Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: July 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
Fruit threading, a cooperative parachute game and a book-lending library give this Dagenham nursery a more specific inspection-era identity than generic play-and-care language. Ofsted judged it Good in April 2023, with Good judgements across education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development, and leadership and management. Safeguarding arrangements were effective at that inspection.
Chestnut Nursery Schools, Markyate Road is at Markyate Road, Dagenham, London RM8 2LD. The current provider record covers children aged two to five and gives a whole-setting capacity of 54. It describes term-time opening, closing for school holidays.
The Early Years Foundation Stage sets the educational programmes, learning goals and assessment framework for English nurseries. In practical terms, it means children learn across communication, physical, personal, social, literacy, mathematical, expressive and world-understanding areas through planned experiences and play.
Staff created engaging learning environments and used small-group fruit threading to combine fine-motor practice with new vocabulary. Children named fruit, repeated words and cooperated with one another. Outdoors, they organised a parachute activity, kept a ball moving and sang together. These are modest activities, but the inspection detail shows staff joining physical, language and social learning rather than treating each as a separate exercise.
Mathematics was the clear weakness. Planned counting activities were present, but staff did not consistently develop mathematical thinking during child-led play. Parents comparing settings should weigh the broad, engaging provision against that precise development point. The same visit also recorded cultural clothing and a local-community art project, giving children ways to connect personal identity with the area around them. Staff deliberately repeated new words rather than leaving language development to chance.
Relationships were a strength at that visit. Close key-person bonds helped staff spot when a child needed extra support. Families, nursery staff, the local authority inclusion team and a speech and language therapist then coordinated that help, with stronger communication recorded for children experiencing language delay. That joined-up response gave additional needs a practical route from observation to specialist help. Noticeboards kept families informed about current learning, while trusting parent relationships supported a joined-up response.
Independence ran through the routines observed at that visit. Children served food, cleared plates and cutlery, then moved to story time. Calm reminders and the nursery's golden rules helped them share, take turns and understand expectations. Additional funding had also supplied books for a lending library, allowing children to continue shared reading at home. That link between nursery and home made the support useful beyond the setting itself.
Ofsted found safeguarding arrangements effective at that visit, providing a clear dated regulatory baseline. Staff understood indicators of abuse and reporting routes, leaders completed recruitment suitability checks, and the premises were checked daily. That is meaningful official evidence from the inspection date, rather than a promise inferred from provider marketing. It also gives parents a concrete baseline for discussing daily safety routines and staff safeguarding development on a visit.
The setting's address is Markyate Road, Dagenham, London RM8 2LD. Its current record describes term-time opening and school-holiday closures. The operating calendar alone is not a confirmed bookable session model, so timetable fit remains a pre-enrolment question.
The record covers ages two to five and 54 places in total. A current provider-specific quotation is essential for budgeting. The funded-entitlement model and charge structure cannot be treated as part of the offer on the available evidence.
This is best suited to families prioritising warm key-person relationships, communication support and practical independence for a child aged two to five. The inspection evidence is strongest on language, cooperation, parent partnership and inclusion; mathematics was the defined weakness. Families needing full-day care or shorter part-day sessions should confirm the current booking pattern before applying.
Ofsted judged the nursery Good at its April 2023 inspection. Safeguarding arrangements were effective, and every graded area was judged Good.
The current provider record covers children aged two to five and gives a whole-setting capacity of 54. No branch-specific room list was available in the frozen evidence.
Inspectors saw children thread fruit while learning vocabulary, work together on a parachute activity and use a lending library funded with additional support.
A current provider-specific quotation should set out the funded-childcare model and associated charge categories.
The provider record describes term-time opening with school-holiday closures. The bookable session pattern is a direct enquiry point.
Closed: School Holidays
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Manager
Sadia Malik (Manager)
Owner
Chestnut Nursery Schools Ltd
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 27 April 2023
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Barking and Dagenham, RM8 2LL
Barking and Dagenham council
0.1 mi away
Barking and Dagenham, RM8 2EQ
Barking and Dagenham council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Barking and Dagenham, RM9 4BL
Barking and Dagenham council
Out-of-school day care
0.2 mi away
Barking and Dagenham, RM9 4BL
Barking and Dagenham council
Out-of-school day care
0.2 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.