Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Box-built dinosaur homes, paint experiments and counting sea creatures give this Chigwell nursery a practical, playful character in its September 2025 account. At its 25 September 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged the nursery Good overall and found safeguarding effective.
St Marys Church of England Nursery has 40 places in total. Children attending in September 2025 were aged two to four; the setting's character at that point centred on shared play, close relationships and preparation for school.
In September 2025, accessible resources on open shelves let children choose materials and develop their own ideas. Adult-guided activities drew on their interests and seasonal subjects. The early years foundation stage provides the framework for children's learning, development and care: here, the inspection-time examples included conversation, creative play and practical problem-solving.
A dinosaur-building activity showed how those elements could work together. Children decorated boxes, worked out how to add bridges and hiding places, and persisted with their designs. Paint mixing prompted predictions about colour, while discussion of texture, shape and size connected creative work with observation.
The garden offered space for running in September 2025. At a water tray, children explored toy sea creatures and counted their collections, bringing movement, imaginative play and early mathematics into the same account of daily life.
In September 2025, settling arrangements helped staff learn about children before they started. Children turned to their key person for comfort and assistance, giving families a concrete picture of how reassurance worked. Planning also included preparation for the move to school.
Communication needed more depth. Daily exchanges and some information-sharing were in place in September 2025, but conversations about continuing progress needed to become more routine so parents could support learning at home. Staff also sometimes moved on before children had enough thinking time or encouragement to develop an answer. Speech and language support was therefore a clear improvement priority.
Regular supervision and training supported staff in September 2025. The remaining leadership task was to make shared evaluation and support between colleagues a more established part of everyday work.
The address is St Mary's Church Rooms, High Road, Chigwell, Essex IG7 6QQ.
In September 2025, opening hours were 9.15am to 12.15pm on Monday and Friday, and 9.15am to 2.45pm on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, during term time. That timetable gave families shorter opening days at either end of the week and longer ones in the middle.
Government-funded early education was provided for eligible children in September 2025. This was an eligibility-dependent arrangement, rather than an entitlement for every family.
This suits families drawn to hands-on creative play and a key-person approach to reassurance, with the September 2025 term-time timetable providing the practical context. The dinosaur construction and water play give substance to that picture. The decision points are equally specific: language support, regular progress conversations and consistent teamwork deserve attention alongside the Good judgement.
Ofsted judged St Marys Church of England Nursery Good overall on 25 September 2025 and found safeguarding effective.
Children attending in September 2025 were aged two to four. The nursery has 40 places in total.
In September 2025, children built dinosaur homes from boxes, experimented with paint and counted sea creatures during water play. These activities connected creativity, conversation and problem-solving within the early years foundation stage.
In September 2025, the nursery provided government-funded early education for eligible children.
In September 2025, the nursery opened during term time, from 9.15am to 12.15pm on Monday and Friday, and from 9.15am to 2.45pm on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 25 September 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.