Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A suspension changes the decision here. Little Chiefs, Paint Pots Day Nursery & Pre-School in Croft received a Good judgement at its 19 February 2025 Ofsted inspection, which also recognised effective support for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). That judgement must be read alongside the later safeguarding action.
On 20 July 2026, Ofsted suspended the nursery’s registration because it considered children potentially at risk of harm, and served a welfare requirements notice following a regulatory visit. The latest published position is the outcome dated 29 July 2026: childcare requiring registration cannot be provided while the suspension is in place.
The setting’s address is 3 Riverside Court, Croft, Leicester, LE9 3HG. Its age range is 3 to 60 months. For parents, the immediate issue is the regulatory position rather than the appeal of the activities described below.
The February 2025 account gives a clear picture of play with practical purpose. In the garden, children used planks and crates to devise a crossing during an imaginary muddy predicament. This brought movement, collaboration and problem-solving into the same activity. Indoors, choosing a story by voting introduced the idea that other children’s preferences count too.
The early years foundation stage is the required framework for children’s learning, development and care. In everyday terms, it connects play with developing language, physical skills and independence. The February 2025 examples make that connection tangible: babies explored hats while staff paired words with objects, and older children carried vocabulary from a book about rockets into their pretend play.
Activities drew on children’s interests and experiences at home. Conversations gave children opportunities to explain their ideas, with adults responding to what they said. These were ordinary interactions with an educational purpose, rather than learning confined to a formal group session.
Group teaching was the qualification to that picture. In February 2025, staff sometimes lacked a clear learning purpose when children gathered for planned activities. Their interactions consequently missed opportunities to develop understanding further. The improvement requested was greater clarity about what each group activity should teach, so an engaging task also has a deliberate next step.
Local walks and shopping for activity ingredients connected play with the surrounding community in February 2025. Chinese New Year and Diwali activities introduced cultural differences, while books represented families with two mothers or two fathers. These examples gave children concrete ways to encounter lives beyond their own household; no particular frequency is attached to them.
In February 2025, children sought adults out and included them in their play, reflecting familiar relationships. Staff responded to individual needs, and children settled into activities they enjoyed. The examples matter because they describe how relationships worked during the day, rather than simply applying a reassuring adjective to the setting.
Independence was practised in small, useful steps. Younger children worked on using spoons, while older children handled cutlery to cut their food. Getting their own drinks and putting on coats also formed part of the February 2025 routine. These skills supported preparation for school through everyday self-care, rather than through a claim about admission to a particular school.
Parent involvement included stay-and-play opportunities in February 2025, helping families understand their children’s interests and continue activities at home. Bonfire Night celebrations and Christmas crafts also brought families into nursery life. Progress updates formed another link between home and the setting.
The later safeguarding action carries greater weight for a current decision. In February 2026, policies had been reviewed following concerns about safeguarding, risk assessment and notifications. The July 2026 notice then required stronger leadership oversight, consistent handling of safeguarding concerns, reviews of concerns about children’s home circumstances and absences, and clearer procedures shared with families. It also required staff to understand safeguarding policies and procedures and apply them consistently in practice. Those requirements concern the protection of children, not simply administrative tidiness.
The nursery is at 3 Riverside Court in Croft, Leicester, LE9 3HG. The July 2026 outcome takes precedence over an ordinary account of opening hours or attendance: while suspended, the provider cannot deliver childcare that requires registration.
In February 2025, funded early education was offered for children aged two, three and four. That is a dated description of provision, rather than a basis for assuming a funded place can now be taken up. The regulatory restriction is the decisive practical consideration for families planning childcare.
The February 2025 picture will appeal to families who value practical play, language-rich conversation and everyday independence. Garden construction, community shopping and family participation gave that nursery day substance.
However, the July 2026 suspension is the controlling consideration. The earlier Good judgement does not settle whether childcare can lawfully resume or whether the later safeguarding requirements have been satisfied. For a family choosing care now, establishing that position must come before weighing the setting’s educational appeal.
Ofsted judged it Good on 19 February 2025. A later outcome dated 29 July 2026 records suspension imposed on 20 July 2026 and a welfare requirements notice concerning safeguarding.
Its age range is 3 to 60 months. Childcare requiring registration cannot be provided while its suspension is in place.
In February 2025, examples included constructing a garden crossing with crates and planks, exploring language through hats and rocket books, and buying ingredients on local outings.
In February 2025, it offered funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-olds. This historical offer does not override the later suspension.
It required stronger leadership oversight, consistent identification and handling of safeguarding concerns, reviews of concerns about children’s circumstances and absences, and clear absence procedures understood by staff and shared with families. Staff also had to understand safeguarding policies and procedures and apply them consistently in practice.
Closed: Bank Holidays & 1 week at Christmas
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Lou Palmer (Nursery Manager)
Owner
Little Chiefs Day Nurseries Ltd
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 19 February 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.