The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A new-build secondary created for a growing Oldham cohort, The Brian Clarke Church of England Academy has scaled quickly from its first intake in September 2022 to a full Key Stage 3 roll, with Year 7 places in particularly strong demand. The school’s vision is anchored in luceat lux vestra (let your light shine), with an explicit intention to be a Church of England school that serves families of all faiths, and those of none.
The headline story so far is culture and systems. The June 2025 Ofsted inspection graded Quality of Education as Good, and Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, and Leadership and Management as Outstanding.
This is also a school that has designed its week around an extended day, including a structured co-curricular model (Period 6) and a daily homework and study offer, which matters for families who value routine and supervised learning habits.
Because the school is new, “character” is less about tradition and more about what leaders have deliberately built. The atmosphere described in official findings is calm, warm, and purposeful, with a strong emphasis on kindness and respect, reinforced through events that recognise faith and culture.
The Church of England identity shows up most clearly through a values framework and the way the school talks about belonging. Importantly, the school positions itself as multi-faith in day-to-day composition, rather than expecting a single faith profile across the student body. That tends to suit families who want a faith-grounded moral framework without feeling that religious adherence is a precondition for community membership.
Leadership stability is a notable early asset. Allison Ash was appointed headteacher in May 2021, ahead of opening, and is presented consistently as the founding head, which typically helps new schools avoid the churn that can derail culture-building in the early years.
A final piece of identity is the namesake. The academy is named after Sir Brian Clarke, and the school has referenced a stained-glass installation as part of the building story. For students, this kind of commissioning can give a new site a sense of place and distinctiveness that many new builds struggle to achieve at first.
This is a young school, and its published attainment picture is still emerging. With the school opening to Year 7 in September 2022, the first full GCSE outcomes will only land once the earliest cohort reaches Year 11. For families comparing schools on established Key Stage 4 performance, the honest approach here is to treat outcomes as “not yet proven”, and to judge the academic offer through curriculum design, literacy strategy, teaching consistency, and the credibility of leadership and governance.
Where the early evidence is stronger is in how the school has chosen to organise learning. Literacy is treated as a priority thread, and reading routines are described as embedded, with systems designed to identify gaps and build fluency and confidence over time. That matters because new secondaries often inherit uneven Key Stage 2 starting points, and reading strategy is one of the fastest routes to closing subject access gaps across the curriculum.
A useful nuance from the June 2025 inspection is consistency. Teaching and checking for understanding are described as effective in many areas, but not yet uniformly secure across subjects and year groups. The implication for parents is that the direction of travel is strong, but you should expect some variability between departments as the school grows and appoints new staff.
The teaching model is best understood as “structured mainstream, with explicit routines”. Teachers are expected to explain new content clearly, revisit prior learning, and address misconceptions promptly, with a school-wide language for behaviour and learning habits. Over time, schools that execute this well often see faster curriculum coverage and fewer low-level disruptions, especially in Years 7 to 9, which is a crucial phase for establishing habits before GCSE courses begin.
Key Stage 4 breadth looks carefully planned for a comprehensive intake. Options listed include a mix of academic and applied subjects such as Computer Science, Geography, History, Sociology, Fine Art, Photography, Drama, Engineering, Food Preparation and Nutrition, and Construction and the Built Environment. For many students, that combination provides both “traditional” routes and practical pathways that still keep post-16 options open.
The final teaching-and-learning differentiator is the co-curricular timetable. Period 6 is not framed as an optional add-on; it is built into the design of the school week, with timetabled, registered sessions and a parallel supervised study offer. That can be particularly helpful for families who want their child to build routine around practice, consolidation, and wider participation, without everything relying on home organisation.
With an age range of 11 to 16 and no sixth form, the key transition is post-16 choice. At this stage, families should expect a strong emphasis on careers education and guidance, and on helping students understand both academic and technical routes. Careers fairs and workshops are referenced within official findings, alongside leadership opportunities that build confidence and responsibility, which are useful assets at the point students begin considering colleges, sixth forms, and apprenticeships.
Because the school is new, it is sensible to ask how the academy is building employer and provider links locally, and how it supports different post-16 routes for different prior attainment bands. Over time, the most helpful indicators will be retention into local sixth forms and colleges, and the proportion progressing to sustained education or training at 16 to 18, but these are not yet mature metrics for this school.
Year 7 admissions demand is clearly strong. In the most recent available admissions data here, there were 1,134 applications for 228 offers, which is around 4.97 applications per place. On first preferences, the ratio was 2.85, which suggests many families are not only listing the school, but actively prioritising it. Oversubscription, rather than quality of education, is the practical constraint.
The published admission number for Year 7 is 240.
For September 2026 entry, the application window is stated as opening 01 August 2025 and closing at 5pm on 31 October 2025.
As a Church of England school, faith-related admissions criteria and any supplementary information requirements matter for families intending to apply under those criteria. The key practical point is timing. Where a supplementary form is required for faith prioritisation, it must be submitted by the stated deadline, otherwise the application cannot be considered under faith-based criteria, which can materially affect outcomes in an oversubscribed year.
Open events tend to cluster in September and October for secondary transfer, and the school has run open evenings in that pattern. Parents should check the current year’s calendar and booking arrangements before planning.
For families who want an extra layer of certainty, FindMySchool’s Map Search is a practical way to sanity-check travel time and day-to-day logistics, even when distance cut-offs are not published.
35.1%
1st preference success rate
162 of 461 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
228
Offers
228
Applications
1,134
Pastoral design is one of the school’s early strengths. The language used about relationships, care, and safety indicates an intentional culture, not simply a reactive safeguarding posture. A wellbeing curriculum is referenced within official findings, including personal safety and online risk education, which is increasingly important as students move into older Key Stage 3.
The second pillar is behaviour. Routines are described as clearly established, with exemplary conduct and a calm learning environment. For parents, the implication is straightforward. If your child learns best in orderly classrooms with explicit expectations, the school’s approach should suit them well.
Safeguarding is a high-stakes baseline, and Ofsted confirmed safeguarding arrangements were effective at the June 2025 inspection.
The co-curricular programme is not generic. It is built into the timetable through Period 6, and it spans both enrichment and targeted support. The school also runs structured study support, including Home Learning Club and supervised study sessions, which can be a meaningful advantage for students who benefit from quiet space, access to computers, and adult supervision while they build independence.
The best evidence for “what students actually do” comes from specific named activities. In official findings and published materials, examples include Ancient Hebrew, Poetry by Heart, choir, and Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, which together suggest a blend of academic stretch, cultural literacy, and confidence-building performance opportunities.
Published co-curricular schedules also point to a broad offer that reflects the school’s multi-faith and multi-cultural positioning, with activities such as Arabic Club, Henna Club, and a Virtual Exchange Group appearing alongside sport and study clubs. For many students, that range helps them find a niche quickly in a growing school, and helps friendships form beyond the classroom.
The school day is organised around an early start and an extended model. Students are expected to arrive by 8:10am for an 8:15am registration. The gates open at 7:45am. Friday is an early finish day, with dismissal times staggered by year group.
Co-curricular and study provision typically runs after the main lesson sequence, which can simplify family routines, particularly for working households that prefer supervised after-school structure rather than immediate pick-up.
Transport-wise, the academy sits in central Oldham. Most families will be thinking for bus routes, walking, and cycling, plus the broader town-centre travel network. The sensible step is to trial the journey at the time your child would actually travel, as peak-time patterns matter more than map distance.
A young school, still building its track record. Culture and systems look well established early on, but GCSE outcomes are not yet the kind of multi-year data set parents can benchmark confidently. This suits families comfortable judging quality through curriculum, routines, and leadership credibility.
Consistency across subjects is still bedding in. Teaching and checking for understanding are described as strong in many areas, but not yet uniformly secure. Some variation between departments is a realistic expectation as staffing and cohorts expand.
Oversubscription is the limiting factor. Demand for places is high, and families should treat admissions as competitive rather than assumed, even if the school feels like a good fit.
Faith criteria have practical deadlines. Where faith-based priority requires supplementary information, missing the deadline can change how the application is ranked. Organisation matters here.
The Brian Clarke Church of England Academy looks like a new secondary that has prioritised the foundations that matter most: behaviour, belonging, routines, and a structured approach to learning, including a timetabled co-curricular model. The early external grading supports the picture of a calm, caring school with ambitious expectations and strong leadership.
Who it suits: families who want a comprehensive 11 to 16 with clear standards, a faith-informed values framework that is explicitly welcoming to a multi-faith intake, and a school day designed to make enrichment and supervised study normal, not exceptional.
The early indicators are encouraging. The June 2025 inspection graded Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, and Leadership and Management as Outstanding, with Quality of Education graded Good. That combination usually signals a strong culture and a school that is building teaching consistency as it grows.
Yes. Families should approach applications as competitive and make sure they understand the admissions criteria and deadlines.
Applications for September 2026 entry are stated as opening 01 August 2025 and closing at 5pm on 31 October 2025, using Oldham’s coordinated process. Always check the local authority and school website for any updates, and do not leave it to the final week.
It is a Church of England school, and admissions materials include faith-related criteria and supplementary information processes. If you intend to apply under faith priority, pay close attention to what evidence is required and the submission deadline, because late supplementary forms can prevent the application being considered under that criterion.
The school has built co-curricular activity into the week through timetabled Period 6, alongside study support such as Home Learning Club and supervised study. Named activities referenced publicly include Ancient Hebrew, Poetry by Heart, choir, Arabic Club, and Henna Club, plus sport and leadership roles.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.