Ellesmere Park High School Review 2026: A structured, inclusive 11–16 offer with a clear enrichment spine

Ellesmere Park High School is a mixed, state-funded secondary in Eccles (Salford), serving students aged 11 to 16 and operating as part of Consilium Academies. A defining feature is the school’s emphasis on inclusion, including a resourced strand supporting students with education, health and care plans, alongside mainstream provision.

Leadership stability is also a notable element. Mr I Ross is listed as Headteacher from 01 September 2019, and the school’s published staffing list shows him as Principal.

On quality assurance, the latest Ofsted inspection graded the school Good across all judgements, with safeguarding confirmed as effective (inspection 11–12 July 2023; report published 27 September 2023).

The school’s own language is direct and easy to understand, built around three values: being Vibrant, being Inclusive, and being Proud. The helpful point for parents is that these are defined in practical terms, not left as slogans. “Vibrant” is explained as education that is lively and memorable; “Inclusive” is framed around removing barriers so students can fulfil their potential; “Proud” is about belonging and self-belief. That clarity tends to translate well into day-to-day expectations, because staff and students have a shared vocabulary for behaviour, effort, and participation.

In the official picture, pupils are described as happy in school and positive about learning, with a sense of belonging linked to charity work and community contribution. It is also clear that leaders place weight on calm routines, respectful relationships, and rapid response when poor language or discrimination appears.

The inclusion story is more than a generic statement. The school describes a “whole child, whole school” approach and sets out a named SEND team, including a SENDCO and an Enhanced Resource Provision manager. For families who need clarity on who does what, this matters because it signals defined accountability rather than informal goodwill.

A further contextual feature in 2025–26 is significant site development work. The school has described phased building activity, including dining expansion, modular classrooms for one year, and strict segregation of construction areas from students. For many families, the practical implication is mixed, improved capacity and facilities over time, with a need to ask sensible questions about day-to-day site movement and noise management during works.

This is an 11–16 school, so the headline measures are GCSE-focused rather than A-level outcomes.

In the FindMySchool GCSE outcomes ranking (a proprietary ranking based on official data), Ellesmere Park High School is ranked 3091st in England and 70th in the local area listed as Manchester. This performance sits below England average, within the bottom 40% of ranked schools in England.

Looking at the underlying measures available here:

• Attainment 8 is 42.7.

• Progress 8 is -0.28, which indicates students, on average, make less progress than peers with similar prior attainment across England.

• EBacc average point score is 3.25.

These figures suggest the school’s priorities are likely to centre on securing consistent progress across subjects, tightening curriculum precision where needed, and ensuring assessment checks reliably identify misconceptions early enough to correct them. The wider context is important too: a school can be the right choice for many children even when results are not top-quartile, particularly when pastoral systems, inclusion capacity, and enrichment access are strong and consistent.

For parents comparing options locally, the FindMySchool Local Hub pages and the Comparison Tool can help you place these measures side-by-side with nearby schools, using the same methodology for each.

The curriculum model is structured around a two-week timetable, designed so that both weeks are similar, with 25 hours of lessons per week. That sort of model often benefits students who do best with predictable routines, because it limits the “different every week” effect that can unsettle organisation and homework habits.

The most recent official evaluation also indicates recent curriculum refinement, especially in key stage 3. In most subjects, leaders have organised the knowledge students should learn; in a smaller number of subjects, leaders were expected to define more precisely what should be remembered long term, and ensure assessment aligns tightly to that knowledge. The practical implication for families is that teaching is broadly secure, with some variation between departments, so it is sensible to ask subject-specific questions at open events, particularly about how understanding is checked and revisited over time.

Literacy is treated as a whole-school priority. Reading is positioned as a route to attainment, engagement, enrichment, and intervention. The school also uses Accelerated Reader and Star Reading assessments, with students completing Star Reading three times per year to set targets and monitor growth. For students who arrive with weaker literacy foundations, a structured assessment and target cycle can be a real advantage, because it turns reading support into a tracked programme rather than informal encouragement.

Because the school finishes at 16, the “next step” conversation is about post-16 pathways in the local area rather than internal sixth form progression.

The official narrative describes students as successful in applications to an ambitious range of post-16 destinations, supported by a thorough careers programme. That matters in practical terms because strong careers education at 11–16 can reduce the risk of students drifting into ill-fitting courses after GCSEs. The school’s careers and guidance information also frames routes in a balanced way, covering academic and technical options and apprenticeships, which is often what families want to see from a modern 11–16.

If you are shortlisting, it is worth mapping likely destinations early. Different sixth forms and colleges have different entry requirements and subject availability, so the best route is usually to discuss likely pathways from Year 9 onwards, not just after results day.

Admissions are coordinated through Salford City Council. The school is clear that its admissions policy is administered by the local authority, and it publishes the planned admission number for the Year 7 cohort for 2026 as 180.

For September 2026 entry, Salford’s published timeline states: applications open on 01 September 2025 and close on 31 October 2025, with offers viewable for on-time online applicants on 02 March 2026. This matters because late applications are processed after on-time applications, which can materially change what is available.

Demand indicators in the available admissions data point to competition for places. The most recent figures available here show 467 applications for 177 offers, with an applications-to-offers ratio of 2.64 and the route marked oversubscribed. A first-preference ratio of 1.15 indicates that first preferences exceeded available offers. The practical implication is that parents should treat admission as uncertain unless they are confident they meet the highest priority criteria in the published admissions arrangements.

Open events often help families judge fit. In the 2025 open evening listings for Salford, Ellesmere Park High School is shown with an open evening on 25 September 2025, which supports the broader pattern that open evenings typically run in late September during the application period. Dates can change year to year, so families should rely on the published listings for the relevant cycle.

If distance or local priority criteria are relevant in a given year, families should use the FindMySchoolMap Search to check their precise position relative to the school, then compare that with historical allocation patterns. Even where distance is not the only criterion, it commonly becomes decisive once priority groups are applied.

The anti-bullying approach is described plainly, with a “zero-tolerance” stance and a named student leadership role through Anti-Bullying Ambassadors. The practical value here is that students have visible peer contacts as well as adults, and the school describes specific mechanisms for raising concerns, including a “bully box” and direct reporting routes through staff.

The wider wellbeing content is presented as a set of resources and signposting, covering online safety, mental health support, and external services for students and families. While this style of page is not the same as describing in-school counselling capacity, it does indicate a culture where asking for help is normalised and where safeguarding themes are addressed explicitly, including online risk.

For students with additional needs, the SEND structure is set out clearly, including leadership roles and the Enhanced Resource Provision manager. The school also sets the expectation that all staff share responsibility for supporting SEND, which is usually important for mainstream lessons, because it reduces the risk of support being siloed into one department.

The enrichment programme is unusually easy to evaluate because the school publishes a structured weekly schedule. That matters because many schools describe clubs in broad terms, whereas a timetable lets parents see whether opportunities are routine, supervised, and accessible across the week.

A few examples that give a clear sense of breadth:

• Maths Axiom Club and a Maths Homework Club, indicating targeted academic extension and support.

• Journalism Club, which tends to suit students who enjoy writing, interviewing, and producing content with deadlines.

• Dungeons and Dragons club, a strong indicator of provision for students who thrive socially in structured, interest-led groups.

• International Film Club, typically helpful for cultural literacy and language learners.

• Core Drama and Beginners Drama, plus KS4 Music, showing creative pathways beyond just curriculum arts lessons.

Sport is also represented across the week, including netball, football (KS3 and older year groups), rugby, and a girls-only PE slot. For many families, the key implication is not simply “there is sport”, but that sport appears across multiple days and formats, lunch and after school, which increases the chance a student can participate even with transport constraints.

A distinctive whole-school event mentioned in the official narrative is the annual Ellesmere Parklife music festival, which is framed as a performance opportunity for students. There is also a published news item describing an event model influenced by Manchester’s Parklife festival, with extensive student performances. This adds texture for parents who want to know whether performance is occasional or embedded in the school calendar.

The published school day timings for 2025–26 show arrival at 08:35 (bell), form time from 08:40, and lessons running through to 15:10.

Before-school provision appears in the enrichment timetable via Breakfast Club. After-school enrichment runs on multiple days, although families should confirm how late individual sessions run and what supervision exists for students waiting for collection.

For term dates, the school publishes a full calendar for 2025–26, including INSET days and holiday periods, which is useful for planning childcare and travel.

• Results profile and progress. A Progress 8 score of -0.28 indicates below-average progress from key stage 2 baselines across England. Families who want a strongly exam-driven environment may prefer to compare several local options carefully using consistent measures.

• Admission competition. With 467 applications for 177 offers in the most recent available data and the route marked oversubscribed, entry can be uncertain without strong priority criteria.

• Ongoing building works. The school is in the middle of phased development, including a temporary modular building and construction segregation. This should bring long-term benefit, but it is worth asking how movement, dining, and sport spaces operate while works continue.

• Department-to-department consistency. The official evaluation indicates most subjects have strong curriculum organisation, with a smaller number still tightening long-term knowledge and assessment alignment. If your child has clear subject strengths or vulnerabilities, ask targeted questions about how learning is checked and revisited.

Ellesmere Park High School will suit families looking for a mainstream 11–16 with a clear inclusion offer, a visible enrichment timetable, and structured routines, including a consistent school day model and whole-school literacy systems. The biggest decision factors are whether the results profile fits your child’s needs, and whether you are comfortable with admission competitiveness and ongoing site works. For students who benefit from clear expectations, steady pastoral structures, and interest-led clubs alongside mainstream provision, it can be a sensible and supportive option.