The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Built to serve a growing part of Bramshall, Bramshall Meadows First School is still in its early chapters, but it already reads like a school that has decided exactly what matters. The public language is consistent, Wonder, Kindness, Self-belief, and it is backed up by practical structures such as “The Bramshall 5” classroom expectations, weekly outdoor learning through Muddy Meadows, and a cultural entitlement offer called the Bloom Agreement.
Leadership is structured across the trust, with an Interim Executive Headteacher on site (Mrs Geri Pugliese) and an executive headteacher role sitting above the school. The wider trust support matters in a new school because curriculum and subject leadership are still being embedded as year groups grow.
This is a state school, so there are no tuition fees. Families should still plan for the usual add-ons, uniform, clubs, trips, and childcare. Wraparound is a meaningful practical advantage here because it runs from Nursery onwards, with sessions available from 7.30am to 5.30pm.
The strongest “feel” signal is not décor or branding, it is routine. In the March 2025 inspection evidence, pupils are described as polite and respectful, and learning is supported by clear expectations known as “The Bramshall 5”, which set out how pupils are expected to sit and listen. The implication for families is straightforward: this is a school leaning into calm, predictable systems, which often suits children who thrive when boundaries are explicit and consistently reinforced.
There is also an unusual amount of intentionality about experiences beyond the classroom for a school of this size and age. The Bloom Agreement is framed as a cultural capital offer, designed so pupils leave in Year 4 having shared a set of practical and community experiences, with the stated aim of putting children “on an equal platform” for the next stage. It is explicit about context and catchment, and it is trying to reduce the gap between children who arrive with lots of experiences already banked and those who do not.
The staff list reads like a tight core team, again typical of a newer school, with clear operational roles, a Deputy Headteacher who is also the SENCO, and a designated safeguarding lead named within the senior team. For parents, this kind of clarity can make communication easier because responsibility is visible rather than dispersed.
Because Bramshall Meadows is a first school serving ages 3 to 9, there is not yet the familiar Key Stage 2 results profile that parents use to compare many primaries. Judging the school on published SATs style outcomes is not the point here, at least not yet.
The most recent formal quality marker is the March 2025 inspection, which set graded judgements for each area. The latest Ofsted inspection (25 March 2025) judged Quality of Education, Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, Leadership and Management, and Early Years Provision all as Good.
The most useful evidence inside the report is not generic praise, but the combination of curriculum intent and growth planning. Inspectors describe a curriculum that has been carefully constructed for concepts, knowledge and vocabulary, and note that planning beyond Year 2 has been built out as the school grows towards capacity. That is a key “new school” risk point, and one the evidence suggests the trust is actively managing.
The school day structure published by the school places early emphasis on phonics and mathematics in the morning, with a later English focused lesson often built around a text linked to a creative curriculum theme. The immediate implication for pupils is coherence, especially for younger children who benefit from repeated practice in core skills, and for families it signals a fairly traditional prioritisation of early reading and number alongside a topic-led spine.
The inspection evidence also points to a realistic improvement agenda. Teaching is described as effective in most subjects with strong subject knowledge, but with a minority of subjects where staff knowledge of the intended curriculum is not yet fully secure. That is not unusual in a growing school where teams expand quickly, but it is something families may want to probe during a visit, for example, how subject leaders support consistency across classes as new staff join.
Nursery provision is integrated into the school’s model rather than tacked on. The Nursery offers 15 to 30 hour funded places from the term after a child turns 3, with morning and afternoon session timings published. Activities are framed around the seven areas of learning and development, which is a clear signpost for parents who want an Early Years Foundation Stage aligned approach rather than something informal.
As a first school, the natural question is transition. Children typically move on after Year 4, so the “destination” conversation is about local middle or primary-junior arrangements rather than Year 6 to Year 7. The inspection evidence states that pupils are ready for the next stage in their education, and the school’s own Bloom Agreement aim is explicitly to prepare pupils socially and culturally for that move, not only academically.
For families, the practical step is to treat Bramshall Meadows as the first phase of a longer plan. When you visit, ask how transition is handled, what information is shared with the next school, and how pupils who need extra support are prepared for a different site, different routines, and often a larger peer group.
Demand indicators suggest pressure on places, with an oversubscribed picture and more applications than offers. In a growing school in a new housing development, that pattern is plausible, and it aligns with the school’s purpose as additional local provision.
Reception applications are handled through Staffordshire’s coordinated admissions process. For children starting in September 2026, Staffordshire’s published closing date is 15 January 2026.
The school’s own earlier admissions communications mirror the standard Staffordshire pattern, with applications typically opening in early November and a mid-January closing date, with offers released on the national primary offer day. For 2026 entry, Staffordshire-aligned school admissions pages also reference offers on 16 April 2026.
Nursery admissions operate differently, with direct applications to the school and policy documentation available on the school site. Do not rely on Nursery attendance as an automatic route into Reception, ask explicitly how Reception allocations work and what priority rules apply in practice.
If you are shortlisting options, the FindMySchool Map Search is the sensible tool to sanity-check practicalities such as day-to-day travel time and the real shape of your local alternatives, especially when a school is popular and demand changes quickly as housing phases complete.
Applications
57
Total received
Places Offered
21
Subscription Rate
2.7x
Apps per place
The formal safeguarding statement in the March 2025 evidence is reassuring, and it is the kind of binary check families care about most. Ofsted confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
Beyond safeguarding, what stands out is the emphasis on belonging and behaviour consistency. The inspection evidence describes pupils as happy and safe, and also notes that most pupils behave well in lessons, with occasional lapses of concentration. For parents, the useful question is how the school responds to those lapses, whether through coaching, reset routines, or stepped consequences.
SEN leadership is explicitly identified within the senior team, with the Deputy Headteacher also serving as SENCO. That structure can help with continuity because strategic decisions and individual support planning are less likely to drift apart.
A good “new school” test is whether enrichment is genuinely embedded or just an aspirational list. Here, the evidence includes specific named activities and a concrete entitlement model.
The inspection report lists inclusive extracurricular options such as arts and crafts, desk drumming, and cricket, and also references participation in events like a dodgeball festival, plus curriculum visits such as a trip to a local farm to learn about habitats. The implication is breadth even at a young age, and the kind of practical, hands-on learning that suits many early years and key stage 1 pupils.
Outdoor learning is not occasional. Muddy Meadows runs weekly, described by the school as a regular Wednesday programme based on exploration and supported risk taking on the school grounds. For some children, this is the highlight of the week, and for parents it is worth planning for the kit expectations, including suitable clothing and wellington boots kept in school.
Eco Warriors is another distinctive pillar. Each class selects two pupil representatives who meet with staff to develop practical projects, including a clothing recycling donation point for the community and larger reuse builds such as a bottle igloo project. This kind of structure does two things: it builds pupil voice early, and it connects the school to the surrounding community in a way that is particularly relevant in a new development.
Reading culture is being actively built too. The school news highlights a new library and a “Book Garden” display created from book covers, presented as a deliberate attempt to encourage a love of reading.
The published school day begins at 9.00am, with a morning break at 10.30am noted on the school site. This matters for working families because it anchors drop-off timing and childcare handovers.
Wraparound care is a significant operational strength. Ladybird Club is available from Nursery onwards, running from 7.30am until 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, with priced session options published by the school.
Uniform expectations include dedicated days for PE kit and for Muddy Meadows clothing, which is a practical detail that reduces morning friction if you treat it like a fixed weekly rhythm.
Transport wise, the school sits within the Bramshall Meadows housing development area, so many families will be thinking for walkability plus short local drives. The most useful thing you can do is run a real journey test at the times you will actually travel, because traffic patterns around new housing can change fast as building phases complete.
It is a young school. Much of what you will be buying into is direction of travel, routines, and culture, rather than long-run public results data for older year groups. For some families that is exciting; others prefer a long-established track record.
Curriculum consistency is still being embedded. The March 2025 evidence points to strong subject knowledge in most areas, with a minority of subjects where staff knowledge of the intended curriculum is not yet fully secure. Ask how leaders standardise practice and support staff development.
Oversubscription pressure. Demand indicators suggest competition for places. If you are targeting Reception, treat deadlines and evidence requirements as non-negotiable, and build a Plan B early.
Outdoor learning is a real commitment. Muddy Meadows is weekly and practical, so families need to be comfortable with weather-ready kit, muddy clothes, and the philosophy of supported risk taking.
Bramshall Meadows First School has the advantage and challenge of being new. It can design routines, curriculum and enrichment deliberately, and the evidence shows it is trying to do exactly that, with clear behavioural expectations, an explicit cultural entitlement model, and regular outdoor learning. The limiting factor for many families is likely to be entry rather than day-to-day quality.
Best suited to families who want a structured, calm start to school life, who value outdoor learning and broad experiences early on, and who are comfortable choosing a growing school where the story is still being written.
The most recent inspection evidence is positive. In March 2025, Ofsted judged Quality of Education, Behaviour and Attitudes, Personal Development, Leadership and Management, and Early Years Provision as Good, and safeguarding was confirmed as effective.
Reception admissions are coordinated by Staffordshire. In practice, priority rules and oversubscription criteria in the school’s admissions arrangements determine who is offered a place when the school is full. Families should read the current admissions policy carefully and compare realistic travel times before relying on a place.
Yes. The school’s wraparound provision, Ladybird Club, is available from Nursery onwards and runs from 7.30am until 5.30pm on weekdays, with published session options.
Nursery offers 15 to 30 hour funded places from the term after a child turns 3, with published morning and afternoon sessions. Activities are planned around the seven areas of learning and development used in the Early Years Foundation Stage. For Nursery fee details, use the school’s own published information rather than relying on third-party summaries.
Two school-specific features stand out in published material: Muddy Meadows, a weekly outdoor learning programme, and the Bloom Agreement, a cultural entitlement offer intended to ensure pupils leave Year 4 with shared practical experiences and life skills.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
