A long established Lowestoft secondary with an unusual blend of heritage and practicality, the academy’s roots go back to 1910, and its historic main building is Grade II listed.
The most recent inspection, in March 2025, judged all four Ofsted key areas as Good, which signals a markedly more positive external view than the academy has had in the past. Results data still points to outcomes that are below many schools across England, so the central question for families is trajectory, how quickly stronger teaching and calmer routines translate into exam performance. The school’s offer is broad, with structured support for reading, behaviour, attendance and post 16 decision making, and an enrichment programme that runs beyond the formal timetable.
There is a distinctive sense of place here. The academy’s history page sets out a clear lineage from its founding in 1910, with the main building designed by Brown and Kerr and described as having a Queen Anne façade. That heritage matters less day to day than what it represents, a school that has served the north Lowestoft area through multiple reorganisations, including the shift to an 11 to 16 intake in 2011 and the move into Ormiston Academies Trust in 2013.
The tone presented to students is purposeful and expectation led. The published values language emphasises aspiration and respectful conduct, and staff positions such as attendance and safeguarding leadership are prominent in academy communications, which usually correlates with tighter routines and a clearer behaviour culture.
In day to day experience, the academy places a strong emphasis on students feeling secure and treated fairly. The March 2025 inspection report describes calm lessons, clear expectations, and a school where students recognise recent improvement. Parents weighing this option should treat that as an important signal, especially given that sustained improvement in behaviour and attendance is often the precondition for better outcomes in mixed intake secondaries.
Leadership is stable and clearly front and centre in public communications. The academy lists Mrs K Williams as Principal, and national education databases also record Mrs Kate Williams as the headteacher or principal.
Outcomes data is mixed, with a clear improvement narrative from inspection evidence, but performance measures that remain challenging.
Ranked 3,441st in England and 3rd in Lowestoft for GCSE outcomes. This places the academy below England average overall, within the lower performance band nationally.
On the core measures provided, the picture looks like this:
Attainment 8: 35.7
Progress 8: -0.38
EBacc average point score: 3.08, compared with an England average of 4.08
Percentage achieving grade 5 or above in the EBacc: 6.3
For parents, the practical implication is that a student’s experience is likely to depend heavily on subject level consistency. A negative Progress 8 figure indicates that, historically, students have made less progress than similar students nationally from their starting points. The more encouraging counterweight is that the latest inspection evidence points to stronger curriculum planning and clearer teaching routines, which can take time to appear in headline exam measures.
If you are comparing schools locally, use the FindMySchool Local Hub comparison tools to place these figures alongside nearby alternatives, paying particular attention to Progress 8 and EBacc entry patterns, which often reflect curriculum ambition and how well schools serve a full ability range.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
Curriculum intent is clearly articulated. The academy describes a broad Key Stage 3, then greater specialisation from Year 10, which is the standard structure families would expect in an 11 to 16 setting.
At Key Stage 4, published curriculum information shows a conventional core, with time allocations that indicate sustained focus on English and mathematics, and a wide options menu that includes both academic and applied routes. Options information includes arts subjects such as photography and dance, and vocational style choices such as health and social care and travel and tourism, alongside EBacc options such as history, geography and languages. The implication for families is flexibility, students who need a practical pathway can build one, while those aiming for academic routes can keep EBacc doors open.
Reading is treated as a foundational priority. The March 2025 inspection report describes regular opportunities for reading across the school day, with Key Stage 3 students reading to an adult and trained staff supporting weaker readers to build accuracy and fluency. This is a meaningful detail because structured reading support in Years 7 to 9 often drives improvements across subjects over time.
There is no sixth form, so every student makes a post 16 transition at the end of Year 11. This tends to sharpen the academy’s focus on careers guidance, applications and readiness for the next setting, because there is no internal Year 12 destination.
The latest inspection report describes a comprehensive careers and guidance programme, including work experience placements, aimed at helping students make informed choices about next steps. For families, the key question to explore is how that guidance is tailored, for example, what support is provided for college applications, apprenticeship pathways, and students who need additional confidence building to sustain participation after 16.
A sensible approach is to ask, early in Year 10, what the timeline looks like for personal guidance interviews, work experience preparation, and support with applications. Where possible, align option choices in Year 9 with realistic post 16 plans, while leaving enough breadth to adapt if interests change.
Quality of Education
Requires Improvement
Behaviour & Attitudes
Requires Improvement
Personal Development
Requires Improvement
Leadership & Management
Requires Improvement
Year 7 admissions are coordinated through Suffolk’s normal admissions process rather than direct application to the academy. The academy states a published admission number of 200 places per year group.
For September 2026 entry, Suffolk’s deadline for the common application form was 31 October 2025, with outcomes available on 2 March 2026 (National Offer Day in Suffolk for that cycle). Even if you are reading this later, the pattern is consistent, applications open in early autumn of the preceding year and close in late October, with offers in early March.
Oversubscription is handled through published criteria and proximity once higher priority categories are applied. The academy notes that if applicants are tied by equal distance, a random allocation process is used, independently verified.
Open events are typically scheduled in both the autumn and summer terms, and the academy also indicates that tours can be arranged outside those windows. If you are applying for a later intake, treat term based open event references as typical timing and confirm the live schedule directly with the school.
Applications
160
Total received
Places Offered
171
Subscription Rate
0.9x
Apps per place
Support structures are a visible part of the academy’s improvement approach. The inspection report highlights that behaviour routines have become more consistent and that the number of suspensions has fallen during the year of inspection, linked to clearer application of policy and effective pastoral support.
Two named provisions, The Bridge and Thrive, are described in the inspection report as highly effective in helping students manage feelings and behaviour so learning can take priority. For parents, the practical implication is that the school is not simply expecting behaviour to improve through sanctions, it is putting staffed support in place for students who need structured intervention.
Student leadership is also positioned as a strength, with roles such as prefects and ambassadors referenced in the inspection report, which often indicates a deliberate effort to build belonging and responsibility, particularly for older students.
Enrichment is presented as a core strand rather than an optional extra. The academy runs lunchtime and after school activities and notes that students can attend without booking, which reduces barriers for students who may not have strong parental logistics support. Enrichment is also explicitly framed as employability and life skills development, not just recreation.
The most convincing details are where extracurricular connects to academic ambition. The mathematics department notes an opportunity for students to study Further Maths GCSE through extracurricular provision in Key Stage 4, which is a strong signal for more able mathematicians who want stretch beyond the standard curriculum.
Sport is a visible pillar. The academy’s on site Community Sports Centre includes a sports hall set up for multiple court sports and five a side, and the facilities listing describes a floodlit all weather 3G pitch, as well as grass pitches and a gymnasium. The implication for students is simple, there is capacity for regular fixtures, clubs and training without needing to rely heavily on off site venues.
There is also evidence of a broader cultural programme. The inspection report references musical productions and enrichment days, which suggests that performance and whole school events are part of the annual rhythm rather than occasional add ons.
The published school day sets out a structured timetable, with breakfast available from 07:45, students expected on site by 08:35, and after school clubs and quiet study spaces available until 16:15. That matters for working families, because it indicates supervised time beyond the final bell without necessarily implying a formal wraparound care model.
Travel and site logistics are also addressed. The academy notes that it is open from 08:00 to 16:00 on weekdays, and that vehicle access is restricted at the end of the day because the driveway barrier closes briefly during peak dismissal time. For families who drive, it is worth planning drop off and pick up routines carefully. The parent handbook also states there is a no drop off policy on site and encourages drop off on nearby roads with a short walk.
This is a state funded school with no tuition fees. Families should still budget for the usual secondary costs such as uniform, equipment, trips and optional activities, and confirm what support is available if affordability is a concern.
Outcomes are still a work in progress. The latest inspection judgements are positive, but published GCSE performance measures remain below many schools across England. This suits families who value improvement momentum and strong routines, but it may not be the right fit for those seeking consistently high exam outcomes today.
No sixth form means an earlier transition. Every student moves on after Year 11, so families should be comfortable with a clear post 16 planning process, and should engage with guidance early rather than leaving decisions to late Year 11.
Site access rules can be inconvenient. The academy’s approach to traffic management reduces congestion risk, but it can be awkward for families expecting on site car access at peak times, particularly if students have after school commitments.
Ormiston Denes Academy looks like a school on an improvement path that is being recognised externally, with Good judgements across Ofsted’s key areas in March 2025 and a curriculum and pastoral model that prioritises calm classrooms, reading, and structured support. Outcomes data is still the weaker part of the picture, so the fit is strongest for families who want a broad 11 to 16 education with clear routines, strong pastoral scaffolding, and plenty to do beyond lessons, and who are prepared to engage actively with learning and post 16 planning. Entry is through Suffolk’s coordinated admissions process, so practical planning around deadlines remains essential.
The most recent inspection in March 2025 judged all four Ofsted key areas as Good, which is a strong sign of improved quality of education, behaviour culture, personal development and leadership. Outcomes measures still sit below many schools across England, so families should read “good” here as a sign of stronger provision and direction, with results improvement likely to be the next test.
There are no tuition fees because this is a state funded secondary school. Families should still expect typical costs such as uniform, equipment, trips and optional activities, and should ask the school what support is available where affordability is a concern.
Applications are made through Suffolk’s coordinated admissions process rather than directly to the academy. For the September 2026 intake, the closing date was 31 October 2025 and Suffolk’s offer day was 2 March 2026. In most years, the pattern is similar, apply in early autumn of the preceding year and expect offers in early March.
The academy’s FindMySchool GCSE ranking is 3,441st in England and 3rd in Lowestoft, which places it below England average overall. The Progress 8 figure is negative, indicating that historically students have made less progress than similar students nationally from their starting points. This sits alongside inspection evidence that teaching and curriculum are improving, so families should think in terms of trajectory as well as current outcomes.
The academy has strengthened routines and pastoral support, and the latest inspection report describes a calmer learning environment and improved consistency in applying behaviour expectations. Named support provisions, The Bridge and Thrive, are described as helping students manage behaviour and feelings so learning is protected.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.