Ambition is a defining thread here. Pupils are encouraged to aim high from the earliest years, and the tone is purposeful without feeling joyless. The most recent full inspection judged the school Good overall, with Outstanding judgements in behaviour and attitudes, personal development, leadership and management, and early years provision.
On results, the picture is unusually strong for a state primary. In 2024, 90.33% of pupils met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, well above the England average of 62%. At the higher standard, 41% reached greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics, compared with an England average of 8%. The school’s primary outcomes place it 385th in England and 5th in Nottingham (FindMySchool ranking based on official data).
For families, the practical question is admission. Demand is high relative to places, and Nottingham City’s published admissions framework means catchment and distance can matter sharply when a school is oversubscribed.
A calm, respectful culture comes through strongly in formal evidence. Pupils are described as courteous and articulate, with high expectations of themselves and each other. There is also a clear emphasis on belonging, including pride in a diverse cohort and a belief that pupils can achieve ambitious goals.
Pastoral structures appear practical rather than performative. Pupils have more than one route for raising worries, including peer support via ambassadors and access to a school counsellor. That breadth matters in a busy urban primary because small issues can escalate quickly when families are stretched. Here, the systems are designed to resolve concerns promptly and keep day-to-day learning on track.
Character education is made concrete through roles and responsibilities. Examples include pupils serving the community as school posties and digital ambassadors, alongside a careers focus that links even primary-aged pupils to the language of strengths, work, and aspiration. This is not about turning ten-year-olds into mini job applicants, it is about giving them vocabulary for confidence and agency.
Outcomes at the end of Key Stage 2 are exceptionally high.
Reading, writing and mathematics expected standard (2024): 90.33%, versus England 62%.
Higher standard in reading, writing and mathematics (2024): 41%, versus England 8%.
Scaled scores (2024): Reading 110, Mathematics 108, and Grammar, punctuation and spelling 113.
Science expected standard (2024): 83%, in line with the England average of 82%.
These figures indicate both strong core attainment and an unusually large share of pupils working at greater depth, which tends to reflect secure curriculum sequencing and consistent classroom routines over time.
In the FindMySchool primary rankings (based on official data), the school is ranked 385th in England and 5th in Nottingham, placing it well above England average and within roughly the top 3% of primary schools in England by rank position.
Results like these can have a visible knock-on effect. Pupils often approach transition with a strong base in reading and number, and parents may find that secondary options open up more readily, whether through confidence, recommendations, or the child’s own academic self-belief.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
Reading, Writing & Maths
90.33%
% of pupils achieving expected standard
Early reading is treated as a non-negotiable priority. The early years and Key Stage 1 approach focuses sharply on phonics and vocabulary so that pupils build fluency quickly. The evidence points to good alignment between the sounds pupils learn and the books they read, which is a practical indicator of structured teaching rather than a loose reading-for-pleasure model.
Mathematics appears similarly structured. Younger pupils develop number recognition early, and older pupils move into more complex methods with confidence and accuracy. That progression matters because it reduces the need for last-minute intervention in Year 6 and supports deeper reasoning rather than procedural cramming.
The curriculum is strong across most subjects, with one clear improvement area identified in formal evaluation: in a minority of foundation subjects, the precise knowledge pupils should retain is not always sequenced tightly enough, leading to weaker recall over time. In practice, this is often the difference between pupils remembering an enjoyable activity and remembering the underlying learning it was meant to secure.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Outstanding
Personal Development
Outstanding
Leadership & Management
Outstanding
This is a primary school, so the main transition point is Year 6 to Year 7. A useful indicator of seriousness about transition is that leaders check how pupils settle into secondary school and use what they learn to refine preparation in the later primary years. That suggests a school that treats Year 6 as more than test preparation, with attention to the habits pupils need for the next phase.
Nottingham City families typically have a range of secondary options across the city, with applications coordinated through the local authority. For September 2026 secondary entry (Year 7), Nottingham City’s published timetable sets a 31 October 2025 deadline and a 2 March 2026 offer day for families living in the Nottingham City authority area.
For parents, the practical approach is to plan backwards: shortlist secondaries early, look closely at each school’s oversubscription criteria, and consider travel time as well as academic fit. Strong KS2 outcomes give pupils a platform, but the right secondary choice is usually about ethos, support, and daily logistics as much as raw attainment.
Admission pressure is real. The most recent admissions dataset provided shows 100 applications for 45 offers, indicating 2.22 applications per place, and the school is recorded as oversubscribed. The proportion of first-preference demand relative to first-preference offers is 1.18, suggesting that even families prioritising the school cannot assume a place.
Welbeck’s published admission number is 45 places in the relevant primary intake planning documents.
For main school entry, Nottingham City’s coordinated arrangements apply. Applications for Reception are made through the local authority, with the closing date for September 2026 entry set at 15 January 2026, and offers released on 16 April 2026 for Nottingham City applicants. Families are expected to respond within 14 days of the offer.
Oversubscription is handled through the local authority’s published criteria for community schools. Where demand exceeds places, priority runs through looked-after and previously looked-after children first, then catchment and sibling criteria, followed by distance-based allocation using a straight-line measurement.
Nursery provision is available, but parents should treat it as a separate admissions route. Nottingham City’s published arrangements are explicit that the local authority does not coordinate nursery admissions, and attendance at nursery does not guarantee a Reception place.
A practical tip for families comparing options is to use FindMySchool’s Map Search to understand how your home position relates to likely distance-based allocation patterns in oversubscribed years, then stress-test your shortlist against at least one realistic alternative.
Applications
100
Total received
Places Offered
45
Subscription Rate
2.2x
Apps per place
Pastoral care appears integrated into daily routines rather than bolted on. Pupils have clear avenues for support, including peer ambassadors, a counsellor option, and structured ways to raise concerns. This matters in a primary setting because children often disclose worries indirectly, so multiple channels increase the chance that a concern is surfaced early.
Support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities is described as high expectation rather than low demand. Staff are expected to help pupils with SEND access the same core knowledge as peers, beginning in the early years.
The second anchor point is safeguarding. Ofsted confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective, with staff understanding risk indicators, leaders keeping detailed records, and a willingness to challenge other agencies when needed.
Online safety is also clearly covered in age-appropriate terms, with pupils able to explain who to approach if something worries them in digital spaces.
Enrichment is unusually specific in the formal record, which is helpful because it reduces guesswork for parents.
One strand is leadership and responsibility. Roles such as school posties and digital ambassadors give pupils structured ways to contribute and practise reliability. The implication is not just confidence, but habits of organisation and accountability that support learning across the week.
Another strand is debate, civic understanding, and personal development. Pupils take part in debates and can explain concepts such as the rule of law in meaningful terms. When pupils can articulate ideas like rights and responsibilities, it often signals that discussion is normalised in classrooms rather than restricted to occasional themed days.
A third strand is aspiration through exposure. A careers fair is referenced as part of the school’s wider work on character traits and future readiness, and pupils engage in “children’s university” courses, including engineering and photography. The educational value is twofold: it widens what pupils see as possible, and it offers practical hooks for writing, vocabulary, and applied problem-solving.
Seasonal and community events also feature, including a Winter Wonderland experience created for pupils. These shared moments can matter as much as clubs for family loyalty and school identity, especially in a city primary where families may have fewer time and travel options for out-of-school activities.
This is a state primary serving pupils aged 3 to 11, with a published capacity of 315.
Breakfast provision exists, and it was part of inspection activity, indicating it is an established feature rather than an informal arrangement. However, clear public information on breakfast and after-school wraparound timings and costs was not consistently accessible at the time of writing, so families should confirm current arrangements directly with the school.
For travel planning, most families will focus on walking routes and local public transport within The Meadows area of Nottingham, with daily logistics often becoming a decisive factor when children are also attending clubs or childcare before and after school.
Competition for places. With 100 applications for 45 offers in the latest provided dataset, admission pressure is significant. Families should build a realistic second-choice plan rather than relying on a single outcome.
Nursery does not guarantee Reception. The local authority is explicit that nursery attendance does not secure a main school place, and applications for Reception remain coordinated through Nottingham City.
Curriculum refinement is still ongoing in places. Formal evaluation highlights that a small number of foundation subjects need tighter sequencing so pupils retain the intended knowledge, not just memories of activities.
High expectations can feel demanding. The culture emphasises ambition and strong routines. Many children thrive on this; a minority may need careful support to manage perfectionism or performance anxiety, particularly approaching Year 6.
Welbeck Primary School combines very strong Key Stage 2 outcomes with an unusually developed personal development offer for a state primary. Early years provision stands out, and the wider enrichment, from children’s university courses to pupil leadership roles, supports confidence and vocabulary alongside attainment.
It suits families who want a high-expectation primary with clear routines, strong reading and maths foundations, and a culture that encourages pupils to see ambitious futures as normal. The main limitation is admission pressure; families should treat shortlisting as a probability exercise rather than a single yes or no.
Yes, for many families it will feel like a high-performing choice. The latest inspection judged the school Good overall, with Outstanding judgements in early years provision, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, and leadership and management. Academic outcomes at Key Stage 2 are also well above England averages, including a high share working at greater depth.
Reception applications are coordinated through Nottingham City Council. For September 2026 entry, the published deadline is 15 January 2026, and offers are released on 16 April 2026 for Nottingham City applicants. If the school is oversubscribed, published oversubscription criteria and distance-based allocation can be decisive.
No. Nottingham City’s published arrangements are clear that attendance at a nursery does not guarantee admission to the main school. Nursery admissions are not coordinated by the local authority in the same way as Reception admissions, so families should treat these as separate processes.
The 2024 headline measures are very strong. Over 90% met the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined, well above the England average. At the higher standard, around four in ten pupils reached greater depth, far exceeding the England average.
Breakfast provision is established, and it forms part of the school’s wider approach to supporting families. Publicly available information on current wraparound hours and costs was not consistently accessible at the time of writing, so parents should confirm the latest arrangements with the school directly, especially if childcare is a deciding factor.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.