This is a small independent alternative provision in Eltham, commissioned by local authorities, schools, and youth agencies for young people who have experienced disruption in mainstream education. The school works with a capped roll and frames success as re engagement, improved attendance, and credible qualifications, alongside reintegration where appropriate.
The latest inspection outcome (January 2024) reinforces that positioning. Personal development stands out as a headline strength, while the overall quality judgement remains Good, with clear next steps around defining subject knowledge more precisely and building consistent reading across the curriculum.
Parents considering this setting are usually weighing fit more than status. For the right student, the draw is a personalised curriculum, careful induction, and a strong safety culture in a smaller environment.
The school presents itself as a nurture led alternative setting with a focus on re engagement and confidence building. It explicitly targets pupils who are at risk of exclusion or who have a history of disrupted education, including some with social, emotional and mental health needs.
Day to day expectations are structured. External review describes a calm and orderly environment, with pupils settling quickly and feeling well supported. That matters for families who want a reset from a negative mainstream cycle, because it signals that routines and relationships are deliberately engineered rather than left to chance.
Leadership roles are clearly identified. The head teacher is Will Conn, with Orlando Clement listed as executive head teacher, and Sonia Ramanah as proprietor and managing director. The school does not publicly set out the head teacher’s appointment date, so parents who want leadership tenure as part of their due diligence should ask directly.
A final point on identity: the school’s own messaging repeatedly emphasises “Motivate. Inspire. Create. Achieve.” as a guiding phrase, and you can see how that maps onto its curriculum emphasis on creative and technical learning alongside core subjects.
Headline performance needs careful interpretation because this is not a conventional intake. The school’s GCSE outcome profile sits in the lower band nationally on the FindMySchool ranking, which places it below England average overall (bottom 40% of schools in England, by percentile position). Specifically, it ranks 4,268th in England and 21st locally in Greenwich for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data).
Two implications flow from that. First, this is not the right choice for families primarily optimising for high grade volumes across a full EBacc suite. Second, the more useful question is whether the school secures credible progress for students who may be behind, anxious, disengaged, or excluded from their prior setting, because that is the cohort it exists to serve.
The available GCSE measures also hint at the curriculum balance. An average Attainment 8 score of 4.4 is recorded, with 0% recorded as achieving grade 5 or above in the EBacc measure provided. In a mainstream comprehensive, those figures would be a red flag. Here, they may reflect a model that prioritises re engagement, small group teaching, and a more vocationally aligned route for some pupils, rather than pushing every student through a traditional EBacc pathway.
If you are comparing multiple local options, use the FindMySchool Local Hub comparison tool to view the ranking context alongside other nearby alternative provisions and mainstream schools, so you are comparing like with like.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The curriculum is described as bespoke to individual need and context, with coherent skill building where it is tightly specified. Music technology and production are used as an example of structured progression, including using digital technology to record multiple instrumental and vocal tracks when students produce compositions. That specificity is useful for parents, because it shows a practical, sequenced model rather than a generic “creative” promise.
Staff capability is positioned as a core strength. Teachers are described as having secure subject knowledge, and the school highlights professional development as a leadership priority. In a small setting, this matters disproportionately, because the quality of teaching and relationships is concentrated in a small team, with less room to hide inconsistency.
Reading is given explicit attention. There are timetabled opportunities to practise reading, and pupils select books from school libraries. The improvement point is consistency across subjects, so families may want to ask how subject teachers build vocabulary and comprehension when students move from English into humanities, vocational units, and personal development content.
At post 16, provision is inspected separately and is described as ESFA funded. The most recent inspection for the post 16 provider took place in October 2022 and was judged Good. For families considering Year 12 entry or progression, the practical question is what “Good” translates to in outcomes, for example sustained destinations, functional skills progress, and work related learning.
The school’s destination story is best read through the lens of small cohorts and individualised routes. In the 2023/24 leaver cohort (six students), 17% progressed to apprenticeships, 17% to employment, and 17% to further education, with 0% recorded as moving directly to university.
For some families, a low university figure will be a deal breaker. For others, it will align with a plan that prioritises stabilisation, employability, and a realistic next step after a difficult period. What matters is whether the school can evidence appropriate progression for your child’s starting point, and whether there is a credible pathway into college, training, or employment with support.
Reintegration is explicitly described as effective, which is an important feature for students placed temporarily to avoid exclusion or to reset behaviour and attendance. Parents should ask what proportion of pupils reintegrate to mainstream, what timeframes are typical, and what “success” looks like when reintegration is not appropriate.
Admissions are not shaped like a standard independent day school with fixed entry deadlines, because places are typically commissioned by local authorities, schools, and youth agencies. The school describes working with multiple London local authorities and partner schools, and it frames its role as supportive education and reintegration provision.
The induction process is a key differentiator. External review describes a thorough approach that gathers information from parents, carers, and professionals before admission, including identifying special educational needs and disabilities and social, emotional and mental health needs. The implication for families is that the school is likely to ask for detailed background information and will use it to personalise strategies early, rather than waiting for problems to emerge.
The published admissions policy states the school is non selective and has an agreed admission number of 40 pupils. In practice, availability will be shaped by suitability, safeguarding considerations, and the commissioning route.
Open days are referenced as typically taking place in the autumn term. For current dates and whether booking is required, families should check directly with the school.
Pastoral support is positioned as central, with mentoring, counselling signposting, and links to external organisations for wider support needs. The school also sets out clear safeguarding processes and regular staff training, and safeguarding is reported as effective.
Attendance is treated as a priority, with an expectation of daily attendance and a named attendance officer. Importantly, the inspection narrative links attendance improvement to a positive atmosphere that encourages reluctant attenders to return. For families, that is often the make or break issue, because improved attendance is usually a prerequisite for any qualification progress.
Extracurriculars are used here as a confidence and engagement lever, not as a glossy add on. The school sets out several named clubs, including Book Club, Maths Club, and Music Club.
The Music Club description is unusually practical, with access to instruments such as keyboards, guitars, drums, and other percussion, plus opportunities to perform within and outside school. The implication is that creative participation can be part of a student’s re engagement plan, particularly for those who struggle to connect through purely academic routes.
Facilities and equipment appear to be a genuine feature. The school also references access to specialist creative resources through its wider organisational offer, including a DJ lab, an internet radio station, and professional studios. For families, the key question is how much of that is integrated into the weekly timetable for pupils, versus occasional enrichment. It is worth asking what a typical week looks like for a student on a music technology route compared with a more core GCSE route.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per year
The published contact information indicates opening hours of Monday to Friday, 9.00 to 16.00. Parents should confirm the daily timetable for their child’s programme, especially if transport is LA arranged.
Uniform expectations are clearly defined and relatively simple, with a focus on affordability and practical items, plus specified equipment such as a scientific calculator, USB memory stick, and wired headphones for music and media classes.
In travel terms, the school is on Eltham High Street. Local Transport for London mapping indicates nearby bus connections around Eltham station and surrounding stops, which may help families planning independent travel.
Fees for independent alternative provision can be complex because placements are often commissioned rather than parent paid. The most recent public figure appears in the standard inspection report published in March 2024, which lists annual day fees as £19,500. Families should confirm the current schedule for the 2025/26 year directly, and clarify whether it applies to their child’s route (commissioned placement, parent funded place, or post 16 ESFA funded provision).
For local authority referral style placements, one local authority alternative provision directory notes day rates starting at £165 per day excluding VAT, with additional support costs agreed during consultation. This suggests that actual cost can vary materially by student need and package.
The school does not publicly set out bursary or scholarship percentages in the sources reviewed, so parents who are self funding should ask what support, if any, is available and what the criteria are.
It is a specialist purpose setting. The school is designed for pupils with disrupted education or exclusion risk, and it may not suit students who are thriving in a mainstream environment and simply want a small independent school.
Traditional EBacc outcomes are not the headline. The FindMySchool GCSE ranking sits in the below average band for England, and EBacc measures in the available dataset are very low. Families should judge success against re engagement, attendance, and realistic next steps.
Post 16 is separate and route dependent. Post 16 provision is inspected separately and described as ESFA funded. Families should ask exactly which programmes are available, and what progression looks like for students aiming for college, training, apprenticeships, or employment.
Fees can be package based. Published annual fees exist, but commissioning and day rate models can mean costs vary significantly by placement type and support level.
StreetVibes Media Academy is best understood as an independent alternative provision built for re engagement, reintegration where appropriate, and a personalised curriculum with a clear creative and music technology thread. The latest inspection profile supports a strong safety and personal development culture, with a Good overall judgement. It suits students who need a smaller setting, a fresh start, and a programme that blends core learning with practical, motivating pathways. Families seeking a conventional high performing academic environment, or a full EBacc focused route, are likely to find a better fit elsewhere.
The most recent inspection (January 2024) judged overall effectiveness as Good, with personal development rated Outstanding. The school’s model is alternative provision for pupils who have experienced disruption in mainstream education, so “good” is often best assessed through re engagement, attendance improvement, and progression to the next step, rather than league table style outcomes.
The standard inspection report published in March 2024 lists annual day fees of £19,500. Because placements are often commissioned by local authorities or referring schools, families should confirm the 2025/26 position for their specific route, and whether additional support costs apply.
The school’s admissions are not usually driven by a single national deadline. Places are commonly arranged through local authority, school, or agency commissioning, and the school describes a detailed induction process that gathers professional and family information before admission. Open days are referenced as typically taking place in the autumn term, with exact dates confirmed by the school.
The school describes offering GCSEs, BTECs and other qualifications, and it states that it is an approved examination centre for GCSE, BTEC and Functional Skills. The curriculum specialism highlighted in the inspection report is music technology and production, with learning structured through digital production work alongside core subjects.
In the 2023/24 leaver cohort (six students), recorded destinations include apprenticeships, employment, and further education, with no recorded university progression. For families, the key due diligence is to ask what progression looks like for students with similar starting points, and how the school supports sustained destinations beyond the immediate next step.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
