The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Ellington Infant School serves pupils aged 5 to 7 in Ramsgate, with a published capacity of 180 and 167 pupils on roll at the time of the most recent official profile update. It is a state school, so there are no tuition fees.
Demand for places is high at Reception entry. In the most recent local admissions here, 108 applications were made for 38 offers, with the school recorded as oversubscribed (2.84 applications per offer). This matters because, for many families, the hardest part is not choosing the school, it is securing a place in the first place.
The leadership picture is current and clear. Vikki Bowman is listed as headteacher in Department for Education records and is also described on the school’s governance page as having been headteacher since September 2025. That makes this a school in a new headship phase, with the latest inspection evidence reflecting the previous leadership team, but still offering a strong view of culture, curriculum intent, and safeguarding.
This is an infant school where routines and relationships do much of the heavy lifting. Official inspection evidence describes calm and orderly behaviour, strong adult expectations, and pupils who are keen to contribute in lessons. That combination typically shows up in small, everyday moments that parents care about: purposeful starts to the day, transitions that do not unravel, and classrooms where pupils understand what “good learning” looks like.
There is also a strong thread of belonging. The same evidence highlights close relationships between staff and families and a sense that pupils feel safe and supported. For a 5 to 7 setting, that matters as much as any curriculum plan because confidence at this stage is often the gateway to literacy, talk, and willingness to have a go.
A distinctive feature is how the school frames personal development for very young children. The inspection evidence points to structured work on emotions and self regulation, including practical tools used by pupils to manage worries. That is the sort of detail that suggests wellbeing is not treated as an add on, it is built into the weekly rhythm in a way that young pupils can actually use.
Finally, the local context is not ignored. Because of the school’s proximity to the sea, water safety and swimming are woven into how pupils learn to keep themselves safe. That is a good example of an infant curriculum being made relevant rather than abstract, and it tends to land well with families who want practical life skills alongside early reading and number.
On that front, the latest published inspection confirms the school continues to be Good. Ofsted judged that safeguarding arrangements are effective. For many families, that combination is the minimum bar: a safe, orderly environment with consistent routines.
For parents who want a more comparative view, FindMySchool’s Local Hub pages and the Comparison Tool can still be useful, not for headline test scores here, but to compare contextual indicators across nearby schools and keep your shortlist disciplined.
Early reading is positioned as a central priority. The inspection evidence describes daily phonics sessions beginning as soon as children join the school, with reading books closely matched to the sounds pupils are learning. That “match” is not a small technicality. In infant settings, mismatch is one of the most common reasons parents see reading stall: children can decode in a session, then take home a book that quietly asks them to guess. A tight matching approach tends to create steady momentum, and it is a strong signal of staff training and consistency.
The curriculum beyond reading is described as ambitious, with clear learning goals and careful sequencing from one year to the next. For parents, the implication is that this is unlikely to be a setting where pupils simply do “activities”. Instead, there is an intention for pupils to remember key knowledge and build it over time, even at age 5.
Assessment is described as purposeful, used to adapt future learning and target support where pupils face barriers. That matters in a mixed intake infant school because the spread of starting points is wide. Good infant practice is rarely about pushing everyone at the same pace, it is about spotting where a pupil is stuck and moving them on without creating stress.
There is also a specific improvement point that parents should take seriously, because it is concrete rather than generic. The latest inspection highlights that essential vocabulary is not yet consistently identified and reinforced across subjects, with computing cited as an example where pupils did not reliably know key terms. That is not a criticism of early years play or creativity, it is about precision. If your child thrives on language and loves explaining ideas, you may want to ask how vocabulary is now planned and revisited across the wider curriculum.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
As an infant school, Ellington’s main transition point is into Year 3 at a junior or primary school. There is no automatic transfer between infant and junior schools in Kent’s coordinated system, so families need to plan ahead rather than assuming a place is secured by default.
Practically, that means two things.
First, you should treat Year 2 as a decision year. Families apply for junior transfer through Kent County Council on the published timeline, and should review schools early enough to attend open events and read admissions criteria carefully.
Second, it is worth asking Ellington how they support transition for pupils who find change difficult. In strong infant settings, transition work tends to include visits, familiarisation, and careful information sharing with receiving schools. If your child needs extra reassurance, the details here can matter more than any headline statement.
Reception places are allocated through the local authority rather than directly by the school. The admissions data here shows a clear pressure point: 108 applications for 38 offers, and an oversubscribed status. With 2.84 applications per offer, families should be realistic that preference alone is not enough.
For September 2026 entry, Kent’s published timetable sets out the core deadlines. Applications opened on Friday 7 November 2025 and the national closing date was Thursday 15 January 2026, with offers released on Thursday 16 April 2026. Even if your child is applying in a later year, those dates are useful as a pattern guide, early November opening, mid January closing, mid April offers.
The school has also historically run open sessions in late autumn, with previous open session listings published in November for prospective families. For future cycles, treat November as a likely window, but rely on the school’s calendar for the exact dates.
One practical tip: where oversubscription is common, small differences in address evidence timing can matter. Kent’s admissions guide is explicit about deadlines for address changes and when evidence must be submitted to be treated as on time.
If you are shortlisting based on travel and day to day logistics, FindMySchool’s Map Search is the simplest way to check how your home address compares to local options, then sanity check that plan against current admissions rules.
Applications
108
Total received
Places Offered
38
Subscription Rate
2.8x
Apps per place
The inspection evidence supports a picture of pupils who feel safe, know who to talk to, and experience consistent behaviour expectations across the school. In an infant school, consistency is pastoral care. When every adult uses the same language for routines and boundaries, pupils tend to settle quicker and conflict drops.
The same evidence describes explicit teaching on emotions and relationships in an age appropriate way, including online safety. For parents, that should translate into pupils developing the language to describe worries earlier, and staff being able to intervene before small issues become patterns.
Support for pupils with additional needs is also referenced, with pupils described as being well supported in class and teachers checking understanding before moving learning on. If your child has identified needs, the most useful next step is to ask how support is organised day to day at age 5 to 7, for example, how interventions are scheduled without pulling pupils away from core phonics, and how progress is communicated to parents.
Infant schools can sometimes be light on extracurricular detail because so much development happens inside the classroom. Here, official evidence points to a richer picture, including clubs and enrichment that are clearly designed to broaden pupils’ experience.
A concrete example is clubs. The most recent inspection references a range of clubs and gives baking as a specific example. Earlier inspection evidence provides further named activities that sit outside the standard “sports and crafts” template, including Bollywood dancing, archery, golf, yoga, and fencing. The implication for families is that there is intentional exposure to unfamiliar activities, which can be particularly valuable for pupils who have not had much access to clubs outside school.
Trips and experiences also feature strongly. Enrichment cited in official evidence includes visits to Kew Gardens and Dover Castle, alongside local cultural experiences such as art gallery visits. Those experiences matter in infant settings because they give pupils shared reference points for talk, vocabulary, and writing, even before writing becomes fully fluent.
Pupil leadership is also present in an age appropriate way. School council work is referenced in inspection evidence, including involvement in events planning and community minded projects such as environmental action. For parents, this often signals that pupils are encouraged to speak up and make small decisions, which can be especially helpful for quieter children.
This is a small infant school setting, so the daily logistics tend to matter as much as the educational philosophy. The public pages accessible at the time of research did not clearly set out start and finish times, so families should confirm the current school day timings directly.
Wraparound care is clearer. The latest inspection confirms that breakfast and after school clubs operate on site. If wraparound is a deciding factor for your family, ask how places are allocated, whether sessions run every weekday, and whether provision changes by term.
Transport wise, the key practical variable is usually drop off flow and walkability for local families, rather than long commute patterns. If you are balancing multiple schools, map your realistic door to door routine, not the ideal one, then keep your shortlist lean using Saved Schools.
** Reception entry is oversubscribed in the admissions data here (108 applications for 38 offers). For many families, the limiting factor is admission rather than the day to day experience once a place is secured.
Limited headline outcomes data. As an infant school, there is less published comparative attainment information to lean on than for junior or full primary schools. Your best evidence base will be the inspection picture, phonics approach, and what you learn on a visit.
Curriculum vocabulary is a known improvement area. The latest inspection points to inconsistency in identifying and reinforcing essential vocabulary across subjects. Ask what has changed, particularly in foundation subjects and early computing terminology.
Year 3 transfer needs planning. There is no automatic transfer from infant to junior school in Kent’s coordinated process, so families should treat Year 2 as a key planning year.
Ellington Infant School looks like a well organised infant setting where pupils feel safe, behaviour is calm, and early reading is treated as a central priority. It suits families who want clear routines, a structured approach to phonics, and enrichment that broadens experience beyond the immediate local area. The main challenge is securing a place, so families who are serious about Ellington should plan their application early and keep realistic alternatives on the shortlist.
The school is rated Good, with the latest published inspection confirming it continues to meet that standard and that safeguarding arrangements are effective. It is a small infant setting with calm behaviour expectations, strong attention to early reading, and a well established enrichment approach through clubs and visits.
Applications for Reception are made through Kent’s coordinated admissions process rather than directly to the school. For September 2026 entry, Kent’s published timeline opened on 7 November 2025 and closed on 15 January 2026, with offers released on 16 April 2026. The same pattern typically repeats each year, early November to mid January, so check the current Kent timetable for your child’s entry year.
Yes, the admissions data here records the school as oversubscribed for Reception entry, with 108 applications and 38 offers in the latest cycle provided. That level of demand means families should apply on time and keep a realistic set of preferences.
The latest inspection confirms breakfast and after school clubs operate on site. Families who rely on wraparound should confirm session times, availability across the week, and how places are allocated.
In Kent, there is no automatic transfer from infant to junior school, families apply for Year 3 places through the local authority process. Planning early in Year 2 helps, especially if you want to visit potential junior schools and understand their admissions criteria.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.