The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Oakwood Primary School, Luton is a small independent primary with an Islamic character, serving children from age 3 to 11. With a published capacity of 160, it sits firmly in the close knit bracket, where staff can keep a tight grip on routines, behaviour and communication with families.
The headteacher is Mrs Fatemah Salihi. For parents, that matters less as a name and more as a signal of continuity, because a small school’s day to day feel is highly leadership-dependent.
Oakwood’s public-facing messaging is explicit about integrating faith and schooling. It positions itself as an Islamic ethos school aiming to meet children’s spiritual and moral development alongside a broad and balanced curriculum. That framing is helpful for families who want consistency between home and school values, and less helpful for those looking for a more secular environment.
Size is one of the defining features here. A school at around 150 pupils does not rely on scale to offer breadth; it relies on structure. In practice, that tends to show up as consistent classroom routines, clear expectations, and a premium on relationships. The 2025 inspection evidence supports that style of delivery, highlighting consistent approaches across the school and well-structured lessons.
Faith practice is not treated as an add-on. Curriculum materials and prospectus content describe core elements that include Qur’anic study and Arabic alongside the National Curriculum. For a child who thrives on routine and clear identity, that integration can feel grounding. For a child who prefers a lighter touch on faith within school time, it may feel like a poor match.
There are no KS2 performance metrics available for this school, so this section cannot report headline outcomes such as the percentage reaching expected standards.
The most useful current proxy, in the absence of published outcome data here, is the evidence around teaching quality and curriculum coherence from formal inspections. The June 2025 ISI routine inspection reported that Standards relating to leadership, education quality, wellbeing, and safeguarding are met.
Ofsted’s most recent standard inspection (05 July 2022) judged the school Good.
Oakwood presents its curriculum as a blend of the National Curriculum and Islamic studies, with Qur’an and Arabic described as core components alongside English and mathematics, plus foundation subjects such as history, geography, design and technology, and physical education.
A clear strength, based on the available evidence, is the degree of structure in lessons. External review notes indicate that staff follow consistent approaches and plan sequences that build knowledge and skills over time. For pupils, the implication is predictability in expectations and a clearer pathway through learning, which can be especially beneficial for children who need routine to stay confident.
Arabic and Qur’an content is described in inspection evidence in a way that goes beyond exposure. The 2025 report references pupils, by the end of Year 6, reading and reciting significant passages in Arabic from the Qur’an fluently. That is a meaningful marker for families who want strong faith-language outcomes as part of primary education.
On the practical side, parents will also notice a school that points families to specific learning platforms and structured programmes in English and mathematics (for example, phonics and times tables practice), which suggests a preference for systematic instruction rather than informal, purely topic-led delivery.
In practice, families considering Oakwood should ask directly about the most common secondary routes from Year 6, including whether pupils tend to move into local state secondaries, selective routes, or independent schools, and what guidance the school offers for those choices.
Admissions are handled directly by the school rather than through local authority coordinated allocation. The school asks parents to read its admissions policy, and it indicates that visits are by appointment, including when visiting with a child.
For families moving from nursery into Reception, the key question is how automatic progression is in practice. Oakwood confirms nursery provision and indicates funded hours availability for eligible families, but progression rules and any assessment steps should be checked in the admissions policy or in discussion with the school.
Because this is an independent school, “catchment” operates differently than at local authority maintained primaries. Place availability is more likely to be driven by the school’s capacity, year-group balance, and admissions priorities set out in policy, rather than distance from the gate.
A practical tip: parents using FindMySchool’s Map Search can still benefit from mapping commute time and local alternatives, even where distance is not an admissions criterion, because day to day logistics affect punctuality, attendance, and after-school participation.
Pastoral confidence in a small primary usually comes down to how well staff spot issues early, how consistent boundaries are, and how effectively safeguarding is managed. The inspection evidence points to a safeguarding culture that prioritises welfare, with systems that support oversight and follow-through.
Families should also expect the school’s Islamic ethos to show up in behaviour expectations and community norms. This can be positive for children who benefit from clear moral framing and shared expectations, but parents should explore how the school supports pupils who are less confident, less compliant, or still building self-regulation, particularly in the early years.
Oakwood’s wider offer is best understood as an extension of the school’s identity rather than a generic menu of clubs. A concrete example is the Morning Qur’an Club, which signals that enrichment can include faith-based study as well as broader activities.
Inspection evidence from recent years also references clubs and opportunities that include art, baking and sport, with the implication that the school does aim to broaden pupils’ interests beyond core classroom lessons.
For parents, the important follow-up is not just “what clubs exist”, but “how accessible are they”. Ask whether clubs are free or chargeable, how places are allocated, and whether participation is designed to include quieter children, not only the keen joiners.
Oakwood publishes its fees clearly. The annual tuition fee for one child from Reception to Year 6 is £5,028, with sibling concessionary rates of £4,528 for a second child and £4,028 for a third and subsequent child. The school also publishes an initial registration fee of £100 and a deposit of £500 payable on acceptance of a place.
The fees page states that tuition fees are inclusive of VAT, effective from 1 January 2025.
*Bursaries may be available for eligible families.
Basis: per year
Published policy material states a school day running from 8.40am to 3.30pm, with a pre-morning club beginning at 8.15am offering a range of activities.
For travel, Oakwood is based in Bury Park, Luton. As a day school with a small roll, drop-off and pick-up routines can be a significant part of the daily experience, so it is worth asking how the school manages arrival, parking expectations, and any local traffic pinch points.
Faith integration is central. The curriculum integrates Islamic studies, Qur’an and Arabic alongside the National Curriculum; families wanting a lighter faith footprint in the school day should consider alternatives.
Fees include VAT from 2025. The school’s published fee approach states VAT inclusion from 1 January 2025; parents budgeting over several years should ask how future fee setting is handled.
Oakwood Primary School, Luton is best understood as a small independent Islamic primary where faith and schooling are designed to reinforce each other. Inspection evidence points to consistent teaching approaches and a safeguarding culture that prioritises pupil welfare. The clearest fit is for families who actively want Islamic ethos integrated into daily education, value structure and routine, and are comfortable with independent-school fees. Families needing extensive wraparound or looking for a more secular school day should explore carefully before committing.
Oakwood’s most recent published inspection evidence is positive. It was judged Good at the last Ofsted standard inspection in July 2022, and the ISI routine inspection in June 2025 reports that the required standards are met across leadership, education quality, wellbeing and safeguarding.
The school publishes an annual tuition fee of £5,028 for Reception to Year 6 for a first child, with lower concessionary rates for siblings. It also lists a £100 registration fee and a £500 deposit on acceptance.
Yes. Oakwood has nursery provision and states it has spaces for 15 and 30 hours funding. Specific nursery fee amounts should be checked directly with the school.
Applications are made directly to the school. It asks parents to read its admissions policy and to arrange visits by appointment, including when visiting with a child.
The curriculum is described as combining the National Curriculum with Islamic studies, with Qur’an and Arabic included as core elements alongside English and mathematics. Inspection evidence also describes strong Arabic outcomes by the end of Year 6.
Get in touch with the school directly
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including the Department for Education (DfE), Ofsted, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI), the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, and official school websites.
Our rankings, metrics, and assessments are derived from this data using our own methodologies and represent our independent analysis rather than official standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Data may change without notice, and schools and/or local authorities should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular school, and rankings reflect specific metrics rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.
