The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Hujjat Primary School is a young, state funded primary that opened in September 2020, created as Harrow’s first Muslim free school and designed to grow to full capacity over time. Its identity is values-led and explicitly faith-informed, while admissions are structured to welcome families of all faiths and none through a split oversubscription model.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (10 to 11 January 2023) rated the school Good across all graded areas, including early years provision. The report describes a safe, orderly setting where pupils feel secure and staff relationships matter, with leaders building an ambitious curriculum for a growing school.
For families weighing it up in 2026, the practical picture is also quite concrete. The core day runs from 08:45 to 15:15, with wraparound care delivered by an external provider from 07:30 to 17:45. Admissions for Reception 2026 have a clear deadline, and the school is oversubscribed in the latest published demand data, so families need to be realistic about entry.
A school can be values-led in a vague way, or in a way that shows up in the small mechanics of the day. Here, the available evidence points to the second. Pupils are described as feeling safe and showing respect to each other, with bullying characterised as rare and addressed appropriately. That is not a minor detail for a new school still building its culture. It suggests systems that are already working, not just aspirations on a website.
The school’s faith character is not subtle, and for some families that will be a core reason to apply. The day structure explicitly includes moments of reflection and remembrance, and lunchtime is framed as a shared routine with prayers of gratitude. At the same time, the school’s public messaging emphasises learning about other faiths and cultures alongside confidence in one’s own. That combination often appeals to families who want a clear moral and spiritual framework, but do not want their child socially insulated.
Because the school is still relatively new, it has had to build identity quickly. One distinctive anchor is the site context. The school’s travel plan, written for its early operational phase, describes the building as originally constructed in 1932 as Harrow Weald County Grammar School and later refurbished for primary use. This matters for parents in a very practical way, because older sites can bring constraints around access, parking, and drop-off patterns, which the same document addresses through travel behaviour expectations and safety measures.
Leadership information is clear on both the school website and government records. The headteacher is Mr David Syed, and the deputy headteacher is Mrs S Saad. What is less clearly published in official sources is a precise headship start date, so any attempt to time-stamp leadership tenure should be treated cautiously unless the trust publishes it explicitly.
In the absence of published performance figures, the strongest available evidence sits in curriculum quality, learning routines, and the way reading is taught early. That is not a soft substitute. In primary, the foundations matter, and early reading is a leading indicator of later attainment.
Formal judgements place the school at Good overall at the most recent inspection, with Good recorded in quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, leadership and management, and early years provision.
Parents comparing local schools should use FindMySchool’s local hub pages to check side-by-side published performance outcomes as they appear for each school, particularly as Hujjat’s first complete cohorts move through Key Stage 2 and more comparable data becomes available.
What does a “growing school” do well when it is still building year groups? The clearest advantage is that curriculum design can be coherent from the start, rather than inherited. The inspection evidence describes an ambitious curriculum where leaders have identified important knowledge pupils should learn over time, with sequencing that supports revisiting and embedding ideas. In practice, that means pupils are less likely to experience the common primary problem of repeating activities without deepening understanding.
Reading is treated as a central building block from the earliest stages. The school day information describes phonics in Reception and Key Stage 1, daily guided reading in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, and an emphasis on comprehension as well as decoding. The inspection report reinforces this, noting that pupils read books that match the sounds they have learned and that intervention is put in place for pupils falling behind. The implication for families is straightforward. If your child needs structured early literacy teaching, this is exactly the kind of framework that can prevent small gaps becoming entrenched.
Support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities is also described as established rather than improvised. Leaders are said to have well-established approaches to identifying needs, and staff training supports adaptations so pupils can access the same curriculum as peers. That matters in a mainstream primary because the day-to-day reality of inclusion is not policy wording, it is whether teachers can change tasks and explanations without lowering expectations.
There is also one clear improvement point that parents should take seriously, because it goes directly to learning quality. At times, misconceptions are not identified and corrected swiftly enough, which can leave gaps. This is a common challenge in schools where curriculum ambition is high, because the pace can expose misunderstandings quickly. The practical question for parents visiting is how teachers check understanding in lessons, and what happens when a child gets something wrong repeatedly.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
For a primary school, the transition pathway matters, but Hujjat’s timeline is unusual because it opened in 2020 and has been expanding year by year. The school states it will reach Year 6 as the school grows, which means the first full set of end-of-primary transitions is a relatively recent or imminent development in 2026.
In Harrow, secondary transfer is coordinated through the local authority, and family choices typically involve a mix of local comprehensive schools, faith secondaries, and selective pathways where relevant. The most sensible approach is to treat Hujjat as one part of a longer plan and review secondary options early, not in Year 6. FindMySchool’s Map Search can help families understand how realistic different secondary options are, based on location and historical offer patterns.
If the school publishes named destinations or transition partnerships in future years, those will become a more concrete indicator than any generic statement about “moving on well”.
Admissions are one of the most distinctive parts of Hujjat’s offer, and families need to understand the mechanics rather than relying on general impressions.
For Reception entry, the school’s published guidance for September 2026 states that children born between 1 September 2021 and 31 August 2022 should apply via the local authority, with an additional step for those applying under faith criteria. The oversubscription approach is explicit. If applications exceed places, 30 places are allocated by reference to faith, and the remaining places are allocated with no reference to faith. That structure can suit two kinds of families. Those seeking a faith-informed education with admissions recognition of that commitment, and those who value the ethos but want reassurance that places are not exclusively faith-gated.
The published deadline for applications and supplementary forms for Reception 2026 is 15 January 2026. Harrow’s wider primary admissions timetable also matters, because offer day and response deadlines drive real decisions about housing, childcare, and contingency planning. The Harrow primary guide for 2025 to 2026 includes an April 2026 offer notification point and a deadline later that month for accepting or declining offers.
Demand is clearly high. In the latest available admissions demand data for this review, there were 172 applications for 60 offers, which is roughly 2.87 applications per place, and first preference demand exceeded first preference offers. This points to an admissions reality where ethos fit is not the only issue, competition is. Families should use the FindMySchool distance tools and shortlisting features to keep alternatives active rather than treating this as a certainty.
The school also notes that in-year applications can be made throughout the year via the local authority route, with an extra supplementary form step for those applying under faith criteria.
52.7%
1st preference success rate
59 of 112 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
60
Offers
60
Applications
172
A useful way to judge pastoral strength is to look for three elements, safety culture, routine clarity, and adult responsiveness. The inspection evidence supports all three. Pupils are described as being kept safe and feeling safe, and they are confident that concerns will be dealt with. That is reinforced by the school’s leadership structure naming a designated safeguarding lead within the senior team.
Behaviour appears to be managed through clear expectations and rewards linked to values and attendance, including small rituals that make it real for children. For many primary pupils, especially those who need predictability, this kind of consistent reinforcement is more effective than punitive escalation.
Wellbeing is also framed as a leadership responsibility. The inspection report notes staff support, including for wellbeing, which often correlates with lower churn and calmer classrooms.
Extracurricular life is where a new school can either feel thin, or surprisingly established. Hujjat’s published clubs grid for Autumn Term 2025 shows an offer that is more specific than many parents expect from a relatively young primary.
There is a creative and performance strand, including Choir (lunchtime), Arts and Crafts Club, Origami Club, and LAMDA sessions for Years 3 to 5. The implication is that confident speaking and performance can be supported early, not left until secondary school, which often suits pupils who are bright but reserved.
There is also a practical skills strand, including Cooking Club, Gardening Club, and Let’s Bake Club, plus a school journalism style activity labelled Hujjat Times Club under the heading “We Are Editors”. These are not filler clubs, they teach sequencing, teamwork, and the habit of completing a project, all of which support classroom learning.
Sport is present through football, gymnastics, badminton, and taekwondo, with some sessions provided externally. That breadth can matter for pupils who need movement to regulate attention, particularly in early years and Key Stage 1.
Wraparound care is delivered through ClubsComplete, and the school states availability from 07:30 to 17:45. For working families, this is a material advantage, because it reduces reliance on ad hoc childcare and makes the school day logistically workable.
The school day begins at 08:45, with Reception routines such as “Busy Fingers” described as a fine motor warm-up, and the day ends at 15:15 for pupils, with collection from classroom doors.
Wraparound care is available from 07:30 to 17:45 via an external provider, which is important to confirm directly if you need specific session times, pricing, or holiday coverage. Term dates for 2025 to 2026 are published on the school site, which helps families planning ahead for childcare and travel.
Transport and access are unusually well documented for a primary. The school’s travel plan describes the site on Brookshill (A409), shared access constraints, bus routes serving the area, and an expectation that families use walking, public transport, cycling, and scooting where possible. It also signals that parking restrictions and enforcement are a live consideration, so families who rely on driving should read the school’s travel expectations carefully.
Competition for places. Demand is strong, and the school is oversubscribed in the latest available admissions data. Have realistic alternatives ready alongside this preference.
Faith character is central. Islamic values and faith practices are integrated into the day structure. This will suit many families, but those seeking a more secular framework should reflect honestly on fit.
Learning checks need to be consistently sharp. The most recent inspection highlights that misconceptions are not always identified and corrected quickly enough, which can create gaps over time. Ask how teachers check understanding and how intervention works day to day.
A young school means evolving benchmarks. As cohorts reach Year 6 and more published outcomes appear, the data picture will become clearer. Parents should keep an eye on updated results as they are released.
Hujjat Primary School offers a clearly defined ethos, structured routines, and a day that is designed to work for families who need wraparound care. External evaluation places it securely in the Good bracket, with a curriculum that is ambitious for a growing school and a culture where pupils feel safe.
Who it suits: families who want a state funded primary with an explicit Islamic values framework, strong behaviour expectations, and a practical school day that supports working patterns.
The main challenge is admission. Oversubscription means fit alone is not enough, you also need a realistic plan for securing a place and for what you will do if you do not.
The most recent Ofsted inspection (January 2023) rated the school Good overall, including Good judgements for quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, and early years provision. The report also describes pupils as feeling safe and leaders as ambitious for what pupils can learn over time.
Yes. It is a state funded free school, so there are no tuition fees. Families should still budget for typical school costs such as uniform, trips, and some optional clubs.
Applications are made through the local authority route, and if you are applying under the faith criteria you also need to submit the school’s supplementary information form directly to the school. The published deadline for applications and supplementary forms for Reception 2026 is 15 January 2026.
Yes. The school states that wraparound care is run by ClubsComplete and is available from 07:30 to 17:45. Availability of specific sessions and holiday provision is best confirmed directly with the provider.
The published programme includes Choir, LAMDA, Forest School Club, Arts and Crafts Club, Origami Club, Cooking Club, Gardening Club, Hujjat Times Club, taekwondo, badminton, football, gymnastics, and mindfulness sessions, with some delivered by external providers.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.