The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
This is an infant school built around the early years and Key Stage 1, with a clear emphasis on helping children become confident readers early. The latest Ofsted inspection (25 to 26 April 2023) judged the school Good in every area reported, including early years provision, and it also confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective.
Day to day, the tone is warm and purposeful rather than intense. External review evidence describes pupils as safe, kind and respectful; routines are understood and generally calm enough to protect learning time, even though breaktimes are lively.
Admissions are competitive by local primary standards. available here, there were 162 applications and 89 offers for the Reception style entry route, which equates to about 1.82 applications per offer. For families, that translates into real competition, and it means it is worth getting the admissions detail right early.
The school’s best descriptor is sociable and structured. Children are expected to play hard at break, then settle quickly and get on with learning. Formal review evidence highlights energetic playtimes with lots of equipment, plus quieter spaces for children who want to draw or chat. That balance matters in an infant setting, because some children thrive on movement while others need a calm corner to reset.
Behaviour is framed through clear rules and routines that pupils recognise as fair. When those routines are well embedded, the practical benefit is time, more teaching minutes, fewer stops and starts, and less cognitive load for younger pupils who are still learning how “school” works. Where a small number lose focus, adults are described as spotting it quickly and steering them back, which is exactly the kind of micro-support that keeps infant classrooms running smoothly.
A notable feature here is how extracurricular sits inside the school day rather than being treated as an optional add-on. External evidence describes a wide range of lunchtime clubs for Years 1 and 2, with examples including crafts, Lego, French and ballet, and the review notes that pupils attend enthusiastically. The implication is that enrichment is part of the normal weekly rhythm, not something reserved for a small group.
Leadership-wise, the headteacher is Ms Anna Conley, and that name is consistently listed across official and school sources. Publicly available sources do not consistently publish a specific appointment date, but she is clearly in post by 24 November 2020, when an Ofsted letter is addressed to her as headteacher.
As an infant school, families should not expect the same headline measures as a full primary, because pupils move on before Key Stage 2 outcomes are reached. That makes it especially important to look at the building blocks of later attainment, early reading, phonics, language development, early number, and learning behaviours.
Here, the strongest evidence points to early reading as a defining strength. Reading is positioned as the central pillar of learning, with children introduced early to high-quality texts and established authors. Pupils are described as listening closely to stories, talking confidently about books, and using props in Reception to retell tales, which is a practical sign that comprehension and vocabulary work is happening early, not delayed to later years.
Phonics is another clear headline. Staff are described as well trained; checks happen regularly; misconceptions are corrected quickly; and pupils who need extra help receive targeted support to catch up. Books are matched to phonic knowledge, so children can practise decoding successfully rather than guessing. For parents, this is the bit that often makes the biggest day-to-day difference at home, because children who can reliably decode are more likely to choose to read.
. In practical terms, parents should treat this as a “quality of provision” decision rather than a “league-table” decision, and focus on what the school does with children during the most formative two to three years of schooling.
If you are comparing local infant and primary options, the FindMySchool Local Hub pages and the Comparison Tool can still help, particularly for nearby schools that do publish comparable end-of-phase metrics.
Teaching is described as systematic in most subjects. The curriculum content is set out clearly; teachers are explicit about what pupils need to know; new vocabulary is introduced carefully; understanding is checked frequently; and learning is revisited for children who need more support. The implication is a classroom experience where children are less likely to drift because adults are actively checking comprehension rather than assuming it.
The nuance is that not every subject is at the same stage of maturity. The most recent inspection evidence notes that in a few subjects the curriculum was still evolving, with less clarity about what pupils should know at each step, and with subject leadership monitoring not yet fully consistent. For parents, this is not unusual in an infant school where staffing is tight and leaders carry multiple roles, but it does suggest you should ask how curriculum development is being prioritised and reviewed year on year.
Early years practice is described as well considered, with children given opportunities to build independence and knowledge through stimulating indoor and outdoor activities. There are also concrete examples of adults modelling and extending language through everyday contexts, such as counting objects or planting, and teaching feelings vocabulary through structured activities. That kind of language work matters, because it underpins both behaviour and learning, and it is often the difference between a child coping in a larger class and a child feeling overwhelmed.
Quality of Education
Good
Behaviour & Attitudes
Good
Personal Development
Good
Leadership & Management
Good
FMS Inspection Score calculated by FindMySchool based on official inspection data.
The key transition point is the move into a junior school after Year 2. For families, that is not just a change of building; it is a change in expectations, curriculum depth, and the pace of learning. The most relevant question to ask is how the infant school prepares children for that step, academically and emotionally.
The admissions documentation for this school explicitly references siblings at the “partner junior school” within its oversubscription priorities, which signals an expected local pathway for many families, even though progression itself is not an automatic entitlement.
Practically, parents should approach this as a two-stage plan. First, choose the right infant environment for ages 4 to 7. Second, start exploring junior options early enough to understand whether you are aiming for a linked local junior route, a different local primary that spans to Year 6, or an in-year move. If you are moving into the area, it is worth mapping both infant and junior catchment priorities together, using a distance tool such as FindMySchool Map Search as an early sense-check.
Admissions for the normal entry point are coordinated through Essex County Council rather than handled solely by the school. The school’s published admissions information indicates that the standard application window for the September 2026 intake ran from 10 November 2025 to 15 January 2026. After that point, applications are treated as late, which can materially reduce your chance of receiving an offer at a popular school.
Oversubscription criteria are clearly structured. In summary, priority moves from looked-after and previously looked-after children, to siblings at the infant school or partner junior school, then to children living in the priority admission area, and then to remaining applicants. Where there are more applicants than places within a criterion, straight line distance from home to school is used as the tie-break.
Demand is not extreme on a “London hotspot” scale, but it is meaningfully competitive. Based on, the school was oversubscribed, with 162 applications and 89 offers for the entry route captured here. If you are using distance as a key strategy, remember that allocations move around year to year depending on where applicants live. Families considering a house move should always verify likely priorities and distances for the specific admissions year they care about.
Open events appear to run on a seasonal rhythm. The school published open mornings for the September 2026 intake during November and January in that cycle, which suggests a repeat pattern most years. Because dates change annually, treat this as typical timing and check the school’s current events listings.
In-year transfers are handled directly, with an online form route referenced in the admissions information.
Applications
162
Total received
Places Offered
89
Subscription Rate
1.8x
Apps per place
Pastoral work is unusually explicit for an infant context, in a good way. The school publishes a clear approach to mental health and wellbeing, including practical classroom tools such as worry boxes, calm corners, and structured emotional vocabulary work. It also references a mindfulness mentor supporting positive mindset and self-regulation strategies. The value for families is straightforward, children who can name feelings and practise calming strategies tend to recover more quickly from small upsets, which makes learning and friendships easier.
Safeguarding culture is described as strong, with staff trained to notice signs of risk and to report concerns quickly, and with leaders acting rapidly to put help in place when needed. This is the kind of behind-the-scenes competence that rarely shows up in marketing, but it is central to how safe a school feels in daily life.
The most distinctive enrichment feature is the lunchtime club model. Instead of relying solely on after-school activities, external evidence describes lunchtime clubs as a core part of the offer for Years 1 and 2, with examples spanning creative activities and structured pursuits like French, alongside clubs like ballet.
Sport is also positioned as a regular entitlement rather than an occasional treat. A published sport offer document indicates that lunchtime sport clubs and multi-skills sessions are led by a sports coach and are designed for Key Stage 1 children.
For children who need quieter enrichment, music is presented as an accessible route. The school’s music information notes lunchtime music clubs and opportunities to learn instruments during the year.
This mix matters because it supports different temperaments. A confident, highly social child can burn energy and learn new physical skills, while a quieter child can find a “small group” identity through music, craft, or Lego style clubs. Either way, the aim is the same, to help children feel they belong to something beyond their class.
Published opening times are clear and parent-friendly: morning session 8:40am to 12:00pm, lunch 12:00pm to 1:00pm, and afternoon session 1:00pm to 3:10pm.
Drop-off and pick-up routines are also spelled out in a parent booklet, including gates opening at 8:40am and classroom doors closing at 8:55am.
Wraparound care is offered through Bridge the Gap, with sessions advertised from 7:45am before school and until 6:00pm after school, with published prices of £5.00 and £10.00 respectively.
On travel, parking and road safety are explicitly flagged as important in school documents, which is often a sign that the immediate approach roads can get congested at peak times.
** With 162 applications and 89 offers snapshot here, admission can be tight. If you are applying outside the normal cycle, your options may be more limited.
Infant-only structure. Families need to plan for a second transition after Year 2. That can be a positive reset for some children, but it does mean thinking about the junior stage earlier than you would at a 4 to 11 primary.
Curriculum development in a few subjects. The most recent inspection evidence notes that some subjects were still being refined, with monitoring not yet consistent everywhere. Ask how subject leadership and curriculum review have progressed since 2023.
Wraparound costs. Breakfast and after-school provision is available, but it is paid childcare rather than a free add-on. Budgeting for this can change the real cost of the school week.
This is a well-organised infant school where early reading is treated as the core job, not one priority among many. The strongest fit is for families who want a structured approach to phonics, consistent routines, and enrichment that happens within the school day through lunchtime clubs. It can also suit working families well because wraparound care is clearly advertised.
The main challenge is getting a place and then planning the junior transition. Families who shortlist this option should map likely admissions priorities early and keep a parallel plan for junior progression.
The most recent inspection (April 2023) judged the school Good overall and Good across the specific areas reported, including early years provision. Evidence from that review also points to early reading and phonics being well organised, with books matched to pupils’ phonic knowledge and timely extra help for those who need it.
The admissions information describes a priority admission area and uses straight line distance as a tie-break when there are more applicants than places within a priority group. Because the school is oversubscribed here, it is sensible to treat distance and priority area as important factors and to verify your position against the published criteria for the year you are applying.
Yes. The school advertises wraparound care through Bridge the Gap, with sessions running from 7:45am before school and until 6:00pm after school, with published session costs.
Applications are coordinated via Essex County Council. The school’s published information states that the main application window for the September 2026 cycle opened in November 2025 and closed on 15 January 2026, with later applications treated as late. If you missed the deadline, you should still apply, but you should expect the process to follow late application rules and consider alternative local options in parallel.
Children move on to a junior school for Key Stage 2. The admissions priorities reference siblings at the partner junior school, which indicates a common local pathway for many families, but it is still important to check junior admissions separately and plan early for that next step.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.