Quality of education
Good
The FMS Inspection Score is FindMySchool's proprietary analysis based on official Ofsted and ISI inspection reports. It converts ratings into a standardised 1–10 scale for fair comparison across all schools in England.
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted or ISI. Always refer to the official Ofsted or ISI report for the full picture of a school’s inspection outcome.
Last reviewed: July 2026 · Inspection data and key information above update regularly, however, this review below is refreshed bi-annually and may not reflect recent changes. Contact the nursery directly to confirm current arrangements. If you spot anything outdated or inaccurate, please let us know.
This 58-place New Southgate setting has a serious current inspection position. In February 2026, safeguarding standards were not met and Ofsted said it intended to take enforcement action. Urgent improvement was needed in behaviour and routines, welfare and wellbeing, inclusion, and leadership and governance. Families should read that position before considering the strengths recorded during the same inspection.
In February 2026, experiences varied sharply. Baby-room staff planned tummy time to strengthen core muscles, and stronger interactions used songs, stories, repetition and descriptive language. Children also collected rainwater in jugs, explored splashing sounds, made potato prints, sang, danced and took part in role play.
The setting works within the Early Years Foundation Stage, the English framework through which young children develop communication, physical and personal skills through play and everyday routines. However, the provider was not meeting its requirements in February 2026. Some questions gave children too little time to answer, some learning was incidental, and activities involving alphabet letters or telling the time were not always developmentally suitable.
Some key-person relationships were warm and reassuring, but practice was inconsistent. Room-transition handovers did not always give a new key person enough understanding of a child's needs or learning. Children with special educational needs and disabilities did not consistently receive prompt, well-targeted help.
Safeguarding is the decisive concern. Some staff did not understand how to report concerns about children's wellbeing or use whistleblowing procedures, while leaders' checks on staff's continuing suitability were not sufficiently rigorous.
The nursery is registered at 60 Beaconsfield Road, London N11 3AE, with 58 places. No current provider website was available in the frozen evidence, so this review does not state sessions, accepted ages, funding, meals, consumables or booking patterns.
There were recognisable strengths, especially baby-room physical development, children's independence and the better language interactions. They do not outweigh the current evidence of urgent weaknesses across safeguarding, wellbeing, inclusion and leadership. This setting may suit only families satisfied that the present regulatory position and evidence of improvement meet their needs; no attendance pattern can be recommended because none was published in the evidence.
The 2026 report card found safeguarding standards were not met, four evaluation areas required urgent improvement and two needed attention. It said Ofsted intended to take enforcement action.
There are 58 registered places. This is whole-setting capacity, not a room or daily group size.
The 2026 inspection recorded tummy time in the baby room, rainwater play, potato printing, singing, dancing and role play, alongside inconsistent teaching.
The available official evidence does not establish the nursery's current funded-childcare offer. Current written terms are needed to establish that position.
No current session or booking pattern was established by the available official evidence. The nursery’s current options and times therefore remain a prerequisite for planning attendance.
Get in touch with the nursery directly
Inspection outcome and judgement breakdown
FMS Inspection Score
Good
Based on 4 subcategory ratings
Official Ofsted Grade
Good
Inspected: 25 January 2023
Safeguarding: Yes
Quality of education
Good
Behaviour and attitudes
Good
Personal development
Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management
Good
Disclaimer: The FMS Inspection Score is an independent analysis by FindMySchool. It is not endorsed by or affiliated with Ofsted. Always refer to the official Ofsted report for the full picture of a setting’s inspection outcome.
Other nurseries and nursery schools close to this profile.
Barnet, N11 3HG
Barnet council
0.2 mi away
Barnet, N11 3HG
Barnet council
Out-of-school day care
0.2 mi away
Barnet, N11 1NQ
Barnet council
0.2 mi away
Barnet, N11 3EH
Barnet council
Full day care
0.2 mi away
Disclaimer
Information on this page is compiled, analysed, and processed from publicly available sources including Ofsted early years registration and inspection data, local authority records, and the setting’s own published material.
FMS Inspection Scores and any assessment on this page are derived from that data using our own methodologies. They are our independent analysis and are not official Ofsted ratings or standings.
While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee that all information is current, complete, or error-free. Places, opening arrangements, session patterns, funding eligibility, and fees change without notice, and the nursery and/or local authority should be contacted directly to verify any details before making decisions.
FindMySchool does not endorse any particular nursery, and scores reflect specific inspection evidence rather than overall quality.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on information provided. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.