Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: October 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Ice with sea creatures hidden inside gives a concrete picture of learning here: in July 2025, children used tools and warm water to uncover them, then talked about what emerged. Play supplied both the puzzle and the conversation.
Ofsted rated the nursery Good at its 9 July 2025 inspection, judging safeguarding effective and finding that teaching adapted to individual children supported their progress. The setting has 72 places in total; children attending at that visit were aged 0 to 4.
In July 2025, learning combined imaginative play with practical investigation. Children mixed water, leaves and bark in pots to pretend to make cakes. The outdoor area supplied another place to play, with staff preparing children for the weather using sun protection and hats.
The early years foundation stage sets the requirements for children's learning, development and care: here, the July 2025 examples show how play brought language, early mathematics and exploration into the day. Staff used conversation to extend children's thinking and learning, while songs and simple signing gave children other ways to communicate.
Mathematical activities moved from familiar shapes towards more complex ones. Activity trays introduced shape vocabulary. Staff introduced words such as empty, full and half in everyday contexts, connecting mathematical vocabulary with practical experience.
In July 2025, younger children sought familiar staff for comfort, and shared books provided opportunities for close contact. Staff explained expectations calmly and modelled considerate behaviour. These everyday interactions gave children a recognisable source of reassurance.
Parents received updates through an electronic app and face-to-face conversations, including information about routines and development. Settling-in communication was a feature of the feedback gathered that July. Leaders also organised training, coaching and continuing support for staff.
In July 2025, children ate home-cooked meals, with dietary needs and allergies taken into account. However, preschool meal routines needed better organisation: children serving food and clearing plates competed for restricted space, while floor cleaning and handwashing after nose wiping were inconsistent.
The address is The Old School, Vicars Terrace, Allerton Bywater, Castleford WF10 2DJ.
In July 2025, opening hours were 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, across the year except bank holidays. Government-funded childcare places were offered at that time. These are dated operating details, useful context for understanding the nursery's attendance arrangements at the visit.
For families who value practical play, conversation and familiar staff relationships, the July 2025 account offers concrete reasons to consider this nursery. Its learning examples are memorable: uncovering frozen sea creatures, making pretend cakes and exploring shapes through activity trays.
The balance matters. A Good judgement sits alongside a clear requirement to improve preschool meals and hygiene, making those routines an important part of a family's decision.
Ofsted rated it Good on 9 July 2025 and judged safeguarding effective. Preschool mealtime organisation and hygiene were the areas requiring improvement.
At the July 2025 inspection, children attending were aged 0 to 4. The nursery has 72 places in total.
In July 2025, children investigated ice containing sea creatures, made pretend cakes with natural materials and explored mathematical shapes using activity trays. Conversation, songs and simple signing supported communication.
Government-funded childcare places were offered in July 2025.
In July 2025, staff shared information about children's routines and development through an electronic app and face-to-face conversations.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 9 July 2025
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.