The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Hornsby House School is the sort of London prep where parents typically judge “results” less by published test tables and more by how confidently children move on at 11. That transition picture is a genuine strength here, with a long list of senior-school destinations and a culture that treats scholarships as a bonus rather than the only goal.
Leadership is well-established. Mr Edward Rees has been Headmaster since September 2012, long enough to embed consistent routines and a clear house culture running from Reception to Year 6.
The most recent Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI) inspection (19 to 21 March 2024) found that the Independent School Standards were met across leadership and governance, education, wellbeing, contribution to society, and safeguarding. The report’s single “next step” is also telling, it is about consistency of planning and clarity in a minority of teaching, rather than any systemic deficit.
Hornsby House was founded in 1988 by Professor Bevé Hornsby, and the origins still show in the school’s emphasis on inclusive practice and teaching approaches that work for different learners, not just the obviously academic.
A distinctive feature is how deliberately the school builds “whole-school” identity at a relatively young age. The House System is framed as a shared story from Reception through Year 6, with children encouraged to take responsibility, show initiative, and see themselves as contributors rather than passengers.
The 2024 inspection paints an environment where pupils feel safe and supported, and where behaviour is positive because expectations are applied consistently. Bullying and discriminatory behaviour are treated as unacceptable, and pupils are described as secure and well supervised across the day.
You also get a sense of a school that prioritises talk and relationships, not just rules. “Wellbeing club” and “chat and chill” sessions are highlighted as informal, accessible spaces for pupils to bring worries to trusted adults, a practical mechanism that matters in a busy London setting where family schedules can be tight and children can carry more than parents realise.
For an independent primary, the most useful “outcomes” evidence is usually a blend of inspection findings, internal progress tracking, and senior-school destinations. On the inspection side, pupils are described as achieving well and being well prepared for their secondary schools, with assessment and feedback helping pupils understand what to do next.
The academic picture is not presented as one-size-fits-all. The report notes effective support for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, and for pupils with English as an additional language, with these pupils making good progress when teaching and support are well matched.
A key nuance, and one parents should take seriously, is the inspection’s point about variability. Where teaching is less well planned or explanations lack clarity, progress is slower. That is a manageable issue, but it is still the most “academic” critique in the current evidence base, and worth probing on a visit: how is lesson quality checked, and how are weaker pockets supported to improve?
Families comparing options can use the FindMySchool Local Hub pages to line up nearby schools’ published performance indicators, even though the most decision-relevant data for an independent prep will often be the 11-plus destination pattern and the fit for your child.
The school’s curriculum is designed as a continuous journey from Reception to Year 6, with increasing demands year by year and a conscious effort to build skills, not just cover content.
Inspection evidence gives helpful specifics about what “good learning” looks like here. Teaching often stimulates interest and excitement, building positive attitudes and a desire to learn, while careful assessment and marking help pupils understand how to improve. In the strongest examples, pupils collaborate, reflect, and deepen understanding through clear teacher explanations and well pitched tasks.
Support systems for different learners appear well integrated. Teaching assistants are described as contributing effectively to progress for pupils who need extra scaffolding, and external professionals are used where appropriate for language support. For parents, the implication is that this is not a school that expects every child to “keep up” unaided, but it will still be important to understand the boundary between everyday classroom support and charged add-ons such as learning support lessons.
This is where Hornsby House most clearly signals its purpose as a London prep, it prepares pupils for a spread of senior schools at 11-plus rather than feeding one destination by default.
The school publishes a detailed 11-plus destinations document (2023 leavers) showing offers, acceptances, and awards across a range of well known London independents. In that year, examples include Streatham and Clapham High School (12 acceptances), Emanuel School (10), and Whitgift School (8), alongside destinations such as Alleyn’s, James Allen’s Girls’ School, Dulwich College, and Epsom College. Scholarships and awards are also recorded by type across these destinations.
The inspection report reinforces that pupils are well prepared for their next schools, which aligns with the destination pattern above.
For parents, the practical implication is that conversations in Years 4 to 6 are likely to include a steady drumbeat of “where next”. That can be motivating for children who enjoy targets and variety, but some families will want to be careful about overloading a child with external expectations too early.
Admissions at Hornsby House are age-sensitive and structured around different entry points.
Reception entry is unassessed, and places are offered in order of the child’s age at registration (based on elapsed time between date of birth and date of registration), with priority also noted for registered siblings and children of staff and alumni.
For Years 1 to 6, entry is assessed. Applicants typically spend a morning in school, and the assessment includes reading, writing, and maths, with reasoning added for Years 3 to 6, plus a group activity and a report request from the previous school.
The school explicitly encourages early registration, and the current online registration information states a registration fee of £125 paid during the process.
If offered a place, families are asked to pay a £2,500 deposit to secure it (with terms around deduction from the final term under the notice conditions set out in the admissions policy).
Given the London prep market, families should treat timelines as an annual cycle rather than a single deadline. The admissions policy describes the school contacting parents around 16 months prior to entry and issuing offers during the Spring Term for the following academic year, with a short response window.
Parents weighing competitive local options can use the FindMySchool Map Search to sense-check commute practicality and shortlisting, especially if you are considering more than one possible “next school” at 11-plus.
Pastoral support shows up in the inspection evidence as a blend of systems and culture. Pupils are described as safe and supported, with well trained staff taking account of academic, emotional and physical needs. Safeguarding arrangements are judged effective, including recruitment checks, staff training, and systems for recording and acting on concerns.
The school also appears to make “everyday wellbeing” visible rather than leaving it to chance. The presence of “wellbeing club” and “chat and chill” is an example of a low-barrier approach, children do not need to be in crisis to access support.
For families with children who need learning support, the inspection highlights identification and support for pupils with SEND, and progress linked to effective teaching assistant support and adapted activities. That is encouraging, but parents should still ask how plans are coordinated and how the school decides when external specialists are needed.
The co-curricular picture is one of breadth with some unusually concrete examples.
On the practical, skills-based end, the inspection report gives a vivid snapshot of cookery club, where pupils learn safe techniques such as chopping and peeling, and cook items such as apple crumble.
On the sport and physical development side, golf coaching using specially weighted clubs and putters is cited as building chipping and putting skills, and specialist ballet teaching is referenced as improving dance skills.
There are also community-facing activities that help pupils see beyond the school gate. The inspection mentions a gardening club working with a local social enterprise as part of a “beautify Balham” campaign, and school choirs performing in local care homes, alongside pupil involvement in community visits and charitable initiatives.
Enterprise and “real world” thinking are also present. An entrepreneurial week is described, including collaborative work and a Year 6 competition to develop a business concept, with the winning team allocated funds to realise the idea at the summer fair.
The implication for parents is that extracurricular life here is not only about CV building. Much of it is designed to grow practical competence, confidence speaking to adults, and comfort working in teams.
Hornsby House is an independent school, so fees are a central part of decision-making.
From September 2025, published termly fees are:
Lower School: £7,530 per term, inclusive of VAT
Upper School: £8,082 per term, inclusive of VAT
The school also states that fully catered lunches are compulsory and charged as an additional £411 per term.
On financial support, the admissions policy notes that assistance with fees may be offered based on an assessment carried out by a third party, and that the school offers a small number of music scholarships on an annual basis.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per term
As a London day prep, daily logistics matter as much as philosophy.
The school promotes before and after school clubs and wraparound options, but specific start and finish times are not consistently surfaced in the public material captured for this review, so families should confirm operational hours, booking requirements, and holiday coverage directly during enquiry.
For travel, the Balham and Wandsworth Common area offers multiple public transport routes, but the day-to-day reality for many families is the walkability of the final stretch. When shortlisting, focus on what mornings will feel like in winter, not just what looks possible on a map.
Teaching consistency. The latest inspection’s main improvement point is unevenness in a minority of teaching, with slower progress where planning and clarity are weaker. Ask how lesson quality is checked and supported.
Early registration culture. Reception places are offered by age at registration, and the school actively recommends registering as early as possible. That structure can feel stressful if you are new to the London prep market.
Costs beyond tuition. Lunch is a compulsory extra cost per term, and learning support lessons are separately priced, so it is worth modelling realistic total costs for your child’s needs.
11-plus intensity varies by child. The published destination pattern is strong, but it can also create a “where next” focus from mid-school upwards. Consider whether your child is motivated by that, or pressured by it.
Hornsby House School suits families who want a co-educational London prep with an established head, a clear pastoral framework, and a demonstrably busy pathway into selective senior schools at 11. The school’s tone is inclusive, with wellbeing mechanisms that are practical rather than performative, and extracurriculars that build real competence, from cookery to enterprise.
Who it suits: children who respond well to structure, enjoy a broad curriculum, and will benefit from steady preparation for a range of 11-plus destinations. The challenge is less about whether the school offers opportunity, and more about navigating the early registration and the cumulative cost of a London independent prep.
The latest ISI inspection (March 2024) found that the Independent School Standards were met across leadership and governance, education, wellbeing, contribution to society, and safeguarding. The main development point was improving consistency in a minority of teaching so that progress is consistently good across all subjects and year groups.
From September 2025, fees are £7,530 per term for Lower School and £8,082 per term for Upper School, inclusive of VAT. Fully catered lunches are compulsory and cost £411 per term in addition.
Reception entry is unassessed. The admissions policy states that places are offered in order of the child’s age at registration, with priority also noted for registered siblings and children of staff and alumni.
Yes. The admissions policy describes applicants spending a morning in school and completing reading, writing and maths tasks, with reasoning included for Years 3 to 6, plus a group activity and a report request from the previous school.
The school publishes a destinations document showing a spread of London independent senior schools. Examples in the 2023 destinations list include Streatham and Clapham High School, Emanuel, Whitgift, Alleyn’s, James Allen’s Girls’ School and Dulwich College, with acceptances and awards recorded.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
