A University Technical College (UTC) asks families to make a deliberate choice at 14 or 16, leaving a conventional secondary route in favour of technical specialism and industry contact. UTC Warrington positions itself squarely in that space, with pathways spanning engineering, digital and construction, alongside core GCSEs and post-16 options including T Levels. Employer involvement is a defining feature, and the equipment list reads more like a small training centre than a typical school.
Leadership is stable, with Chris Hatherall in post as principal since September 2021. The school opened in September 2016 and is part of Aldridge Education, giving it trust-level capacity and a wider network.
UTC Warrington’s stated identity is professional and workplace-facing. The model is built around technical specialisms and employability, with employer partners involved in masterclasses and project briefs, and a personal development programme that explicitly teaches workplace behaviours such as leadership and teamwork. For students who like learning by making, building, testing and presenting, that structure can feel purposeful.
The facilities reinforce the message. Instead of a single design and technology room, the school describes multiple specialist spaces, including Computer Aided Design suites, a Computer Numerically Controlled machine suite, an electronics workshop, hydraulics and pneumatics, materials testing, and prototyping kit such as laser cutting and 3D printers. The same page also cites five science laboratories and a £540,000 investment in ICT resources, plus a named Fujitsu digital hub. The practical implication is straightforward, students spend more time with industry-standard tools, and less time simulating the real world.
Governance and accountability also look like a trust-run technical institution. The school sits within Aldridge Education, and that context matters because improvement work, staffing support and external partnerships can be coordinated at trust level rather than left solely to a single site.
Headline performance indicators in the most recent dataset are challenging at GCSE level. The school’s Attainment 8 score is 24.2 and Progress 8 is -1.82. EBacc measures are also very low with 1% achieving grades 5 or above in the EBacc. These figures suggest that, historically, outcomes have not matched the ambition of the technical model.
Rankings should be read as comparative indicators rather than absolute verdicts. Ranked 3,835th in England and 14th in Warrington for GCSE outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data). The percentile band places performance below England average overall.
At A-level, results are also weak and likely reflect a small cohort. A-level outcomes show 11.11% of grades at A, 0% at A* and B, and 11.11% at A*-B. Ranked 2,493rd in England and 3rd in Warrington for A-level outcomes (FindMySchool ranking based on official data).
The key context for families is that UTCs are often judged not only on GCSE and A-level outcomes, but also on progression into apprenticeships, technical routes and sustained employment. The right question is whether the technical pathway and support structures compensate for the exam profile for the individual student, particularly for those who learn best through applied work.
England ranks and key metrics (where available)
A-Level A*-B
11.11%
% of students achieving grades A*-B
GCSE 9–7
—
% of students achieving grades 9-7
The curriculum model combines core GCSEs with specialist pathways. At Key Stage 4, core subjects include English, mathematics and combined science, with specialist study selected alongside. Post-16, the offer is overtly technical, with T Levels highlighted across areas such as engineering and construction, and explicit entry requirements for these routes.
The most recent inspection evidence points to a school that is still standardising its academic model in places. The inspection report notes that the curriculum is not finalised in some subjects, and that staff do not always apply agreed learning techniques consistently, which can make it harder for students to build secure knowledge over time. The practical implication is that students who need very consistent routines and highly structured teaching may require careful consideration and detailed questioning during a visit.
On the positive side, reading support is described as targeted, with checks to identify students who are behind and support to build confidence. SEND identification is also described as prompt, which matters in a setting where students may arrive after a disrupted earlier experience.
The school’s stated destinations are apprenticeships, university or employment, with employer engagement designed to translate into real opportunities. For a UTC, progression matters as much as grades, particularly for students targeting technical apprenticeships or higher technical study.
In the 2023/24 leavers cohort (27 students), 22% progressed to university, 22% started apprenticeships, and 30% entered employment.
Because UTCs attract students who want a technical route, families should also ask how progression is supported at individual level, for example employer project links, work experience, interview preparation, and guidance on apprenticeship applications. The Aldridge Connect and Connect+ programme is presented as the structured mechanism for careers education, guidance and targeted support.
Quality of Education
Requires Improvement
Behaviour & Attitudes
Requires Improvement
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
UTC Warrington primarily recruits at 14 (Year 10) and 16 (Year 12), and is currently accepting applications for both entry points. For September 2026 Year 10 entry, the school states that applications must be submitted by 31 October 2025, with later applications placed on a waitlist.
For Year 12, the admissions policy sets the same application deadline of 31 October 2025 and states that offers will be made from 1 March 2026. The school’s Year 12 page also sets academic entry expectations for T Levels, including a minimum of 5 GCSEs at grade 5 or above including maths and English, and a separate threshold for its T Level Foundation Year.
If you are comparing UTC Warrington to other options, FindMySchool’s Local Hub and Comparison Tool can help you benchmark outcomes and context across nearby providers, before you commit to a technical pathway.
Pastoral effectiveness in a UTC often hinges on consistency, attendance expectations and relationships, because many students join after a difficult earlier fit. The most recent inspection evidence describes work to raise expectations of behaviour and to introduce new behaviour and attendance strategies, with a positive effect for many students, alongside an ongoing challenge with a minority not attending regularly enough. That matters because technical courses build sequentially, missed time tends to show up quickly in practical competence and written understanding.
Safeguarding arrangements are described as effective in the most recent inspection evidence. SEND needs are identified quickly and shared with staff, which is important for students arriving mid-phase from other schools.
A UTC should offer more than lessons, it should build a portfolio of experiences that make sense on an apprenticeship or university application. UTC Warrington describes enrichment and employability as core features of student life.
Recent prospectus materials give a sense of the kinds of enrichment that can run alongside the curriculum. Examples listed include Combined Cadet Force, Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, the Royal Navy Engineering Challenge, Green Kart Racing, programming and coding, Young Enterprise, STEM Ambassadors, and the Baker Technical Award. The practical implication is that students can build evidence of teamwork, leadership and applied problem solving, rather than relying solely on exam grades.
Facilities also play an extracurricular role. When a school has specialist workshops, CAD suites and prototyping equipment, project work can extend beyond timetabled lessons into co-curricular time, especially for students preparing portfolios or employer presentations.
The published day structure is longer than many mainstream schools. The working day is described as 8:30am to 4:30pm, with optional co-curricular activities running after 3:15pm on Tuesday to Thursday, and lunchtime activities also available. The school’s FAQ page adds that students arrive between 8:30am and 8:45am, first lesson begins at 9:10am, and the day finishes at 3:15pm.
The site is described as centrally located with access to bus and train links, which supports a wider catchment than a typical local secondary.
Exam outcomes need scrutiny. The GCSE and A-level indicators in the latest dataset are weak, including a Progress 8 score of -1.82 and an Attainment 8 score of 24.2. Families should ask for the school’s current improvement priorities, subject-by-subject support, and how technical pathways are protected if a student struggles with core GCSEs.
Attendance and behaviour culture is a key risk factor. The inspection evidence highlights improved strategies, but also that some students still do not attend regularly enough, which can limit achievement and progress in sequential technical courses.
The technical model suits a specific learner. This route works best for students who want engineering, digital or construction in their week, and who respond to practical projects and professional expectations. Students who mainly want a traditional academic experience may prefer a mainstream sixth form or college.
UTC Warrington offers a clearly defined technical pathway, supported by specialist facilities and an employer-facing model that can appeal strongly to the right student. It suits families seeking a deliberate move at 14 or 16 into engineering, digital or construction routes, particularly where apprenticeship progression is a priority. The challenge is that published exam outcomes and recent inspection evidence point to inconsistency, so families should probe how teaching practice is being standardised and how students are kept on track academically while they specialise.
UTC Warrington has a distinctive technical offer and specialist facilities, but recent published indicators present a mixed picture. The November 2024 inspection recorded Requires Improvement judgements for quality of education and behaviour and attitudes, with Good for personal development, leadership and management, and sixth form provision. Families should weigh the technical pathway and progression support against the exam outcomes and ask detailed questions about current improvement work.
The most recent Ofsted inspection took place on 12 to 13 November 2024. It judged quality of education as Requires Improvement and behaviour and attitudes as Requires Improvement, with personal development, leadership and management, and sixth form provision judged Good.
Applications for Year 10 entry are made through the school’s application route, with the school stating a deadline of 31 October 2025 for September 2026 entry, and that later applications may go onto a waitlist.
For Year 12, the school sets specific entry thresholds for T Levels. It states that entry to a T Level course requires at least 5 GCSEs at grade 5 or above including maths and English, and the T Level Foundation Year requires at least 5 GCSEs at grade 3 or above including maths and English.
A UTC combines core academic study with a technical specialism linked to local industry, plus a strong emphasis on employability and progression into apprenticeships, university or employment. UTC Warrington describes employer masterclasses and projects, a structured careers programme, and specialist workshops and labs designed for technical learning.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.