Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
At the July 2025 inspection, dough volcanoes, child-designed obstacle courses and close links with the host school characterised children's experiences at Snettisham Bobtails. At its July 2025 inspection, Ofsted judged the provision Good, found safeguarding effective and praised support for children's communication and language.
Based at Snettisham First School in Snettisham, the setting has capacity for 24 children. Children attending in July 2025 were aged two to four. That inspection picture centres on playful learning and preparation for school, with clearer opportunities needed for children to manage tasks independently.
In July 2025, children explored ideas through practical play: making dough volcanoes prompted a search for orange material to represent fire. Staff used questions to extend children's thinking. Outdoors, children devised obstacle courses and practised transferring water with pipettes, combining movement with careful handling of equipment.
The early years foundation stage provides the framework for learning, development and care. In everyday terms, play supports children's language, physical skills and growing ability to manage relationships. In July 2025, sand timers helped children wait for equipment and take turns, making an abstract expectation easier to understand.
In July 2025, key persons shared their approaches with colleagues so that individual children's care remained consistent across the team. Stories and coloured stones helped children identify emotions, including using blue to represent sadness. These were concrete ways to give feelings a name.
A stay-and-play session let parents see children's learning activities, while ideas shared for home extended that involvement. Staff also encouraged handwashing and pouring drinks at snack time. Independence was less consistently supported during other routines, including dressing after using the potty.
Staff received supervision, peer observations and training shared through team meetings in July 2025. Coaching needed further development to help practitioners recognise improvements to their teaching and learn from one another.
The address is Snettisham First School, School Road, Snettisham, Kings Lynn, PE31 7LT.
In July 2025, attendance followed school terms, with sessions running from 8.30am to 3pm Monday to Thursday and from 8.30am to 11.30am on Friday. That pattern gave Friday a substantially shorter finish than the other weekdays. Government-funded early education was provided for eligible children at that time.
In July 2025, staff worked with the host school's teachers and incorporated some school routines and activities into children's learning to prepare them for Reception. Attending the nursery does not guarantee a Reception place; families still use the local authority admissions process.
Snettisham Bobtails merits consideration for families seeking play-based preschool experiences and close preparation for school. Its July 2025 pattern served both longer Monday-to-Thursday sessions and a shorter Friday morning, within school terms. The strongest practical examples are hands-on exploration and support for recognising feelings; consistent independence and staff coaching remain the points to probe.
Ofsted rated the setting Good on 8 July 2025 and found safeguarding effective.
Children attending in July 2025 were aged two to four. The setting has capacity for 24 children in total.
In July 2025, children made dough volcanoes, created obstacle courses and used pipettes to move water. Stories and coloured stones also helped them identify feelings.
In July 2025, the setting provided government-funded early education for eligible children.
In July 2025, sessions ran from 8.30am to 3pm Monday to Thursday, with Friday sessions from 8.30am to 11.30am. The setting operated during school terms.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 8 July 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.