Inclusion
Expected standard
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Relationships and routines are the stronger side of Haddenham Pre School; teaching and leadership need closer scrutiny. This Chewells Lane setting in Haddenham, Ely, has capacity for 35 children.
At its December 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged safeguarding standards met and inclusion and behaviour at the expected standard, while achievement, welfare and wellbeing, curriculum and teaching, and leadership and governance needed attention. These are separate area judgements, rather than an overall grade. Children attending at that time were aged two to five.
In December 2025, daily experiences included books, songs and conversations, alongside play dough, balls, bicycles and climbing equipment. Children used the outdoors each day. These experiences gave them opportunities to practise speaking and physical skills, but the educational purpose of activities was not consistently clear.
The early years foundation stage sets expectations for children's learning, development and care: play and everyday interactions need to help children build their understanding and skills. In December 2025, an ice-and-water activity illustrated the difficulty here. Staff organised the experience but were unsure what children should learn from it.
Mathematics required specific work. Staff used mathematical terms without consistently explaining their meaning, and their understanding of children's counting skills was insufficient to plan what should follow. Assessments also failed to produce suitable next steps consistently. Enjoyable activities therefore did not reliably translate into carefully planned learning.
At the December 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that children sought reassurance from staff, speech and language developed through conversation, and support involving outside professionals helped children with SEND make progress. Physiotherapists advised staff, while additional funding supported physical-development resources and some extra attendance sessions.
In December 2025, gentle reminders helped children follow routines, share resources and take turns. Fidget toys sometimes supported participation during group activities. These were practical ways of helping children join in.
Communication was developing, with a lending library being introduced to support reading at home. However, information about healthy eating had not been shared consistently with parents, and lunchtime policies were not being implemented. Parents supplied lunches at that time. Teaching about oral hygiene, exercise and rest also needed strengthening.
Leadership weaknesses affected this work. In December 2025, leaders lacked sufficient support with workload and wellbeing; supervision did not reach everyone working at the setting, and feedback and training were insufficiently tailored. Those shortcomings reduced the time and professional support available to improve teaching and care.
The address is Chewells Lane, Haddenham, Ely, CB6 3SS. In December 2025, opening hours were 8.30am to 4.30pm, Monday to Friday. This was an opening window, rather than a description of bookable sessions.
Capacity is 35 places in total. That figure describes the whole setting, not the size of a child's daily group.
Haddenham Pre School merits consideration by families who value staff relationships, supported group participation and outdoor play. The December 2025 picture also demands careful attention to teaching: clear learning goals, mathematics and leadership support are central decision points. The December 2025 inspection required improvements to individual learning next steps, staff curriculum knowledge, sequenced mathematics teaching, healthy-eating policies and teaching, supervision and professional development, and support for leaders, with a completion deadline of 2 March 2026. Families should weigh the social experiences alongside the specific improvements required, rather than treating children's enjoyment as a substitute for educational quality.
At the December 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged safeguarding standards met. Inclusion and behaviour reached the expected standard; achievement, welfare and wellbeing, curriculum and teaching, and leadership and governance needed attention.
Children attending in December 2025 were aged two to five. Capacity is 35 places in total.
In December 2025, experiences included daily outdoor access, bicycles, climbing equipment, play dough, reading and singing. Planning did not consistently identify what children should learn through these activities.
At the December 2025 inspection, Ofsted found that work with outside professionals supported progress. Physiotherapists advised staff, and additional funding supported resources for physical development and some extra sessions.
In December 2025, parents supplied lunches. Guidance for families and the implementation of healthy-eating policies needed improvement at that time.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Developing
Based on 6 subcategory ratings
Ofsted Report Card
No single overall grade under the current framework
Inspected: 8 December 2025
Safeguarding standards met
Inclusion
Expected standard
Achievement
Needs attention
Behaviour, attitudes and establishing routines
Expected standard
Children's welfare and wellbeing
Needs attention
Curriculum and teaching
Needs attention
Leadership and governance
Needs attention
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.