 hours provided across a typical week.
For travel, the school signposts home to school transport guidance through the local authority. In addition, Merseytravel publishes school service information, including a dedicated route listed as serving the school (Route 686). Families relying on buses should verify the current timetable and eligibility rules each year, particularly if travel is near the threshold for support.
Uniform expectations are presented as a core part of ethos, and the school has also described practical help for Year 7 families, including a voucher approach for a blazer during transition.
Current GCSE outcomes are below England average. Ranked 3,581st in England for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking), plus a Progress 8 score of -1.08, signals that many pupils are not yet making the progress they could. Families should ask how teaching routines and intervention work are changing in Year 10 and Year 11.
Attendance and punctuality remain a key risk factor. Formal evidence highlights a high level of absence and lateness for a considerable proportion of pupils, which directly limits learning and achievement. This is a school where home routines and school routines need to reinforce each other.
Behaviour can be more variable at social times. Most pupils behave well in lessons, but some pupils find break and lunch less predictable. For children who are anxious or easily unsettled, it is worth asking about supervision patterns, safe spaces, and how staff respond to boisterous behaviour.
Enrichment exists, but not everyone takes it up. The published club programme is broad, yet formal evidence suggests participation is lower for some groups, including pupils with SEND. Parents may need to actively encourage engagement to make sure their child benefits from the wider offer.
The Prescot School is a large local secondary that has put clear improvement structures in place, with curriculum ambition rising and reading and behaviour systems positioned as central levers. The latest official judgement remains Requires Improvement, and the academic metrics show that outcomes are currently below England averages, with attendance and social time behaviour still needing sustained tightening.
Who it suits: families in the Prescot area who want a mainstream, structured setting with a published enrichment programme, and who are willing to prioritise attendance, punctuality, and steady revision habits at home as well as in school. Families interested in this option can use the FindMySchool Saved Schools feature to track it against alternatives, then revisit the shortlist as updated inspection and results data are published.
The school has clear signs of improvement, including higher curriculum ambition and stronger classroom expectations, but the most recent Ofsted inspection (May 2024) judged it Requires Improvement. GCSE performance measures also sit below England averages, so families should weigh the direction of travel alongside current outcomes.
Year 7 applications are coordinated by Knowsley Council. For September 2026 entry, the published closing date was 31 October 2025, with offers due on 02 March 2026. If you missed the deadline, you would usually need to use the in year admissions route through the local authority.
The school’s Attainment 8 score is 32.7 and Progress 8 is -1.08, indicating lower progress than pupils with similar starting points nationally. In FindMySchool’s GCSE ranking based on official data, it sits 3,581st in England and 39th in Liverpool.
Reading is assessed annually using NGRT, with follow up testing to identify specific needs and target support. SEND information is published through the school’s local offer and SEND information report, and formal evidence notes that staff receive relevant information about pupil needs so teaching is adapted appropriately in many cases.
The published enrichment timetable includes sport and fitness options such as boxing, gym clubs, and British Weightlifting, alongside KS3 dance, cheerleading, and groups such as LGBTQ+ Club and Environment Club. The timetable also shows structured Year 11 revision sessions in several subjects.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.