The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
An 11–16 secondary that has been on a visible improvement trajectory, with leadership framing the recent period as a turning point and a school ethos built around Belong, Challenge, Inspire. The latest full inspection sits firmly in the Good bracket, and the report describes calm behaviour, raised ambition, and a school that has grown quickly in roll and reputation.
This is also a school that places literacy high on the agenda. Daily reading with tutors is reinforced by a dedicated reading time model that explicitly teaches vocabulary and supports weaker readers to catch up quickly. For families who want a secondary that takes reading seriously rather than treating it as something handled only by English lessons, that is a meaningful signal.
The headline performance picture from FindMySchool’s GCSE ranking is more challenging, with outcomes placing it below England average overall, so the best fit tends to be families who value the school’s direction of travel, pastoral stability, and structured routines, and who are prepared to ask detailed questions about subject-level consistency and support where gaps remain.
The tone set publicly by leadership is straightforward and community-facing. The principal describes continuity with the school’s recent journey, having worked at the academy for several years before taking on the top role, while also acknowledging the role of the previous principal in the school’s wider transformation.
Leadership is current and clearly documented. Mark Cook is listed as Principal, and formal governance documentation records his start date as 01 September 2025. That kind of clarity matters because it helps parents interpret what is “new leadership” versus “embedded approach”.
The wider organisational context is also part of the story. The academy sits within Moorlands Learning Trust, and formal evaluation links school improvement work to trust support, particularly in strengthening the curriculum and stabilising staffing. For parents, that can translate into access to shared expertise and a more consistent operating model as the school grows.
On day-to-day culture, the most recent inspection evidence points to calm behaviour in lessons and around the school, and pupils who are keen to do well. Bullying is described as rare, and where it occurs, staff systems are portrayed as responsive and persistent in checking that issues are resolved. This is useful context for families weighing up how safe and orderly the environment is likely to feel for an 11-year-old moving from primary.
FindMySchool’s GCSE ranking places The Skipton Academy at 3,456th in England and 4th locally (Skipton) for GCSE outcomes. This sits below England average overall, placing it within the lower performance band nationally (FindMySchool ranking based on official data).
The more diagnostic measure is Progress 8, which is -0.62. In plain terms, that indicates students, on average, made less progress than similar pupils nationally from their starting points across the GCSE suite.
How should parents interpret that alongside the school’s improvement narrative. Two things can be true at once. The 2023 inspection describes strong progress in most subjects from historically low starting points, and it also flags that some older pupils have experienced a mix of newer and older curriculum models, leaving gaps that are not always identified and addressed consistently. That second point is a practical explanation for why progress measures can lag even when day-to-day practice is improving.
For families, the implication is to look beyond headline figures and ask focused questions: where has the curriculum been fully rebuilt, how are gaps diagnosed for students who have experienced change mid-course, and what does catch-up look like in practice for those who need it.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
A key strength described in the most recent evidence is the school’s move towards clearly sequenced curriculum thinking, especially in the core. The 2023 report links improvement work to stronger curriculum planning that spells out what pupils should already know, how that knowledge is checked, and how new content is introduced unit by unit. That sort of structure tends to reduce variability between classrooms, and it can be particularly helpful in a school that has grown quickly and has needed to stabilise staffing.
Reading is treated as a whole-school responsibility. Pupils read daily with their form tutors, and weaker readers are assessed carefully and supported quickly. The school’s own published literacy approach reinforces this with dedicated reading time that explicitly teaches vocabulary, with the stated aim of helping students access a broad, challenging curriculum across all subjects. The practical implication is that literacy is not left to chance; it is engineered into routine.
The report also offers a clear area for further work: in some subjects, curriculum development is newer, and gaps from previous study are not always spotted and addressed reliably. That is a useful frame for parents at open events, because it suggests exactly what to probe, how departments check prior knowledge, how they spot misconceptions early, and how consistent that practice is across subjects.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
With students leaving at 16, the main question is progression into sixth forms and colleges locally, alongside apprenticeships and employment pathways. The school’s inspection evidence indicates that pupils can talk clearly about ambitions for further study and work, and that careers-related thinking is embedded as part of the personal development offer.
. The provider access duty is explicitly referenced in the inspection report’s school information section, which is a useful prompt for parents to ask what encounters with colleges, training providers, and employers look like across Years 7 to 11.
Year 7 entry is handled through the coordinated local authority process. The academy’s published admissions policy states that applications are made via the home local authority common application form, and it sets out a timetable that is designed to align with the local authority schedule. In that timetable, the key parent action is clear: submit preferences by 31 October for September entry.
Oversubscription is addressed explicitly. Where there are more applications than places, priority is given in this order: children with an Education, Health and Care Plan naming the school; looked-after and previously looked-after children; children on exceptional medical grounds (with supporting evidence); siblings; then distance from the school measured by defined mapping methodology to the school gate used by students. For many families, the real-world implication is that proximity and sibling links can matter a great deal once the higher-priority categories are satisfied.
Open events are typically scheduled in the early autumn term. The school’s news feed shows open-evening activity in September, and the admissions policy also indicates open evenings and visit opportunities in the run-up to the application deadline, with exact dates varying year to year. A sensible approach is to treat September and October as the usual window, then check the school calendar for the current year’s booking arrangements.
Parents comparing options can use the FindMySchoolMap Search to check journey practicalities and understand how location interacts with distance-based criteria where those apply.
Applications
338
Total received
Places Offered
163
Subscription Rate
2.1x
Apps per place
Pastoral culture is best judged by how a school handles behaviour, bullying, and safeguarding systems. The most recent formal evidence describes calm behaviour in lessons and around school, with adults acting quickly when behaviour falls short. Bullying is described as rare, and the response model is not just immediate intervention but follow-up checking to confirm issues are resolved.
Safeguarding is also clearly stated as effective in the latest inspection documentation, including staff awareness of signs of risk and clear reporting routes to the designated safeguarding lead and deputies. The report also notes careful handling of safeguarding information when pupils join mid-year, which matters in a school that has had notable movement and growth in roll.
Support for pupils with additional needs is another documented feature. The inspection report references an additionally resourced provision, The Lookout, supporting a small number of pupils with communication and interaction needs, alongside tailored individual support plans and precise classroom adjustments. For families considering SEND support, that is an important conversation starter about assessment, staffing, and how support is integrated into mainstream lessons.
Extracurricular breadth matters most when it is concrete and sustained, rather than a generic list. Two strands stand out from the school’s published information. The first is environmental action through Eco Club, which is presented as long-running and tied to the Eco-Schools programme. The club is associated with the Eco-Schools Green Flag award, and the school describes practical projects such as funding for recycling bins in every room, installing water fountains to reduce single-use plastic, and planting hundreds of tree saplings on school grounds. The implication for students is that sustainability is not just an assembly theme; it is a programme that involves planning, funding bids, and visible change on site.
The second is the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award. The school offers Bronze and Silver, with participation typically across Years 9 to 11. The value here is less about badges and more about habits: volunteering, skills development, physical challenge, and expedition planning. For some students, this becomes a practical route to confidence and independence, especially for those who thrive when learning extends beyond the classroom.
Reading also links to enrichment. Beyond the core literacy mechanics, the school frames reading as a route into cultural and emotional development and as a platform for learning across the curriculum, reinforcing the idea that academic improvement is being built from the foundations up.
The school also publishes termly extracurricular timetables, with activities and sports changing by season and resourcing. For parents, this is useful because it allows you to check whether the current offer matches your child’s interests, and whether clubs run consistently across the year or fluctuate.
This is a state school with no tuition fees.
The published school day structure shows an extended day with a structured morning routine and five periods. The timetable indicates the day begins at 08:45 and finishes at 15:15.
Transport planning is helped by the school’s emphasis on sustainable travel, linked to its wider environmental activity. Families should still sanity-check the practicalities for their own route, including winter travel and after-school club timings, because those are the points where a workable plan can become stressful.
Because this is a secondary phase school, wraparound care is not typically offered in the same way as primary provision. If a family needs early drop-off or supervised after-school arrangements beyond clubs, it is best to ask directly what is currently available and how places are allocated.
Progress measures are challenging. The Progress 8 figure of -0.62 suggests students, on average, make less progress than peers nationally from similar starting points. Families should ask what interventions are targeted at this, and how impact is tracked subject by subject.
Curriculum consistency is still a live issue in some areas. The latest inspection notes that some older pupils have gaps from previously less rigorous curriculum models, and that these gaps are not always identified and addressed consistently. That matters most for students who need clear scaffolding and systematic catch-up.
Rapid growth brings operational pressure. The inspection evidence describes a school that has grown quickly in pupil numbers, which can be a positive indicator of reputation locally, but it also creates a need for strong systems as departments expand and staffing stabilises.
Distance can become the deciding factor if oversubscribed. The admissions policy sets out a distance-based tie-break after priority categories and siblings. Families relying on a place should understand precisely how distance is measured and which gate point is used.
The Skipton Academy presents as a school that has moved into a more stable and ambitious phase, with a clear focus on reading, structured curriculum planning, and a calm behavioural baseline supported by formal evaluation.
Best suited to families who want an improving 11–16 secondary with a strong literacy push and a practical enrichment offer, particularly Eco Club and Duke of Edinburgh, and who are prepared to ask detailed questions about progress and subject consistency. The main challenge is ensuring the academic experience is consistently strong across departments as the school continues to grow.
The most recent full inspection outcome is Good, with evidence pointing to calm behaviour, raised ambition, and effective safeguarding systems. The academic picture is more mixed in the published progress measures, so families should weigh the school’s direction of travel alongside current performance indicators.
Applications are made through the coordinated local authority process using the common application form. The academy’s admissions policy indicates that parents should submit preferences by 31 October for September entry, with offers made in March through the local authority timeline.
FindMySchool’s results places the school at 3,456th in England and 4th locally (Skipton) for GCSE outcomes, which is below England average overall. The Progress 8 score is -0.62, indicating below-average progress compared with similar pupils nationally.
The inspection evidence references an additionally resourced provision called The Lookout for a small number of pupils with communication and interaction needs, alongside carefully tailored support plans and classroom adjustments. Parents should ask how support is assessed and delivered day to day, and how transitions are handled for students who join mid-year.
Eco Club is described as a long-running programme linked to Eco-Schools, with projects such as recycling provision in classrooms, water fountains to reduce single-use plastic, and tree planting on site. The school also offers Duke of Edinburgh Bronze and Silver, typically across Years 9 to 11, supporting volunteering, skills, physical challenge, and expedition work.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.