The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Set in the Cheshire village of Mottram St Andrew, this is a small, single-form-entry primary with nursery provision and a long local history. The academy opened on its current site in 1908, and later converted to academy status on 01 April 2011.
On the evidence available, the school’s strengths sit in three places: pupils’ outcomes at the end of Year 6, a reading culture built on systematic phonics, and a calm climate where pupils report feeling safe and cared for. External scrutiny aligns with that picture, with the most recent inspection (June 2021) confirming the school continued to be Good, and safeguarding arrangements being effective.
Leadership is stable, with Miss Jean Willerton named as headteacher, and governance information indicating a headteacher appointment date of 01 September 2017.
A small primary can feel either intense or close-knit; the available evidence suggests the balance here leans toward purposeful and friendly. The 2021 inspection record describes pupils as happy, keen to learn, and confident that adults listen and deal quickly with concerns such as bullying if it arises. It also notes that pupils value relationships with staff, and that behaviour is strong in lessons and around school.
The school’s age range runs from 3 to 11, so the early years matter to the overall tone. Official evaluation describes children getting off to a strong start, with adults who understand how young children learn and plan varied opportunities to deepen learning and extend interests. In practical terms, that usually shows up as a Reception and nursery phase that feels structured rather than informal, with clear routines and carefully-chosen activities rather than a free-for-all.
The academy also runs pupil roles that give children a stake in school life. The inspection record highlights responsibilities such as house captains and school councillors, with pupils describing how these roles help them improve the school. For families, this matters because a small school can sometimes struggle to offer leadership opportunities beyond the obvious sports captain roles, and structured responsibilities help pupils practise speaking up, representing peers, and taking responsibility.
Nursery is part of the picture, but it is important to separate “nursery attendance” from “guaranteed progression”. The nursery admissions policy is explicit that nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place the following year, even though nursery attendance can be part of the Reception oversubscription criteria.
The published end of Key Stage 2 outcomes indicate a very strong year for Year 6.
Reading, writing and maths (expected standard): 89.33% (England average: 62%).
Reading scaled score: 108 and maths scaled score: 107.
Higher standard in reading, writing and maths: 33.33% (England average: 8%).
Science expected standard: 88% (England average: 82%).
These figures place the school well above England averages across the headline measures. They also suggest strength at the top end, with around one-third reaching the higher standard in the combined measure, far above the England benchmark.
In the FindMySchool proprietary ranking based on official outcomes data, the school is ranked 2,181st in England for primary outcomes, and 7th in the local area of Macclesfield. That translates to performance above the England average, placing it comfortably within the top 25% of primary schools in England, and around the top 15% by rank position. (FindMySchool ranking.)
A useful way to interpret this is reliability rather than perfection. A single year’s KS2 results can spike or dip in any small school because cohort sizes are modest. Even so, results at this level typically reflect systems that are working, such as early reading, explicit teaching sequences, and consistent expectations.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
89.33%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
The strongest publicly evidenced academic feature is reading. The 2021 inspection record describes a clear leadership focus on ensuring every child learns to read, including phonics from Reception, staff training, careful matching of books to taught phonics, regular progress checks, and targeted extra help when pupils need to catch up.
The practical implication for parents is that early reading is less likely to be left to chance. In a primary setting, this matters because reading fluency is the gateway skill; if children read well by the end of Key Stage 1, they typically access the full curriculum more confidently in Key Stage 2.
Mathematics is also described positively, with teachers planning activities that build on prior knowledge and giving pupils time to revisit learning where understanding is insecure. For families, this tends to translate into fewer “gaps that snowball”, especially for pupils who need repetition to secure core number and calculation skills.
The inspection record also includes a constructive area for development that is relevant to parents who care about a broad curriculum. It notes that, outside English and maths, some subject leaders did not yet have a clear understanding of what children learn in early years in certain subjects, and that some curriculum plans did not start from early years. It also flags that assessment systems in some foundation subjects were still developing after the disruption of the pandemic period.
That is not a red flag in itself, but it is worth understanding what it can mean in day-to-day learning. Where early foundations in subjects such as history, geography, art, or design and technology are less clearly mapped, progression can be slightly less consistent, and teachers may have to do more “catch-up” later. Parents who prioritise a tightly-sequenced foundation curriculum should ask how subject leaders have developed curriculum maps and assessment since 2021.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Outstanding
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
For most families, the key transition question is Year 6 to Year 7. While primary schools rarely publish a full destination breakdown, there is clear evidence that the local secondary pattern includes The Fallibroome Academy as a recognised feeder destination, with admissions documentation listing Mottram St Andrew among feeder primaries.
In practical terms, this means families should treat the primary decision as linked to secondary planning. The most useful approach is to review the secondary admissions rules alongside the primary choice, and to use mapping tools to understand how distance and feeder criteria interact year by year.
For pupils who are already working at the higher standard by Year 6, the academic foundation suggests they will be well placed for a strong start at secondary. The key “fit” question then becomes pace and pressure: whether a child thrives on challenge, or does best with a steadier ramp-up.
There are two admissions routes to understand: nursery entry and Reception entry.
Reception admissions are coordinated through Cheshire East Council, with the school’s published admission number set at 26 pupils in Reception.
The school’s 2026 to 2027 admissions policy sets out the oversubscription criteria, including:
looked-after and previously looked-after children,
designated catchment area (with a map available from the school),
siblings,
nursery children meeting a specified attendance condition,
children of staff (with a service-length condition),
then distance measured in a straight line using the National Land and Property Gazetteer method.
For timing, the local authority’s published timetable for September 2026 entry sets out the key dates clearly:
applications available from 01 September 2025,
closing date 15 January 2026,
offers made 16 April 2026,
acceptance deadline 30 April 2026.
Demand, suggests competition is real rather than extreme. For the recorded year, there were 56 applications for 26 offers, around 2.15 applications per place, and the entry route is recorded as oversubscribed.
A practical tip is to use FindMySchool’s Map Search to understand how your home location relates to published catchment guidance and to typical distance-based allocation patterns in Cheshire East. It does not guarantee an outcome, but it improves decision-making.
Nursery entry is handled directly via the academy’s nursery admissions arrangements. The nursery policy sets a maximum of 16 places in any one session, and specifies the September 2026 nursery cohort as children turning three between 01 September 2025 and 31 August 2026 (birth dates 01 September 2022 to 31 August 2023).
It also includes specific dates for the nursery process:
closing date 16 January 2026 at 9am,
offers made 23 January 2026,
acceptance by 13 February 2026.
A key nuance is again made explicit: nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place.
96.0%
1st preference success rate
24 of 25 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
26
Offers
26
Applications
56
Safeguarding information published by the academy identifies named safeguarding leads, including the headteacher as designated safeguarding lead and a deputy DSL structure. This is the kind of operational clarity parents should expect, because it signals that safeguarding is organised as a system, not as an assumption.
The June 2021 inspection report confirms safeguarding arrangements were effective, and describes staff training, clear systems for raising concerns, and effective work with other professionals where families need support.
Beyond formal safeguarding, wellbeing in a primary setting often shows up in behaviour norms and relationships. The inspection record indicates pupils feel safe, behaviour is calm, and staff respond quickly to concerns. For many families, that is the difference between a school day that feels manageable and one that feels emotionally draining.
The school’s enrichment programme is unusually well-documented, and gives a clear sense of the practical offer rather than generic claims. In the January to February 2026 enrichment brochure, activities include Wild Club, Lego Club, Story Club, Young Art, Craft and Sewing, Futsal, Netball, Dodgeball, and multi-sports sessions offered free for specific year groups.
This matters for two reasons.
First, it shows extracurricular life is planned and timetabled, not ad hoc. Sessions run after school in structured blocks through the week, which typically helps working families coordinate pickup routines.
Second, the content is varied in the way parents often mean when they say “breadth”. Wild Club includes practical nature activities such as shelter building, sowing a vegetable garden, and making seed bombs, which tends to suit pupils who learn best through hands-on experiences. Lego Club has an explicit design brief style, such as designing an eco village or floating city, which can appeal to pupils who like practical problem-solving and talking through their models.
There are costs in the programme, and they vary by club. The brochure indicates most clubs are priced at £5.00 per session, with cookery priced at £13 per session to include ingredients, while some multi-sports sessions are free. The practical implication is that enrichment is accessible, but families using multiple paid sessions per week should budget across a half-term.
8.45am to 3.15pm, totalling 32.5 hours per week. Pupils can arrive during the registration window from 8.45am to 9.00am.
the school publishes wraparound provision from 7.45am to 6.00pm. For parents who need childcare outside the school day, this is a meaningful practical advantage over schools that rely entirely on third-party providers.
the school does not publish specific public transport guidance on its website. Families usually solve this by planning routes around the nearest larger towns and then checking current bus and train options separately, as services can change. If you are relying on public transport, it is worth doing a test run at school-run times.
Competition for Reception places. The recorded year shows 56 applications for 26 offers, and the entry route is recorded as oversubscribed. This is not an automatic barrier, but it does mean you should treat admissions as a process rather than an assumption, and read the oversubscription criteria carefully.
Nursery is not a guaranteed pathway. Nursery attendance can help within the Reception oversubscription criteria, but the nursery policy is explicit that nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place the following year. Families hoping to “secure the place early” should plan for that uncertainty.
Foundation subject sequencing has been an improvement area. External evaluation in 2021 highlighted that curriculum sequencing from early years, and assessment systems in some foundation subjects, needed further development. Parents who want strong history, geography, and wider curriculum progression should ask what has changed since that inspection cycle.
Small-school dynamics. With a PAN of 26, each cohort is compact. This can be excellent for knowing children well, but it can also mean fewer friendship options if a peer relationship becomes difficult. This is best explored through how the school handles friendship issues, peer mediation, and structured play support.
For a state primary with nursery provision, this is a compelling mix of strong Year 6 outcomes, a clearly evidenced approach to early reading, and practical wraparound care that supports working families. It suits pupils who respond well to clear routines and high expectations, and families who value academic security without losing the feel of a smaller community.
The main challenge is admissions, particularly for Reception, where oversubscription and criteria details matter. Families who shortlist it should pair the school visit with a careful read of Cheshire East’s application timetable and the academy’s oversubscription rules, and use shortlist tools such as FindMySchool’s Saved Schools feature to keep deadlines and comparisons organised.
The most recent inspection (June 2021) confirmed the school continued to be Good, and that safeguarding arrangements were effective. Outcomes data also indicates very strong Key Stage 2 results, with 89.33% reaching the expected standard in reading, writing and maths, well above the England average of 62%.
The admissions policy refers to a designated catchment area, with a map available from the school. If the school is oversubscribed, catchment can be a priority category ahead of distance, so it is sensible to request the catchment map and confirm your home address position before applying.
No. The nursery admissions policy explicitly states that nursery attendance does not guarantee a Reception place the following year, even though nursery attendance can form part of Reception oversubscription criteria.
Applications are coordinated through Cheshire East. The published timetable for September 2026 entry lists 15 January 2026 as the closing date, with offers made on 16 April 2026. If you live outside Cheshire East, you apply through your home local authority but still follow the same deadline pattern.
The school publishes wraparound care availability from 7.45am to 6.00pm, alongside an after-school enrichment programme that runs across the week.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.