The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Phoenix Infant Academy is a state-funded infant school in Chalvey, Slough, serving pupils aged 5 to 7, with a published capacity of 270. It is part of The Thames Learning Trust and has been within the trust since September 2015.
This is an infant school that puts routines and relationships to work from the earliest days. The day is structured carefully, from gates opening at 8.40am to a 3.15pm finish, with 32.5 hours taught each week. Breakfast club begins at 8.00am, which can be a practical help for working families and can also steady the start of the day for pupils who benefit from predictable transitions.
Academic headline metrics are limited at infant phase, so parents should focus on what the school says it prioritises and what external evidence indicates about early reading, behaviour, inclusion, and preparation for junior school. In February 2025, an ungraded Ofsted inspection indicated the school’s work may have improved significantly since the previous inspection, with behaviour, safety, early reading, and SEND adaptation described as strengths.
Admissions are competitive. For the most recent Reception entry route data here, 132 applications were made for 84 offers, with the route described as oversubscribed. Competition matters in practical terms because it shapes how realistic it is to secure a place without flexibility on preferences.
The school’s identity is built around a clear set of values that are simple enough for young children to hold in mind, and specific enough to be used in everyday behaviour expectations. Those values are presented as: stay safe, try your best, be kind, be respectful. This matters because infants respond best when expectations are concrete and consistent, not abstract.
There is also a distinctive internal “language” to the way the school organises itself. Classes are themed around British birds, with Reception linked to garden birds, Year 1 to river birds, and Year 2 to birds of prey. For pupils, this gives each class a memorable identity and a set of shared reference points that can support talk, writing prompts, art, and assemblies. For parents, it is a clue that the school thinks deliberately about belonging, even at infant scale.
Inclusion is not framed as a bolt-on. The school describes a specialist resourced provision, referred to as the “Nest”, where pupils with SEND are linked to mainstream classes and also spend time in the specialist base. That model, when it is done well, usually benefits both groups: children in the specialist base can take part in wider class life in supported ways, and mainstream peers learn early that difference is normal and handled calmly.
Leadership is clearly identified. The headteacher is Amanda Jarrett. The school also presents itself as working in partnership with families and the local community, and this theme appears in both the school’s own messaging and external reporting.
At infant phase, national testing and headline public results are limited compared with Key Stage 2, so families should avoid over-weighting simplistic “results” narratives. The more relevant question is whether pupils leave Year 2 reading confidently, writing with increasing control, and ready to manage the bigger setting of a junior school.
Early reading is positioned as central, with phonics beginning from the start of Reception and structured support for pupils who need to catch up quickly. For parents, the implication is practical: you should expect daily reading routines, direct teaching of sounds, and a strong emphasis on books and stories. If your child needs repetition and clear sequencing, that approach typically fits well.
Mathematics is also described in a way that suggests deliberate vocabulary and concept-building, even in the early years, with terms such as regrouping, part-part whole, and partitioning explicitly referenced as taught and revisited. The benefit, when this is consistent, is that pupils build language alongside number sense, which can reduce later confusion when the maths becomes more abstract.
Writing is described as a cross-curricular focus, with pupils learning to write confidently and produce work they feel proud of. In a school like this, parents can support progress best by aligning home routines with what is taught: short daily reading, talking about stories, practising letter formation as advised by staff, and treating vocabulary as a daily habit rather than a once-a-week worksheet task.
If you are comparing local options, use FindMySchool’s local hub and comparison tools to line up context, demand, and phase-appropriate indicators side-by-side rather than relying on generic league-table expectations that do not fit infant schools.
Phoenix Infant Academy presents a broad curriculum offer, but with a clear concentration on the building blocks that matter most at 5 to 7: early reading, language, and foundations for writing and maths. The practical question for families is what this looks like day-to-day.
The school day timings show an organised start: gates open at 8.40am, classroom doors open at 8.45am with “morning challenges”, and gates close at 8.55am, with registration completed by 9.00am. This kind of start can be particularly helpful for pupils who need a purposeful routine as soon as they arrive, rather than an unstructured settling period.
Computing is described as supported by Purple Mash, with online safety taught using Google’s Be Internet Legends curriculum. In infant terms, this usually translates into safe device habits, careful handling of personal information, and age-appropriate understanding of what to do if something online feels wrong, framed in language children can repeat and remember.
Personal, social and health education is positioned as high quality, and the model described suggests it is not treated as a “Friday afternoon” subject. Where this is embedded, parents often notice improvements in friendship management, resilience after small setbacks, and children being able to name feelings and ask for help early.
The school also signals that it thinks carefully about subject identity in the wider curriculum. For example, its subject pages for history and geography are written as “intent” statements that emphasise knowledge, sequencing, and curiosity. The point here is not marketing language, it is the implication that curriculum planning is deliberate rather than improvised.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
Because this is an infant school, transition to Year 3 is the key destination moment. The most important practical point is that there is no automatic transfer from Phoenix Infant Academy into a junior school. Families must make a separate application for a Year 3 place.
In practice, many pupils appear to move on to Godolphin Junior Academy, and the school references transition arrangements where Year 2 children with confirmed places attend transition days there. The implication is straightforward: even if most local children tend to go to the same junior setting, parents should treat the Year 3 application as a significant decision in its own right, with deadlines, preferences, and realism about demand.
A good infant-to-junior transition is not just about paperwork. It is also about independence habits: managing belongings, listening in larger spaces, and moving between lessons. The structured routines described at Phoenix, including clear expectations for behaviour and consistent adult support where needed, are the types of foundations that typically make Year 3 less of a shock.
Reception admissions are coordinated through Slough’s local authority process, with Phoenix Infant Academy operating an equal preference scheme. For September 2026 entry, the school states that the application process for Slough residents opens on 12 September 2025.
Slough’s published guidance states the deadline for Reception applications for September 2026 was 15 January 2026, with late applications handled after that point. If you are reading this in 2026 and aiming for future cohorts, the safest assumption is that the same pattern repeats annually, autumn opening and mid-January deadline, but you should always confirm exact dates for your child’s year with the local authority.
Demand, based on the latest admissions figures provided here for the primary entry route, indicates competition: 132 applications for 84 offers, and the route is described as oversubscribed. In practical terms, that can mean you should use all preference slots wisely, and include at least one realistic fallback school you would genuinely accept.
The planned admission number listed for recent years is 90. Parents sometimes assume that “infant school” means plentiful places; this figure, paired with an oversubscription picture, suggests it is worth treating the application as a priority task rather than something to do at the last minute.
100%
1st preference success rate
76 of 76 first-choice applicants received an offer
Places
84
Offers
84
Applications
132
Pastoral strength in an infant school shows up in small, repeatable behaviours: calm corridors, quick intervention when a child is dysregulated, and adults who can hold firm boundaries without escalating situations. The evidence available points to clear expectations and supportive adult-child relationships being central.
Online safety is also addressed in an age-appropriate way, including pupils learning how to keep personal information private and understanding the emotional impact of online harm. For families, the implication is that pastoral care is not treated narrowly as “feelings”, but includes practical safety behaviours that children can carry into home device use.
SEND identification and adaptation are described as prompt and specific, with curriculum adjustments matched closely to need, and a model that aims for equal access to opportunities. If your child has additional needs, the “what matters” question is how support is delivered in lessons, not simply whether a label exists. The picture here suggests staff think actively about access and participation, including through PSHE and wider experiences.
One explicit safeguarding note is worth including because it is high stakes: the February 2025 inspection stated that safeguarding arrangements were effective.
Clubs and enrichment are clearly part of the offer, and the school provides specifics rather than vague claims.
Breakfast club runs from 8.00am to 8.45am, with breakfast followed by planned activities delivered by staff. For many families, this is not just childcare, it is a calmer runway into the day that can reduce late arrivals and anxieties at the classroom door.
After-school clubs listed include yoga, cricket, art, science, multi-sports, girls’ football, mixed football, chess, and a lunchtime singing club. The benefit here is breadth at the right level: infant pupils get short, high-interest experiences that build confidence and expose them to new skills without overloading them with competitive pressure.
A particularly distinctive offer is lunchtime fencing with Musketeers Education. For young children, fencing tends to be less about “sport performance” and more about coordination, listening, and self-control. Those are transferable skills, and they often show up later in improved focus in class and better turn-taking in games.
The class structure theme is also used for enrichment. The school references opportunities to observe and learn about local birds and mentions visits connected to this theme, such as a visit from Feathers and Fur Falconry Centre in Bracknell. This is the kind of detail that signals curriculum experiences are built around memorable anchors rather than disconnected topics.
Music appears prominently too. The school references singing and performances as key features, and it also notes lessons for Reception to Year 2 that lead to termly band performances for school and parents. For a young child, performing in a supportive setting can be an early confidence-builder that carries into speaking, reading aloud, and trying difficult tasks without giving up quickly.
The school publishes clear timings. Gates open at 8.40am and the school day finishes at 3.15pm, with gates closing at 3.25pm. Breakfast club runs 8.00am to 8.45am.
Wraparound beyond breakfast club is partly defined through after-school clubs, which vary by term. If you need full after-school childcare every day rather than club-based provision, you should confirm the current offer directly with the school, since the published clubs model does not always equate to daily wraparound care.
Competitive admissions. Recent data shows more applications than offers, and the route is described as oversubscribed. Have at least one fallback preference you would genuinely accept, and submit on time to avoid the disadvantages of late processing.
Infant-to-junior transfer is not automatic. A separate Year 3 application is required, even for pupils already attending the infant school. Families should treat this as a second major admissions moment.
Wraparound may not match every work pattern. Breakfast club is clearly defined, but after-school provision appears to be mainly through clubs that change termly. If you need guaranteed childcare until 5.30pm or 6.00pm daily, check the current position before committing.
A structured, high-expectation culture. Behaviour expectations are described as consistently applied from Reception, which suits many children, especially those who thrive on predictability. A small minority of pupils who struggle with boundaries may need time, and parents should ask how support plans are used when behaviour is challenging.
Phoenix Infant Academy suits families who want a tightly organised infant setting where routines, early reading, and behaviour expectations are taught explicitly, and where inclusion is treated as part of everyday school life. The strongest fit is for children who benefit from predictable structure, clear adult expectations, and lots of practice with language and reading from day one.
The main challenge is getting a place and planning the next step. Families who shortlist Phoenix should prepare early for Reception admissions and keep the separate Year 3 junior application firmly on the radar.
Phoenix Infant Academy was previously judged Good at its last graded inspection, and an ungraded inspection in February 2025 indicated the school’s work may have improved significantly since 2019. The published evidence highlights clear behaviour expectations, a strong early reading focus, and inclusive practice for pupils with SEND.
Reception applications are made through Slough’s coordinated admissions process. For September 2026 entry, the school states applications for Slough residents open on 12 September 2025, and the local authority deadline for on-time applications was 15 January 2026.
Breakfast club runs from 8.00am to 8.45am. The school also lists after-school clubs that vary by term, including options such as yoga, cricket, art, science, multi-sports, football, and chess, plus lunchtime clubs including fencing and singing.
No. The school’s admissions policy states that pupils do not transfer automatically into Godolphin Junior Academy or any other junior or primary school, and a separate application must be made for a Year 3 place.
Gates open at 8.40am, classroom doors open at 8.45am, and the school day finishes at 3.15pm.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.