This is an unusually small independent setting in Barnet, with a published capacity of 45 and a registered address at Woodside Park Synagogue in N12.
Public records also show an active period of change. A pre registration inspection (March 2024) described plans centred on a boys sixth form model (ages 15 to 18), while a later additional inspection (July 2025) was triggered by a request to change the registered age range to 11 to 13.
For parents, the practical implication is simple, treat this as a provider whose structure and age range may not look the same from one admission cycle to the next, and confirm the current offer directly before committing to an application.
What stands out most from the official evidence is that the organisation has been built around compliance planning and curriculum intent rather than a long operating track record. In both the March 2024 and July 2025 Ofsted documents, leaders are described as having written curriculum and assessment policies, planned assemblies and enrichment, and put safeguarding and governance arrangements in place, even when pupil numbers were limited or not yet established.
The physical base is clear, the registered site is at Woodside Park Synagogue, which strongly suggests a community rooted setting rather than a conventional school campus with dedicated sports grounds or specialist blocks.
Government performance services also indicate that no performance data is available or applicable for this provider in the standard comparison tables.
The fairest reading is that families should assess academic fit by interrogating the curriculum model, staffing, and the consistency of teaching routines, rather than expecting the usual published exam track record to do the filtering.
The most concrete curriculum detail comes from the inspection documentation. In March 2024, the proposed sixth form plan referenced A level study across a range of subjects including economics, geography, and Biblical Hebrew, alongside physical education and a programme of food and nutrition.
By July 2025, the emphasis had shifted to planning for boys aged 11 to 13, with schemes of work covering the required areas of learning, plus personal, social and health education (PSHE) and relationships and sex education (RSE). The same report also describes planned approaches to assessment and monitoring of academic progress.
Taken together, the intent points to a relatively structured model, with explicit planning for statutory content and a clear expectation that curriculum coverage will align with national requirements where relevant.
.
For sixth form families, the practical approach is to ask for recent leaver destinations with numbers, not just named universities or general statements. For younger entry (if the age range change proceeds), the key question becomes which Year 11 and post 16 routes pupils typically move into, and how transition is supported.
No official admissions calendar, entry testing detail, or application deadlines were found on an official school website, and the March 2024 inspection record explicitly lists the website as none.
That does not mean admissions are opaque, only that parents should expect a more direct, conversation led process than the standard local authority coordinated route used by state schools. A sensible checklist for enquiries is:
Current age range actually being admitted for the September intake you care about (post 16, Key Stage 3, or both)
Entry requirements and any assessment steps, plus how decisions are communicated
Whether places are offered rolling through the year or in a single cycle
What a typical week looks like, including taught hours, supervision outside lessons, and any enrichment expectations
The inspection evidence focuses on safeguarding readiness and on the planned structures that support pupils. The July 2025 report notes leaders discussing safeguarding arrangements as part of the inspection activity, and both reports emphasise planning for PSHE and RSE, plus attention to equality and protected characteristics.
For families, this indicates that wellbeing is intended to be handled through formal policy, PSHE delivery, and governance, rather than being left to informal culture alone. The limitation is that published evidence is largely about plans and compliance, not long running practice observed with pupils over time.
If extracurricular breadth matters to your child, ask for a current term list and push for operational details, who runs each activity, how often it meets, whether it is compulsory or optional, and how participation is tracked. In very small settings, opportunities can be excellent but naturally limited by cohort size, staffing, and venue constraints.
However, the March 2024 pre registration inspection documentation records an annual fee for day pupils of £15,000 at that point in planning. This should not be assumed to be the current figure for 2025 to 2026, it is best treated as a historical reference point that needs confirming directly with the provider.
No published bursary or scholarship figures were located in the official sources accessed. If affordability is a factor, ask explicitly whether means tested support is available and what evidence is required.
Fees data coming soon.
The official records accessed do not publish school day start and finish times, wraparound arrangements, or term dates. The March 2024 inspection paperwork also records no public website, which partly explains the absence of easily checkable operational detail.
For travel, the address is in Woodside Park (N12).
Evolving age range and offer. Public records show an active request to change the registered age range, which can affect curriculum structure, staffing, and peer group. Confirm the current intake model for your intended year of entry.
Limited published outcomes data. There are no usable performance benchmarks or in standard government comparison tables for this provider. You will need to rely more on direct evidence from the school.
Small cohort dynamics. A capacity of 45 can mean highly individual attention, but it can also mean fewer subject options, fewer teams, and a narrower social mix.
Fees clarity for 2025 to 2026. A specific 2025 to 2026 fee schedule is not publicly available in the sources accessed. Treat any historical figure as provisional until confirmed in writing.
This is a niche, small scale independent provider whose public evidence base is dominated by inspection documentation about readiness, compliance, and planned curriculum coverage, alongside a clear signal that its age range may be changing.
Who it suits is families who want a small setting and are willing to do due diligence directly with leaders on curriculum, staffing, and day to day routines, rather than relying on published exam outcomes and a conventional website presence. The main challenge is certainty, parents should verify the current age range, fees, and operational model for the specific entry year they care about.
The latest published inspection documents focus on whether the provider is likely to meet the independent school standards, rather than giving graded judgements. That can be reassuring on compliance, but families will still need to probe educational quality through meetings, curriculum materials, and staffing detail.
Public records show it was originally planned around a sixth form model, and a later inspection was linked to a request to change the registered age range to 11 to 13. Because this indicates active change, parents should confirm the current intake age range directly for the relevant September entry.
No official admissions calendar or deadlines were found on an official website, and an inspection record lists the website as none. Expect admissions to be handled directly with the provider, so you should request written details of entry requirements, assessment steps, and decision timelines.
The most recent published report is an Ofsted additional inspection dated 16 July 2025. Its overall outcome states that the school is likely to meet the relevant independent school standards if the material change relating to the school provision is implemented.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
