The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
The first impression is of a school that takes early childhood seriously, not as a holding pen before “real school”, but as the place where habits, confidence, and curiosity are built. A clear, child-friendly mantra sits behind the day-to-day: be safe, be kind, be respectful. It is reinforced through consistent routines, calm relationships, and adults who know pupils well.
The current headteacher is Mrs Catherine Bull, appointed in January 2019. Pupils attend from Reception to Year 2, with an unusually small planned intake for a state school: 30 places per year group, which shapes everything from class size to the intensity of competition for places. In the most recent admissions cycle there were 63 applications for 30 offers, indicating sustained local demand.
For families, the big practical advantage is the partnership model with the linked junior school on the same site, plus wraparound childcare through Twilight Club and a set of initiatives that connect learning to real life, including cooking and growing projects, and structured outdoor play at lunchtime.
A good infant school is defined by what happens in the smallest moments, how quickly a nervous Reception child settles, how adults intervene when a friendship wobbles, how often pupils are praised for effort rather than outcomes. Here, those basics appear secure. Pupils are described as happy and safe, with strong relationships across the community, and low-level disruption is reported as infrequent.
The school’s age range matters. Because pupils leave at the end of Year 2, leaders have to get the essentials right early: phonics, early number sense, language development, and the self-management that makes Key Stage 2 learning possible. The Early Years Foundation Stage is structured around learning through play, supported by a well-resourced outdoor area, with pupils also moving into the main hall for assemblies, lunch, and physical education.
There is also a clear “family infrastructure” to the partnership. The parent handbook describes an open-door approach for concerns, and practical routines that reduce friction: defined gate times, expectations on punctuality, and clear pick-up procedures. These might sound mundane, but for working families, the predictability is often what makes a school feel manageable.
Infant schools do not offer the same headline key stage measures that parents may be used to seeing for junior or primary schools, so this is not a place where it makes sense to fixate on published test tables. Instead, the most useful indicators are the quality of early reading, the sequencing of the curriculum, and whether pupils build knowledge steadily without gaps.
Reading is treated as a cornerstone. Phonics is taught as a structured programme by trained staff with strong subject knowledge, and this systematic approach is designed to ensure that early sounds learned in Reception are built on effectively through Years 1 and 2. A new library is also cited as part of the push to promote reading, alongside events such as World Book Day and the use of class stories selected with pupils.
Mathematics shows a similar pattern: focus on the core content, frequent review of prior learning, and improvement work following weaker outcomes over time. The main next step, based on external feedback, is extending opportunities for pupils to apply their maths in problem-solving and reasoning tasks, so that more pupils can deepen understanding rather than simply complete routine practice.
Because the school is small, parents should read “results” more as a trajectory than a single data point. In a 30-pupil cohort, a few pupils with higher needs or a few pupils who arrive mid-year can shift the shape of a class significantly. The stronger question is whether the system consistently gets pupils ready for Year 3, and the evidence points to a school that is working deliberately on curriculum precision and on reducing gaps.
At this age, good teaching looks concrete. Pupils need to handle materials, talk through ideas, rehearse vocabulary, and practise routines until they become automatic. The curriculum is described as ambitious and increasingly well sequenced, with particularly strong sequencing in the early years foundation curriculum, and lessons planned to keep engagement high.
Examples help make that real. In design and technology, pupils learn practical skills such as sewing in Year 1, and safe food preparation in Year 2. Those are not “extras”, they are deliberate ways of building fine motor control, vocabulary, and independence. They also signal a curriculum that is not limited to English and maths, even while those subjects remain central.
Two development areas are worth highlighting because they are specific and actionable. First, in some foundation subjects, the knowledge and vocabulary pupils should learn are not yet identified with enough precision to build learning as effectively as it could. Second, maths needs more structured chances for pupils to transfer skills into varied contexts. Neither is unusual in a school that is refining curriculum sequencing, but both matter, because gaps formed in Key Stage 1 can show up later as confidence issues.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
The most immediate “destination” is Year 3. Most pupils transfer to the linked junior school on the same site as part of the federation, which makes transition easier for children: familiar routines, familiar staff faces, and a consistent ethos. However, parents still need to apply through the local authority to secure the junior school place, even where the move is the expected route.
Looking further ahead, the partnership publishes a small set of common secondary destinations, with many children moving on to Kennet School and some to Trinity School, plus other West Berkshire secondaries such as Park House School and St Bartholomew's School. For parents of Reception-age children, this is mostly reassurance that the school is thinking about the full pipeline, not a promise of any particular route.
Admissions are coordinated by West Berkshire Council, and the pattern is competitive. there were 63 applications for 30 offers, with 2.1 applications per place, and first preferences slightly above the number of places available. This is the profile of a school where families should assume that a single preference strategy is risky.
Key timing is clear for the 2026 entry cycle. The local authority indicates that applications open from 12 September, the closing date is 15 January, and offers are issued on 16 April. Because this is a small-intake infant school, distance and catchment dynamics can change year to year even without published distance figures. Families serious about this option should use the FindMySchool Map Search to check their exact home-to-school distance and sense-check it against recent allocation patterns, then hold a realistic back-up in the same application.
There is also a structural factor behind the numbers: the published admission number has been set at 30 in recent years. In practical terms, that means fewer “marginal” places, so oversubscription tends to bite earlier in the criteria list than it might at a two-form entry school.
Applications
63
Total received
Places Offered
30
Subscription Rate
2.1x
Apps per place
Pastoral quality at infant level is less about “programmes” and more about how adults notice, respond, and reset. Pupils are described as trusting adults, with bullying reported as rare and handled quickly when it occurs. That matters, because early experiences can set a child’s relationship with learning for years.
Support is also designed into lunchtime and wider school life. The inspection report notes a lunchtime-based ‘SEAL’ programme for pupils who feel anxious or vulnerable. The parent handbook also describes a structured approach to behaviour and rewards through Learning Gems, with six “gems” linked to specific learning behaviours (such as attempting a new challenge, being kind, and solving problems). For many children, that concrete language is more meaningful than abstract values posters.
On the adult side, staff wellbeing is treated as an operational issue, not a slogan. Staff are described as consulted on workload changes and given time to complete tasks, which contributes to stability. For parents, staff stability often translates into consistent expectations for pupils, and fewer sudden shifts in classroom practice.
For infants, “extracurricular” is often code for play, movement, and practical experiences, and this partnership leans into that in a distinctive way.
Outdoor Play and Learning (OPAL) is a central plank. The partnership handbook describes the lunchtime OPAL model as giving children year-round outdoor play opportunities, including den building, a loose parts area, the multi-use games area (MUGA), a wildflower meadow, a garden, and a sensory garden. The implication is simple: pupils get a larger dose of unstructured, creative play alongside structured teaching, which can improve self-regulation and social confidence for many children, especially those who find long periods of sitting difficult.
Twilight Club provides wraparound care before and after school for infant and junior pupils, with a deliberately activity-rich model rather than just supervision. The club lists art and craft (including hama beads), construction play (Lego and Duplo), organised games (including bench ball), reading corners, and outdoor use of the field and adventure playground. For working parents, this is often the difference between a school being viable or not.
A final strand is the Good Grub Club, a programme built around growing and cooking. Pupils cook budget-friendly meals at school, then take home ingredients to recreate recipes with family, with a link to West Berks Foodbank and practical use of herbs grown in the Pod Planters. For younger children, cooking is more than a novelty: it builds fine motor skills, sequencing, vocabulary, and a sense of competence, while giving families a low-pressure way to talk, plan, and share routines.
Environmental action is not an add-on. The school reports achieving the Eco-Schools Green Flag with Distinction for the second year in a row, and also notes an OPAL gold standard accreditation, described as the first in West Berkshire. These markers will matter most to families who want sustainability and outdoor learning to be part of daily culture, not just occasional theme days.
The school day is clearly set out in the partnership handbook. Doors open at 8.45am for Reception and Key Stage 1, and the school day ends at 3.15pm for all children, with an earlier 1.35pm finish at the end of each long term. Wraparound care is available via Twilight Club, and the school also manages its own before and after-school care provision.
Drop-off and pick-up logistics are addressed directly. The handbook advises that the staff car park is not for parent parking, promotes a Park and Stride approach using the Nature Discovery Centre nearby, and encourages walking, cycling, or scooting, with cycle racks available. There is also a stated no-idling approach to reduce emissions around the school gates.
Competition for places. With 63 applications for 30 offers entry is the main hurdle. Families should plan preferences strategically, not emotionally, and keep a realistic alternative in play.
Small cohorts can feel intense. A 30-pupil intake can be ideal for children who prefer tighter friendships and predictable routines, but it can feel limiting for children who need a very large peer group to find their niche.
Curriculum refinement is still in motion. The school is developing curriculum sequencing in some foundation subjects and strengthening maths application through problem-solving. This is sensible improvement work, but parents who want fully “finished” curriculum structures in every subject may want to ask how these changes are being implemented year to year.
Pick-up logistics require planning. The handbook is explicit about parking constraints and safe gate routines. Families who rely on driving at peak times should factor this into daily life.
This is a state infant school that looks strongest when judged on the things that matter most at ages 4 to 7: calm routines, strong early reading, purposeful play, and adults who take wellbeing seriously. The small intake creates a close-knit feel and a sharper admissions challenge.
Best suited to families who value an outdoor-heavy early years experience, want structured phonics and clear behaviour routines, and can engage early with local authority admissions. If securing a place is realistic, the day-to-day experience should suit many children who thrive on warmth, consistency, and practical learning.
The latest Ofsted inspection took place on 21 May 2024 and concluded that the school continues to be Good, with safeguarding effective.
Applications are coordinated by West Berkshire Council rather than made directly to the school. For the 2026 entry cycle, the council indicates that applications open from 12 September, close on 15 January, and offers are issued on 16 April.
Yes. In the most recent admissions here, there were 63 applications for 30 places, which equates to 2.1 applications per place. This level of demand means families should include a realistic alternative preference.
Yes. The partnership runs Twilight Club, a wraparound childcare option for infant and junior pupils, with structured activities and outdoor play opportunities.
Most pupils transfer to the linked junior school within the partnership, which helps continuity. Parents still need to apply through the local authority to secure the Year 3 place, even where the transfer is the expected route.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.