The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is a state special school serving pupils aged 4 to 16 in Lostock Hall, Preston, with specialist classes and an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) cohort at its core. The school has recently been through significant change, including a move into academy status, and it is now part of The Sea View Trust.
Leadership has also shifted. John Cockerill took up post as headteacher in June 2025, following earlier senior roles at the school and within local specialist provision. For families, that combination of continuity and a fresh accountability structure matters, because the most recent external assessment set out clear priorities around curriculum design, staff guidance, and safeguarding record keeping.
The practical takeaway is that this is a school to approach with a clear-eyed focus on fit. For the right child, specialist staffing, communication strategies, and structured routines can be life changing. The question for parents is whether the current trajectory, and the specific profile of need the school is set up to meet, aligns with their child and the local authority placement pathway.
Special schools live or die by the small things, consistency, shared language, predictable routines, and adults who understand why behaviour communicates need. Applebee Wood’s public materials place strong emphasis on partnership with parents and carers, and on building coherent home school working. The welcome messaging is direct about aiming for a relevant education and increased confidence for pupils with diverse learning needs and additional challenges.
Communication and regulation are recurring themes across the school’s curriculum and staff development resources. The website references approaches such as Attention Autism, Intensive Interaction, Zones of Regulation, Colourful Semantics, and sensory programmes as part of staff training and practice development. Even where some pages are still being refreshed, the breadth of CPD material suggests a school trying to standardise practice across teams, which is particularly relevant for pupils who struggle with transitions or inconsistent adult responses.
Families should also note the school’s safeguarding framework includes Operation Encompass, a police and education partnership designed to ensure that school staff receive timely information when a child has been exposed to domestic abuse or related incidents, so support can be put in place at the start of the next school day. In a special school context, where pupils may have limited language or higher vulnerability, that kind of joined-up working can be an important part of the wider safeguarding culture.
Special schools do not reduce progress to a single exam metric. For many pupils here, meaningful progress is better captured through communication, independence, emotional regulation, readiness to learn, and preparation for adulthood, rather than a headline grade profile.
That said, families do need to understand the external picture. The latest Ofsted inspection (29 October 2024) graded Quality of Education as Inadequate, Leadership and Management as Inadequate, Behaviour and Attitudes as Good, and Personal Development as Requires Improvement.
The improvement priorities highlighted in the published inspection documentation focus strongly on curriculum sequencing and clarity for staff, alongside consistency in early reading and phonics, leadership capacity, and coherent safeguarding records. For parents, the implication is that you should ask very practical questions about what has changed since the inspection, how curriculum planning is now structured, how staff are trained to deliver it consistently, and how leadership checks impact day-to-day classroom practice.
A further contextual point is that the school has been through reorganisation since the inspection period, including academy conversion and a new headteacher appointment in 2025. When leadership changes coincide with a clear improvement agenda, the most useful evidence tends to come from the school’s current routines and operational detail, rather than mission statements.
The curriculum information available publicly shows a broad subject offer adapted to a specialist setting, including English, mathematics, computing, humanities, art, music, physical education, PSHE and RSE, and cooking, healthy choices and life skills. The more distinctive element is the emphasis on functional application and sensory access. In cooking and life skills, for example, the school describes a progression from sensory exploration in younger years to structured meal planning and preparation in older year groups, with a stated aim of building fine motor skills, independence, and confidence.
In early years, the school describes communication practice as embedded through daily routines, including Makaton signing, Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), and structured visual supports such as now and next boards, individual timetables, and sensory diets for individual pupils. For families, the key implication is that this is a setting where learning is intended to be highly scaffolded and multi-sensory, which may suit pupils who struggle to access learning through language heavy instruction alone.
Where the school is still developing, based on the most recent published external findings, is in ensuring that the curriculum is consistently planned and delivered so that pupils build knowledge over time, rather than completing disconnected activities. In practical terms, parents may want to ask to see examples of current long term plans, how staff check what pupils remember, and how reading and communication programmes are aligned across classes.
The school is explicit that pupils have EHCPs and that it supports a broad range of needs, including autism, moderate learning difficulties, social, emotional and mental health needs, and speech, language and communication needs.
Although not all therapy detail is presented in a single consolidated page, the school’s wider material indicates active links to Speech and Language Therapy and play therapy or counselling, alongside special educational needs support services. Staff training resources also indicate a strong focus on sensory processing, trauma informed practice, and structured regulation strategies, which often function as the day-to-day “therapeutic” architecture in special settings, even when clinical provision is delivered via visiting services.
For parents, the practical question is how these supports are coordinated: who sets targets, how therapy advice is translated into classroom practice, how communication aids are selected and reviewed, and how consistency is maintained across staff teams. In a school in improvement, the operational glue between therapy recommendations and daily teaching is often one of the most important determinants of pupil progress.
Special schools often deliver enrichment through structured, routine-friendly activities rather than a long menu of optional clubs. Applebee Wood does, however, describe specific enrichment strands that help show how learning is extended beyond the formal timetable.
A clear example is the senior pupils’ opportunity to attend an after school cooking club, linked to the life skills curriculum. For the right pupils, this kind of club does double duty: it reinforces functional skills, supports independence and confidence, and can translate into credible next step interests for post-16 pathways.
The school also references Duke of Edinburgh as part of its pupil offer. In a specialist setting, the value of DofE is often less about the badge and more about the structure for teamwork, planning, and safe stretching of independence, especially for pupils whose confidence has been shaped by earlier school experiences.
Curriculum linked enrichment also appears in subject pages, for example a humanities activity describing an Australia Day theme linked to a relationship with a school in New South Wales. The value here is not the event itself, but the way it creates a coherent context for communication, cultural learning, and practical activities, which can be a strong accessibility strategy for pupils who learn best through concrete experiences.
For most pupils in special schools, the key gateway is the EHCP process. Pupils placed in specialist provision typically have their school named in Section I of the EHCP, following consultation led by the local authority SEND team and informed by professional advice and parental preference.
Lancashire’s guidance is clear that, where a child does not have an EHCP, families should still use the standard coordinated admissions route, even if an assessment is in progress, because not applying can mean missing out on a place if an EHCP is not issued.
For mainstream coordinated admissions in Lancashire for September 2026 entry, applications opened on 01 September 2025. The statutory closing date was 15 January 2026 for primary (Reception) applications, and 31 October 2025 for secondary applications. For future years, these dates typically follow the same national pattern, but families should always check the current cycle in case timings shift.
A practical tip for parents comparing multiple options is to use FindMySchool’s Saved Schools feature to keep notes from visits and professional meetings in one place, especially when your child’s placement decision involves several agencies and a longer timeline.
This is a state school, there are no tuition fees. Families should still budget for the usual associated costs, particularly uniform and transport where relevant, plus any optional activities.
Some day-to-day operational details are not consistently published in a single place, so families should confirm the current school day timings, arrival arrangements, and any breakfast or after-school wraparound directly with the school.
For travel planning, Lostock Hall station is the nearest named rail station for the immediate area, and many families will find that car travel and local bus routes are the practical default for daily attendance.
Recent inspection picture: The most recent inspection graded Quality of Education and Leadership and Management as Inadequate (29 October 2024). For families, the key is understanding what has changed since then, and what is demonstrably consistent now.
Change period: Academy conversion and trust sponsorship can accelerate improvement, but it can also mean policy, staffing, and curriculum changes in a short period. The school is now within The Sea View Trust and has a headteacher who took up post in June 2025.
Admissions pathway reality: Specialist placements are rarely a simple “apply and wait” process. For many children, an EHCP route, consultation timelines, and annual review decisions will shape access more than general admissions deadlines.
Site and facilities evolution: The school has communicated plans connected to a new build and future facilities, but details and timelines should be treated as live project information and verified in the current term.
Applebee Wood is a specialist setting serving a wide range of additional needs across 4 to 16, with explicit emphasis on communication, sensory-informed practice, and functional learning. It is also a school in a clear transition phase, with an inspection-driven improvement agenda and a new governance context.
Who it suits: children whose needs are best met in a specialist environment with structured communication supports, predictable routines, and a curriculum that prioritises independence and preparation for next steps, alongside parents who want active involvement and can engage closely with the EHCP process. The main decision point is confidence in the current improvement trajectory and how well the provision aligns with your child’s specific profile.
The most recent published inspection grades (29 October 2024) show a mixed picture, with Behaviour and Attitudes graded Good, and Quality of Education and Leadership and Management graded Inadequate. Since then, the school has moved into academy status and appointed a new headteacher in 2025, so families should focus on what has changed in practice, including curriculum planning, staff training, and safeguarding systems.
For many pupils, placement is linked to an EHCP and consultation led by the local authority SEND team. Where a child does not have an EHCP, Lancashire advises parents to apply through the standard coordinated admissions route, even if an EHCP assessment is in progress, so that you do not miss out on a place if an EHCP is not issued.
No. This is a state school, so there are no tuition fees. Families should still plan for associated costs such as uniform and any optional activities.
The school cohort is EHCP-based, and published information describes support for a range of needs including autism, moderate learning difficulties, social, emotional and mental health needs, and speech, language and communication needs. The best next step is to discuss your child’s profile with the local authority SEND team and the school, to confirm whether the current provision matches need.
The school describes structured enrichment that aligns with its curriculum, including an after-school cooking club for senior pupils and participation in Duke of Edinburgh. In specialist settings, enrichment is often most effective when it reinforces independence, communication, and confidence in real-world contexts.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
