Pre-school

Farlea Childcare, St. Marys

St. Marys RC Primary School, Hunter Road, CANNOCK, WS11 0AE·Staffordshire council·Ofsted URN: EY386044
Sessional day care
32 places
Registered 17 Oct 2008
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register
FMS Inspection Score
Good
7/10
Nursery official?Claim Profile

Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.

Farlea Childcare, St. Marys

At a Glance

Story-built houses, balancing beams and children serving their own fruit give Farlea Childcare, St. Marys a practical, hands-on character in its March 2025 account of nursery life. The setting shares the St. Marys RC Primary School site in Cannock and has 32 places in total. Its appeal rests on concrete examples of children building, experimenting and practising independence.

At its 7 March 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated the provision Good, found safeguarding effective and reported that children progressed well from their starting points. Children attending at that time were aged two to four; this is an inspection-time age range.

Two improvement priorities temper that positive assessment: teaching needed to stretch learning more consistently, and parents needed a clearer understanding of their child's key person. Both matter to the everyday experience of care.

The Nursery Experience

Learning and Activities

The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning, development and care, bringing play and skill development into the nursery day. In March 2025, themed activities connected stories with making and experimentation. Children explored the three little pigs by constructing houses using bricks, straw and sticks, then experimented outdoors with blowing paint through straws. A familiar story became something they could build and investigate.

Language received deliberate attention. Adults spoke with children at their level, repeated words and used assessment to identify those needing extra help with communication. Flash cards also became a shared activity: children showed pictures to friends and asked them to identify what they saw. That gave vocabulary practice a social purpose.

Small-world play offered another opportunity to talk and cooperate. Children shared figures, negotiated turns and chose where to play. These examples show a day with room for children's decisions alongside adult-planned learning.

Outdoor and Physical Play

In March 2025, balancing beams gave children a physical challenge, with adults encouraging those who felt uncertain. Creative work exercised smaller movements: children spread glue while making crowns and practised cutting spaghetti with scissors. Different materials gave them different ways to rehearse coordination.

The limitation was how far those activities were taken. Adults used observations to plan for individual next steps, but did not consistently adjust teaching to push learning further. Families weighing the educational offer should consider the challenge available after a child has mastered an activity, as well as the activity itself.

Care and Support

Relationships and Communication

In March 2025, children developed relationships across the staff team, while adults modelled considerate behaviour and helped them understand the setting's rules. Encouragement during balancing activities supported perseverance; children showed pleasure when they succeeded. Care and learning were closely connected in these examples.

An online portal carried regular updates to parents. However, some parents did not know which practitioner was their child's key person, leaving uncertainty about whom to approach with developmental questions. Updates are useful, but a clear personal contact matters too. This was a specific weakness in communication, rather than an absence of communication altogether.

Independence and Moving On

In March 2025, a self-service water station let children practise pouring drinks. At snack time they washed their hands, chose fruit and used tongs to pick up orange segments. These small tasks gave children opportunities to manage parts of their own routine.

Staff also worked with the school nursery on the same site, exchanging curriculum ideas and supporting transitions. They shared developmental information as children prepared to move on to school. That work connected the nursery experience with the next stage, while keeping attention on the individual child.

Practical Information

Sessions and Attendance

The address is St. Marys RC Primary School, Hunter Road, Cannock, WS11 0AE. The branch can be contacted on 07940 342732 or at stmarys.farlea@gmail.com.

In March 2025, the nursery operated on weekdays during school terms and included care before and after school. Its session times then were 7.30am to 9am and 11.45am to 6pm. These are dated attendance details, rather than a promise about the present booking arrangement.

Funding and Moving On

In March 2025, funded early education was offered for children aged two, three and four. Families considering funded childcare need to distinguish that entitlement from any additional care they choose.

Sharing a school site does not guarantee a Reception place. Families still use the local authority admissions process; transition support and school admission are separate decisions.

Things to Consider

  • Challenge beyond the first attempt. In March 2025, teaching did not consistently extend learning far enough. On a visit, ask how practitioners develop an activity once a child can already complete it.
  • A clear key-person relationship. Some parents were uncertain about their child's key person in March 2025. Ask how that relationship is introduced and how developmental questions reach the right practitioner.
  • Term-time planning. The March 2025 pattern combined school-term attendance with care before and after school. Before joining, ask which current sessions and holiday arrangements match your family's working week.

The Verdict

Farlea Childcare, St. Marys suits families drawn to practical early learning and a setting on a primary-school site. The March 2025 examples are concrete: story-linked construction, conversation through picture games and independence through serving snacks. The dated attendance pattern also makes it relevant to families considering term-time nursery care or care around the school day. Teaching challenge and clarity about the key person remain the two most useful points to explore.

FAQs

Ofsted rated the nursery Good on 7 March 2025 and found safeguarding arrangements effective. Improvement priorities concerned extending children's learning and helping parents understand the key-person role.

Children attending in March 2025 were aged two to four. The nursery has 32 places in total; that is whole-setting capacity, rather than a group size.

In March 2025, children built houses linked to the three little pigs, experimented with paint outdoors and used picture cards to practise vocabulary with friends.

In March 2025, it offered funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

No. Being on the school site does not guarantee a Reception place. Families apply through the local authority admissions process.

Contact Information

Get in touch with the nursery directly

St. Marys RC Primary School, Hunter Road, CANNOCK, WS11 0AE

Ofsted Inspection

Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown

7/10

FMS Inspection Score

Good

Based on 4 subcategory ratings

Official Ofsted Grade

Good

Inspected: 7 March 2025

Safeguarding: Yes

Inspection History

7 Mar 2025Most recent full inspectionGood
2 May 2019Previous full inspectionGood
27 May 2016Earlier full inspectionGood

Inspection Judgements

Quality of education

Good

Behaviour and attitudes

Good

Personal development

Good

Effectiveness of leadership and management

Good

Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.

Disclaimer

Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.

FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.

While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.

FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.