Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Conkers for counting, fruit to peel for friends and a coat to put on independently: practical learning gives Killisick Pre-School its character. At its September 2025 inspection, Ofsted rated it Good overall, with Outstanding leadership and management, and found effective safeguarding, strong SEND support and good progress from children's starting points.
Based at Coppice Farm Primary, Laver Close, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 7LS, the pre-school has 30 places in total. Children attending in September 2025 were aged two to four; that age range belongs to the inspection snapshot.
In September 2025, children chose activities indoors and outside, with resources arranged around their interests and development. They practised dressing themselves, serving food and pouring drinks. These small responsibilities gave independence a practical purpose.
The early years foundation stage sets the framework for children's learning, development and care: play supports communication, physical skills and understanding of the world. In September 2025, adults expanded conversations through signing and new vocabulary. Conkers and pine cones became materials for patterns, shapes and counting, linking mathematical ideas to objects children could handle.
Gardening, cooking and sessions combining movement with music also featured that month. Links with a local elderly care home gave children opportunities to practise consideration for others. Projects, visitors and charity activities extended learning beyond the immediate play space.
In September 2025, key-person relationships helped children settle and explore confidently. Adults listened to children's ideas and used calm guidance to support sharing and turn-taking. Settling arrangements were adapted to families, while home learning activity bags, information packs and workshops connected learning with home.
Support that month included individual adult help and external support for children with SEND. Translation tools and pictures helped children learning English alongside another language. A family culture wheel gathered information about children's backgrounds, complemented by photographs and a world map display; celebrations were adjusted to respect families' identities.
Leaders supported staff through training in emotional coaching, mathematics and fine motor development. However, in September 2025, curriculum delivery did not consistently meet individual children's needs. More consistent adaptation was the improvement required, and it matters alongside the positive account of relationships and inclusion.
In September 2025, the pre-school operated on weekdays during term time, with session times of 8.50am to 3.35pm. This was a school-term timetable rather than year-round attendance, an important distinction for families planning holiday care.
Funded early education for children aged two, three and four was provided that month. The pre-school's base at Coppice Farm Primary does not guarantee a Reception place.
Killisick suits families who value practical independence, communication and links between home and pre-school learning. Its September 2025 account offers concrete examples, from counting with natural materials to adapting settling arrangements. Families seeking a term-time weekday routine have a useful starting point here; consistency in individual curriculum delivery remains the central question to explore.
Ofsted rated it Good overall in September 2025, with Outstanding leadership and management. The improvement required was more consistent curriculum delivery for individual children.
Children attending in September 2025 were aged two to four. The setting has 30 places in total.
In September 2025, children used conkers and pine cones for mathematical activities, took part in gardening and cooking, and practised everyday independence through dressing and serving food.
In September 2025, it provided funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
In September 2025, staff adapted settling arrangements and used home learning activity bags, information packs, workshops and ongoing communication to involve parents.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Excellent
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 25 September 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Outstanding
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Gedling, NG5 6TA
Nottinghamshire council
Full day care
0.5 mi away
Nottingham, NG5 8BU
Nottinghamshire council
0.6 mi away
Gedling, NG5 4PT
Nottinghamshire council
Sessional day care
0.6 mi away
Nottingham, NG5 7EX
Nottinghamshire council
0.6 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.