The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
A prep that treats ages 3 to 11 as one continuous runway, with early years, specialist teaching, and a strong co-curricular rhythm built into the week. It sits within the wider Loughborough Schools Foundation family, which matters because transition routes, shared facilities, and community events are part of the offer rather than add-ons. The school describes itself as academically selective, and the admissions policy makes clear that entry is filtered through assessment and (for some year groups) school references, not simply on a first-come basis.
Parents get a practical, broad proposition: wraparound provision to 18:00, an extensive bus network from Year 3, and a campus set-up that allows pupils to access a wider ecosystem while staying in a prep-sized setting. The headline breadth is explicit, with 60 plus clubs, 18 instruments taught, and multiple productions across the year.
A key piece of external reassurance is the latest inspection. The most recent ISI visit, 26 to 28 November 2024, reported that the Standards were met across leadership and governance, education, wellbeing, social and economic education, and safeguarding.
There is a clear “big-school opportunities, prep-scale childhood” feel here, shaped by three factors the school itself foregrounds: a strong co-curricular programme, specialist teaching, and being part of a foundation of schools on a shared campus. That combination tends to suit families who want variety without making a 3 to 11 setting feel stretched. The admissions pages also flag “high demand” in some year groups and the use of waiting lists, which is often a proxy for an engaged local market.
The school’s physical identity blends heritage and newer spaces. It was founded in 1929 as part of Loughborough High School and became autonomous in 1969. The site history also highlights Fairfield House, often referred to as the White House, built in 1828, as a focal point of the community.
Those details matter because they point to a school that has expanded around an older core, which often translates into a mix of traditional rooms and purpose-designed areas for early years, sport, and specialist subjects.
Leadership continuity is another feature. Headmaster Andrew Earnshaw has been in post since January 2013, and his biography positions the period since then as one of growth and investment, alongside an emphasis on pastoral care.
That kind of tenure usually helps with consistency of routines and expectations, particularly in a prep where pupils pass through several phases before Year 6.
Faith character is listed as Christian. In practice, what comes through most strongly in published materials is not confessional exclusivity, but an ethos framed around kindness, respect, and community, with explicit statements that applications are welcomed irrespective of religion or background.
For families who want a faith-informed tone without narrow entry criteria, that combination can be reassuring, although it is sensible to ask directly how worship and faith teaching sit within the weekly rhythm.
For independent preps, the most meaningful “results” are often less about public data tables and more about the consistency of progress, the rigour of teaching, and where pupils move on at 11. Published performance metrics are limited here, and the admissions policy is explicit that the school does not publish entrance assessment results.
So the best evidence base comes from two places: the curriculum breadth described by the school, and the most recent inspection’s commentary on curriculum, assessment, and learning behaviours.
The latest ISI report describes a broad curriculum and notes that teachers enable pupils to make good progress through a range of lesson activities, supported by an assessment framework that identifies needs and targets support. It also flags an area to tighten, namely that opportunities for pupils to deepen understanding through independent thinking are not consistently evident across lessons.
The implication for parents is straightforward: expectations are high and progress is monitored, but the quality of challenge may vary by class or subject area, so it is worth probing how the school is standardising stretch and independent learning.
If you are comparing preps locally, FindMySchool’s Local Hub pages can still be useful for building a shortlist, even when public exam tables are not central for the prep phase. In practice, the best comparison points become curriculum structure, transition routes, and the daily logistics that affect family life.
Teaching is framed around strong foundations plus specialist provision. The school highlights specialist subject teaching in areas such as modern foreign languages, music, Forest School, and physical education.
That matters at prep level because specialist teaching can prevent the timetable becoming “generalist plus clubs” and instead gives pupils sustained skill-building earlier, particularly in languages and the arts.
Music is the clearest example of a structured pathway. The music curriculum draws on the Kodály approach and includes defined schemes such as Ocarina Warrior in Year 1 and Recorder Karate in Year 3.
The implication is that music literacy is treated as a taught skill, not simply an extracurricular add-on. For pupils who respond well to staged progression, that approach tends to build confidence quickly.
There is also a strong ensemble and performance spine. The school describes weekly Soundbites concerts (Friday lunchtime), a Prep Gala Concert, and a summer Al Fresco event, alongside foundation-wide music competitions each February.
For families, this often translates into regular low-stakes performance opportunities, which can be particularly helpful for quieter pupils who benefit from repeated, supported exposure rather than one high-pressure showcase.
Outdoor learning is also explicitly embedded in the lower years. Forest School provision includes an Outdoor Odyssey Scheme, with specialist-taught outdoor education for children from Kindergarten to Year 2, combining child-initiated tasks and teacher-led investigations across a forest school site and dedicated outdoor learning areas.
The practical benefit is that attention, language, and social skills can be developed through structured outdoor routines, which tends to suit children who learn best through doing rather than extended seatwork.
For many families, the key question at 11 is whether Year 6 feels like an ending or a handover. Here, the school is explicit about a foundation pathway. Pupils who join before the start of Year 6 are guaranteed a place at one of the foundation senior schools, provided they are on track to meet the entry threshold for Loughborough Grammar School or Loughborough High School. Pupils joining in Year 6, or those not on track, will need to sit an 11 plus entrance assessment for the relevant senior school.
That kind of conditional guarantee has two implications. First, it can reduce uncertainty for families who are committed to the foundation route, because the pathway is planned rather than improvised. Second, it keeps academic expectations meaningful, because progression is linked to readiness, not automatic entitlement in all circumstances.
The school also describes a senior transition programme intended to build independence and maturity for the move to Year 7.
Parents considering a switch out of the foundation at 11 should ask directly how the school supports external applications, scholarships, and references, since the default narrative is understandably foundation-focused.
Admissions are selective and structured around assessment. The admissions policy states that the restrictions placed on entry are academic ability, behaviour, and numbers, and that the headmaster makes the final selection after consultation with staff.
For parents, the key takeaway is that this is not a “register early and you are in” model, especially in busier year groups.
Entry points start early. Children can begin in Kindergarten from their third birthday, subject to availability. The admissions policy also sets expectations for Kindergarten places, including a minimum of three full days per week and a pre-entry assessment visit focused on readiness and development.
A practical nuance is worth noting: children who joined Kindergarten prior to October half term do not require a separate entrance assessment for the move into Reception, because readiness is assessed through ongoing observation in the Kindergarten unit.
For Reception through Year 6, the school uses entrance assessments. For Years 3 to 6, the policy describes assessment in mathematics and English plus measures of general ability, with references requested from the current school for entry into Years 1 to 6.
This tends to suit pupils who present well in a school-based assessment setting and whose current school can provide a supportive reference.
The website also publishes specific assessment and taster dates across the 2025 to 2026 cycle, including 14 October 2025 for a Reception to Year 6 assessment and taster day, and 17 January 2026 for 4 plus entrance assessments.
Because these dates can shift year to year, treat them as the current published schedule and confirm the next cycle early if you are aiming for later entry.
When discussing logistics and competitiveness, FindMySchool’s Map Search tool can help families understand travel time and practical day-to-day feasibility, particularly if you are weighing bus routes, drop-off patterns, or a move into the local area.
Pastoral care is emphasised in both leadership messaging and external reporting. The latest ISI inspection summary describes pupils being known and understood by staff and leaders, and notes that leaders prioritise health and welfare with oversight of facilities, first aid, and pastoral care.
That typically translates into clear routines and an expectation that adults track pupils beyond pure academic output.
Behaviour standards appear to be a lived priority. The inspection summary describes pupils meeting leaders’ high expectations of behaviour towards others and communicating thoughtfully with respect for others.
For parents, this matters most in the ordinary moments: classroom transitions, lunchtime, and competitive activities where values are either reinforced or forgotten.
The school’s wraparound provision also plays a pastoral role because it changes how the day feels for working families. Breakfast club and after-school care are described as structured, with breakfast provision, supervised transitions into class, and homework supervision for older pupils in the after-school window.
If your child is likely to be a regular wraparound user, it is worth asking how staff continuity works across the day, since that can affect attachment and behaviour in younger pupils.
The co-curricular offer is positioned as a core part of school life, not a bolt-on. The admissions pages cite more than 60 clubs, alongside multiple musical productions and a wide instrumental offer.
The important question for parents is not the number alone, but how the school turns that breadth into sustained progress rather than short-lived tasters.
Music is unusually structured for a prep. In addition to classroom schemes and instrumental pathways, there are frequent performance opportunities. Weekly Soundbites concerts, the Prep Gala Concert, and the Al Fresco summer event create repeated performance practice, which tends to build stage confidence steadily.
For pupils who love music, this frequency matters more than a single annual concert, because it normalises performing.
There is also a modern strand through music technology and recording, with the school describing two recording studios and positioning music technology as both curricular and enrichment.
The implication is a broader definition of “musical”: composing, recording, and digital production can be a legitimate pathway alongside traditional instrumental routes.
Sport is clearly resourced and taken seriously as part of preparation for senior school. The sports page highlights national finalist outcomes in 2024 to 2025 competitions, including IAPS under-11 football for both boys and girls, alongside athletics relay and sprint achievements.
Even if your child is not an elite athlete, this level of fixture ambition often benefits the wider cohort by raising the quality of coaching, training habits, and sports culture.
The curriculum language is also explicit. In Years 3 and 4, the school describes HEAT values (humility, empathy, adaptability, togetherness) taught through a mix of games, dance, gymnastics, athletics, and swimming. For Years 5 and 6, the emphasis shifts towards concepts such as collaboration, resilience, and self or peer analysis, taught through a wide activity mix.
This approach suits pupils who respond to clear behavioural expectations in sport, not just competitive selection.
The school also describes a triathlon club with links to coaching and training opportunities around the wider campus and local institutions.
If your child is keen on endurance sport, it is worth asking how training is balanced with prep workload and whether commitment levels vary by age.
Performing arts are presented as inclusive by design. The school states that every year group has the opportunity to perform in a production, including the audition process for roles, and it offers LAMDA tuition and examination routes.
That combination usually works well for pupils who need both an inclusive baseline and an optional “stretch” pathway for formal qualifications.
Beyond generic lists, the best clues come from the school’s own achievements and named programmes. The Outdoor Odyssey Scheme under Forest School gives outdoor learning a recognisable spine in the younger years.
And the school’s recent chess coverage signals a serious culture around chess rather than a casual lunchtime club.
For parents, these specifics matter because they indicate which activities are likely to be well-coached, well-attended, and sustained across the year.
Fees are published for 2025 to 2026 on a per-term basis. Pre-Prep (Reception, Year 1 and Year 2) is £5,525 per term. Upper Prep is £5,760 per term for Years 3 and 4, and £5,995 per term for Years 5 and 6.
Nursery and pre-school fees are listed separately by the school; for early years pricing, use the school’s fees page rather than relying on third-party summaries.
There are also clear one-off and optional costs. The registration fee is £60, and the acceptance deposit for day pupils is £500, refundable when pupils leave in line with the foundation’s terms.
Lunch, music and LAMDA lessons, and wraparound care are itemised as extra charges, which is helpful for budgeting because it makes the “headline fee” versus “real term cost” distinction more transparent.
Discounting is focused on siblings across the foundation. From September 2025, the third child receives a 10% discount and subsequent children receive 15%, applied to the youngest child.
On financial help, the foundation’s bursary information frames bursaries as means-tested support for children who have passed entrance assessments but whose families cannot meet the fees. It does not publish a simple percentage figure for this particular school, so parents considering assistance should ask early about eligibility and timelines.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per term
Wraparound provision runs up to 18:00, with breakfast provision beginning at 07:45, and structured after-school care that includes a light tea and homework supervision for older pupils in a defined window.
Holiday club is also listed as part of the wider wraparound offer.
Transport is unusually well developed for a prep. The school highlights free parking on site, access by train with the local station around a 25 minute walk away, and an extensive bus network across surrounding counties from Year 3.
For families commuting from outside the immediate area, that combination can make a significant difference to daily stress and punctuality.
Selective entry. Entry is filtered by assessment, and for some year groups by school references and behaviour expectations. This can be a good fit for pupils who enjoy academic challenge, but it is less suitable if you want a purely non-selective local intake.
Lesson-to-lesson consistency. The latest ISI report highlights that independent thinking opportunities are not equally evident across all lessons. Ask how the school is tightening challenge and independent learning as pupils move through Years 3 to 6.
Budgeting beyond tuition. Lunch, wraparound, and individual lessons are priced separately, and these extras can become a meaningful part of the termly cost depending on your child’s timetable.
Foundation route expectations. The pathway to foundation senior schools is a strength, but it can also shape assumptions about Year 7 destinations. Families aiming elsewhere should ask how the school supports external applications at 11.
This is a well-established independent prep with a clear identity: structured early years, specialist teaching from a young age, and a busy co-curricular calendar that is backed by facilities and foundation-wide infrastructure. The latest inspection gives confidence on core standards and safeguarding, while still leaving a useful prompt for parents to ask about consistency of stretch and independent learning across classes.
Who it suits most: families who want an academically selective prep with strong music, sport, and outdoor learning, and who see the foundation senior schools as a natural next step. The main decision points are fit with selective entry, and the overall cost once clubs, lessons, and wraparound are added.
The most recent ISI inspection (26 to 28 November 2024) reported that the Standards were met across leadership and governance, education, wellbeing, and safeguarding. The report also describes high expectations for behaviour and a culture where pupils are well known by staff.
For 2025 to 2026, Pre-Prep (Reception to Year 2) is £5,525 per term. Upper Prep is £5,760 per term for Years 3 and 4, and £5,995 per term for Years 5 and 6. Extra charges apply for items such as lunch, wraparound care, and individual music or LAMDA lessons.
The school is academically selective and uses entrance assessments for Reception through Year 6, with references requested from the current school for entry into Years 1 to 6. The admissions policy also sets out a pre-entry assessment approach for Kindergarten, focused on readiness. Published dates include entrance assessments in January 2026 for 4 plus entry.
Yes. Wraparound care runs up to 18:00, with breakfast provision from 07:45 and after-school care that includes a light tea and homework supervision for older pupils. Holiday club is listed as part of the wider offer.
The school sits within the Loughborough Schools Foundation. Pupils who join before the start of Year 6 are guaranteed a place at one of the foundation senior schools if they are on track to meet entry thresholds for Loughborough Grammar School or Loughborough High School; others may need to sit the relevant 11 plus assessment.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.