Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
A pet tortoise, insect hunts and a water wall give Kings Park Pre-School a practical, hands-on character. In July 2025, children explored living things, moving water and their own growing independence through everyday play. Small experiences carried useful lessons.
Ofsted rated the pre-school Good at its July 2025 inspection. It has 22 places in total; those attending that visit were aged two to four. Its address is Kings Park School, Kings Park, Dereham, NR19 2AH.
In July 2025, learning moved between indoor materials and outdoor exploration. Children shaped kinetic sand, tackled climbing equipment and followed obstacle courses. A water wall gave staff a concrete way to explain water flowing through pipes.
The early years foundation stage sets the framework for children's learning, development and care. Here, the July 2025 activities connected those purposes: counting spots on painted ladybirds practised number skills, while an insect checklist brought early literacy into outdoor exploration. Children searched for worms in mud and looked for spiders' webs, linking the insect topic to things they could investigate themselves.
Stories and conversation also mattered that month. Staff encouraged children to contribute familiar story phrases and introduced vocabulary such as millipede and earwig. Learning to care for the pet tortoise added an everyday opportunity to practise responsibility.
At the July 2025 inspection, Ofsted found safeguarding effective and children, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND), progressing well. That judgement sat alongside practical support: in July 2025, staff assessed development, adjusted experiences to individual interests and needs, and worked with other professionals on SEND support.
Independence was practised in manageable steps that month. Children served themselves fruit, poured drinks and took responsibility for personal care. Staff taught toothbrushing and explained sun protection through hats and drinking water. Medical training supported children's health needs, and activities were adapted to enable participation.
Families received regular updates on progress in July 2025. Farm outings and story cafes brought parents into children's learning, while relationships with local schools supported the move onwards. These were opportunities for involvement and transition support, rather than simply information sent home.
In July 2025, the pre-school operated Monday to Friday in term time, with sessions running from 8.30am to 3pm. This was a daytime, term-time attendance pattern, so its calendar matters as much as the daily finish time when weighing it against family routines.
Government-funded places were offered to eligible children in July 2025. Eligibility remained a condition of that offer.
Kings Park Pre-School suits families seeking the term-time daytime pattern documented in July 2025, with practical play and opportunities for children to manage small tasks themselves. The tortoise, water wall and insect investigations give that account substance. The balance to weigh is equally concrete: engaging experiences sat alongside uneven teaching challenge, making staff development an important consideration.
Ofsted rated it Good in July 2025.
Children attending in July 2025 were aged two to four. The pre-school has 22 places in total.
In July 2025, children investigated a water wall, searched outdoors for insects and learnt to care for the pre-school's pet tortoise.
In July 2025, it offered government-funded places for eligible children.
In July 2025, sessions ran from 8.30am to 3pm, Monday to Friday during term time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 1 July 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Breckland, NR19 2EW
Norfolk council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Breckland, NR20 3AE
Norfolk council
Full day care
0.3 mi away
Dereham, NR19 1ED
Norfolk council
0.4 mi away
Dereham, NR19 1BJ
Norfolk council
0.6 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.