The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is a community infant school with early years provision, taking children from age 2 through to the end of Year 2 (age 7). It serves a compact local area and is closely tied into wider family support locally through Pebbles Children's Centre.
The feel is purposeful and warm, with calm classrooms and clear routines. Pupils are described as happy, considerate, and confident about approaching trusted adults if something is worrying them. Those messages matter at an infant school, because secure relationships are the foundation for literacy, language, and behaviour at this age.
The latest Ofsted inspection (July 2023) confirmed that the school continues to be Good.
A lot of the school’s identity is built around belonging and community. The published mission statement focuses on children becoming honest, active citizens and lifelong learners, and the inspection evidence backs up the practical side of that ambition, pupils learn about difference, respect, and healthy relationships early, not as a one-off theme.
The early years phase is a substantial part of the setting, so the atmosphere is shaped as much by Nursery and Reception as by Key Stage 1. The early years approach is explicitly play-based alongside small-group learning, designed around immersive, stimulating environments led by experienced practitioners. For families, that usually translates into a setting that values language development, routines, and exploration, rather than rushing children into formal work too early.
Leadership and staffing are clearly presented. The headteacher is Mrs Jo Orbell, and she was in post by March 2012, based on historic inspection documentation; the current inspection report names Joanna Orbell as headteacher. Key roles are signposted too, including SEN coordination, which matters in a school serving ages where needs often become clear for the first time.
Because the school’s oldest pupils are in Year 2, there is no Key Stage 2 data to use here, and a “results” conversation looks different. The most meaningful evidence is how well the curriculum is structured for early reading, early maths, and the foundational knowledge children need before they move on at age 7.
The curriculum story in the 2023 inspection is a strong one. Leaders are described as having put in place an ambitious curriculum from Nursery to Year 2, with most subjects sequenced so that children build knowledge in a deliberate order. The report gives mathematics as a clear example, with steps mapped so early number concepts in Nursery and Reception prepare children for Key Stage 1 work.
Early reading is treated as a priority and the school has responded to weaker reading outcomes previously by refining phonics. The inspection notes that leaders improved the way phonics is taught and that current pupils are learning to read well, with additional activities used when children start to fall behind.
A useful parent-facing detail is the school’s explanation of how reading and phonics are organised. Children read books matched to their phonological ability, and the phonics programme used is Super Sonic Phonic Friends (described as a Department for Education validated programme). That “book match” point is not a marketing extra, it is one of the practical features that often makes the difference for early confidence and fluency.
Learning here is built around two distinct, but connected phases.
In Nursery and Reception, teaching is intentionally mixed, small-group teaching sits alongside structured play and exploration. The aim is to develop early language, communication, and physical skills while building routines that later support more formal learning. This model suits many children well, particularly those who need to gain confidence in speaking, listening, and self-regulation before literacy becomes more explicit.
In Year 1 and Year 2, the school follows the national curriculum, but it emphasises an active transition from Early Years Foundation Stage into Key Stage 1, so children build on prior learning while continuing to use creative and active approaches. That continuity can be a real strength in infant schools, because it reduces the “cliff edge” some children experience after Reception.
Curriculum design is unusually transparent for a small setting. The school states that it uses a progressive curriculum to ensure sequence and progression across core and foundation subjects. In maths and music, it references White Rose Maths and Charanga as supporting schemes. For parents, the practical implication is consistency, staff are not starting from scratch each year group, but they still retain flexibility to respond to children’s needs.
There are also honest development points. The 2023 inspection identifies a small number of non-core subjects that are not yet as precisely sequenced as the strongest areas, and it flags that not all staff are trained well enough to provide the most precise support for a small number of pupils with the most complex SEND needs. Those are not red flags, but they are the right questions to explore if your child needs high-consistency specialist support.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
This is an infant school, so families need a plan for transition at 7+ (Year 3). The school’s nursery admissions policy states that pupils from the defined area normally transfer to Orchard Academy or Jubilee Wood Primary School.
That statement is useful because it gives parents a realistic local pathway early, rather than leaving the Year 2 to Year 3 move as a surprise. The implication is straightforward, if you are choosing this school for Nursery, Reception, or Key Stage 1, you should look ahead now at junior options and how those admissions are handled.
It is also important to understand that a nursery place does not guarantee a Reception place. The nursery admissions policy is explicit that Reception admissions follow the normal local authority process regardless of nursery attendance.
Reception admissions are coordinated by Milton Keynes City Council, not handled directly by the school. For September 2026 entry, the council timetable is clear:
Applications open 02 September 2025
Closing date 15 January 2026
National Offer Day 16 April 2026
The council also operates an equal preference scheme, meaning schools consider applications without knowing where they sit on your preference list; if more than one school can offer a place, your highest preference is the one allocated.
Demand for places is meaningful. In the available admissions snapshot, there were 59 applications for 34 offers, and the school is classified as oversubscribed, equating to 1.74 applications per offer. This is not “exam school” competition, but it is enough to make planning, catchment understanding, and backup choices sensible.
Published school admissions information indicates a catchment centred on Fishermead and adjacent parts of south central Milton Keynes, with distance used as the final tie-break when other priorities do not separate applicants.
The school handles applications for Time for Twos and Nursery places directly, rather than through the council. The nursery admissions policy describes a main September intake, with places allocated from an applicant list in April for a September start, and occasional additional entry points if space allows. It sets out oversubscription priorities including looked-after children, siblings, catchment, and then distance.
Nursery also sits within the wider national funding context. The policy notes funded places from the term following a child’s third birthday, and families should confirm how 15-hour and 30-hour entitlements apply to their child’s pattern of attendance.
100%
1st preference success rate
34 of 34 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
34
Offers
34
Applications
59
Pastoral strength at infant level is about consistency and safety, not grand programmes. The inspection picture is reassuring: pupils know who to talk to, feel safe, and learn explicitly how to keep themselves safe, including online safety as age-appropriate.
SEND support is described as ambitious and inclusive, with needs identified quickly and many pupils benefiting from specialist support. The current development work is about precision for the small number with the most complex needs, and making sure practice is consistently strong across all staff.
Support roles appear clearly in school communications. For example, the school bulletin identifies a Learning Support Mentor who families can book to discuss attendance support and practical solutions. For some families, that is the difference between a school that notices an issue and a school that actively helps fix it.
Safeguarding is treated seriously. The 2023 inspection confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective, including staff training to identify concerns, swift follow-up, and detailed record-keeping with persistence in working with external agencies.
Extracurricular at infant level works best when it is structured but flexible, and the evidence points that way here.
The school council is used as a genuine voice for children. In the inspection narrative, pupils help shape aspects of school life such as clubs, and this led to a rotation of activities including pottery, den building, and tennis club. That mix is a good indicator of breadth, creative work, outdoor play, and early sport.
Clubs and enrichment also show up in day-to-day communications. A January 2026 bulletin describes an inspirational visit from Olympian Peter Bakare, with a follow-on Nutri Troops after-school club planned after half term. The same bulletin lists a Board Games Club, plus a run of after-school “super clubs” such as Art Club, Pizza Club, and Film Club.
Wraparound provision is also positioned as enrichment, not only childcare. The on-site 3-2-6 club describes cooking, crafts, technology, and outdoor games, with children contributing ideas for future sessions. For working families, that can turn the after-school slot into something children look forward to, rather than just an extension of the day.
The core school day for Reception to Year 2 runs with doors opening at 8.35am, registration at 8.45am, and end-of-day doors opening at 3.15pm. Nursery sessions run on a morning, afternoon, or full-day pattern with published start and finish times.
Wraparound extends the day from 8.00am to 6.00pm. Breakfast Club runs from 8.00am, is free for school-aged children, and remains chargeable for nursery children at £2.50 per session.
After-school care can be structured in tiers. Extended pick-up to 3.45pm is £3 per session, and the 3-2-6 club offers a half session to 4.30pm for £8 or a full session to 6.00pm for £15, with a late collection charge of £5 if no session has been booked.
Competition for Reception places. The school is oversubscribed in the available demand snapshot, with 59 applications for 34 offers (1.74 applications per offer). Families who are set on this option should understand how catchment and distance operate, and include realistic alternatives on the council form.
Nursery is not a guaranteed route into Reception. The nursery admissions policy is explicit that a nursery place does not automatically confer admission to Reception, the local authority process still applies.
A planned move at 7+. Pupils typically transfer on to Orchard Academy or Jubilee Wood Primary School at 7+, which works well if you like a staged model, but it does mean you are choosing a pathway rather than a single through-primary experience.
SEND precision is an active development area. External review highlights that support is being refined for a small number of pupils with the most complex needs, and that staff training consistency is part of that work. If your child needs highly specialist, highly consistent support, ask direct questions about staffing, training, and day-to-day strategies.
This is a well-organised infant setting with a clear early-years identity, a calm climate for learning, and a strong focus on early reading, early maths, and personal development. Wraparound provision is unusually detailed and well integrated for an infant school, which will matter to working families.
It suits families who want a child-centred start from age 2, value inclusive culture, and are comfortable planning a Year 3 move to a junior or primary setting later. The main constraint is admission demand, so the practical work is understanding the council process, getting the timeline right, and shortlisting alternatives early.
Yes. The latest inspection confirmed the school continues to be Good, with pupils described as happy, calm, and secure, and with clear strengths in curriculum ambition and early reading.
Applications are made through Milton Keynes City Council. The application window opens on 02 September 2025 and closes on 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026.
No. The nursery admissions policy states that a nursery place does not automatically confer admission to Reception, Reception places are allocated through the local authority process.
Children move on at 7+ (Year 3). The nursery admissions policy notes that pupils from the defined area normally transfer to Orchard Academy or Jubilee Wood Primary School.
Wraparound runs from 8.00am to 6.00pm. Breakfast Club from 8.00am is free for school-aged children and £2.50 per session for nursery children. After school, extended pick-up to 3.45pm is £3 per session, and 3-2-6 sessions are £8 (to 4.30pm) or £15 (to 6.00pm), booked in advance.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.