The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is a small-window school phase done properly, nursery through to Year 2, with a clear emphasis on getting the basics right early. The most recent external evaluation found that standards were being maintained, with a calm feel and strong behaviour, plus an explicit focus on reading from the moment children start.
Admissions demand is steady rather than extreme. For the most recent Reception entry data available here, there were 90 applications for 63 offers, which is around 1.43 applications per place. That is oversubscribed, but not in the same bracket as the hardest-to-access city primaries. )
The operational set-up is also worth knowing. The academy sits within Greenwood Academies Trust, and families will see leadership structured across the infant and junior sites, with wraparound care run via the junior site.
The strongest through-line is a purposeful, child-friendly culture that still expects a lot. The latest inspection narrative describes pupils enjoying school, playing well together, and behaving well, with pupils also taking on roles such as play leaders.
Values are not treated as poster material. The school’s RICHER values are explicitly named as resilience, independence, creativity, high aspiration, exceptional, and respect, and they are described as guiding pupils’ actions. This matters in an infant setting because it sets a shared language for routines, turn-taking, and how pupils handle small conflicts before they become big ones.
There is also evidence of pupils having a voice in practical school improvement, not just token councils. One example given is pupils voting on changes to an outside space, including ideas such as bug hotels, planting, and a water feature. That combination of agency and concrete projects tends to land well with younger pupils, because they can see the results of decisions rather than just hear about them.
Leadership is presented as a team model. The staff information names Mrs Jo French as Executive Principal, with Mrs Lewis Bettison as Head of School.
For an infant academy, the most meaningful “results” evidence is what the school does with early literacy, and how consistently it is implemented. The inspection evidence is unusually specific on this point: pupils begin learning to read as soon as they start; staff are trained to teach phonics; and the school uses high-quality texts alongside incentives that encourage regular reading. Support for parents is also referenced, to help reading practice at home.
A second strand is curriculum structure. The inspection report describes a structured curriculum, teachers with the subject knowledge to teach it, and the use of “reading starters” to help pupils recall prior learning. It also notes that work in books is of high quality.
The improvement picture is equally important for parents. Two curriculum issues are highlighted: in some subjects there is too much content for pupils to remember, and there are not enough planned opportunities for pupils to explore multicultural Britain and develop cultural capital. Those are the kinds of points to raise at an open event, because they shape how broad and coherent learning feels across the week.
Teaching priorities look well aligned to age and stage. Early reading is treated as a whole-school discipline rather than an add-on, with staff expertise in phonics and careful text choices forming the backbone. The likely implication for pupils is a faster move from learning to decode, into reading with confidence, which then frees up capacity for vocabulary, comprehension, and writing.
In Early Years, the inspection narrative gives concrete examples of learning that builds knowledge through practical activity, including planting vegetables and exploring how water supports plant growth. That is a good signal for parents who want learning to feel hands-on rather than worksheet-led.
There are also signs of assessment and feedback being taken seriously for this age range. The inspection report notes that video technology is used effectively to find out what pupils know and can do.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Outstanding
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
Most pupils will move on to junior provision for Year 3. The school itself references close collaboration between the infant and junior academies, which should support continuity in routines, curriculum expectations, and pastoral knowledge about each child.
For nursery families, the internal pathway is also clear. The Early Years information states that children can progress into Reception already familiar with the environment, staff team, and older pupils.
For Reception (statutory school entry), applications are coordinated through Lincolnshire County Council, rather than made directly to the academy. The academy publishes a Reception admission number of 90.
The local authority’s published timeline for primary applications is the one families should work to for 2026 entry: applications open 17 November 2025 and close 15 January 2026, with later windows for late applications and changes. If you are comparing several options, use the FindMySchool Local Hub comparison view to keep admissions deadlines and practical constraints in one place.
With 90 applications for 63 offers in the latest available results, the academy is oversubscribed, but it is not operating on ultra-fine distance margins in this snapshot.
Nursery entry is different. The admissions information indicates entry from age 3 plus, and the nursery provision highlights funded 15 and 30 hour places for eligible 3 and 4 year olds, alongside paid provision. For nursery fees and session structures, use the academy’s own nursery information rather than relying on second-hand summaries.
Applications
90
Total received
Places Offered
63
Subscription Rate
1.4x
Apps per place
Behaviour and routines are described as a strength, including pupils understanding expectations and reporting that staff help if they have concerns. In an infant setting, that predictability often matters as much as any single initiative, particularly for pupils who are new to group settings or who need additional support with regulation and turn-taking.
Safeguarding is explicitly confirmed as effective in the latest inspection report.
Attendance is also flagged as improving significantly in the most recent inspection narrative, which is a meaningful indicator because infant attendance tends to reflect both family engagement and how safe, settled, and manageable the school day feels for children.
Enrichment looks practical and frequent, rather than occasional. The academy describes carefully selected enrichment opportunities designed to broaden aspirations, and the inspection narrative references careers-related activity that increases awareness of different jobs, including examples such as nursing, dentistry and the armed forces.
Clubs are also concrete, with a published example set including Lego, multi-skills, agility, dance, yoga, phonics, and computing. For families, the implication is that co-curricular life is being used to build both physical confidence and early academic habits, rather than simply providing childcare.
A distinctive enrichment marker is the academy’s stated link as a lead associate school with the Royal Shakespeare Company, framed as a cultural enrichment lever for the curriculum. For an infant school, that can translate into stronger oracy, storytelling, and performance confidence, if it is implemented through classroom practice and not only through one-off events.
Session timings are clearly published. For Reception to Year 2, arrival is between 8:45am and 8:55am, with collection at 3:10pm. Nursery sessions include morning, afternoon, and full-time options, with published drop-off and collection windows.
Wraparound care is available via JB Sports and Education, operating from the junior site. Breakfast club drop-off is 7:45am to 8:15am, and after-school club runs to 4:30pm with extended options to 5:30pm and 6:00pm.
Curriculum breadth work in progress. The most recent inspection evidence highlights that, in a few subjects, there can be too much content for pupils to remember, which can lead to gaps in what some pupils retain over time.
Cultural breadth is a stated development area. The inspection narrative flags limited opportunities to explore multicultural Britain and develop cultural capital. If this matters to your family, ask what has changed since the inspection and how it shows up in topic choices and visits.
Wraparound care runs from a different site. Breakfast club and after-school provision are based at the junior academy site, which is convenient for some families but can add logistics for others.
Oversubscription is real. The academy is oversubscribed in the latest intake snapshot, so have a Plan B and use the local authority timeline carefully.
Skegness Infant Academy reads as a well-organised infant setting with strong early reading habits, clear routines, and enrichment that is regular and purposeful. It suits families who want a structured start to schooling, including nursery provision with funded hours for eligible children, and who value a calm behaviour culture backed by consistent expectations. The main limitation to weigh is the curriculum development agenda, particularly breadth and sequencing in some subjects, plus cultural experiences that expand pupils’ understanding beyond their immediate environment.
The academy’s most recent inspection confirmed that standards are being maintained and described a positive experience for pupils, including strong behaviour and an effective approach to safeguarding. The evidence also points to a strong start in reading and phonics from the moment children join.
Reception admissions are coordinated by Lincolnshire County Council, using the local authority’s published admissions process and timelines. The academy does not publish a single fixed catchment radius here, and no last-distance figure is available so families should check the current admissions arrangements and criteria via the local authority.
Yes. The academy has Skylarks Nursery, described as term time only, and it offers 15 and 30 hour government funded sessions for eligible 3 and 4 year olds, plus paid provision. For up-to-date nursery fee details, use the nursery information on the academy website.
For Reception to Year 2, arrival is 8:45am to 8:55am and collection is 3:10pm. Nursery operates morning, afternoon, and full-time sessions with published drop-off and collection windows. Wraparound care is available through JB Sports and Education, with breakfast club and after-school provision based at the junior site.
The academy publicises a varied menu across the year. Examples include Lego, multi-skills, agility, dance, yoga, phonics, and computing, alongside curriculum-linked enrichment designed to broaden pupils’ aspirations.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.